July 20, 2010 1:56 PM

U.K. PM: Releasing Lockerbie Bomber Was Wrong

(AP)  Britain's prime minister criticized the Scottish government's decision to free Lockerbie bomber Abdel Baset al-Megrahi from jail last year, saying Monday that the move had been "completely and utterly wrong."

Prime Minister David Cameron told the BBC he had opposed the decision to return the cancer-stricken prisoner to Libya on compassionate grounds in August.

He spoke before leaving Tuesday for his first visit as British leader to the United States, where he is expected to face questioning about the case. Cameron took office in May, after an inconclusive election that resulted in his Conservative Party forming a coalition government that ousted the previous Labour Party administration.

"As leader of opposition, I couldn't have been more clear that I thought the decision to release al-Megrahi was completely and utterly wrong," Cameron said.

The decision had been made by Scotland's government, which holds some limited powers within the United Kingdom, and not by the previous British government headed by Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

Al-Megrahi served eight years of a life sentence for the Dec. 21, 1988, bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, killing all 259 people on board, most of them Americans, and 11 people on the ground.

Relatives of victims killed in the crash said Cameron's words must be backed by actions to have any real meaning.

"That's a wonderful statement, what are you going to do to back that up with substance," asked Bert Ammerman of River Vale, New Jersey, who lost his brother Tom in the crash. He called for investigations in the UK and U.S. into the circumstances of the release.

"There has to be an investigation done on how this took place, and heads have to roll," he said.

Scotland's government has previously held an inquiry into the case, while Brown's administration released internal documents related to the case.

Glenn Johnson of Greensburg, Pennsylvania, whose daughter Beth Ann died in the crash, said Cameron's words offered little comfort. "For the prime minister to come forward and say it was a mistake, that's just politics," he said.

Two New York senators, who have called for an inquiry into oil giant BP's lobbying of the British government over a prisoner transfer agreement with Libya, reacted positively to the comments. They suspect the lobbying may have bearing on the case.

"This admission is a first step in getting to the bottom of what could well be a quid pro quo for an oil contract," Sen. Charles Schumer said.

More on the BP-Lockerbie Controversy

BP Admits Pressure to Speed Up Prisoner Release
U.K. Envoy Denies BP Role in Lockerbie Release
Lockerbie Bombing Parent Outraged--Justice Swept Aside
Probe Sought Over BP Role in Bomber's Release

Sen. Kirsten Gillbrand said she respected the comments, but "we need further review of how and why al-Megrahi was released, so we can learn from this mistake and assess what steps can be taken so that justice is served and terrorists are held accountable."

Cameron's Downing Street office said a British-government commissioned inquiry was "not currently under consideration."

"I have no idea what BP did, I am not responsible for BP," Cameron said. But he insisted that discussions between BP and Brown's administration on a prisoner transfer agreement did not include talks on al-Megrahi.

Al-Megrahi served eight years of a life sentence for the Dec. 21, 1988, bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, killing all 259 people on board, most of them Americans, and 11 people on the ground.

BP has acknowledged it had urged the British government to sign a prisoner transfer agreement with Libya, but stressed it didn't specifically discuss al-Megrahi's case during those talks.

Britain's growing diplomatic and business ties with Libya had been under intense scrutiny since al-Megrahi's release. Critics have accused British authorities of putting commercial interests before the families of the 270 victims of the attack.

Officials in the U.K. have insisted the prisoner transfer deal was part of broader diplomatic effort aimed at furthering efforts to transform Libya from a rogue state to Western ally. Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi renounced terrorism and dismantled his country's clandestine nuclear program in 2003.

Schumer and three other U.S. senators asked the State Department last week to investigate whether BP pressured lawmakers as part of efforts to seek access to Libyan oil fields.

In a letter sent Saturday to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Sen. John Kerry, Britain's Foreign Secretary William Hague said there was nothing to suggest BP had influenced the Scottish government.

"There is no evidence that corroborates in any way the allegations of BP involvement in the Scottish executive's decision to release al-Megrahi on compassionate grounds in 2009, nor any suggestion that the Scottish executive decided to release al-Megrahi in order to facilitate oil deals for BP," Hague wrote.

In Washington, Cameron will hold talks with President Barack Obama, as well as meetings with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and senior legislators. Separately, he will meet with Sen. John McCain.

Associated Press Writer Deepti Hajela in New York contributed to this report.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment
by lilbear925 July 19, 2010 10:13 PM EDT
Of course, Scotland can simply ask Libiya to send the Lockerbie bomber back to them. I believe they would probably like to do to him what the English did to William Wallace.
Reply to this comment
by cleric60 July 19, 2010 4:42 PM EDT
Britain's prime minister criticized the Scottish government's decision to free Lockerbie bomber Abdel Baset al-Megrahi from jail last year, saying Monday that the move had been "completely and utterly wrong."
So, why did Great Britain allow this tragic event to happen? I'm sure there were legal ways/means to stop it! But, Great Britain allow it to happen, Why? why? why?
Reply to this comment
by an5200 July 20, 2010 2:31 AM EDT
Scotland has an independant and different law system from the English and Welsh, if i've got this right, it's abit like Texan law would be different from Californian law?
by skunk_monkey July 20, 2010 6:30 AM EDT
this is more Americas fault than uk's America was lobbying for the Scots to get control over its own justice system in 1999 then blame the uk when they screw up. the americans could of had the bomber in an american prison but insisted that he be kept in a Scottish prison because they did not want to screw up there own oil deals. its unbelievable how they blame everyone else
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook