CBS/AP/ June 9, 2010, 5:20 PM

U.N. Approves New Sanctions Against Iran

Updated at 4:08 p.m. ET

The U.N. Security Council has approved new sanctions against Iran over its suspect nuclear program that target the country's powerful Revolutionary Guard, ballistic missiles, and nuclear-related investments.

President Obama welcomed the new sanctions, saying it sends an "unmistakable message" to Tehran.

Mr. Obama called them the toughest sanctions ever faced by the Iranian government, even though the final version was not as tough as what his administration initially proposed.

Speaking at the White House shortly after the U.N. vote, Mr. Obama said that Iranian leaders continue to "hide behind outlandish rhetoric" while moving ahead with "deeply troubling" steps on a path toward nuclear weapons.

In Dushanbe, Tajikistan, where he is on an official visit, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said "we do not recognize sanctions."

"From right and from left, they adopt sanctions, but for us they are annoying flies, like a used tissue," Ahmadinejad said.

With Middle East tension high and Iran at the center of the storm, the Obama administration successfully got China and Russia to back the new sanctions resolution, the U.N.'s fourth since 2006, CBS News Foreign Affairs Analyst Pamela Falk reports.

"Iran is high on President Obama's agenda for good reasons: Iran's Red Crescent Society announced this week that a 3,000 ton vessel is heading soon for Gaza; International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors reported that Iran has enough nuclear fuel, if enriched, for two nuclear weapons, and U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, in London, said the U.S. has not lost the ability to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, but the clock is ticking," Falk said.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Iran's decision to turn its back to White House overtures convinced the world of the need for sanctions.

"The challenge that President Obama faced in trying to reach out and engage Iran was politically difficult, but it served a very important purpose to demonstrate clearly that the United States was willing to pursue diplomatic engagement," she said.

The resolution imposing the latest sanctions against Iran was approved Wednesday with 12 "yes" votes, two "no" votes from Brazil and Turkey, and one abstention from Lebanon.

Before the vote, Turkey and Brazil, both non-permanent council members, brokered a fuel-swap agreement with Iran which they hoped would address concerns Tehran may be enriching uranium for nuclear weapons and avoid new sanctions.

Diplomats said the United States, Russia and France rejected that agreement hours before approving the new sanctions.

More Sanctions Coverage

Analysis: Sanctions Unlikely to Stop Iran
U.N. Hits Iran with New Sanctions
Iran U.N. Sanctions Push: Timing is Everything

Iran's U.N. Ambassador Mohammad Khazaee defended the country's right to produce nuclear energy and accused the United States, Britain and their allies of abusing the Security Council to attack Iran.

"No amount of pressure and mischief will be able to break our nation's determination to pursue and defend its legal and inalienable rights," Khazaee said. "Iran is one of the most powerful and stable countries in the region and never bowed - and will never bow - to the hostile actions and pressures by these few powers and will continue to defend its rights."

"These sanctions are as tough as they are smart and precise," U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice said after the vote, dismissing Khazaee's statement as "ridiculous" and "reprehensible."

"Today the Security Council has responded decisively to the grave threat to international peace and security posed by Iran's failure to live up to its obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty," Rice said after the vote, CBS Radio News reports.

In Tehran, one man told CBS Radio News the sanctions won't make a difference.

"We have been sanctioned for the last 30 years, and it had not had an effect on Iran and it will not have any effect on Iran in the future," the man said. "We are determined to become the eighth nation in the world for peaceful energy activities, and therefore it makes us more determined to follow our goal."

Immediately after the Security Council vote, the White House released a statement saying, "The United States remains open to dialogue, but Iran must live up to its obligations and clearly demonstrate to the international community the peaceful nature of its nuclear activities."

Mr. Obama said the United States "will ensure that these sanctions are vigorously enforced."

"These sanctions show the united view of the international community that a nuclear arms race in the Middle East is in nobody's interest," Mr. Obama said at the White House. "The Iranian government must understand that true security will not come through the pursuit of nuclear weapons. True security will come through adherence to international law and demonstration of peaceful intent."

Brazil and Turkey delayed the sanctions vote by an hour because the representatives for both countries were waiting for word from their foreign ministries on whether to vote for or against, Falk reports.

Brazil and Turkey, in voting against sanctions, complained that the proposal for Iran to export low-grade uranium was not given its due and that the sanctions resolution was negotiated behind closed doors, Falk reports.

Brazil's U.N. Ambassador Maria Luiza Ribeiro Viotti said sanctions would lead to "suffering" by the Iranian people, delay dialogue on the country's nuclear program, and run contrary to Brazil and Turkey's efforts to engage Tehran.

The Security Council imposed limited sanctions in December 2006 and has been ratcheting them up in hopes of pressuring Iran to suspend enrichment and start negotiations on its nuclear program. The first two resolutions were adopted unanimously and the third by a vote of 14-0 with Indonesia abstaining.

Iran has repeatedly defied the demand and has stepped up its activities, enriching uranium to 20 percent and announcing plans to build new nuclear facilities. Tehran insists its program is purely peaceful, aimed at producing nuclear energy.

The U.S. and its allies believe Iran's real aim is to produce nuclear weapons and want Iran to suspend uranium enrichment and start negotiations on it nuclear program.

Clinton said she was appointing the State Department's nonproliferation adviser, Robert Einhorn, to lead an administration-wide sanctions implementation team.

"We want to be sure that we don't just pass the sanctions and then leave it to chance as to whether or not they are being implemented," she said.

The new resolution bans Iran from pursuing "any activity related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons," bars Iranian investment in activities such as uranium mining, and prohibits Iran from buying several categories of heavy weapons including attack helicopters and missiles.

It imposes new sanctions on 40 Iranian companies and organizations - 15 linked to Iran's powerful Revolutionary Guard, 22 involved in nuclear or ballistic missile activities and three linked to the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines. That more than doubles the 35 entities now subject to an asset freeze.

The resolution also adds one individual to the previous list of 40 Iranians subject to an asset freeze - Javad Rahiqi who heads the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran's Esfahan Nuclear Technology Center. Under its provisions, all 41 individuals are now also subject to a travel ban.

The resolution also calls on all countries to cooperate in cargo inspections - which must receive the consent of the ship's flag state - if there are "reasonable grounds" to believe the cargo could contribute to Iranian nuclear program.

On the financial side, it calls on - but does not require - countries to block financial transactions, including insurance and reinsurance, and to ban the licensing of Iranian banks if they have information that provides "reasonable grounds" to believe these activities could contribute to Iranian nuclear activities.

China and Russia have strong economic ties with Iran and last week Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov was quoted as saying in Beijing that the resolution would protect the economic interests of both countries.

China's U.N. Ambassador Zhang Yesui said after the vote that the sanctions were aimed at curbing nonproliferation and would not affect "the normal life of the Iranian people" nor deter their normal trade activity.

The new resolution was hammered out during several months of difficult negotiations by the five veto-wielding permanent council members - the U.S., Russia, China, Britain and France - and nonmember Germany who have been trying for several years to get Iran into serious discussions on its nuclear ambitions.

The five permanent council members, in a statement after the vote, stressed that the resolution "keeps the door open for early engagement" with Iran. It welcomed and commended "all diplomatic efforts, especially those by Brazil and Turkey."

But in Vienna, three diplomats said the U.S., Russia and France dismissed Iran's proposal to swap some of its enriched uranium for fuel for a research reactor in Tehran which was brokered by Brazil and Turkey.

The diplomats, speaking on condition of anonymity because the replies were private, said they contain a series of questions that in effect stall any negotiations on the issue and present Tehran with indirect demands that it is not ready to meet.

The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed receipt of the three-nation response and said it would be passed on to Tehran.

The U.S., Russia and France have said that - unlike the original plan drawn up eight months ago - the swap proposal would leave Iran with enough material to make a nuclear weapon.

A European Union statement also criticized Iran for stonewalling attempts to probe its nuclear activities and refusing to heed U.N. Security Council demands for a freeze on enrichment, which can make both nuclear fuel and fissile warhead material.

But his Iranian counterpart, Ali Asghar Soltanieh told the meeting that "illegal resolutions" by the council will not stop his country from exercising its "legitimate right to develop its nuclear program."
© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
41 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bajajohn1 says:
The people on this board are far more diplomatically brilliant than the people on the U.N.Security Council. Right?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lifeson2112 says:
by meshine June 9, 2010 5:06 PM EDT
"The difference in the color of their complexion really bothers you doesn't it."-------------------

No racist. Its does not. What bothers me is morons like yourself who throw race into everything. One of the people in that picture stood for freedom against tyranny. The other one promotes tyranny. Now stop with the child-like notion that anyone who doesn't like Obama is a racist. Some of us don't like him because he is overwhelmingly in over his head and is ruining the country. Now go thank your mother for letting you live in her basement and play on your computer all day.
reply
Perish1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
That's pretty funny. That's what I tell my twelve year old about his Xbox pals. That they are all really 30 year olds in their parents basements.
Lifeson2112 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lol. Sad but true.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jgg000101 says:
in the photo, washington almost seems to be looking at obama with contempt. It's a very bizarre photo.
reply
Lifeson2112 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
That's because he can't believe we elected someone without any qualifications to be president.
user000049586849302948602 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Obama is a veritable genius compared to Repugnitard offering like Bush and McCain.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
consciousnes says:
why is it that in almost every picture of Obama we have to look up his nose? I know he isn't that tall.
reply
jgg000101 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
it's a heckuva lot better than looking up from the other direction.
user000049586849302948602 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
It must just be that you want him.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AlanW21126p says:
I'll bet anyone $100 the sanctions will have zero, zilch, effect.

Iran will laugh and continue as usual on their merry path of insanity.

Here's hoping Israel goes in this year and bombs the holy sh***t out of them.
reply
kcits replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Exactly what would give Israel the right to attack another country? They would be the aggressors in a attack condemned throughout the region. I'm not sure they want to do that after the commando raid on the ships in international waters last week.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mrjustice1 says:
Correction:

...God just informed me that he was agnostic, and that he strongly disapproved of the three most violent, pigheaded, immutable religions which are the Abrahamic religions - Christianity, Judaism and Islam.
reply
jgg000101 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
maybe God can take you on a tour of the world and show you which religion is wreaking havoc in europe, the middle east, africa, russia, china, australia and the United States.
Lifeson2112 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yeah, I can remember the last time one of those fearsome christian mobs came through my neigborhood.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jgg000101 says:
pathetic. absolutely pathetic. we have blown 1 1/2 years while iran has been building a nuclear weapon, and we have ended up in a place with iran and the middle east that is worse than when bush was president. The sanctions aren't going to do squat. The concessions we have to make to russia and china to get them on board don't outweigh the benefits. And two of our allies, Turkey and Brazil have chosen to side with our adversaries. Iran will get nuclear weapons and the US will look like fools. For the gov't and media to portray this as "good news" is pure hot air. It really is disgraceful and I hope this charade is exposed for what it is.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
OhPinYun says:
I feel uncomfortable with the author's reference to our President as "Mr Obama". Personally I did not vote for our President but in respect for our country I still refer to him as President Obama and anyone who fails to pay our country at least that much respect should also fail to report anything from it.
reply
jgg000101 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
it is standard journalism procedure to refer to a dignitary by their title only the first time they are mentioned.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lifeson2112 says:
Just looking at the photo that accompanied this article it seems as if George Washington is sending Obama a death ray.
reply
Lifeson2112 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
No, racist. It does not. One stood for freedom against tyranny. The other is promoting tyranny. Stop interjecting race into everything. It gets tiresome for those of us not obsessed with the color of other people's skin.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bajajohn1 says:
Why blame Mahmmod Adminijihad? He is merely a puppet to the Ayatollah.
reply
mrjustice1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You are right bajaj

How about a viable long-term plan to eliminate religion and delusional, warped religious mindset it creates?

Do our religious icons, gods and friends come from heaven or are they from hell?

By the way, God recently informed me that was agnostic, and he strongly disapproved of the three most violent, pigheaded, immutable Abrahamic religions - Christianity, Judaism and Islam.
See all 41 Comments