The constant drone of cheap and tuneless plastic horns is killing the atmosphere at the World Cup.
Where are loud choruses of "Oooohhhs" from enthralled crowds when a shot scorches just wide of the goalpost? And the sharp communal intake of breath, the shrill "Aaahhhhss" when a goalkeeper makes an acrobatic, match-winning save? Or the humorous/moving/offensive football chants and songs?
Mostly, they're being drowned out by the unrelenting water-torture beehive hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm of South African vuvuzela trumpets. Damn them. They are stripping World Cup 2010 of football's aural artistry.
Vuvuzela apologists - a few more weeks of this brainless white noise will perhaps change, or melt, their minds - defend the din as simply part of the South African experience. Each country to its own, they say. When in Rome, blah, blah, blah. Get with the par-tee and blow, man.
Which would be fine if this was purely a South African competition. Fans could then legitimately hoot away to their hearts' content while annoying no one other than their immediate neighbors.
But this is the World Cup, a celebration of the 32 nations that qualified and all that did not, but still play and love the game. Hosting planet football brings responsibilities. At the very least, South Africa should ensure that the hundreds of millions of visitors who come in goodwill to its door, both in person and via the magic of television, do not go home with a migraine.
How many TV viewers, longing for a more nuanced soundtrack to go with the show, have already concluded that the only way to enjoy this World Cup is by pressing mute on their remote?
In Tweeting, "No offense to the vuvuzela posse but, man, it's a bit much," seven-time Tour de France champion Lance Armstrong was not alone.
Attending or watching a match should be a feast for the eyes and ears. Those two senses work better together, each augmenting the other.
Sounds should ebb and flow like tides with the fortunes on the field. That adds to the drama. Fans reacting with their voices to action on the pitch, to events in the stadium and to each other's sounds, songs and chants are part of football's theater. Outside of South Africa, they are.
A sudden crowd silence can also tell a story - perhaps of the heartbreak of a late, defeat-inflicting goal or of the shock of seeing a player horribly injured by a bad tackle. Sometimes, you should even be able to hear a coach bark orders from the touchline or players shouting at each other for the ball.
There are stadium sounds other than vuvuzelas at this World Cup - just not enough of them. They are being bullied into submission by the trumpets' never-ending screech.
There were scattered unison chants of "In-ger-land, In-ger-land," a few bars of "God Save the Queen" and the occasional "USA! USA!" when England played the United States on Saturday night. But vuvuzelas ultimately won the battle of the bands. They and the result - a disappointing 1-1 tie - silenced England's fans, who usually are among the best-drilled noisemakers in football.
They take their singing seriously, with chants that are cheeky, taunting and often insulting. But at least they are inventive.
The same cannot be said of vuvuzelas. They are simply mindless. Their pitch doesn't change, only the intensity. Blow hard. Blow soft. The range is from horrifically loud to just annoyingly so.
Please, South Africa, make them stop. Give us a song, instead.
John Leicester is an international sports columnist for The Associated Press.
For those that are complaining.....get over it! I've been to many games in Europe and the "singing" people are referring to you hear on the TV is actually filtered, why, because most of the songs have swearing, are derogatory or antagonise (in a malicious way) the opposition e.g. singing what the Germans did in WW2 or singing about Liverpool fans killing their own fans (referring to Hillsborough), or sing racist songs or throw coins at players......there are plenty examples. Europe also brings much more colour to football than in Africa such as hooligans and organised fighting between clubs & countries etc. etc. Even with all these joys that European football brings I still support my team (Liverpool). This is African, yes you will like some of the customs and some not, why not try to out-singing the vuvuzela.......ideally with something more creative than England, England, England, England, England, England, blah, blah, blah. This is not Europe, this is Africa, we will not change. When is Rome do as the Roman's do.......Africa welcomes you with open arms.....if you don't like it tough, you can exercise your right and leave.
by incog-nito June 14, 2010 2:41 AM EDT Halve the goal? Lose the goalie? Well each team would just post five or six guys on front of the goal at all times. It's going to be a really low scoring game then. ----
The phrase "man-on-man" appears to befuddle you....
This is what you get from 8 years of Bush!!! ------------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual, you've got it all wrong. This is what you get after only a year-and-a half of Obama.
But it gives the brain dead something to do while watching the most boring sport on the planet..... ------------------------------------------------------------------------
I take it that you don't define Golf as a sport?
To paraphrase Bart Simpson, I didn't know that something could suck and blow at the same time...fortunately I have a mute button, and I use it while I'm snoozing in front of the TV showing another spell-binding 0-0 game. Or I change the channel to Univision and watch the f?tbol in Spanish!
Oh, i get it! Billions of people around the world love the game of "Football" but since a lot of Americans find it Boring & call it "Soccer" then that settles it! Because everyone knows that the U.S. is right in Everything & only their opinion matters. America, join the rest of the World for once! You are not as "Exceptional" as you Obnoxiously & Boringly try to convince yourselves & the rest of the World !
I know soccer/football is a national obsession in many countries, however, matching that obsession with incessant, distracting, mind numbing noise from horns only shows those of us who do not like soccer another reason to avoid the sport. If you are so eaten up by soccer that you need to honk a f***ing horn constantly, it merely reinforces the negative image you have made for yourself and all your other soccer hooting fans. It's even annoying on the television.
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Reply to Comment The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Halve the goal? Lose the goalie? Well each team would just post five or six guys on front of the goal at all times. It's going to be a really low scoring game then.
----
The phrase "man-on-man" appears to befuddle you....
This is what you get from 8 years of Bush!!!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual, you've got it all wrong. This is what you get after only a year-and-a half of Obama.
But it gives the brain dead something to do while watching the most boring sport on the planet.....
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I take it that you don't define Golf as a sport?
Imagine how boring basketball would be if a 7-footer was allowed to goal-tend all game....
Sheesh.