Dow
     -89.23
12801.23
-0.69%
|
     -9.31
1342.64
-0.69%
|
     -108.90
14000.51
-0.77%
|
     -23.35
2903.88
-0.80%
|
     -1.03
53.27
-1.90%
|
     +1.09
116.27
+0.95%
|
     +0.01
2.01
+0.42%
July 29, 2010 3:16 AM

Dudley: Spill a "Wake-Up Call" for Oil Industry

(CBS/AP)  Updated at 7:40 p.m. ET

The American who will take over as head of British oil giant BP says he's not underestimating the nature and complexity of what the company must do to restore its reputation and financial strength after the massive Gulf of Mexico spill.

Special Section: Gulf Coast Oil Disaster

Robert Dudley, who will replace Tony Hayward as CEO on Oct. 1, told reporters the spill has been a "wake-up call, not only for BP, but the oil and gas industry overall, and we will be looking deeply at our review of operational safety and what we have learned from this spill."

During his press briefing Tuesday, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs noted the announcement of Hayward's removal as chief executive.

"I don't think that a lot of people in any country are feeling overly sorry for the former CEO of BP," Gibbs told reporters, CBS Radio News reports.

As Dudley was promoted from Managing Director, BP announced a second quarter loss of $17 billion.

To pay for the epic oil spill, B.P.'S forced to sell $30 billion in assets, roughly 13 percent of its global production resources. The company has also set aside $32.2 billion to cover spill costs including $20 billion for its general compensation fund, reports CBS News correspondent Mark Strassmann.

The company has already made a start with the $7 billion sale of gas assets in the United States, Canada and Egypt to Apache Corp.

"It's of course a tragedy and it has large consequences, but we've no doubt that we will be able to rebuild the company," said BP Chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg.

Dudley grew up partly in Hattiesburg, Miss., and has so far avoided any public missteps. He spent 20 years at Amoco Corp., which merged with BP in 1998, and lost out to Hayward on the CEO slot three years ago.

His standing within BP and along the Gulf Coast has risen since he took over response to the oil spill in June from Hayward, who will be reassigned to BP's joint venture with Russia, TNK-BP.

Dudley said today he has great respect for Hayward and great admiration for what he has done. During Hayward's tenure BP has expanded its reach in the United States (which accounts for 40 percent of its market).

Dudley said that BP had no intention of exiting the U.S., despite costly fines and lawsuits expected after government investigations into the spill.

"I think we have a lot to offer in the United States to the oil and gas industry and getting this right, working in the U.S., meeting those commitments and cooperating with officials is vital to BP's future success in America," he said.

The newly-named CEO said Tuesday his top priority was sealing the company's blown oil well for good and cleaning and restoring the Gulf of Mexico.

Though his words weren't all that different, Dudley delivered BP's message - Don't worry, we're going to pay for all this - in a calm manner without Hayward's public impatience and occasional whininess.

And serendipity was on Dudley's side: He was in charge when they finally capped the spewing well, shutting off the flow of oil until a relief well can finish the job.

Dudley told ABC's "Good Morning America" he didn't expect any more oil to gush into the Gulf as BP PLC moves to permanently plug the well with cement.

He told ABC he plans to change the company culture and make sure checks and balances are in place to prevent a repeat of the disaster.

Dudley will return to London when he takes up his appointment and will hand over his present duties coordinating the spill response to Lamar McKay, the chairman and president of BP America.

During a webcast presentation on the company's second quarter results, Svanberg told investors, "BP will change as a result of this accident. . . . We are taking a hard look at ourselves, what we do and how we do it. What we learn will have implications for our ways of working, our strategy and our governance."

Svanberg also said the company was determined to restore value to shareholders, after a 35 percent (or $60 billion) drop in market value, to around $116 billion, since the April 20 explosion of the Macondo well on the Deepwater Horizon platform. Under U.S. political pressure, the company also axed dividends to shareholders this year.

The stock started out marginally higher on Tuesday, but dropped 3 percent in afternoon trade on the London Stock Exchange.

"They have seen enormous loss of capital and of the dividend and the board is committed to creating value to shareholders and believes that we can deliver a stronger BP for them over time," Svanberg said.

Revenue for the quarter was up 34 percent at $75.8 billion, and underlying replacement cost profit - the measure most closely watched by analysts - was $5 billion when adjusted for one-off items and accounting effects. That compared favorably with a $2.9 billion profit for the second quarter of 2009.

