AP/ July 13, 2010, 8:32 AM

Roman Polanski Free as Swiss Reject Extradition

Updated 4:55 p.m. ET

Roman Polanski was declared a free man on Monday after Switzerland rejected a U.S. request to extradite him to be sentenced for having sex in 1977 with a 13-year-old girl.

The Swiss government blamed the decision on U.S. authorities, saying they had failed to address defense arguments that the 76-year-old filmmaker had actually served his sentence before fleeing Los Angeles three decades ago.

Nine months after arresting Polanski, the Swiss Justice Ministry said U.S. officials should have backed up their request by providing confidential testimony about Polanski's sentencing procedure in L.A.

"Mr. Polanski can now move freely," Justice Minister Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf declared. "He's a free man."

Photos: Roman Polanski

The stunning decision could end the United States' long pursuit of Polanski. France, where he has spent much of his time, does not extradite its own citizens and Polanski has had little trouble traveling throughout Europe - even if he's stayed away from Britain.

The U.S. cannot appeal the decision, but Polanski is still a fugitive in the United States.

"That warrant remains outstanding," Los Angeles Superior Court spokesman Allan Parachini said, adding that Polanski could be arrested and sent back to the U.S. if he traveled to another country that has an extradition deal with the United States.

A top Justice Department official expressed deep disappointment Monday over Switzerland's rejection of a U.S. extradition request for fugitive movie director Roman Polanski.

Lanny Breuer, the assistant attorney general in charge of the department's criminal division, said the U.S. request that Polanski be sent to the United States was completely supported by treaty, facts and the law.

The underlying conduct in the criminal case against Polanski "is, of course, very serious" and the department is "deeply disappointed" by the Swiss rejection, Breuer told reporters at a news briefing on a separate topic.

The U.S. government will review its options, Breuer added, but declined to discuss them.

The Swiss decision was praised by senior government officials in France and Poland, where Polanski holds dual citizenship. But there was criticism from groups representing victims of sexual abuse.

The Oscar-winning director of "Rosemary's Baby," "Chinatown" and "The Pianist" was accused of plying his victim with champagne and part of a Quaalude during a 1977 modeling shoot and raping her. He was initially indicted on six felony counts, including rape by use of drugs, child molesting and sodomy, but pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful sexual intercourse.

In exchange, the judge agreed to drop the remaining charges and sentence him to prison for a 90-day psychiatric evaluation. However, he was released after 42 days by an evaluator who deemed him mentally sound and unlikely to offend again. The judge responded by saying he was going to send Polanski back to jail for the remainder of the 90 days and that afterward he would ask Polanski to agree to a "voluntary deportation." Polanski then fled the country on the eve of his Feb. 1, 1978, sentencing.

The Swiss government's main argument concerned confidential testimony given on Jan. 26 by Roger Gunson, the Los Angeles attorney in charge of the original prosecution against Polanski. The Swiss asked for the transcript, but Washington rejected the request.

Based on references to Gunson's testimony in U.S. courts, the Swiss said it "should prove" that Polanski served his sentence after undergoing the diagnostic study.

"If this were the case, Roman Polanski would actually have already served his sentence and therefore both the proceedings on which the U.S. extradition request is founded and the request itself would have no foundation," the ministry said.

The Justice Ministry said its decision reflected the spirit of the law, as U.S. authorities hadn't pursued Polanski in Switzerland previously, even though he's often visited the country and bought a house here in 2006. It also cited the wishes of the victim, Samantha Geimer, who long ago publicly identified herself and has joined in Polanski's bid for dismissal.

Polanski's electric monitoring bracelet was removed, the government said, but it was unclear if he had already left the confines of his house and garden for the first time since being placed under house arrest in December on $4.5 million bail.

A woman who answered the door said Polanski had left. The director's France-based lawyer, Herve Temime, told The Associated Press by telephone from his office in Paris that his client was still at his chalet but was now ready to enjoy his freedom.

Approving extradition had seemed the likeliest scenario after Polanski was arrested on Sept. 26 as he arrived in Zurich to receive a lifetime achievement award from a film festival. Polanski had also suffered a series of legal setbacks this year in California courts, and Switzerland only rejects about 5 percent of the 200 extradition requests it handles annually.

"This decision was certainly not expected," Temime said, praising Swiss authorities for making the responsible decision.

Peter Cosandey, a former Zurich prosecutor, said complete evidence isn't normally required in extradition decisions. But this case might have been different because of Polanski's confused sentencing procedure, he said.

"We in Switzerland do not know, and that's why the government sought the transcript of Gunson," Cosandey said. "In extraditions, there are formalities that must be fulfilled. One is whether the person has already served his sentence."

Widmer-Schlumpf said this decision was not meant to excuse Polanski's crime, saying the issue was "not about deciding whether he is guilty or not guilty."

The government said extradition had to be rejected "considering the persisting doubts concerning the presentation of the facts of the case."

Beyond the legal confusion, Polanski's extradition was complicated and diplomatically sensitive because of Polanski's status as a cultural icon in France and Poland, and his history as a Holocaust survivor whose first wife was murdered by crazed followers of cult leader Charles Manson in California.

Widmer-Schlumpf said she hoped the decision wouldn't harm Swiss relations with Washington. The two countries have bickered in recent years over wealthy Americans hiding their money in the biggest Swiss bank, UBS AG, but have cooperated well on resettling prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

"These were three completely different cases that have to be treated completely differently," Widmer-Schlump said.
© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
63 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
patocc123 says:
Bottum line here is that this convicted child rapist skip the country to avoid serving out his prison sentence. People who are defending him for doing so and using a biased court system as justification are seriously lacking morals.

Its amazing how far the mind will become warped to justify someone elses actions for a political talking point. Its also amazing that those people have suddenly become experts on a case that happened so long ago. Seriously was personal research done on the case or was a TV show watched that showed a biased version of the actions that took place.

Regardless of any of the propaganda for or against this man he skipped the country to avoid finishing a sentence on his conviction.

I wonder if the same lenency will be given by those same individuals to the catholic church if they harbor thier criminals for decades.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
harpoot says:
Finally it's nice to see they didn't cave in to the bullying Americans. Hop Schwyz!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
finkfurst says:
by alancontact July 13, 2010 1:45 AM EDT
Most of you who are foaming at the mouth for justice don't even know what a pedophile is.
-----------------
YOU don't know what a pedophile is. I say it's a completely harmless interest and I will justify that to ANY of you illiterate Americans.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wdh3007 says:
Crimes don't go unpunished they will get their man & pick him up at a later date unexpectedly as it always happens only the swiss won't be invited to the trial.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
alancontact says:
Most of you who are foaming at the mouth for justice don't even know what a pedophile is. Rape of an underage girl is one thing... lusting after prepubescent children is something completely different.
reply
voxpopulus replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Well said. They say justice should be served but don't even know enough to know the US court-appointed panel decided Polanski was NOT a pedophile.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kastner64 says:
If the Department of Justice was so interested in having Mr. Polanski then why did they not provide the Swiss with this Protocoll of the judge's interview. If they thought they had a case, and the Swiss wanted them to prove it, then why did they not do so? The fault is with the U.S., not with Switzerland.
reply
voxpopulus replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Exactly. The handling of the original case has been described by INDEPENDENT legal sources as a textbook example of bad jurisprudence and legal corruption. But the lynch mob does not know and does not care.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hornsnbr1 says:
send your comments to Switzerland Ministry of Justice at:
http://www.bj.admin.ch/bj/en/misc/conform.html?contactid=0360&backpagepath=/content/bj/en/tools/kontakte
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bradkt1 says:
He served his sentence? Not rebutting this nonsensical claim is the reason why the Swiss let him go? Please!

Did it ever ocur to anyone in the Swiss courts that if Roman Polanski served his sentence, there wouldn't be an arrest warrant out for him in the first place?

Let's face it...the Swiss were looking for a reason to let this confessed child rapist go...any reason. They have as little moral character or sense of decency as Mr. Polanski does. After all, these are the people who had no compunction when it came to dealing with Nazis and hiding their stolen loot, making it all but impossible for their victims to get at least some of what was stolen from them back...and now this.
reply
voxpopulus replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You are aware, I assume, how many Nazi rocket scientists we allowed into the States after the war? Read up on Operation Paperclip before you come out with such holier-than-thou nonsense about the Swiss.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wfw3536 says:
Where is the outrage from the women's rights groups and the Hollywood folks who claim to care about regular folks. Oh, that is right most of the Hollywood folks think this sex offended is ok. And the women's right groups are oh so still when they should be speaking out for someone who was a 13 year old victim. How sad.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
meshine says:
This proves that only poor people with no influence in society serve time in jail. If you're rich with a lot of influence, you can commit just about any heinous crime and not have to worry about serving time in jail. In my next frekking life, i want to be rich, famous and handsome.
reply
voxpopulus replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
In fact, there is plenty of evidence that it was Polanski's celebrity, and the fact that the judge in the original case was over-influenced by it, that stopped him from having a fair trial. The judge was a media hound, who - unheard of at the time - actually held press conferences in the middle of an ongoing trial, and decided to use Polanski's celebrity to "make an example" of him. For example, I'll bet you know very little about Victor Salva, who - unlike Polanski even in the eyes of the court - has committed textbook pedophilic acts.
See all 63 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right