CBS/AP/ June 28, 2010, 4:58 AM

Oil Spill's Economic Impact Mostly Local

The BP oil spill has hammered the fishing and tourism industries along the Gulf of Mexico. But it appears the economic damage to the rest of the nation will be limited.

Analysts say the spill will reduce economic growth by only about one-half of 1 percentage point this quarter, and even less during the second half of the year. Even for an economy as large as the United States' - $14.6 trillion - a $73 billion cut is barely a nick.

Here's why:

• Spending on tourism is moving elsewhere. Beachgoers who might have headed for Pensacola, Fla., for example, are looking toward Atlantic coast sites such as Myrtle Beach, S.C. Gulf hotel rooms going unused by tourists are being booked by cleanup crews.

• Damage to Gulf fishermen may last, but, as with tourism, the Gulf's commercial fishing makes up only a tiny fraction of the U.S. economy. And most fish eaten in the United States is imported, says Michael Feroli, an economist at JPMorgan Chase.

• The Gulf energy industry, which makes up about 10 percent of the regional economy, is not vital to the nation's. The six-month ban on deepwater drilling that a judge blocked Tuesday would only deduct about 0.03 percent from the U.S. economy.

• If deepwater drilling becomes too much of a financial burden and oil companies move their rigs abroad, coastal communities in Louisiana and Texas would be hurt. But the national impact would be slight because of how small a portion of U.S. oil consumption the Gulf supplies, says Ed Friedman, economist at Moody's Analytics - less than 10 percent.

Special Section: Gulf Coast Oil Disaster

The local communities will suffer damage to their economies and environments for years, even if the spill is capped later this summer. Wells Fargo economist Mark Vitner estimates that up to 250,000 Gulf jobs in fishing, tourism and energy will be lost in the second half of the year.

The new jobs in cleanup won't make up for what's been lost, and will probably pay less, Vitner and others say.

As CBS News correspondent Kelly Cobiella reports, there is renewed anger that many of those newly-created jobs in the cleanup effort are going to out-of-state boat owners, rather than the Gulf fishermen and tour operators who have seen their earnings cut off by the spill.

BP's Gulf Hiring Creates Hostility

Captain Craig Bielkiewicz hasn't had a charter fishing customer for two months, ever since the spill put an end to fishing in the waters off Grande Isle, Louisiana. He applied to work for BP three weeks ago, but tells CBS he hasn't heard back.

Yet every day he sees boats from out of state on the water, busy protecting his backyard.

With many of their fellow Gulf residents out of work, consumers in the region will spend less as a result.

That will lower the U.S. economy's growth rate in the July-to-September quarter by a slight 0.2 percentage point, Vitner said. He envisions little or no effect on growth in the fourth quarter of the year, assuming the leak is plugged by then.

Some cleanup jobs are paying $15 to $18 an hour. By contrast, the thousands of rig workers idled by the deepwater drilling moratorium earn up to $1,800 a week - roughly $45 an hour, trade groups estimate. That amounts to a collective loss of tens of millions of dollars in pay.

Fishermen earn less - on average about $13 an hour, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics says. But the destruction of fishing industry jobs is still taking a heavy toll.

Take Rocky Ditcharo, a dock owner in Plaquemines Parish, La., whose family has been in the shrimping business for four generations. Shrimpers sidelined by the spill aren't using his dock. Neither are boats involved in containing the spill by laying booms.

Ditcharo, 44, survived Katrina and other hurricanes. But he fears this may be the end of his business.

"I'm in dire straits," he says.

BP has committed to a $20 billion fund for oil-spill victims. In addition, it will pay $100 million into another fund to help oil workers sidelined by the moratorium on deepwater drilling. And President Obama has pledged additional resources to the coastal states, though he hasn't provided details.

All the promises have failed to satisfy some Gulf leaders that enough is being done to protect their states.

Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour said over the weekend that he's pressing BP and federal officials to increase resources in Mississippi, where oil has reached the shoreline and continues to flow into the waters around barrier islands.

"While command and control of on-water resources has improved, it must get much better and the amount of resources to attack the oil offshore must be greatly increased," Barbour said in an e-mailed statement.

The governor said "under the circumstances, we are taking some of that into our own hands." Officials announced Friday the state has contracted to buy skimmers being built by two Mississippi companies.

Some economists also say the promises from BP and the government to restore the region will likely fall short, and could leave some affected people and businesses awaiting help years from now. Vitner points to Hurricane Katrina and New Orleans, where many buildings and homes await restoration. Businesses are still shuttered.

Vitner and others fear a similar scenario this time: A local economy remains devastated even as the national economy moves ahead.

"This particular situation is much more than can be measured by GDP," says Lynn Reaser, president of the National Association for Business Economics. "It is a real tragedy for people's livelihoods and culture in the region."
© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
11 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
credibility_problem says:
Tourism in California is up 5% since the spill. California had a similar huge spill that coated the coastline in 1969, and ended up banning new offshore drilling. As a result, our beaches aren't coated with oil, so the tourists have re-booked.

The people of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama have all backed offshore oil expansion, however - but the people who really got shafted are from Florida, who, despite having blocked new offshore drilling, are still getting stuck with the results.

Maybe they'll all wise up and ban new offshore drilling?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ronaldr5-2009 says:
How come sand berm dredging has been stopped off Louisiana?

How come the water is bubbling just off the Florida beaches?

How come the Military wasn't mobilized to the Gulf for 52 days?

How come there are still "fire extinguisher issue" on the sucker barges?

How come only 31 of nearly 2,000 skimmers are off Florida?

How come Florida must pay for additional skimmers?

How come Mississippi can't get a skimmer?

How come there are still miles of oil booms stockpiled in warehouses?

How come we've accepted help from only 5 of the 28 Countries who have offered assistance?

How come it took 53 days to accept help from "exploration experts" like Great Britain and Holland?

How come our Government doesn't seem to care about any of this?
reply
dronemonk replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
how come you're peddling serf-like propaganda?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
consh8theusa says:
Besides, in three weeks BP will plug the leak, Britany Spears will discover a pimple on her butt and the media and public will turn to something else.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
consh8theusa says:
I'm all for BP paying for the damage and cleanup but, "will pay $100 million into another fund to help oil workers sidelined by the moratorium on deepwater drilling",........the moratorium is a government imposed one, why should BP pay for their lost jobs?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
JJASMAN says:
DON'T WORRY BE HAPPY.........
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
parisdakar says:
Oh, so that's supposed to make us feel better? Only the roobs that live down there will have their lives ruined, so the rest of the country can go back to not giving a crap? Nice.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
larrryshrine says:
There are lies, damn lies and statistics. This story is full of the latter, which makes for dry reading and paints an inaccurate picture of what has become the greatest ecological disaster in this country's history. Try showing this story to a shrimper who is out of business, or the motel owner who has no guests. Try thinking of this story when you are cleaning an oil-fouled bird. This is a nation of individuals, and we all should feel affected by this tragedy.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ahrats says:
It's easy for all these analysis to say its not hurting the economy, they are not the ones trying to survive this diaster. Pensacola and much of the gulf coast relies on the tourist dollar, so now the Carolinas make all the money while the gulf is leftout in the cold. This something that next year will still be a problem for this area, oil will keep washing up on beaches for years to come.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sean56v says:
Jamaica and Mexico should issue reports on petroleum reaching their shores and destroying the fish.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sean56v says:
This misconceived AP story on economics is a ridiculous shill for BP. The Gulf oil spill reaches Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida. Mexico and Jamiaca restrict reports on this situation. America seriously lost equity over the last two years. Losses in the fish industry and unemployment will undermine value throughout the region. The Obama Admin has no other choice but spend money there for disaster recovery.
reply
See all 11 Comments