August 24, 2010 2:25 PM

Ansel Adams Pics Bought for $45 Worth $200M?

By
CBSNews
(AP)  Last updated: 10:41 PM ET

A trove of old glass negatives bought at a garage sale for $45 has been authenticated as the lost work of Ansel Adams and worth at least $200 million, an attorney for the owner said Tuesday, but the iconic photographer's representatives dismissed the claim as a fraud and said they're worthless.

Arnold Peter, who represents Fresno painter and construction worker Rick Norsigian, said a team of experts who studied the 65 negatives over the past six months concluded "beyond a reasonable doubt" that the photos were Adams' early work, believed to have been destroyed in a 1937 fire at his Yosemite National Park studio.

Adams is renowned for his timeless black-and-white photographs of the American West, which were produced with darkroom techniques that heightened shadows and contrasts to create mood-filled landscape portraits. He died in 1984 at 82.

His photographs today are widely reproduced on calendars, posters and in coffee-table books, while his prints are coveted by collectors. His print "Clearing Winter Storm, Yosemite National Park" fetched $722,500 at auction last month in New York, a record for 20th century photography.

Norsigian, who works for the Fresno Unified School District, is already planning to capitalize on his discovery. He's set up a website to sell prints made from 17 negatives from $45 for a poster to $7,500 for a darkroom print with a certificate of authenticity. A documentary on his quest to have the negatives authenticated is in the works, as well as a touring exhibition that will debut at Fresno State University in October.

Representatives of Adams, however, said they're not buying Norsigian's claims.

"It's an unfortunate fraud," said Bill Turnage, managing director of the Ansel Adams Publishing Rights Trust. "It's very distressing."

Turnage said he's consulting lawyers about possibly suing Norsigian for using a copyrighted name for commercial purposes. He described Norsigian as on an "obsessive quest."

"We've been dealing with him for a decade," he said. "I can't tell you how many times he's called me."

Adams' grandson, Matthew Adams, who heads the Ansel Adams Gallery in San Francisco, said he reviewed Norsigian's authentications last fall and thinks they're stretches. Many photographers took pictures of the same places Adams did in that era, he said.

"There is no real hard evidence," he said. "I'm skeptical."

Norsigian bought the negatives from a man who said he had purchased the box from a Los Angeles salvage warehouse in the 1940s, bargaining the price down from $70 to $45. He saw they were views of Yosemite but never suspected they might be Adams' works until someone mentioned they resembled the famed photographer's shots.

"We got a laugh out of that," Norsigian said.

But the idea stuck with Norsigian, and he started researching the photographer, eventually concluding they were Adams' work.

The shots are of places Adams frequented and photographed. Several shots contain people identified as Adams associates. Adams taught at the Pasadena Art Center in the early 1940s, which would account for the negatives being in Los Angeles. The negatives are the size Adams used in the 1920s and '30s and several have charred edges, possibly indicating the 1937 fire.

"You keep adding bits and pieces," Norsigian said.

For years, he tried to get them officially verified, taking them to experts at the Smithsonian Institution, the Getty Center and others, but no one would venture to authenticate them.

Three years ago, he met Beverly Hills entertainment lawyer Peter, who assembled a team of experts to review the negatives.

The key evidence came from two handwriting experts, who identified the writing on the negative sleeves as that of Adams' wife Virginia.

But Matthew Adams said there were inconsistencies in the handwriting and a lot of misspelled Yosemite place names.

"She grew up in Yosemite. She was an intelligent, well-read woman. I find it hard to believe she would mispell those names," he said.

Peter also hired a meteorologist who studied the cloud formation, snowdrift and shadows on one image and compared it with a similar photograph by Adams, concluding they were taken at the same location on the same day.

But Matthew Adams said those evaporation clouds appear every day and the snowdrift is on mountains 20 miles (32 kilometers) away. "I suggested carbon dating of the charring and the envelopes," he said.

Matthew Adams said it was unlikely his grandfather would have misplaced the negatives, especially after the devastating fire that destroyed 5,000 negatives - a third of his portfolio.

"Ansel was very meticulous about his negatives," he said. "He kept them in a bank vault in San Francisco after the fire."

Beverly Hills art appraiser David W. Streets said he conservatively estimated the negatives' value at $200 million, based on current sales of Adams' prints and the potential for selling never-seen-before prints.

Turnage called that figure ridiculous because the value of Adams' work is in his darkroom hand-crafting of the prints, and said the negatives are next to worthless.

"Ansel interpreted the negative very heavily. He believed the negative was like a musical score. No two composers will interpret it the same way," he said. "Each print is a work of art."

Norsigian is not fazed by naysayers.

"Prove me wrong," he said. "This has been such a long journey. I thought I'd never get to the end. It kind of proves a construction worker-painter can be right."

AP
Add a Comment
by genxandy July 29, 2010 8:52 AM EDT
Turnage is a sourpuss! Probably stuck up and snobby as well.
Reply to this comment
by Henri_Rochard July 28, 2010 3:50 PM EDT
I visited Yosemite for the first time last October. (Why did I ever wait so long.)

Adams' picture if the Jeffrey Pine atop Sentinel Dome is much nicer than the one I took last fall.
Reply to this comment
by newsterI July 28, 2010 1:50 PM EDT
The negatives are the size Adams used in the 1920s and '30s and several have charred edges, possibly indicating the 1937 fire."

Yeah, same off the shelf size negatives half the photographers in the country back then used. It's like saying the 35 mm negatives your mom used are the same size used by President Obama's daughter, yep, and half the rest of the country too.
Charred edges? wow like that's hard to do, you learn the negs were presumed lost in a FIRE, so you char the edges of just a few to make it look like these were in a fire once.


"You keep adding bits and pieces," Norsigian said."

Yep, fraud works that way, you keep adding in bits and pieces to make a believable story, works every time.

"For years, he tried to get them officially verified, taking them to experts at the Smithsonian Institution, the Getty Center and others, but no one would venture to authenticate them. "

For good reason, they knew a quack and fraud when they saw one.
Reply to this comment
by newsterI July 28, 2010 1:44 PM EDT
He died in 1984 at 82. "

Legally those images are COPYRIGHTED by law for 70 years after the author's death, so this pirate will set himself up for copyright infringement and other violations if he starts making un authorized copies under Adam's name
Reply to this comment
by jmichael07 July 28, 2010 2:46 PM EDT
Yep that's how deceitful effective marketing works...you keep building a bigger story adding immaculate details until it's irresistably believable. As Hitler said, the bigger the lie, the better.

Speaking of copyright, I somehow recall behind every great fortune is a great crime. Look at those unbelievable phags at the RIAA... My much belated thanks to Napster for letting the market breath enough to change the way we buy music. Some "crimes" are better than others.
by thesevenveils July 27, 2010 2:01 PM EDT
What a wonderful discovery. Ansel's eye will never be replaced. And neither will true photography. Digital cameras are great, but they pale in comparison to the resolution of film. It takes a true artist to manipluate film in the way Ansel and others have. And this art is almost lost in less than a generation due to photoshop and phone cameras. I am not saying another art medium has been created by phone cameras and photoshop, only the marriage of man and film, and its divorce because photography was caught messing around with digital technology. Kind of like Sandra Bullock and Jesse James (you bad boy).
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 July 28, 2010 5:22 PM EDT
Sorry to disagree with you, but The latest Digitals are capable of everything Film was. Ansel Adams would have loved the newest DSLRs. with them and a quality Photography program the possibilities are endless.
I have a Nikon DSLR and several quality lenses that give me 'Adams' like quality with half the time and effort he had to invest (getting in a favorable position to get the same shots I do.) The biggest thing about Ansels work was his 'composition' of the shots he wanted. That is the key (along with proper settings) to making fabulous pictures. I made a picture of the Beach at midnight (no moon) that looks like it was high noon with super resolution and detail. "Photoshop helped a bit".
by chadscribe July 27, 2010 1:37 PM EDT
Every time I go to a garage sale I hope for such a find, but this is beyond good fortune. This is stealing from someone who did not realize what they had. I would hope he has enough compassion to share some of his new found riches with the unfortunate seller.
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook