By

CBSNews /

AP/ July 2, 2010, 8:49 AM

Hitler Film Reveals India's Nazi Fascination

Raul Rodriguez sits in a Houston courtroom Monday, June 11, 2012. Rodriguez is charged with murder in a triple shooting in 2010 that left one man dead and two others injured during a dispute over the neighbor's loud party. The retired Houston-area firefighter told a police dispatcher by phone that he feared for his life and was "standing his ground." (AP Photo/Pat Sullivan)

Raul Rodriguez sits in a Houston courtroom Monday, June 11, 2012. Rodriguez is charged with murder in a triple shooting in 2010 that left one man dead and two others injured during a dispute over the neighbor's loud party. The retired Houston-area firefighter told a police dispatcher by phone that he feared for his life and was "standing his ground." (AP Photo/Pat Sullivan) / Pat Sullivan

When word spread this month that Bollywood planned a movie called "Dear Friend Hitler," screenwriter Nalin Singh was genuinely shocked it stirred even a small controversy.

The media expressed disdain, Jewish groups were horrified and his lead actor - though a bit baffled by the reaction - quit.

While such a response would seem, if anything, understated in much of the world, Singh had reason to believe his film would not generate even a ripple of scandal in India.

Here, Hitler is not viewed as the personification of evil, but with an attitude of morally ambiguous fascination. He is seen as a management guru - akin to Machiavelli or Sun Tzu - by business students, and an object of wonder by people craving order amid the chaos of India.

"Indians still have a curiosity about Hitler. The Western audience has seen a lot of films on Hitler, but there was no Hindi film on him," says Singh, explaining the choice of subject for his first film, which he hopes will be made by the end of the year.

Without a major role in World War II, India does not have the intense feelings toward the Nazis that many other nations have. In Bollywood movies, characters routinely call each other "Hitler" as a minor insult, referring to a nagging wife or annoying boss.

But Indians also have a strange fascination with the Nazi dictator, whose brutal dictatorship and slaughter of 6 million Jews has made his name synonymous with the devil in the West.

A few years ago a restaurant named Hitler's Cross opened in the suburbs of Mumbai complete with posters of the dictator and swastikas for decor. Protests from Jewish groups forced the owners to change the name to The Cross Cafe.

A home furnishings company was forced to withdraw a line of bedspreads called NAZI amid similar complaints.

"Mein Kampf," Hitler's semi-autobiographical book outlining his anti-Semitic ideology, sells thousands of copies a year in the upmarket, air-conditioned bookstores of New Delhi.

The book, free of copyright in India, is printed by over half a dozen publishers. It is even a staple amid the small stack of top-selling books hawked by young boys at traffic lights in India's cities.

The book once helped inspire India's far right Hindu politicians, who often expressed open admiration for Hitler, but it is now appealing to a new generation of less political readers.

"It's basically the young crowd. The rebellious," says Anuj Bahri, who runs Bahrisons, a popular book store in New Delhi's posh Khan Market.

"It's a constant seller and sells one, two copies a day," he says, adding that part of the draw for its young readership seems to lie in the fact that Hitler "defied the whole world and challenged the whole world."

Sociologist Ashish Nandy says a confluence of reasons explains why Indians are drawn to both the man and the book.

For some readers, modern India is a country in chaos and, there is a "certain admiration" for Hitler and his extreme authoritarianism.

There is also India's colonial inheritance when "every enemy of Britain was a friend of India and at least potentially a good person," he says, adding that among today's young readers "there is kind a vague sense that it's about a person who gave a tough time to the Brits."

Tarun Singhal, a management student at New Delhi's prestigious Indian Institute of Technology, who first read the book as a young undergraduate, says for him the book is uplifting.

"(It) serves as a reminder that nothing is unachievable," he said, adding that he is able to separate that message from the book's pervasive anti-Semitic ideology.

India's interest in Hitler, mirrors Nazi Germany's in India as the home of the purportedly pure Aryan race - which formed the basis of the Nazis' notions of racial supremacy. The Nazis also co-opted the ancient Hindu symbol of the swastika for the Nazi Party flag and arm bands.

When news about the Indian film on Hitler came out earlier this month, it might have been a step too far.

The title is a reference to two letters written by Indian independence leader Mohandas Gandhi to Hitler.

The first written in 1939 asked the Nazi leader to help prevent a "war which may reduce humanity to the savage state."

India's tiny Jewish community condemned the film as insensitive and the lead actor Anupam Kher dropped out saying he didn't want to upset anyone.

"It's very hurtful," says Jonathan Solomon of the India Jewish Federation, of the film's title. "The Jews in India were not the victims of anti-Semitism or the Holocaust, but we feel for our brother Jews and this is very hurtful to Jews all over the world."

But Singh is determined to see his script - which he says juxtaposes the personality of the German dictator against India's Gandhi - on celluloid and has the support of the film's producers. If he's able to persuade Kher to return to the project or find a replacement, the film should be ready by the end of the year, he says.

"It's misleading to say our film is glorifying Hitler," he says, adding that he just wants to make an "authentic" film for the Hindi film audiences.
AP
10 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
iniyavank@gmail.com says:
CBS, shame on your ignorant viewpoint, Indian army under the crown at the start of the war was 200,000 men strong, thats at 1939 , easily more than the americans fighting at that time, by 1945, we we 2.5 million fighting ( ask about it to your editor or better still check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Army_during_World_War_II )
if it was not for the Indians, i am sure you would not be there to write this crap, next time please do some proper research ( everyone has internet nowadays?)
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
byrdh5n1 says:
Without a major role in WWII!!!??? Ask the Japanese about that.....
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
haagendas23 says:
As an Indian-American, I must say most of the country there doesn't know much about the horrors of what Hitler did. There was an attempted alliance with Shubas Chandra Bose, a Bengali freedom fighter. Bose wanted to weaken the Brits so he tried to broker something with the Axis powers. He was presumed dead after a plane crash from Japan, but his body never found. Consider his relationship to Gandhi as Malcolm X's relationship to Martin Luther King, Jr.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
zootropolis says:
Adam Sandler makes some funny movies.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
j_flood says:
Indian's fascination? What keeps the "Hitler Channel", oops I mean "History Channel" going? I swear half of the documentaries are about Hitler and how close the Nazi's came to winning WWII. Some of the language suggests that people actually did wish he won. In my opinion there is too much time and money spent on re-telling WWII - but the public seems to crave it all over the globe.
reply
haagendas23 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The fascination with WW II was the scale of it and how it was really what the planet looks like in a full, total war situation. We thankfully have not had to deal with the destruction that something like that brings, eventhough our lack of mobilization in the War on Terror is what's causing conflicts like Afghanistan to draw out. Another reason was because there is more readily available footage from it too. The battle lines were clear and it was a "good v evil" strategy with the country united against the enemy. Today, we don't have unity against an equally viscious threat, the Jihdists.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
eiddam says:
Apparently some wealthy Americans were also fascinated about Hitler, or perhaps just his policies. The American Liberty League, which included the likes of Prescott Bush,-and some the duPonts, as well as others, wanted to overthrow the US government, oust FDR. to implement Hiterian fascist policies in 1934. Prescott Bush's grandson, George almost did, and the Tea Party may succeed in 2012.
reply
haagendas23 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Nice strawman. Another swipe by "open-minded progressives" against the Tea Party for having a different point of view on the economy (the only issue that unites them). The far-left in the last 10 years has engaged in a jihad to destroy anyone with whom they disagree with as opposed to having civil discussions about ideas...much like the Nazis. The Nazis have many similarities with the far-left...both believed in centralized government power, both engaged in defamtion and destruction of the opposition and both were highly anti-semitic. It's ironic how the far-left calls anyone that disagrees with them Nazis (anyone who ranges from moderate liberal to centrist to right or far-right) when the Nazis full name was the National SOCIALIST German Worker's Party
linkicon reporticon emailicon
skepticalJM says:
Another result of the capitalist mindset. Anything for a rupee!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
baileyccc says:
No matter how you feel about Hitler, history will make him the most famous person of the 20th century. posted by baileyccc
reply