By

CBSNews /

AP/ July 19, 2010, 8:18 AM

Oakland Pot Growers Fear "Wal-Marting" of Weed

After weathering the fear of federal prosecution and competition from drug cartels, California's medical marijuana growers see a new threat to their tenuous existence: the "Wal-Marting" of weed.

The Oakland City Council on Tuesday will look at licensing four production plants where pot would be grown, packaged and processed into items ranging from baked goods to body oil. Winning applicants would have to pay $211,000 in annual permit fees, carry $2 million worth of liability insurance and be prepared to devote up to 8 percent of gross sales to taxes.

The move, and fledgling efforts in other California cities to sanction cannabis cultivation for the first time, has some marijuana advocates worried that regulations intended to bring order to the outlaw industry and new revenues to cash-strapped local governments could drive small "mom and pop" growers out of business. They complain that industrial-scale gardens would harm the environment, reduce quality and leave consumers with fewer strains from which to choose.

Study: Marijuana Prices to Crater If Legalized

"Nobody wants to see the McDonald's-ization of cannabis," Dan Scully, one of the 400 "patient-growers" who supply Oakland's largest retail medical marijuana dispensary, Harborside Health Center, grumbled after a City Council committee gave the blueprint preliminary approval last week. "I would compare it to how a small business feels about shutting down its business and going to work at Wal-Mart. Who would be attracted to that?"

Special Report: Marijuana Nation

The proposal's supporters, including entrepreneurs more disposed to neckties than tie-dye, counter that unregulated growers working in covert warehouses or houses are tax scofflaws more likely to wreak environmental havoc, be motivated purely by profit and produce inferior products.

"The large-scale grow facilities that are being proposed with this ordinance will create hundreds of jobs for the city," said Ryan Indigo Warman, who teaches pot-growing techniques at iGrow, a hydroponics store whose owners plan to apply for one of the four permits. "The ordinance is good for Oakland, and anyone who says otherwise is only protecting their own interests."

Council members Rebecca Kaplan and Larry Reid, who introduced the plan, have pitched it largely as a public safety measure.

The Oakland fire department blames a dramatic rise in the number of electrical fires between 2006 and 2009 in part to marijuana being grown indoors with improperly wired fans and lights. The police department says eight robberies, seven burglaries and two murders have been linked to marijuana grows in the last two years.

Reid and Kaplan also are open about their desire to have the city, which last week laid off 80 police officers to save money, cash in on the medical marijuana industry it has allowed to thrive.

Oakland's four retail marijuana stores did $28 million in business last year, and if sales remain constant, the city would get $1.5 million this year from a dispensary business tax that voters adopted last summer. A similar tax on wholesale pot sales from the permitted grow sites to the dispensaries would bring in more than twice that amount, the city administrator's office has estimated.

"Allowing medical cannabis and medical cannabis products to be produced in a responsible, aboveboard and legitimate way will be a benefit to the patients, to the workers and to the people of Oakland," Kaplan said.

Synthetic Marijuana Gives Users Legal High

Adding to the anxiety of growers - and the impetus Oakland officials have to get the grow tax in place - is a November state ballot measure to legalize marijuana possession for adult recreational use and authorize local governments to license and tax non-medical pot sales.

If it passes, Proposition 19 is expected to feed the state's hearty appetite for marijuana. Backers of creating the four big indoor gardens say the plan is not dependent on legalization, but would benefit from it.

"The reality is, this is an issue that is going to grow. I would like it to grow here. I would like it to be Oakland business and not the tobacco industry," Councilwoman Jean Quan said.

Regulating the supply side of the business would represent another turning point in California's complicated, 14-year-old relationship with medical marijuana. Although Maine, New Mexico and Rhode Island license nonprofit groups to produce and distribute cannabis, California's law is silent on cultivation other than for individual use.

Even as hundreds of storefront pot dispensaries, marijuana delivery services and THC-laced food products have flourished, the question of where they get their stashes remains murky: Inquiring is considered as impolite as asking someone's income or age.

Industry insiders usually say they rely on a variety of sources, including farmers who grow outdoors in the far northern end of the state, contractors who run sophisticated indoor operations, and customers who grow their own and sell the surplus.

Officials in Berkeley and Long Beach also are moving to take the mystery out of medical marijuana production.

The Berkeley City Council last week approved a measure for the November ballot that would authorize the city to license and tax six pot cultivation sites. Companies running the facilities must agree to give away some pot to low-income users, employ organic gardening methods to the extent possible and offset in some way the large amount of electricity needed to grow weed.

Long Beach officials want to reduce the amount of medical marijuana being sold in the city that isn't grown there.

The city is in the process of trying to whittle its more than 90 dispensaries down to no more than 35 marijuana collectives through a lottery. License winners will be required to grow either at their retail sites or elsewhere in Long Beach and to open their books to prove they aren't growing more than enough to supply their members, said Lori Ann Farrell, Long Beach's director of financial management.
AP
47 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bankalchemist says:
all of us at Community Bank of The Bay support Oakland trade and commerce. you can find us on www.budhopper.com or contact Brian Garrett bgarrett@communitybankbay.com
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
matthewmichalowski says:
I find it interesting, CA is the leader in both banning tobacco/cigarettes, for health, medical, pollution, second hand smoke, etc, and now pushing to legalizing pot, which has all the same properties as tobacco, but one added bonus of the high. This is all about tax dollars with no foresight. I just wonder who the lucky 4 will be to be the suppliers to reap the millions? I'm neither for or against this, just wondering...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tsigili says:
They are only concerned about their bottom line. Totally mercenary.

I am concerned about what happens to our society, when most of the population, starts to play with drugs, and no one is sober.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sjc_1 says:
If we allow personal growing, there will be NO market for drug smugglers. The end of Prohibition put an end to running booze into the U.S. and the end of violent organizations protecting their turf and profits.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MatterofLiberty says:
lol we ALREADY have "Wal-mart" Cannabis! Its called the junk that comes from mexico and is only $65-$100 an ounce! Do you still see home-growers and Medical Dispensaries....? Yes! truth is the market is big enough for everyone!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Noval53 says:
It'll be great; WalmartWeed.com; won't even have to go to the store with free home delivery. It's about time we legalize marijuana and accept the fact that the millions of pot heads will buy it; legal or not. So why not create new jobs, control the quality, and enjoy the benefits of a "legal" crop. Hemp should also be legal for Paper products; much better than wood for making paper anyway.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
msjb1 says:
what an idea i can't imagine this happening in this country but where else does cold blooded murderers get out of prison in 10 years or so
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cyclingpete says:
I think this is GREAT! Humboldt County California here. All the illigal growers who make tons of cash and DO NOT PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE OF TAXES will FINALLY be made to pay thier fair share! Im PRO POT but get really pissed when the growers are making a GREAT living and Im working like a dog to have 30% of my salary taken away from me every month. NOT FAIR!You want it legal? Than it's time to pay for it! PAY YOUR TAXES!!!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
magnumdr says:
As far as I am concerned you can take all of the pot in the world and burn in front of every pot smoker in the USA. It is still a drug no matter whay anyone says about it.
reply
ky7474 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Pharmaceutacals are also drugs, so what's your point.
Biker-N-OH1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
As far as I am concerned you can take all of the pot in the world and burn in front of every pot smoker in the USA........................ Now that would be a paaaaaaaaaaaarrrty!!!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
thy-only_king says:
I have the answer... Make it legal for American citizens to grow pot... Could place a limit how much each person could grow... "Not to sell, just to grow"... It will then be worthless,,, just like other weeds... When you take the dollars out of it,,, you take the crime out of it... This would stop the Mexicans from bringing it across the border... It would be worthless to the drug cartels... This is an easy way to cut off
money to the criminals...
reply
krotec54 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
That would be the answer; it would be great for the citizens and bad for the drug Companies wanting to make a buck. The end product is use for cheap paper, to ethanol fuels and the Mexicans can also make a few bucks to help out the farm workers.
MatterofLiberty replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
this is a model of what REAL decriminalization could/should be....allow possesion/cultivation in ones own residence while not necesarily allowing sales or possesion outside the residence. While not completely eleminating the black market, it would be a good incrimental approach to managing cannabis in society.
See all 47 Comments