By

CBSNews /

CBS/AP/ May 27, 2010, 4:05 PM

Obama: U.S. in Charge of Oil Spill Response

FILE -- This Aug. 2010 photo shows tourists viewing the dining room at Graceland, Elvis Presley's home in Memphis, Tenn. Graceland opened for tours on June 7, 1982. They sold out all 3,024 tickets on the first day and didn't look back, forever changing the Memphis tourist landscape while keeping Elvis and his legend alive.(AP Photo/Mark Humphrey)

FILE -- This Aug. 2010 photo shows tourists viewing the dining room at Graceland, Elvis Presley's home in Memphis, Tenn. Graceland opened for tours on June 7, 1982. They sold out all 3,024 tickets on the first day and didn't look back, forever changing the Memphis tourist landscape while keeping Elvis and his legend alive.(AP Photo/Mark Humphrey) / Mark Humphrey

Updated 2:30 p.m. ET

President Barack Obama moved aggressively to show his government is in charge of the Gulf oil spill on Thursday, calling the gushing leak an "unprecedented disaster" and blasting a "scandalously close relationship" between oil companies and regulators.

"The American people should know that from the moment this disaster began, the federal government has been in charge of the response effort," Obama told a news conference. He was responding to criticism that his administration had been slow to act and had left BP in charge of plugging the leak.

Obama said many critics failed to realize "this has been our highest priority."

He conceded that "people are going to be frustrated until it stops."

Obama announced a series of new steps to deal with the aftermath of the spill, including continuing a moratorium on drilling permits for six months.

He also said he was suspending planned exploration drilling off the coasts of Alaska and Virginia and on 33 wells currently being drilled in the Gulf of Mexico.

Obama Defends Oil Spill Response, Cites Mistakes
Obama's Critics "Don't Know the Facts"
Special Section: Disaster in the Gulf
Live Underwater Video of Leak

The president, speaking to reporters in the East Room of the White House, spoke as oil giant BP pumped mudlike heavy drilling oil into the well in hopes of stopping the flow.

He said while the "top kill" procedure was an example of his administration's willingness to try "any reasonable strategy" to stop the gusher, the process "offers no guarantee of success."

Obama's insistence that his administration was in charge of dealing with the disaster were a marked change in language. Previously, administration officials had emphasized that while they were overseeing BP's actions, the oil company had the expertise and equipment to do the job.

As recently as Monday, the top federal official in charge of responding to the oil catastrophe, Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, declined to broadly say the federal government was "in charge." Instead, when asked about that, Allen told reporters that BP was responsible for the cleanup and the government was accountable to make sure the company did it. "I would say it's less a case of 'in charge,"' Allen said when asked about that phrase.

Yet with each passing day, public frustration with Obama's government has grown, and his poll numbers on the matter are dropping.

As an example of the government's hands-on approach, Obama said that BP had wanted to drill a single "relief" well in an effort to eventually stop the leak in several months if all else failed. Instead, the administration insisted on two relief wells being drilled, Obama said.

Over and over, the president sought to counter criticism that the administration was giving too much leeway to BP PLC.

"Make no mistake, BP is operating at our direction," he said.

"We will demand they pay every dime they owe for the damage they've done and the painful losses they've caused," Obama said.

He denounced what he called "the oil industry's cozy and sometimes corrupt" ties with government regulators.

He spoke shortly after the head of the troubled agency that oversees offshore drilling resigned under pressure. The departure of Minerals Management Service Director Elizabeth Birnbaum was announced just before Obama's news conference began.

Asked about inevitable comparisons between his administration's handling of the disaster with his predecessor's handling of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, Obama said: "I'll leave it to you guys to make those comparisons. ... What I'm thinking about is how do you solve the problem?"

"I'm confident people are going to look back and say this administration was on top of what was an unprecedented crisis," he added.

Obama: There's a Reason I Never Said "Drill, Baby, Drill"
Obama Reacts to MMS and Response
Obama: Malia Asked "Did you Plug The Hole Yet, Daddy?"
Oil Spill Hits Home for Obama

Still, he acknowledged, "We've got to get it right."

Sen. Frank Lautenberg , D-N.J., a critic of offshore drilling, said Obama took an important step to halt the most imminent environmental threat to the Atlantic coast, but he said the danger will remain until there is a permanent ban on drilling in the Atlantic.

"BP's oil catastrophe in the Gulf is a wake-up call for our nation. Giving Big Oil more access to our nation's waters will only lead to more pollution, more lost jobs and more damage to our economy," Lautenberg said.

Obama said the federal government "has acted consistently with a sense of urgency" about the spill. But, he acknowledged a "sense of complacency on the government's part in planning how to deal with the worst-case scenario" before it happened.

He said a cozy relationship between industry and government didn't change when he came into office.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar "came in and started cleaning house. But the culture had not fully changed at MMS. And surely I take responsibility for that."

But, he added, "there is no evidence some of the corrupt practices that took place earlier took place under the present administration's watch."

As to the resignation of the head of the agency that overseas offshore drilling, he said, "I found out about her resignation today. I don't know the circumstances under which this occurred."

Americans polled by CBS News expressed frustration with both the global oil giant and President Obama for their handling of the environmental disaster.

Only 18 percent of those polled said they approved of how BP was acting in response. An overwhelming majority -- 70 percent -- said they disapproved. President Obama fared slightly better, with 45 percent saying they disapproved of his handling of the crisis. That still represents an overall negative rating, however, as only 35 percent said they approved of his words and deeds since the disaster struck.

(BP)
CBS/AP
41 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RobAla says:
In a technical sense, the federal government is in charge of clean up with a disaster of this sort. However, Democrat James Carvell believes the President has been almost MIA on this.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bjm3986 says:
What would you folks have Obama do, stick his toe in the leak? Every one says he does'n't get it and he's done nothing to fix it. What is YOUR solution?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
scottyusa says:
Talk about a knee jerk reaction. Stop everything. I don't agree with that. We will live in paranoia now I suppose. It makes me feel so much better now that Obama is in charge. He is always in charge, he is the president remember? Looks like he just did. Obama sir let me explain. You are like the captain of a ship. You are responsible not only for that ship but for everything that runs that ship. If something isn't working it is your job to know it and fix it. Its your job to ensure all your officers are doing their jobs. You set the standard. If you lie everone lies. You have your priorities and they are not the same as "we the people". When we wanted jobs you were too busy reforming and desimating our health care system. When we wanted immigration control you were busy screwing wall street. I hate winter but this year will be great when November gets here. 2012 will be even better. Hope and change turned out to be change with no hope.
reply
bjm3986 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Who put us in such a position that the President needed to do things like reforming the health system and dealing with wall street? Do you think we should call GW and ask for his help?
Crush1800 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
@liberalme , no his big ass D**K....He is the swinging D**K of the free world, and he should have used his super_P*N*S to stop it...Him or Clinton.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TVO1CITW says:
A man who knows nothing but politics wants to tell an oil company who has been in this business for more years that he is old. Go figure. Obama is a talking head full of the same stuff that spews out of the sewer. He doesn't know anything but blame.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TVO1CITW says:
Obama is a con-artist. He makes the most outlandish claims as if they were real. The main problem is that we have 3 more years of this kind of liberal brain washing.
reply
starleo146 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You know who is responsible for this mess Congress and the Oil companies. How dare they keep blaming Obama Congress made the regulation laws so loose they got away with murder. The want for money on both sides got us in this mess and once again Obama has to straighten it out. Oh yes rush, rush, make a bigger mess blame obama he is tough, but he will straighten the oil companies,and the regulators, and we the voter will straighten Congress.Oil Lobbyist and the ones who are suppose to regulate turn there heads sick of it. Wall Street do you see a pattern here with big corporations, republicans and democrats alike we are just a corrupt country and it has all fallen on Obama.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dwilson59 says:
some one tell me why this would not work.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dwilson59 says:
Just my Thought......

Take all the people getting unemployment and put them to work today cleaning the Oil Spill. Then Bill BP for all the unemployment plus a 25% fee. There has to be 50k people that are collecting unemployment in the south of LA.

This is a win win situation the Govt gets paid back for unemployment and 50k people get a job.
reply
bjm3986 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Love it!!
ikenene replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
good idea
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kenhamlett says:
Those are nice words but false words. The press conference was the obvious repetition of what BP wanted to be said. I don't expect the prez to be competent but I DO expect the agency supposedly in charge of the mess to understand what they are regulating. They failed.

Where is Joe the Plumber when we need him?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
underdogus2009 says:
How about shoving Rush Limbaugh in the hole...? that should solve two of America's biggest problems in one go!
reply
Perish1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The old "rush" maneuver name drop. Now follow it up with a quick left palin, a Cheney to the gut and a Fox news knockout straight right.
bjm3986 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Amen!!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
UndercoverJ7 says:
I think this is a lose lose situation for the admin in this situation. People ***** about money going out the door to quickly when it shoudl be BP cleaning it up. If our gov't agencies were sent in too quick, people would ***** and say why are we paying to clean up BP's mess, if we wait while they do it and don't all wnough time for them to eat it, then when we do people say it's too soon, if we finally send them in after BP takes too long, then it's neglectful. I think people forget that tax dollars have to pay the people that are sent in if they aren't from BP, and right now those need to be conserved at a premium. I wanted quicker resolution all the way from everyone, but any other option left too much room for criticism and ran the risk of using tax money to clean up BP's mess.
reply
See all 41 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right