June 11, 2010 12:53 PM

Adm. Thad Allen in Hot Seat over Spill

 

(CBS/AP)  Updated 10:55 a.m. ET

The oil spoiling the teeming marshes and white-sand beaches of the Gulf Coast is also threatening the pristine image of the burly, take-charge leader who has become the federal government's go-to guy in a disaster.

Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, one of the few federal officials whose reputation survived Hurricane Katrina intact, is facing growing criticism that he and his agency are overwhelmed by the catastrophe. It's unfamiliar territory for a former Coast Guard Academy football captain who has managed responses to crises that include the earthquake in Haiti, Katrina and the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Special Section: Disaster in the Gulf

"It's very discombobulated and disorganized," Orange Beach, Ala., Mayor Tony Kennon said of the federal response after tar balls stained the beach and entered Perdido Bay this week, without protection from booms. "They had five weeks to get ready for this, and it still happened."

Back in 2005, most leaders in the Gulf had kinder words for Allen's operations after then-President George W. Bush tapped him to take over the widely panned Hurricane Katrina response initially led by former FEMA Director Michael Brown.

Allen was credited with turning the effort around. And when the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded on April 20, the White House was so confident it had the right man to lead the response that it persuaded Allen to delay his planned May retirement.

Allen, 61, who relinquished his role as head of the Coast Guard but is staying on as the spill's national incident commander, has since become the public face of the government's efforts. The Obama administration is increasingly relying on him in White House press briefings and elsewhere to try to assure the public that the government is in charge. Briefing reporters this week, Allen came off cool, calm and confident.

But just as Katrina brought unforeseen challenges, the oil spill has proved unprecedented and unwieldy. Allen is taking his lumps.

Early on, the Coast Guard was widely viewed as giving BP too much control on the scene, effectively looking the other way when the company offered misleadingly rosy assessments. Allen, for example, went along for weeks with BP's insistence that measuring the amount of oil spewing from the well was unimportant, only later pressing for accurate figures after scientists complained that it could help officials plan for containing the mess and account for liability.

More coverage:

With Gulf Oil Flow, Bad Keeps Getting Worse
Local Oil Spill Leaders Vent on Washington
Has Gulf Disaster Caused Brit Bashing?
BP Execs Invited to Obama Meeting
Ask CBS News: Is Burning Oil on Water Effective?
Obama: I Won't Forget Rig Workers Families
White House, BP Headed for Showdown on Spill?
BP Vows Faster Payment of Claims as Anger Mounts

There's also the Katrina-like gap between what federal officials say is happening and what local leaders say they are seeing. Since the beginning, Allen has insisted the government and BP deployed more resources than needed. That is consistently disputed by local and state officials who complain of poor coordination, shortages of boom and skimmers, agonizing delays in getting responses to requests and a general reluctance to try new or experimental cleanup strategies.

While BP has taken the brunt of it, much of the criticism also is falling on Allen, the son of a Coast Guard man who rose through the ranks to become the 23rd commandant of the agency in 2006.

"I have spent more time fighting the officials of BP and the Coast Guard than fighting the oil," Plaquemines Parish President Billy Nungesser said. "We've got to find someone to put in charge who has the guts and the will to make some decisions."

Nungesser's parish includes the Louisiana marshes first hit by oil a month ago where recently pelicans were found coated with thick oil.

David Camardelle, mayor of Grand Isle, La., said he meets daily with state and federal officials but that when he brings up a problem or offers a solution he's told "BP or EPA, or the Coast Guard is going to have to approve this before we can do anything."

"How can we accept that when our lives depend on their action," Camardelle asked, testifying Thursday before a Senate Homeland Security subcommittee.

At a Friday press briefing, a reporter asked Allen about complaints from local officials - including one who was brought to tears - over the sluggish and bureaucratic response to the six-week-old crisis.

Allen said that he had dispatched Coast Guard liaisons to every local official three weeks ago and that he could only respond to specific concerns leaders say aren't being addressed.

"The parish presidents have a conduit into the incident command and the president every night on a conference call," he said.

Asked by another reporter if he "trusts" BP, Allen said "We have to have a cooperative … relationship."

During briefings with reporters, Allen has noted the frustration of dealing with a spill across the Gulf. He frequently points to the number of fishermen and shrimpers who have been enlisted into the response - the "vessels of opportunity" as he has dubbed the private armada.

But this strategy too has come under fire.

Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., said many of the fishermen in her state "don't think it's working."

And Camardelle complained that shrimpers in his community who sign up for the program "are being sent off on ships where they find no oil (and) ... they want to return and help protect their communities." At other times they were "ready to go but just waited at the docks for the call," he told lawmakers.

The latest scrutiny of Allen comes as scientific evidence shows that government-supported estimates of the oil flow were far too low - at least the third time that the government numbers have had to be upwardly revised.

New figures for the blown-out well at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico show the amount of oil spewing may have been up to twice as much as previously thought.

That could mean 42 million gallons to more than 100 million gallons of oil have already fouled the Gulf's fragile waters, affecting people who live.

It is the third - and perhaps not the last - time the U.S. government has had to increase its estimate of how much oil is gushing. Trying to clarify what has been a contentious and confusing issue, officials on Thursday gave a wide variety of estimates.

All the new spill estimates are worse than earlier ones - and far more costly for BP, which has seen its stock sink since the April 20 explosion that killed 11 workers and triggered the spill. Most of Thursday's estimates had more oil flowing in an hour than what officials once said was spilling in an entire day.

By comparison, the worst peacetime oil spill, 1979's Ixtoc 1 in Mexico, was about 140 million gallons over 10 months. The Gulf spill hasn't yet reached two months. The Exxon Valdez, the previous worst U.S. oil spill, was just about 11 million gallons, and the new figures mean Deepwater Horizon is producing an Exxon Valdez size spill every five to 13 days.

Allen has been portrayed as complicit in supporting BP-backed low estimates of the oil flow and of being overly friendly to BP (he lauded company CEO Tony Hayward) in the early weeks of the disaster.

But, "I can guarantee you unequivocally, nobody is low-balling anything that works for me," Allen told reporters. "And I will never low-ball anything."
Unfailingly polite in public, Allen takes criticism in stride.

Allen said at the Friday briefing that the containment operation in the Gulf of Mexico is now catching up to 630,000 gallons daily.

Assessing efforts to restrain the spill, he told reporters that "we continue to make progress," although he said reinforcement help is on the way, including the expected arrival of a shuttle tanker from the North Sea within the next few days.

He also said he hopes capacity of the existing containment structure can be increased soon to roughly 1.17 million gallons daily.

Though born in the desert - in Tucson, Ariz. - he's been around the water all his life, moving from post to post as a Coast Guard brat and, later, for his own career. He worked on his first oil spill 20 years ago as a lieutenant when a barge ran aground near Atlantic City, N.J. He says responding is like fighting a battle: The trick is moving resources quickly to where they're needed.

Within the Coast Guard - which itself captures the public's imagination with its rescue swimmers, drug busts on the high seas and missions to save stranded fishermen - Allen is widely admired. On the Gulf, there's little doubt who's in charge when Allen's around.

He has broad authority from the White House to make decisions and can pick up the phone and call BP CEO Tony Hayward when he needs answers. Like the president, Allen in recent days has shown more impatience with BP, writing Hayward a terse letter this week demanding more information about how the company is settling claims.

Last week, preparing for a potentially contentious meeting with Alabama Gov. Bob Riley, Allen sat at a conference table with Coast Guard officers and picked apart a planned presentation addressing Riley's complaints about protective boom being moved from Alabama to other states.

"Guys, we have to be exact with this," Allen said, gesturing with one hand as he drank coffee with the other. "One misstatement and the meeting goes south. We have to be transparent. Transparency! Clarity!"

When inventory numbers on the amount of boom available in Alabama didn't add up, Allen had had enough. He got up, grabbed an easel and a marker and began writing. The numbers got straightened out to his satisfaction just before Riley walked into the room.

The problem appears to have been resolved, but Riley made clear his lingering frustration with Allen in a statement this week in which he credited the president for fixing it.

"I want to thank the president for his personal intervention with the Coast Guard," the governor said. "Boom that was deployed here in Alabama should never have been taken from us in the first place."

Briefing reporters before meeting with President Barack Obama on Monday, Allen acknowledged that the Coast Guard never anticipated something like the BP gusher.

Even though the agency ran a Gulf Coast response drill in 2002 simulating a blown wellhead - with Allen playing the role of incident commander - Allen said the expectation is for a single oil slick contained in a specific area. The Deepwater Horizon spill, he said, is taxing resources because the oil is breaking up and being pushed by winds and currents in all different directions. He acknowledged that the disaster will likely change the way the country plans for spills.

"We're trying to adapt and learn from a spill that's never happened before in this country," he said.

While early reviews have been mixed at best, the final verdict on Allen's performance is still out.

"We've lost some battles (but) we can win this war," Nungesser said. "But it's got to happen quickly."

Allen doesn't have much time to turn the tide. He still plans to retire July 1, although he acknowledges he might not be able to take off the uniform that quickly.

"I didn't anticipate this would happen to end my career, but I'm honored to have been asked to do this," he told reporters Monday. "It's not a very easy job ... It's one of the hardest things I've ever had to deal with."

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 25 Comments
by two-cats June 13, 2010 12:45 AM EDT
I think the people who want something done "yesterday" cannot accept that this oil spill is a nightmare from which there is no quick awakening. No spill of this magnitude has ever happened to our country...we are obviously learning how to deal with as it goes on and so is BP. Not that I am excusing BP...at all. Their negligence caused this disaster but I do believe they are doing all they can. Perhaps they can speed up the process and maybe not. After all, it is in their best interest to make this thing go away as quickly as possible!
Reply to this comment
by 1renegade June 12, 2010 5:01 PM EDT
by catmomtx June 11, 2010 2:08 PM EDT
President Obama IS familiarizing himself with the workings of the office.



This is why it's not good to vote someone in the office of POTUS that has no type of management experience. At least Mayor's, Governor's, competant Business Persons have the tools to handles most situations.
Reply to this comment
by two-cats June 13, 2010 12:56 AM EDT
Quit blaming Obama for a spill that happened because BP got lax on the rules. Also, it is good to remember that deep-water drilling was facilitated by the Bush Administration which hardly read the paper work before they signed off on these wells. Murphy's Law has taken effect because of our oil greed and our complacency about the safety of these wells. Even now, in light of all that's happened, Jindal is screaming for more wells. Obviously, he doesn't want to face facts that this kind of drilling needs to have new rules and safety precautions installed into process. This takes time and the moratorium should stay in place until more safety measures can be instituted.
by kenhamlett June 11, 2010 1:48 PM EDT
I see this two possible ways.
Allen may have been the victim of believing that BP was actually trying to act honorably and believed what he was told. While I don't see how he could have fallen for that, it is possible.
As an alternative, since Allen is retiring and might be looking for a new job soon, if he happens to take a position with an oil company or one of their puppet companies and making major bucks then we might conclude he sold out.
We can discount the option of being incompetent. I have complete belief that he is a capable leader since he has demonstrated his ability so well in the past.
Reply to this comment
by jjoe57 June 11, 2010 1:28 PM EDT
Okay, BP flunked. Obama flunked. Thad Allen flunked. Wait! This looks like a job for SUPERMAN!
Reply to this comment
by jeffinpa1234 June 11, 2010 1:05 PM EDT
Somebody should ask Ken Salazar why he altered the last 2 paragraphs of the report by 7 experts on the subject AFTER THE 7 EXPERTS HAD SIGNED THE REPORT to make it look like the experts supported a ban on drilling in the gulf when if fact they did not. And then our President slapped the ban on drilling in place.

Can we please find out why Salazar did this?? Now this would be some refresheing news reporting for a change. Was this Mr. Salazar acting on his own (hardly) or was it somebody in the Administration not wanting to waste a crisis?????

CBS should be looking into this as it will be big news if true!
Reply to this comment
by generey June 11, 2010 12:46 PM EDT
Seems to me that Allen patronizes BP and "defends" them and their "efforts".
Reply to this comment
by Vet_Turner June 11, 2010 12:36 PM EDT
Why would you even write an article like this? What crap.
I've met Adm Allen. By far the brightest acgtion based man I've ever met.

Everyone is going around also sayiung BP is lying. The web is way too complex to lie. They're doing the best that they can. I even suggest they put some of the ROV equipment from the spill in the Smithsonian.
Reply to this comment
by myopinionpal June 11, 2010 12:34 PM EDT
Way to long we been lead to believe the worst would never happen, and now that it has it shows that the oil industry never had a plan for a deep sea oil leak and everyone turned a blined eye while the oil industry did their thing as long as we got oil for our super sized SUV and pickup trucks. If you must point fingers point them at the ones that came up with this very stupid idea of drilling in 5000ft of water
Reply to this comment
by afmcalax June 11, 2010 12:03 PM EDT
This is immature America at its worst. Whiny children always looking to blame someone else and wondering why all crisis are not resolved in 60 minutes like they are on TV. Journalists are also to blame because their reporting on the true dangers of deep water drilling have been lacking. If it cannot be said in a 15 second sound bite; they ignore it. As for most Americans they are not intelligent enough to comprehend the magnitude of the issue. We have a major oil leak approximately 1 mile deep. The oil is dispersing in a wide area as it rises to the surface. Much does not even get to the surface but remains in suspense underneath. Then the tides and current carry it in many additional directions. Containment booms do not work because the waves just carry the oily water over them. There is more oil in more areas than we have capacity to clean. America's capability to clean oil spills is horrendous. Nothing has really improved since the Exxon Valdez. We live in blissful ignorance of the dangers and corporate America never invests in safeguards as disasters are viewed as a cost of doing business or they know the tax payers will bail them out. This disaster was put in motion by Republican regimes that worship at the alter of big oil; and by Democrats that do not have the backbone to stand up for their principles and just go with the flow of industry sponsored propaganda. The need to drill would be decreased if America would have embraced renewable energy sources decades ago. We would lead the world in this industry thus creating jobs while freeing ourselves from oil company and middle east tyranny.
Reply to this comment
by rickwar June 11, 2010 12:29 PM EDT
100% correct
by kmrunner122 June 11, 2010 1:17 PM EDT
Can't say it much better than that. Greed more than anything caused this. Not wanting to spend the money for a relatively inexpensive blow out valve and second trying to save money pumping saltwater in the pipe instead of the more expensive drilling mud. BP's greed is basically criminal at this point.
by Jim1900 June 11, 2010 11:45 AM EDT
This is a ridiculous media circus. The idea is to retain good people, not get rid of them. We did that when we got rid of W.
Reply to this comment
by 1renegade June 12, 2010 4:51 PM EDT
Think about what you posted! "W" couldn't run for a third term. Although you're right about the media circus.
See all 25 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook