July 27, 2010 8:37 AM

WikiLeaks Founder: Many More Documents to Come

 

(CBS/AP)  Updated 12:50 p.m. ET

The release of some 91,000 secret U.S. military documents on the Afghanistan war is just the beginning, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange promised Monday, adding that he still has thousands more Afghan files to post online.

The White House, Britain and Pakistan have all condemned the online whistle-blowing group's release Sunday of the classified documents, one of the largest unauthorized disclosures in military history. The Afghan government in Kabul said it was "shocked" at the release but insisted most of the information was not new.

It was unclear what kind of an investigation the U.S. might pursue.

Assange said he wasn't surprised by the White House's condemnation of the leak. He said the U.S. government, like other scrutinized subjects, seeks to "criticize the messenger to detract from the power of the message."

Special Report: Afghanistan

He also rejected the notion that the leak would pose a security risk for the United States, saying that the material is more than seven months old and had no "operational consequence."

The documents cover some known aspects of the troubled nine-year conflict: U.S. special operations forces have targeted militants without trial, Afghans have been killed by accident, and U.S. officials have been infuriated by alleged Pakistani intelligence cooperation with the very insurgent groups bent on killing Americans.

Still, they also included unreported incidents of Afghan civilian killings and covert operations against Taliban figures.

The revelations about frequent, concealed and needles civilian deaths came Monday as Afghanistan president Hamid Karzai said a NATO rocket attack killed 52 civilians in the south of the country on Friday.

Karzai said the Afghan intelligence service determined that a NATO rocket hit Regi village in Helmand province's Sangin district. The dead included women and children. Karzai condemned the attack.

Assange told reporters in London that what's been reported so far on the leaked documents has "only scratched the surface" and said some 15,000 files on Afghanistan are still being vetted by his organization.

He said he believed that "thousands" of U.S. attacks in Afghanistan could be investigated for evidence of war crimes, although he acknowledged that such claims would have to be tested in court.

"It is up to a court to decide really if something in the end is a crime," he said.

More on the WikiLeaks release:

Afghan Gov't "Shocked" by Leak of War Documents
Pakistani Officials: WikiLeaks Claims "Outrageous"
Analyst: WikiLeaks Report Fuels War Debate
WikiLeaks Reveals Grim Afghan War Realities
Report: Pakistan Aiding Afghan Insurgency
Papers: Leaks Show Unreported Afghan Deaths

Assange pointed in particular to a deadly missile strike ordered by Taskforce 373, a unit allegedly charged with hunting down and killing senior Taliban targets. He said there was also evidence of cover-ups when civilians were killed, including what he called a suspiciously high number of casualties that U.S. forces attributed to ricochet wounds.

Still, Assange said there was no one revelation that stood out over others. "The real story of this material is that it's war," he said. "One damn thing after another."

White House national security adviser Gen. Jim Jones said the release of the documents "put the lives of Americans and our partners at risk." In a statement, he took pains to point out that the documents describe a period from January 2004 to December 2009, mostly during the administration of President George W. Bush.

Jones noted that time period was before President Obama announced a new strategy.

Pakistan's Ambassador Husain Haqqani agreed, saying the documents "do not reflect the current on-ground realities," in which his country and Washington are "jointly endeavoring to defeat al Qaeda and its Taliban allies."

The U.S. and Pakistan assigned teams of analysts to read the records online to assess whether sources or locations were at risk.

Pakistan's powerful spy agency, Inter-Services Intelligence, said Monday that the accusations it had close connections to Taliban militants were malicious and unsubstantiated.

A senior ISI official said they were from unverified raw intelligence reports and were meant to impugn the reputation of the spy agency. He spoke on condition of anonymity in line with the agency's policy.

Hamid Gul, a former head of the ISI who is mentioned many times in the documents, also denied allegations that he'd worked with the insurgents.

The New York Times said the documents reveal that only a short time ago, there was far less harmony in U.S. and Pakistani exchanges.

The Times says the "raw intelligence assessments" by lower level military officers suggest that Pakistan "allows representatives of its spy service to meet directly with the Taliban in secret strategy sessions to organize networks of militant groups that fight against American soldiers in Afghanistan, and even hatch plots to assassinate Afghan leaders."

Report: Pakistan Aiding Afghan Insurgency

The Guardian, however, interpreted the documents differently, saying they "fail to provide a convincing smoking gun" for complicity between the Pakistan intelligence services and the Taliban.

The most revealing point in the leaked documents, according to The Guardian's correspondent in Afghanistan, are inter-military communications which cite the use of heat-seeking missiles to down coalition aircraft. Taliban militants have been rumored to possess such weapons, but their use has never been confirmed by the U.S. military or NATO.

CBS News chief foreign affairs correspondent Lara Logan first reported in October 2009 that U.S. intelligence officials believed Iran was supplying surface-to-air missiles to the Taliban - the very same weapons the U.S. supplied to the Afghan resistance to bring down the Russians during that country's failed invasion.

One Afghan City's Strong Ties To Iran

The leaked records include detailed descriptions of raids carried out by a secretive U.S. special operations unit called Task Force 373 against what U.S. officials considered high-value insurgent and terrorist targets. Some of the raids resulted in unintended killings of Afghan civilians, according to the documentation.

During the targeting and killing of Libyan fighter Abu Laith al-Libi, described in the documents as a senior al Qaeda military commander, the death tally was reported as six enemy fighters and seven noncombatants - all children.

Task Force 373 selected its targets from 2,000 senior Taliban and al Qaeda figures posted on a "kill or capture" list, known as JPEL, the Joint Prioritized Effects List, the Guardian said.

CBS News correspondent Mandy Clark reports that many of the revelations in the leaked documents come as little surprise, but serve to clarify what is often a murky picture of the war on the ground.

Clark reports that while anger among the Afghan population was already high over the use of drone strikes and the civilian casualties that can occur with them, the details revealed by Wikilieaks will likley stoke that anger and leave many with doubts that the problems are being efficiently addressed.

U.S. government agencies have been bracing for the deluge of classified documents since the leak of helicopter cockpit video of a 2007 firefight in Baghdad. In the video, a helicopter gunner repeatedly asks permission to open fire on a group of people standing in the square and is told to "light 'em all up" and then to "keep shootin'." The shooter guns down two Reuters journalists and later opens fire on a van that came to assist the wounded and dead, wounding two children.

A voice on the radio repeatedly says "nice" after the shooting.

That release was blamed on a U.S. Army intelligence analyst, Spc. Bradley Manning, 22, of Potomac, Md. He was charged with releasing classified information earlier this month. Manning had bragged online that he downloaded 260,000 classified U.S. cables and transmitted them to WikiLeaks.org.

U.S. officials have also publicly declared that they have tried to hunt down Assange.

Assange on Monday compared the impact of the released material to the opening of the East German secret police archives. "This is the equivalent of opening the Stasi archives," he said.

He also said his group had many more documents on other subjects, including files on countries from across the globe.

"We have built up an enormous backlog of whistleblower disclosures," he said.

Assange said that he believed more material would flood amid the blaze of publicity.

"It is our experience that courage is contagious," he said. "Sources are encouraged by the opportunities that they see before them."

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 88 Comments
by T-Fed July 27, 2010 10:04 AM EDT
Shoot Ass boy. No smoking gun here you Wiki-theatrical group. Nothing but old memo's with little relevance. Lastly, let's send O back to Kenya.
Reply to this comment
by walkswithbear July 26, 2010 9:06 PM EDT
we i see that there are people are at odds again as i see it if it was for guys like me and they were in that county they would be shot just forv thinking about disssingthe goverment but i think that julian should be hanged . for the leak. but all the bleeding hearts will say that we are taking away his rights. to me and other vets who fought for our country he has no right as a traitor.
Reply to this comment
by wyodutch July 26, 2010 4:44 PM EDT
Meanwhile... the Great Patriotic War to protect the fatherland goes on...
.
"The fuel theft was uncovered in February when people found boxes of cash in one of the then-soldier's offices at Forward Operating Base Shank, a military base near Pul-e-Alam, the capital of Logar province in eastern Afghanistan.
.
"They opened the boxes and found $168,865," Nichols said. Another $235,000 in hidden cash was discovered during the investigation, she said.

The two former soldiers, Staff Sgt. Stevan N. Ringo and Sgt. Michael Dugger, received the money from Sulieman & Sons, she said. The two, who have been discharged from the service, were charged last month in a U.S. court in Alexandria, Virginia. The case is ongoing."
Reply to this comment
by rockcutr July 26, 2010 3:29 PM EDT
We cannot leave afgan/pakistan until we have total control over the opium trade.
Humanitarian assistance to a country of people that have not advanced in consciousness in 3000 years seems like fighting for giving 8 yearold kids drivers liscences.
On the leak,,,likely government approved. Getting their feathers all ruffled,,,,just part of the act.
Even if someone goes down for the public display of war crimes our military practice on a daily basis....
so be it. It's war people,,,,not entertainment tonight. Civilians die...even with out war. If we stand back, in time they will kill each other off.
It is way past time that the lives lost on 911 have been satisfactorially avenged. The total is nearly 20 to 1 now...-of what they tell us....likely greatly underestimated.
Revenge as a reason to go to war is really pitiful.
Bottom line, your government cannot protect you, but, they are really good at diverting your attention to other countrys weaknesses.
In the meantime Mexico has invaded our country...
But we all love tequilla and tacos.....so that is ok.
Right?
Reply to this comment
by GunsInTheSky July 26, 2010 1:30 PM EDT
by Mortar_29 July 26, 2010 1:13 PM EDT
I am a conservative. And I am for chopping EVERYTHING that isnt listed in the Constitution.


-----------

What a simpleton. And likely an uneducated/dishonest one at that.

If so, you should be pushing for selling the land back from the Louisiana Purchase to France and eliminating all but the original 13 states.

But like everything else you say it is unlikely you understand the full scope of your words.
Reply to this comment
by Mortar_29 July 26, 2010 2:24 PM EDT
Are you two that clueless?

First off, Guns...I have advanced degrees in political science and constitutional law. I have studied the Constitution, the Founders and political theory.

The country we inherited was meant to be a constitutional republic. Which meant, that the powers the Federal government were given to them by the States would be defined (enumerated) in the Constitution. And no other powers could be conferred, unless the States gave it to them.

It is you that do not understand what we have nor why we have it. But it isnt your fault. We have spent decades undermining our republic, and talking about "democracy." Democracy is the worst form of government!

It is you that dont understand the full scope of how far we have fallen. And it is because we have gotten away from what the Founders intended, is why we are having the problems we are. And, unfortunately, unless we get back to the Constitution and the rule of law...then it will only get worse.

Paid, the taxcuts were unConstitutional? Please enighten us.
by Mortar_29 July 26, 2010 3:05 PM EDT
Paid...typical liberal response. No facts to back up your posts. Just attacks and silliness.
See all 6 Replies
by Harden_Tar July 26, 2010 1:16 PM EDT
America has lost the stomach to wage war and should withdraw from all conflicts until such time as we are attacked with such ferocity and force that the panty waist bleeding hearts who have shackled our armies with impossible rules of engagement are shouted down and removed from positions of power. Civilians die in war. Sad but true. War is an ugly game folks but sometimes a necessity. I am also absolutely positive that if the D-Day plans were available to him, this putrid piece of human debris Assange would have gladly given them to the Germans.
Reply to this comment
by doctajim July 26, 2010 1:33 PM EDT
Agreed Ms_Enza, but the nature of instant communication and worldwide information in seconds has now made all wars protracted, long duration periods of destruction. The enemy is no longer a country (with possible exceptions of Iran and N. Korea - but many of their populations are living under a fascist whip) but an ideology - and ideologies (like Christianity during the Romans) can exist and even thrive underground. Nightly postings on the news helped stop the debacle called Vietnam - will the video deaths and documents posted on the Internet perhaps lead to the end of these conflicts in the Mideast?! Perhaps we need to really think and find a better way but no better way will be sought nor found until there are people who benefit from the slaughter - (like corporations - oil, weapons, etc.) are removed from the picture. I check W-leaks regularly; information may be disheartening and even painful - but the fairytales have to end.
by jimmyc1955 July 26, 2010 1:33 PM EDT
More apropos would be giving people the statistics on those who die in surgery without any understanding of the disease or it's consequences.

War isn't neat. I can't be done with zero casualties. It is risk and unfortunately those who fight it are sometimes wrong. They are young men who make bad decisions, or leaders who make bad decisions.

But you want to criminialize this as if somehow that will end war. But look at who we are fighting. Do you really believe that if we leave they will never attack us again? Do you believe that the terrorist attacks on innocent men/women and children world wide will diminish simply because the US left Afghanistan? Do you think it will end if Israel is obliterated?

Or will it keep coming because of a belief that Islam must MUST be the ONLY religion in the world? Do you realize that Islam, in one form or another, has had a violent crusade against the west for over 1000 years?

When do you recognize that the anger and rage is not fueled by American actions - it is fueled by an extremist ideology that will not quit until either all of us or all of them are dead - or the ideology is abandoned.
by GunsInTheSky July 26, 2010 1:10 PM EDT
If conservatives are serious about wanting a smaller federal gov't this should be good ammo to use.

We are spending $500b (Billion with a B) on this so-called defense. If conservative aren't willing to chop spending in this area they have no leg to stand on.
Reply to this comment
by Mortar_29 July 26, 2010 1:13 PM EDT
I am a conservative. And I am for chopping EVERYTHING that isnt listed in the Constitution.
by _One_American____ July 26, 2010 1:01 PM EDT
Julian Assange should be tried for treason and dangled from the end of a rope.

But of course the Communist Obama supporters want to make this bum a "hero".

The Left thinks it's OK for illegal aliens to invade our country, and also believe its OK to reveal military documents in order to cripple our Armed Forces.

I think a good way to make the Left understand the foolishness of their way of thinking - is to remove the doors from their homes, put up a sign that says "everything free - take what you want", and scatter all their personal documents along the street where they live.

Maybe then they will understand what they are doing to America.
Reply to this comment
by GunsInTheSky July 26, 2010 1:06 PM EDT
You should know some facts...

Julian Assange isn't an American. Maybe we could illegally kidnap him and stick him in GITMO.

Conservative logic: Attack the gov't to undermine the parts that actually help Americans like social programs, and then blindly support the parts that get americans killed for, what should be clear to all, no reason. Take a step back and see how counterproduct this is.
by Mortar_29 July 26, 2010 1:15 PM EDT
Guns, the parts of the Federal government that supposedly help people, as you put it, are the parts that are illegal. The Constitution does not authorize them.

Plus, government should NEVER be involved in acts of benevolence. It is immoral and evil.
by starving1968-3 July 26, 2010 12:57 PM EDT
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/datablog/2010/jul/25/wikileaks-afghanistan-data
Reply to this comment
by Wookiee-1138 July 26, 2010 12:55 PM EDT
This was inevitable. Copyright and intellectual property as we have known it are becoming less relevant all the time.

The old credo "Information wants to be free" is as true as "Eppur si muove."

Future generations will remember the redaction pen with the same abhorrence as the Vatican's thumbscrews, brands and iron maidens.
Reply to this comment
by GunsInTheSky July 26, 2010 1:01 PM EDT
Future generations will remember the redaction pen with the same abhorrence as the Vatican's thumbscrews, brands and iron maidens.
------

One problem. How good is free information if you don't know what "information" is accurate?

Be careful what you wish for.
See all 88 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook