Congress Agrees on Sweeping Financial Reform

(CBS/AP)  Last Updated 12:31 p.m. ET

President Barack Obama declared victory Friday after congressional negotiators worked all night before agreeing to a sweeping overhaul of the way Wall Street does business.

Lawmakers shook hands on the compromise legislation at 5:39 a.m. EDT after Obama administration officials helped broker a deal that cracked the last impediment to the bill, a proposal to force banks to spin off their lucrative derivatives trading business.

The agreement now must go to the full Senate and House of Representatives for final votes and was expected to be on Mr. Obama's desk for signing before the U.S. July 4 holiday marking American independence from Britain.

The measure would be the second major legislative triumph for a president who has seen his favorable rating drop as the country watches oil continue to gush into the Gulf of Mexico more than two months after a BP well blew out on the ocean bottom.

Financial Reform Bill: What Made the Cut
Wall St. Reform Bill Greeted with Skepticism
Financial Reform: What's In It For Consumers?
Wall Street Reform: A Summary
Obama: Overhaul Has 90%of What I Proposed
Special Section: Wall Street Under Fire

That, combined with a very difficult economy, high unemployment and worries about the U.S. war effort in Afghanistan, has hit hard against Mr. Obama and his Democratic majorities in Congress just four months ahead of congressional elections.

Speaking to reporters as he left the White House to attend an economic summit of world leaders in Toronto, Canada, the president said he was gratified for Congress' work and said the deal included 90 percent of what he had proposed. He said the bill, forged in the aftermath of the 2008 financial meltdown, represents the toughest financial overhaul since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

"We've all seen what happens when there is inadequate oversight and insufficient transparency on Wall Street," Mr. Obama said. "The reforms working their way through Congress will hold Wall Street accountable so we can help prevent another financial crisis like the one that we're still recovering from."

But the bill doesn't do the the one thing it set to accomplish: prevent the next financial melt-down, writes CBS MoneyWatch.com's editor-at-large Jill Schlesinger, who said the legislation doesn't address the "interconnectedness and size of financial institutions in a meaningful way."

"The watered down elements are a start, but they don't get us there. In the end, Congress wimped out, which may have something to do with the 2500 financial industry lobbyists that flooded DC during these negotiations," Schlesinger said.

Similarly, pundits and analysts around the country met the news with skepticism.

Congress' expected final passage of the measure will give Mr. Obama an extra tool in his meetings in Toronto, where many of the assembled leaders have been critical of the U.S. financial system. They largely blame the United States for the worldwide spread of the economic slowdown gripping the globe.

Asked by reporters whether he can get the financial measure through the Senate, Mr. Obama said, "You bet." With the new health care law, passage of the legislation would give Mr. Obama a second major triumph that he and Democrats can take to voters as they head toward a tough election in November. Senate Democrats are trying to coalesce around the third big-ticket item on Mr. Obama's domestic agenda, passage of clean energy legislation.

He said he will discuss the regulations with other leaders at the Toronto meeting because the recent economic crisis proves that the world's economies are linked.

The legislation touches on an exhaustive range of financial transactions, from a debit card swipe at a supermarket to the most complex securities deals cut in downtown Manhattan.

Lawmakers hope the House of Representatives and Senate will approve the compromise legislation even though Republicans complained the bill overreached and tackled financial issues that were not responsible for the financial crisis.

The legislation would set up a warning system for financial risks, would create a powerful consumer financial protection bureau to police lending, would force large failing firms to liquidate and would set new rules for financial instruments that have been largely unregulated until now.

"It took a crisis to bring us to the point where we could actually get this job done," Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd said.

In its breadth, the legislation would affect working class home buyers negotiating their first mortgage as well as international finance ministers negotiating international regulatory regimes.

The bill came together during a time of high unemployment for American workers, huge bonuses for bankers and rising antipathy toward bank bailouts.

"It is reassuring to know that when public opinion gets engaged it will win," said Rep. Barney Frank, the Democratic chairman of the House-Senate panel that merged House and Senate bills into one piece of legislation.

House negotiators voted a party line 20-11 in favor of the final agreement; senators voted 7-5, also along party lines.

[spaceatoms]

I long again for the summer of 2009 with Adam and the gang and stocks popping like a 4 incher in the Gulf instead of a 19 incher that the lawyers want so bad, mmmmm, its so good now, now raise it boys....mmmm

[nolieshere]

The votes were 'Along Party Lines'. Guess which party voted against the people in favor of the corporations.

[earl21048]

This bill is unconstitutional.

[pubsrtoast]

Oh, Congress doesn't have the right to regulate commerce? Please explain to the rest of us why this is.

[bajajohn1]

Republicans are the missing link in the evolutionary chain. How in the world do Republicans stick to a party-line vote knowing fully well that Wall Street shenanigans nearly destroyed the global economy. Still, they vote like little drones, following Queen Boehner and his evil twin, McConnell in opposing regulation to rein-in the corruption. If anyone should be voted out in November, it must be the Republicans. Republicans obstruct and destroy hope in our nation.

[dadirt]

Barney takes credit for sweepeing reform and not now allowing loans that they know wil not be paid back, and HE IS ONE OF THE ONES THAT PUSHED THROUGH THE BILLS THAT ALLOWED IT AND NOW HE IS BLAMING AIG! These damned politians must be helt to a high standard, and these liars MUST BE EXPOSED FOR THE HIPOCRITICS THEY ARE!

[pw08-2009]

Obamma claims victory, but everyone in America (at least American Citizens) knows that we will not see any REAL benefit from this and will most likely see more expenses and higher taxes. Obamma's administration is a complete failure and they turn their backs on the American citizens, just like the illegal aliens have turned their backs on Mexico (and they wave Mexico's flag here in the US). Isn't it wonderful?

[jsachse]

This article doesn't even mention the $19 billion dollars over 10 years they plan on collecting from the banks to pay for this bill. So the large banks have to pay a fee...where do you think they'll get the money to cover that fee...because you can be pretty sure their revenue is not going down. You can bet it's going to cost "mainstreet" more to bank...this way congress doesn't have to call it a tax increase.

[pubsrtoast]

So go to a credit union.

[pubsrtoast]

by Mortar_29 June 25, 2010 1:57 PM EDT
How foolish, Omega. The rules were always there. They werent enforced.
--------------------------------------------------------------

There were no rules on derivatives and default credit swaps, and there was certainly a lessening of the "rules" with the demise of glass stiegel.

[bajajohn1]

Yes, Mortar you can thank the porn-watching Bush SEC.

[skepticalJM]

It's the same old crap: The incentive for people to buy with what they don't yet have, and end up paying for their private property for the rest of their lives!

Where real reform is needed is where it is not done:

Breaking up the huge Global Monopolies and their influence on our government.

Creating tax reform that stops the poor and middle class from picking up the tab for the rich.

Putting income caps in place that make the rich responsible to our society.

Lowering the cost of energy for our people, and making the Utilities non-profit companies.

Making the rich re-channel all their contributions to charity back to their own society, instead of creating a new generation of slaves in the third world through pretended concern over the same misery they have caused there.

Stopping all outsourcing and off shoring so we can bring back the jobs we need to keep us from becoming another third world country ourselves.

Stopping the speculators from controlling the prices of our homes and creating broken neighborhoods and slums as a result.

Making schools and colleges that create responsible citizens, instead of money-hungry profiteers, preying on their own society.

And finally stopping business from turning the responsible freedom of Democracy into the irresponsible freedom of "only I count!"

[rplat]

A little accuracy in reporting please . . . it's not "congress" that agrees, it's the leftists in congress that agree. This is just another move toward Obama's Marxist state.

[thanksgreed]

No, it's just another Obama "I want special interests to LUV me" thing and Dodd wants a cushy retirement.