July 21, 2010 5:43 PM

No Criminal Charges in Bush-Era Attorney Firings

By
CBSNews

 

(CBS/AP)  Updated at 4:46 p.m. ET

Prosecutors have concluded their two-year investigation into the Bush administration's firing of U.S. attorneys and will file no charges, the Justice Department said Wednesday.

The investigation looked into whether the Bush administration improperly dismissed nine U.S. attorneys as a way to influence criminal cases. The scandal contributed to mounting criticism that the administration had politicized the Justice Department, a charge that contributed to the resignation of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

The decision closes the books on one of the lingering political disputes of the Bush administration, one that Democrats said was evidence of GOP politics run amok and that Republicans have always said was a manufactured controversy.

In 2008, the Justice Department assigned Nora Dannehy, a career prosecutor from Connecticut with a history of rooting out government wrongdoing, to investigate the firings.

In particular, she looked into whether the firing of New Mexico U.S. attorney David Iglesias and whether then-Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., or others should be prosecuted for the dismissal or for lying to Congress about it.

"Evidence did not demonstrate that any prosecutable criminal offense was committed with regard to the removal of David Iglesias," the Justice Department said in a letter to lawmakers Wednesday. "The investigative team also determined that the evidence did not warrant expanding the scope of the investigation beyond the removal of Iglesias."

Prosecutors also said there was insufficient evidence to charge someone with lying to Congress or investigators.

Iglesias was fired after the head of New Mexico's Republican Party complained to the White House that the U.S. attorney was soft on voter fraud. He asked that Iglesias be replaced so that the state could "make some real progress in cleaning up a state notorious for crooked elections."

Nearly a year ago, it was revealed that former White House political adviser Karl Rove played a central role in Iglesias' ouster, according to transcripts of closed-door testimony released Aug. 11, 2009.

Harriet Miers, then White House counsel, said in testimony to House Judiciary Committee investigators that Rove was "very agitated" over Iglesias "and wanted something done about it."

Rove has said he played no role in deciding which U.S. attorneys were retained and which were replaced, that politics played no role in the Bush administration's removal of U.S. attorneys and that he never sought to influence the conduct of any prosecution.

Dannehy faulted the Justice Department for firing Iglesias without even bothering to figure out whether such complaints were true. That indicated "an undue sensitivity to politics on the part of DOJ officials who should answer not to partisan politics but to principles of fairness and justice," the Justice Department wrote in its letter.

But that was not a crime, and was not an effort to influence prosecutions, the letter said.

Domenici became a focus of the investigation because he made three phone calls to the attorney general and one to Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty complaining about Iglesias. But McNulty didn't mention Domenici's phone calls when questioned by Congress.

In another telephone conversation Iglesias said Domenici pressured him to bring charges in a public corruption case before Election Day 2006. The Senate Ethics Committee said Domenici created an appearance of impropriety with that phone call, and he apologized.

Domenici's push to have Iglesias fired was in part politically motivated, Dannehy determined, but did not violate the law.

The nine prosecutors fired were: Daniel Bogden of Nevada, Paul Charlton of Arizona, Margaret Chiara of Michigan, Bud Cummins of Arkansas, Todd Graves of Missouri, Carol Lam of California, John McKay of Washington, Kevin Ryan of California, and Iglesias.

More on Attorney Firings

Rove Link to U.S. Attorney Firing Detailed
Alberto Gonzales: My Reputation has Suffered
Audit: DOJ Weeded Out Liberals, Dems
Gonzales: I've Done Nothing Wrong
New E-Mails Shed Light On Firings
E-Mails Highlight Rove's Role In Firings

CBS/AP
Add a Comment See all 17 Comments
by prometheus77 July 22, 2010 2:12 AM EDT
<cont. from below> This is it fellow citizens in denial. If you ever wanted to see the government held immediately accountable to the American people for anything that cuts this close to our wallets and our WAY OF LIFE UNDER A SYSTEM OF LAWS compromised by MASSIVE CRIMINAL RACKETEERING and taxpayer RIPOFFS at an ENORMOUS SCOPE AND SCALE -- and thought if this doesn't get Congressional hearings and MASSIVE PROSECUTIONS, then it literally is time to throw in the towel -- GET THE HELL OUT OF THIS COUNTRY, or accept completely that you live in a tyranny that will lie to your face about it being a democracy until it is all flushed down the ****-can -- this is it.

God... please make it end and God help you all if you sit back and watch you're "rule of law" administrator do what this piece of human garbage has done since day one -- and rub it in your face with the appointment of Director of National Intelligence Clapper.
Reply to this comment
by bullwinkle64 July 22, 2010 4:40 AM EDT
As soon as I pay my child support arrears and can get a passport I'll leave just to get away from brain dead comments like yours.
by omnix July 22, 2010 4:38 PM EDT
You are one of the patently dimwitted individuals running around parroting the right-wing rhetoric. You should stop listening to Beck or whomever you are getting your "disinformation" from, start doing some thinking and research on your own (critically analyze both sides), and hold off on making these statements until you can clearly articulate a lucid and substantive argument. That way you won't embarrass yourself, again.

See, your diatribe doesn't contain one iota of a substantive argument - it is just pure hyperbole and histrionics. Can you provide any factual information to support anything you said? Do you even know what a logical, lucid, and substantive argument looks like? Have you ever heard of critical thinking? Obviously not since your entire diatribe is replete with logical fallacies... Until you do know what these things are, beyond your present sophomoric understanding, then you probably don't want to expose your ignorance for public scrutiny.
by prometheus77 July 22, 2010 2:05 AM EDT
Looooking VEEERY FORWARD to the next Democratic Presidential primary in just two years and counting...

Obama has to have been the VERY WORST POSSIBLE MISTAKE of an election.... at the most critical time in this country... EVER.

All this god-forsaken country needed was an able and determined rule of law administrator with a SPEC of integrity, who knew Congress makes the laws, the executive branch carries out the law -- without exception, without a single violation of due process and equal protection NEVER IGNORES THE LAW --- NEVER -- NEVER FOR ONE SECOND CAN CLAIM TO LOOK ONLY FORWARD IN ABANDONMENT OF THE LAW -- just to bring some level of trust back to the government WHEN IT WAS SO DESPERATELY NEEDED....

And instead we GOT THIS.... slack-jaw smiling steaming pile prancing around in a suit. I just hope this country can survive two MORE years of this until we can eject this PIECE OF LIVING TRASH out of our White House and just act like this utter waste of 4 CRITICAL post-BUSH NIGHTMARE YEARS NEVER HAPPENED...

I mean has anybody read that Washington Post investigative report into the INTELLIGENCE CONTRACT SPENDING FREAKING NIGHTMARE IN UTTER VIOLATION OF SO FREAKING MANY ACQUISITION AND OTHER FEDERAL LAWS over the past TEN YEARS, and then seen this administration's response?

Has anybody seen who Obama presented to the Senate as the new Director of National Intelligence and heard his cavalier testimony when asked about this report?

Do American taxpayers realize just how bad this situation is -- this MOUNTAIN OF CASH COW TAXPAYER DRAINING schemes that have turned Washington D.C. into a MECCA of MASSIVE TAXPAYER financed PROFIT. That this has been going on with COMPLETE AND UTTER VIOLATION OF FEDERAL ACQUISITION LAWS for the past ten years.

That what this freaking nightmare of GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION AND RACKETEERING GONE AMOCK alone has been treated like is this -- "something that maybe needs to be looked into" -- NOT A LITANY OF FELONIES NEEDING TO BE PROSECUTED and the criminal activity going on with intelligence agency contracting NEEDING TO BE BROUGHT TO A SCREECHING HALT while the executive branch carries out DUE PROCESS and brings these FELONS to justice?

That when Obama's choice for Director of National Intelligence was asked by someone in a SELECT GROUP of intelligence community CONTRACTOR-biased Senators, to comment on the claims made in the Washington Post report, his response, that he frankly thought it a "shrillness to which he didn't subscribe", apparently left no Senator feeling that this WASN'T the man for the job?

This is your rule of law administration? PLEASE READ THE WASHINGTON POST investigation "TOP SECRET AMERICA" -- their front-page story from Monday July 19 to Wednesday July 21, 2010, if you haven't already.

And ask yourself why the White House, Congress and our system of LAWS -- and oversight of OUTRIGHT FELONY WASTE AND VIOLATION OF ACQUISITION LAWS -- could be hi-jacked by such an ENORMOUS SCOPE AND DEGREE... and would DEMAND anything less than MASSIVE IMMEDIATE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AND UTTER HALT IN FUNDING until this MAJOR RACKETEERING AT THE HIGHEST AND MOST SECRETIVE LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT is completely rooted out and brought to justice.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt July 22, 2010 12:56 AM EDT
Dannehy faulted the Justice Department for firing Iglesias without even bothering to figure out whether such complaints were true.
---
They didn't care of they were true.
Reply to this comment
by jgg000101 July 21, 2010 10:26 PM EDT
so this was a political stunt?
Reply to this comment
by MickKegeon July 21, 2010 9:42 PM EDT
Another wonderful decision by Holder and DOJ. Just more tax payers money down the drain. How about closing GITMO and civilian trials for terrorists? Seems like Obama and Holder now love all the "failed Bush policies" that they campaigned so hard against. I sure miss Bush, Cheney, and Rove.
Reply to this comment
by askagain July 22, 2010 12:41 AM EDT
variablespanner - But Obama hasn't cleaned up after Bush. Gitmo still hold prisioners in detention. How many have received a trial? A few have been released. Big deal!
by Simifanene July 21, 2010 8:28 PM EDT
Bush, Cheney and their henchmen, are too powerful. They're Corporate America's puppets who have immunity to all crime. This jurisprudance tampering crime is horrendous and proves America's prosecutors will go after the common man but grant immunity, to men connected to the Corporate Vicoroy. This is not their first crime they've been granted immunity. Bush, Cheny and their henchmen we're also granted immunity for their orders of torture. Any other head of State that ordered his troops to torture would be held accountable by the world court. Not, Bush, not Cheney, nor their henchmen their above our law. These Supreme Court Decisions hurt our country, and make America look corrupt to the rest of the world. Shame on you Mr. & Mrs. Federal Prosecutor. You have let all American's down and have gone against your sworn duty to protect our Constitution and way of life. You've brought shame to our flag, maybe more than the criminal's Bush and Cheney did? You have no flag now, as they don't.
Reply to this comment
by Smokey75 July 21, 2010 9:24 PM EDT
Please name one crime that Bush and Cheney supposed did that Obama isn't continuing to do!

I mean seriously if Bush/Cheney are guilty of war crimes for Iraq and Afghanistan isn't Obama now guilty of war crimes for continuing Iraq and doubling down on the Afghan war.
by STBY21 July 21, 2010 9:37 PM EDT
Didn't Clinton get a pass when he was in office? How do you feel about that?
by darwufche July 21, 2010 6:28 PM EDT
Smokey75, what a zit head you are.
Reply to this comment
by deohgee July 21, 2010 6:22 PM EDT
Really? Surprise, surprise, surprise.........
Reply to this comment
by tsigili July 21, 2010 4:22 PM EDT
Well, we know they wasted a ton of tax dollars, with the investigation.
Reply to this comment
by Smokey75 July 21, 2010 4:02 PM EDT
Another headline that will bring out the hate spewing bigoted liberals!
Reply to this comment
by STBY21 July 21, 2010 9:34 PM EDT
Hey Smokey,

Mission accomplished. The article brought them out just as you said.
See all 17 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook