June 8, 2010 7:21 AM

How Tech Will Ultimately Solve the Oil Spill

By
CBSNews
(National Review Online)  Daniel Foster is news editor of National Review Online.

The BP spill is giving Man, and his works to assert mastery over nature, a bad name. But just as technology caused this mess, technology will eventually end it. Below, the five most impressive technological forces at work in the Gulf saga.

The Rig

Yes, the scorched hulk of the Deepwater Horizon that set this catastrophe in motion now lies in ruins at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, but before it became the site of tragedy for eleven families and a symbol of capitalist hubris for the enemies of domestic drilling, the $500 million Horizon was a record-breaking technological dynamo, and an innovation spurred by the political pressures that are pushing drilling ever farther off our shores. Designed by Houston's Reading & Bates Corp. and built by Hyundai in 2001, the Deepwater Horizon was one of a small number of semi-submersible, dynamically positionable ultra-deepwater rigs. That is, unlike "jackup" rigs, with legs that rest on the ocean floor, the Deepwater Horizon floated on four massive stabilizing pontoons, which kept it stationary and level as waves washed beneath it. This allowed the rig to move anywhere it was needed, withstand 40-foot waves and 100-knot winds, and operate in water as deep as 10,000 feet.

Powered by two 9,775-hp, 7,000-kilowatt AC generators, and outfitted with awesome-sounding machinery like the "heave compensator," "cascading shaker," "hydraulic power choke," and "iron roughneck," it obliterated the previous world record - and its own nominal capacities - for offshore drill depth when it hit 35,055 feet in the Gulf.

The Costner Solution

In a world in which the combination of Hollywood and politics is often nauseating, Kevin Costner's unlikely emergence as a potential hero of the Gulf cleanup effort is a welcome exception. After the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill, and inspired by a fictional machine that turned urine into drinking water in his notorious 1995 flop Waterworld, Costner collaborated with his scientist brother and invested $24 million of his own money to develop a series of machines that can separate oil from water.

Essentially powerful vacuums attached to centrifuges, Costner's contraptions can reportedly remove oil from water at a rate of 200 gallons a minute with a level of 97 to 99 percent purity. Six of them are currently being tested by BP and the Army Corps of Engineers. Costner calls them "Ocean Therapy" machines, but if they manage to keep some of those oil plumes from hitting the Gulf coast, the region's inhabitants might call them "The Bodyguard."

The Mighty Mississippi

The effort to contain the oil that has already escaped the well is unprecedented in size and scope, encompassing a vast fleet of ships and nearly 20,000 workers employing a variety of often ingenious mitigation methods. In favorable weather conditions, controlled fires are burning through oil slicks pooled at the surface. Deeper underwater, powerful chemical dispersants are breaking up monolithic oil plumes into micro-layers, zillions of little oil droplets distributed throughout the water instead of heading toward the marshlands in sheets.

Miles and miles of oil booms - floating fences meant to collect oil and keep it from hitting vulnerable coastlines - are being deployed (some reportedly using human hair wrapped in recycled pantyhose, an excellent absorbent and proven oil collector).

But perhaps the most powerful weapon that responders have turned to is the force that has instigated so many catastrophes in the past: the mighty Mississippi. Swollen with floodwaters from the Ohio River, the Mississippi in mid-May was emptying into the Delta at a rate of half a million cubic feet per second. This gave the engineers manning the complex system of levees and spillways that protects New Orleans and its surroundings a bold idea: Open the floodgates and provide what one Louisiana flood engineer called "a freshwater wedge" to push back against the oil being being carried ashore by the Gulf currents.

The Disaster Bots

With its immense pressures, frigid temperatures, and pitch-black darkness, the crippled wellhead of the Deepwater Horizon might as well be on the dark side of the moon - if the dark side of the moon were also under water and gushing oil at a rate of 20,000 barrels a day. Shallow-water rigs have traditionally employed human divers to install and repair equipment under water. But since no conventional manned vessel can reach the depths of the leak, every effort to contain it must be done via truck-sized Remote-Operated Vehicles, or ROVs.

Piloted by joystick-wielding BP engineers from mission-control centers aboard command ships, ROVs like Oceaneering's 8,800-pound Millenium Plus model feature precision-grip hydraulic arms that are uncannily human in their movements. Most of the vehicles are fed power and telemetry via fiber-optic cables that link them back to the surface, but an increasing number are wireless and "autonomous." The machines have been instrumental in each successive effort to repair the wellhead, from the early attempt to reactivate the blowout preventer to the ill-fated containment-dome and "top kill" operations.

Plan F

The robots were also instrumental in the latest and (fingers crossed) most successful effort to contain the leak, using a "Lower Marine Riser Package" (LMRP) to fit a new cap over the failed blowout preventer. How did it work? First, ROVs were brought in to clear the mangled pipes from atop the failed blowout preventer, using a diamond-tipped circular saw and eventually a pair of giant shears. Then the drill-ship Enterprise, with an exposed "moon pool" and derrick amidships, positioned itself over a newly fabricated cap, which sat on the seabed near the blowout preventer.

It carefully lowered its LMRP drill pipe and maneuvered it into position to latch onto the cap, continuously pumping hot seawater and methanol "anti-freeze" through the system to keep it free of hydrates - compounds formed at the low temperatures and high pressures around the oil plume that would quickly crystallize and block up the works. The cap was brought alongside the newly smooth cut over the leak and swiftly wedded to it.