In London, Greenpeace protesters closed more than 50 service stations in a protest timed to coincide with the company's earnings update. The environmental action group is calling on Dudley to focus the company on greener and renewable sources of energy.

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
  • David Morgan

    David Morgan is a senior editor at CBSNews.com and cbssundaymorning.com.

Add a Comment See all 14 Comments
by tiredofeverything July 28, 2010 1:09 AM EDT
3 Million litre oil spill in Michigan today.
Doesn't sound to me like the industry is 'waking up'

It's clear that none of these companies have a damn clue what they are doing.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/windsor/story/2010/07/27/sarnia-enbridge-oil-spill-michigan-100727.html
Reply to this comment
by kdc1234567890 July 27, 2010 7:44 PM EDT
"Wake up call for the industry"? It's a wake up call for BP. Other companies e.g. Exxon learned from their mistakes (Valdez) and have put programs in place to operate safely. As bad as Hayward was, he just made some mistakes when he was speaking. His intentions were good. This new guy is trying to deflect by saying this is a "oil industry" issue.
Reply to this comment
by deohgee July 27, 2010 6:41 PM EDT
Wait and see. In a short while this will be on the back page and in the past just like Katrina, the Haiti earthquake, Ike, etc. You'll have to dig to find info. Sad but true.
Reply to this comment
by Lifeson2112 July 27, 2010 6:12 PM EDT
Is it me or does it look like the right side of this guy's face is starting to sag or melt or something?
Reply to this comment
by tiredofeverything July 27, 2010 4:55 PM EDT
How many wake up calls do they need?
Barataria Bay oil spill
Talmadge Creek oil spill
Deepwater Horizon
2010 Port Arthur oil spill
2008 New Orleans oil spill
2008 New Orleans oil spill
Citgo refinery oil spill
Prudhoe Bay oil spill
Trans-Alaska Pipeline gun shot spill
Mega Borg
Burmah Agate
Argo Merchant
NEPCO 140 oil spill
Corinthos

And that's just a partial list of American ones, add in the rest of the world...
These guys are literally killing the planet.
Wake up folks.
Reply to this comment
by shocker49 July 27, 2010 4:05 PM EDT
This is the same thing Hayward said when he took over after the accident in Texas, and we all know how that turned out. This guy is just as big a liar and P.O.S. as Hayward. They may as well name one of their lawyers C.E.O., then they would not have to have a middle man when they make statements!!!! What a joke!!!
Reply to this comment
by mnguyen4 July 27, 2010 3:51 PM EDT
The spill is indeed a ?Wake-Up Call? for the Oil Industry. Clearly, the Brit CEO Tony Hayward didn?t know how to deal with the American Congress. So BP governing board decided to replace him with an American who would understand better how politics in Washington worked.

If only Barack Obama, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi were not in power, BP might even have the American taxpayers to foot all the bills the cleanup and the liabilities for the mess they created. A Bush/Cheney, Mitch McConnell, and Boehner would favor Big Oil as they had shown us in the past. Congress voted for billions of dollars in oil subsidies and for R&D. Exxon made millions of dollars in profits under the Republicans.
Reply to this comment
by stinger1z July 27, 2010 3:20 PM EDT
It would be nice if eventually businesses realize that jeopardizing safety and risking catastrophe instead of taking a minor loss in the short term can cost you big time if something goes wrong. Had they heeded safety, they'd be collecting and selling the millions of gallons of oil they instead let flow all over the gulf, and that's from one well. Do they even really care that 11 people died due to their lack of concern?
Reply to this comment
by GunsInTheSky July 27, 2010 2:49 PM EDT
Wake up call? doubtful.

Their objective will still be to make as much money as possible and to eliminate as much costs as possible.

Until shareholders factor in the "public good" into their investment decisions, public companies will not change.
Reply to this comment
by ddaryl July 27, 2010 1:52 PM EDT
Nothing like be re-active instead of pro-active.

Now that we've destroyed so much enviroment they want to justify this as a wake up call...

Personally I think we should take over all BP's Ameircan assets sell them off and fund the full cleanup and dmages that way...

BP should be tarred and feathered and humiliated and be made a huge exapmle of what happens if you take any shortcuts or screw up this badly in this country...

but the reporcissions will be disolved over the next 10 years when a new president and congress make some backdoor deals like they did with the Exxon Valdez that left almost everyone completely screwed

I have NO FAITH IN AMERICA, and anyone who does is a FOOL
Reply to this comment
by tw02 July 27, 2010 2:28 PM EDT
Do you live here ?
See all 14 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook