By

CBSNews /

AP/ June 24, 2010, 11:30 PM

Republicans Kill Senate Unemployment Bill

Republicans on Thursday defeated Democrats' showcase election-year jobs bill, including an extension of weekly unemployment benefits for millions of people out of work more than six months.

The 57-41 vote fell three votes short of the 60 required to crack a GOP filibuster, delivering a major blow to President Barack Obama and Democrats facing big losses of House and Senate seats in the fall election.

The rejected bill would also have provided $16 billion in new aid to states, preserving the jobs of thousands of state and local government workers and providing what White House officials called an insurance policy against a double-dip recession. It also included dozens of tax breaks sought by business lobbyists, and tax increases on domestically produced oil and on investment fund managers.

The demise of the bill means that unemployment benefits will phase out for more than 200,000 people a week. Governors who had been counting on federal aid will now have to consider a fresh round of budget cuts, tax hikes and layoffs of state workers.

"This is a bill that would remedy serious challenges that American families face as a result of this Great Recession," said Max Baucus, D-Mont., the chief author of the bill. "This is a bill that works to build a stronger economy. This is a bill to put Americans back to work."

The bill has been sharply pared back after weeks of negotiations with GOP moderates Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine. The most recent version, unveiled Wednesday night, contained new cuts to food stamps and pared back the state aid provision to allow Democrats to claim the measure was fully paid for except for the unemployment insurance extension.

That didn't move Republicans like Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

"It adds new taxes and over $30 billion to an already staggering $13 trillion dollar national debt," said McConnell.

Only one Democrat, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, voted with Republicans. Another, Robert Byrd of West Virginia, did not vote.

After the Senate vote, the House passed by a 417-1 vote a measure to reverse a 21 percent federal fee cut imposed last week on doctors providing care to seniors on Medicare. That measure was one of the most important contained in the now-dead catchall bill, but was broken out and passed separately by the Senate last week.

The House's move would send the stand-alone Medicare fee fix to Obama for his signature.

Democrats hope that political pressure from voters outraged about the cutoff of jobless benefits averaging $300 a week and from business groups seeking renewal of longstanding tax breaks might eventually revive the bill.

The latest version of the measure contains a variety of provisions sought by lawmakers in both parties, anchored by the jobless aid and dozens of tax cuts sought by the business groups. The latest draft would add $33 billion to the deficit - down from the $80 billion deficit impact of the measure when it came to the floor two weeks ago.

The catchall measure also includes farm disaster aid, $1 billion for a youth summer jobs initiative and an extension of a bond program that subsidizes interest costs for state and local infrastructure projects. It would levy a new tax on investment fund managers but extend tax breaks such as lucrative credits that help businesses finance research and develop new products, and a sales tax deduction that mainly helps people in states without income taxes.

The death of the measure would mean that more than 200,000 people a week would lose their jobless benefits because they would be unable to reapply for additional tiers of benefits enacted since 2008. People seeking the popular homebuyer tax credit would be denied a paperwork extension approved by the Senate last week. And state and local governments would lose subsidies on bonds they issue to finance infrastructure projects.

It also includes $4.6 billion to settle a long-running class-action lawsuit brought by black farmers against the Agriculture Department for discrimination and another by American Indians involving the government's management and accounting of more than 300,000 trust accounts.

By the end of this week, more than 1.2 million people will have lost their jobless benefits since a temporary extension expired at the beginning of the month, according to Labor Department estimates.

Thirty states had been counting on federal support to help balance their budgets for the fiscal year beginning next week since a $24 billion version had earlier passed both House and Senate. Without the money, governors warn they'll have to lay off tens of thousands of workers.

Crestfallen Democrats tried in vain to win support from moderate Republicans Snowe, Collins and Scott Brown of Massachusetts. They voted in March to defeat a filibuster.

"The debt is out of control," Brown said. "Since I did that last time, the debt's at over $13 trillion and rising."

The bill has long been considered a must-pass measure, but the political sands have shifted since it first passed in March. That vote came in the wake of a political scalding for Republicans after Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Ky., blocked a short-term extension of jobless aid.

In the interim, however, the debt crisis in Europe and growing anxiety on deficits and debt among voters has turned Republicans against the legislation, even though it's been cut considerably since passage of a March version that would have added about $100 billion to the debt.

Most of the measure - except for a six-month extension of jobless benefits for people who have been out of work for more than six months - is financed with offsetting tax increases or spending cuts. Congress has always approved additional unemployment benefits as a deficit-financed emergency measure.

Democratic leaders said they bent over backwards to accommodate demands by Republicans for a smaller measure. Among the cuts revealed Wednesday was a more than $10 billion cut from last year's stimulus bill, mostly buy paring back food stamp benefits by about $11 a month per beneficiary.

"They asked to have it reduced, we did it," said Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash. "They asked to have it paid for, we did it."

Just before the vote, Snowe said she opposed the measure because of new taxes on small businesses. She said Democrats had gone back on an offer to delete a tax provision aimed at small businesses that shelter income as dividends exempt from payroll taxes.

Snowe said the measure was drafted too broadly and would have ensnared businesses that aren't abusing the system.
AP
176 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jinc64 says:
I can not understand how we care take care of other countries, and bail out all these corporations and pay Senators $174,000.00 a year But we CAN NOT help our own. I think that it is time to take care of the USA! I just applied today for unemployment.....and to know that I have 20+ weeks to find a job is very scary when you see that reports that there are jobs available.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
48jules says:
What does the tax extension bill, Indian tribal bill, and the unemployment extension have in common? NOTHING. Then why are they all balled up together? That's why the unemployment extension isn't passing. What idiots we have elected to be the stewards of our country. Whom do I sue because I lose my vehicle, can't afford my diabetes supplies, only get 240.00 a month for child support. I will probably die, I was paying for my own insurance, diabetes supplies, and could at least keep my head above water. Not now. And once again Obama, thanks for lying. He snuck a change into the healtcare reform. The ideology that private insurance companies would have to offer insurance to ALL pre-diagnosed clients is a lie, its for children only.

I'm packing all of my bills up and sending them to ALL of the senators.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
warrr92 says:
I think if they dont pass something soon riots and some sort of retaliation from the people might occur. They must remember that the unemployed numbers are very big and many people will lose everything if they havent already. Something must be done or utter chaos might happen
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dubbedmvp says:
I think congress is playing games with the lives of the citizens of our country. They don't know what it's like to go from having a decent job to competing with thousands of others for the same job. Do they really think it's smart to cut people off without warning? Do they not care? It sure seems that way as we watch helplessly while our two party system plays senseless games at the expense of the people.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
used2bemployed says:
I guarantee you, all those who failed to help the people of this country in their time of need will not be receive our votes come the next election!! Let' see how you like losing your means to support your families! This is just NOT RIGHT!! There ARE NO JOBS and the few there are being applied to by many and we have no say as to who they call for a job!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Registered_Voter says:
If the Senators who voted against this do not understand the difficulties involved in being unemployed. Then I feel we should "Unemploy" them next election
reply
48jules replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Uh, I think they should be impeached now.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
looking4work says:
Do the Senators that we elected relize what this will do to us, or do they even care. I am a 56 year old woman that was laid off last summer. I have been dillagently seeking employment everyday. I now am one of the 200,000 per week that lost thier benifits. I will be evicted from my house next week because I can't pay my rent. Almost all employers tell you to go to the website to fill out applications and with no funds I won't be able to afford the internet, a phone or anything else. Maybe one of them might have a room for me to live in God knows if it effected them it would have passed the first go round. I have 20.00 to my name and do't know where to turn to. I have worked since I was 15 years old and this is only the 2nd time I have ever filed for unemployment. What happened to all the money I paid in, oh yeah this is the government we are dealing with. The welfare rolls are going to skyrocket and you don't think that will also be a burden.
reply
hopelessinsc replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Eventually welfare will run out of funds as so many people will be asking for help. This whole situation has me so scared that I cannot sleep at night. I've been unemployed for almost 2 years. My family cannot understand why I cannot get a job. When there are hundreds of people applying for 1 job, its almost luck of the draw. I would love to move to a big city where I may have a better chance finding a job with my MBA, but with my messed up credit from falling behind on the bills, I know my husband and I could not get approved for a house, and the house we own now, probably would not sell as it needs a lot of work, that we of course, cannot afford to do. Good luck to you and to the rest of us out there in the land of unemployment.
48jules replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
What I think is ironic is that now states are *******' because of the money they're spending on food stamps, medicaid, tanf.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gdubyac says:
I lost my job where I lived so I moved to where the work is. I didn't want to move, but that's the way it is. It's important that I work so I can support your 99 weeks of sitting on your ass with my taxes.
reply
48jules replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Not everyone can just pick up and move you idiot, and the government does take taxes out of unemployment. Maybe if you weren't such a lazy ass you would read.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
darioantonio says:
I'm sure that there are plenty of unemployed average Joes out there that are Republicans. Remember the names of the reps that voted against this bill. I can understand the objection to adding to the national debt, but unemp ext benefits are taxed, so there will be some money going back. Also there are people who worked only a few years (some only a few months) and got to collect 99 weeks of benefits. I worked 39 years without ever collecting unemp, and now that I was about to enter the 2nd tier, I'm being cut off. This is effing bullsh*t! The only way this country can get out of this economic collapse is to abolish the 16th amendment and the IRS and replace it with a national sales tax.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jacquesmyers says:
Someone broke into my home and tied my whole family up, then proceeded to mentally abuse us, I have two 3 and 8 year old girls, an 18 year old son, and a wife.There was no way out, I feared most for my little girls,there not as strong as the rest of us.One of the men would yell out along with a wicked laugh, "stop crying! if you want to leave then just leave" as he pointed to the front door knowing we were all still tied up with someone guarding both doors.They start going through the house taking everything in sight putting our hard earned things in front of us lighting them on fire, the heat alone was killing us.They took all the money in the house and stuffed it in their pockets,while doing all of this I saw the law outside, they must of seen the smoke.One of the crooks looked outside and then said to us" they will never take you alive", then I quickly new this was a hostage situation.Looking at my families tearful eyes they asked (my family) "what are we going to do ?" so I told them God is with us,lets pray. THEN I WOKE UP,WHAT A CRAZY DREAM WHY DID I DREAM SOMETHING SO HORRIBLE, WOW I FEEL LIKE IT STILL HAPPEN,OH YEA THE republicans
reply
See all 176 Comments