At first, opened valves allowed high-pressure oil and gas to flow through the cap, until hydrogen pumped down the LMRP could equalize the pressure, allowing oil to be directed up through the riser to be collected by the Enterprise at the surface. ROVs were then dropped in again to close the valves. With this system in place, BP is now keeping up to 10,000 barrels of oil a day from reaching the Gulf coast.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.

By Daniel Foster:
Reprinted with permission from National Review Online

National Review Online
Add a Comment See all 25 Comments
by mackey208 June 10, 2010 6:54 PM EDT
The President was offered help by other countries........Help to understand why we did not go this route. Also help me to understand why we can help and aid, concerts and out pouring for other countries but where are the concerts and support for ours. Please dont even let me here that it is BP's problem because we know it is but we as Americans can act stronger and faster than this. Let the money come pouring this way!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by Perish1 June 9, 2010 5:15 PM EDT
Guess what else? The BOP wouldn't have done a damn bit of good!
The BOP is designed to either close around the pipe in the bore, whether by rams(piston) or hydraulic rubber, or to close off the well completely if there is no pipe in the hole.
The blowout occured through the pipe and not around it. There was a mile of twisted pipe above the well head that used to extend to the rig.
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey June 10, 2010 10:19 AM EDT
[The BOP is designed to either close around the pipe in the bore, whether by rams(piston) or hydraulic rubber, or to close off the well completely if there is no pipe in the hole. ]

wow ... you've been promoted to oil exploration engineer now? how many hours of experience do you have 'reading' about bops?
by bobnjersey June 9, 2010 5:04 PM EDT
[Technology Caused the Oil Mess and Technology Will End It]

hey daniel ... just a bit of advice for you when you get ready to write your next piece.

'technology will be the death of us all'!

and you can take that to the bank.

when it happens ... all those who should have known better will all stand up and say 'there is no way we could have anticipated this' ... like they're doing now ... like they did with the financial collapse in 2008 ... like they did on 9/11 ... like they did w/ the tech bubble collapse ... and like they'll do after the next catastrophe.

this is all true of course ... that they couldn't know ... because they all have their head up their azz!

in fact ... the worst case scenario is that they'll never be able to stop it ... that the oil and dispersant chemicals get airated during the hurricaine season and that airated chemical mix travels for thousands of miles creating untold degree of medical complications for everyone in it's path. bp will ultimately go bankrupt ... scr3wing all those they have liability toward. this will yield a condition where you won't be able to get any company to do these complex risky processes since one failure can destroy the company. this will require your illustrious congress to pass liability limit laws for corporations that limit their exposure to say ... $75 million.

the system is desperately broken ... and all these incidents are just simply symptoms of the greater problem.
Reply to this comment
by Perish1 June 9, 2010 4:52 PM EDT
You folks need to get off of the "blame every republican" that has held office since Eisenhower. Regulation didn't have a damn thing to do with this blow-out.
Start asking the people that are there now, in office and at BP, why aren't you stopping the flow? KILL THE WELL!
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey June 9, 2010 4:55 PM EDT
[Regulation didn't have a damn thing to do with this blow-out. ]

yes it did. they were allowed to practice risky behavior w/o the appropriate contingencies in place ... and that should have been detected and enforced by appropriated regulation.

the blow out may have happened ... but it would have been mitigated by the appropriate safety procedures ... which weren't in place since the agency that should have been tightening the screws were instead accepting gifts from those they were tasked with overseeing.
by Perish1 June 9, 2010 5:11 PM EDT
Bobnjersey....

The blowout occured because the man in charge on the scene made stupid decisions that God himself and Batman and Superman could not have helped at all if they weren't on scene to oversee and veto. The idiot ran too light fluid into the hole that was not heavy enough to offset the downhole pressure.
by sepa2 June 9, 2010 10:07 AM EDT
Technology did not cause this. Abuse and disregard of technology management did this. Most people who take decisions on technology do not have a technology background and they take it for granted. It become worse under Reagan's service economy mind set where it is used for for shortterm gains without investing enough in new technologies and longterm planning.
Reply to this comment
by ss433 June 9, 2010 2:11 AM EDT
"I'm not a journalist but I play one on TV".
Reply to this comment
by ss433 June 9, 2010 2:17 AM EDT
sorry
by nearl451 June 8, 2010 10:14 PM EDT
You have got to be kidding me.

Technology has done some pretty wonderful things, but has also caused incredible disasters and suffering long ago (during industrial revolution, space exploration,etc.) as well as just this recent event. Like tower of Babel, there is always more surety in technology than the risk it presents.

You expect a magic bullet.
Reply to this comment
by ss433 June 8, 2010 4:27 PM EDT
it ain't no oil spill, it be a leak. no big thing, though.
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 June 8, 2010 10:12 PM EDT
If it were a spill from a tanker, we would know how much oil is there. Since it is a leak from a blown out well, it could go on for a decade.
by noloyalisti June 8, 2010 2:07 PM EDT
This is just another attempt by this corporate financed outfit to defend the failed fake "free market".

Hopefully we ALL now realize that privatization and globalization is a complete disaster, has never worked and never will.
Reply to this comment
by tsigili June 8, 2010 12:10 PM EDT
That is the rose-colored glasses outlook, I suppose.

Decades long recovery, from a single incident, bodes badly for the future.
Reply to this comment
See all 25 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook