AP/ May 17, 2010, 4:38 PM

GM Cost Cuts, New Sales Drive $865M Profit in 1Q

General Motors Co. rode expense cuts from its bankruptcy and strong sales of redesigned models to its first quarterly net income in nearly three years, drawing the company closer to a stock offering that would repay at least part of its government aid.

The Detroit automaker said it made money because debt and other expenses were slashed by its stay in bankruptcy court last year, and because of strong new-model sales. It also generated higher revenue from growth in Asia and South America.

GM reported net income of $865 million, or $1.66 per share, in the first quarter. That compared with a loss of $6 billion loss, or $9.78 per share, a year earlier, as it skidded into bankruptcy protection. First-quarter revenue soared 40 percent to $31.5 billion.

New models such as the Chevrolet Equinox small sport utility vehicle and the Buick LaCrosse luxury sedan lifted GM's North American operations to a $1.2 billion profit, compared with a $3.4 billion loss in the year-earlier quarter. North America had been a continual drain on GM's profits before its bankruptcy filing last year.

Chief Financial Officer Chris Liddell said it may be difficult to sustain the same level of profit for the remainder of the year because first-quarter production is usually higher than other quarters, with automakers ramping up for the spring selling season.

"I'd still be reasonably cautious about the rest of the year," he said.

CEO Ed Whitacre has predicted a full-year profit as U.S. auto sales continue their slow recovery. That could lead to a public sale of GM's stock and full repayment of the $50 billion in U.S. government aid that stopped GM from going under last year. The U.S. government now owns 61 percent of the company.

The automaker has repaid a total of $6.7 million to the government. The Obama administration hopes to get back the remaining $43 billion by selling its stake.

For taxpayers to break even by selling the government's remaining investment, the total dollar value of GM's outstanding shares, or market capitalization, would have to reach about $70 billion after an IPO. That's nearly double the size of Ford Motor Co.'s current market cap.

GM has said that it hopes to make an initial public offering, or IPO, late this year.

GM has lost more than $86 billion since 2005, even though it had a few profitable quarters along the way. Before heading into bankruptcy protection it had almost $53 billion in debt, but it ended last quarter at $14 billion. GM paid $5.8 billion to the U.S. and Canadian governments in April, reducing its debt further to $8.4 billion.

GM, once a symbol of U.S. industrial might, would have disappeared late in 2008 or early last year without help from the government. The company cut 10,000 workers last quarter and now employs 205,000 people across the globe, including 77,000 in the U.S.

The company has cut worldwide employment by nearly half in the past decade.

In bankruptcy court, GM was split into two companies, the old one carrying unprofitable assets and much of its debt, while the new one moved forward with a much stronger balance sheet. Based on the trading price of Old GM's bonds, the U.S. government could get back $40 billion, former Obama administration auto czar Steven Rattner said last week.

GM lost $3.4 billion in the fourth quarter of 2009 on revenues of $32.3 billion, the company's first full quarter out of bankruptcy protection. The last time the largest U.S. automaker made a quarterly profit was the second quarter of 2007, when it earned $891 million.

On Monday, GM said it paid $203 million in dividends to its preferred stockholders, the U.S. and Canadian governments and a United Auto Workers union retiree health care trust.

The company reported $35.7 billion in cash at the end of the quarter, including a final installment in April of $6.6 billion in aid from the U.S. government. That money had been held in a GM escrow account that required Treasury Department approval to release and is included in the $50 billion aid total.
© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
15 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
broadwayphi says:
Glory be: make stuff people like and they will buy it. When they buy your stuff, you make money. When you make money you...well, you make money.

Was that so hard?

You're welcome for the loan. Now pay it back. All of it.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
formrusmcsgt says:
Proving that GM could have become competitive on it's own if it had wished to....it had to be dragged kicking and screaming to get it done, however.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cbs4111 says:
Good Heaven's CBS. HIRE SOME FACT CHECKERS.

GM did not pay back the $6.7 billion. Up until this quarter they ran a $4.3 billion loss - THEY DIDN'T HAVE ANY MONEY TO PAY THE LOAN BACK WITH.

The US Treasury allowed GM to use the American Taxpayer's money, part of the $14 billion that the Treasury put into escrow for GM to use, to pay off the loan. GM still owes over $50 billion, not $43 billion.

It looks pretty bad for you , CBS, when your readers have to do your fact-checking for your so-called journalists.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
P0ST1ING_AWAY says:
by fairfaxjoe May 17, 2010 12:30 PM EDT
The latest evidence of this came Monday, when General Motors executives announced here that their company and its local joint venture partners would spend more than $3 billion by 2007 to expand operations in China.
=================================================================
Those cars are SOLD in China ........
reply
liberals_worst_nightmare replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Made there too! I am sure by American workers right?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
P0ST1ING_AWAY says:
by apuan777 May 17, 2010 12:57 PM EDT
All I have to say is GSA.gov, the sole reason GM sold anything in the first quarter.
Reply to this comment

by fairfaxjoe May 17, 2010 1:08 PM EDT
Ahh, that would make sense. From the right pocket to the left.
=======================================================
Sorry to burst your right-wing-idiot bubbles .... but .....
Strong sales and cost cutting lead to the profit.
If things continue as planned .... you poor souls will
have to find something else to complain about.
Oh wait ... you whiners ALWAYS have something to complain
about .....
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dwilson59 says:
WOW GM made a profit.

1. what would you buy a Chevy Volt for 35k or the new Nissan that can go 2 times farther on a charge for 12k less?



Are they going to pay back the 56 billion?

Why does a loaded Caddy DTS still cost 58k then the next year it is worth 30k?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
apuan777 says:
All I have to say is GSA.gov, the sole reason GM sold anything in the first quarter.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
afmcalax says:
If the Republicans would have had their way GM and Chrylser would be gone. All those jobs would be gone. The Parts suppliers would not have been able to succeed with only Ford so most, if not all of them, would have failed. All those jobs gone. Ford then would have had no parts or high cost parts which would have made it more non-competitive so it would have also failed. More jobs lost. Now thousands of car dealerships would have closed. More jobs lost. Car mechanics would have lost jobs also. Communities would have been devasted and jobs dependent on workers earning good wages would have also failed. No more U.S. auto industry - just handed over to the foreigners. Republicans need to start thinking intelligently with more focus on the real world instead of their insular, mindless worship of their conservative prophets. If the Republicans would have been in charge world wide depression and violence would have prevailed. People really need to understand how Republicans would have let that happen and had no sympathy for the lives wrecked by their adherence to political dogma.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
askagain says:
If you wiped out my debts, my company would show large profits too. GM always sold a lot of cars. The thing that dragged GM down were the promises made years ago to the unions for high pay and unaffordable benefits in their health and pension benefits. Don't kid yourself, many people lost a lot of money when the govrnment took GM over. This whole bebacle cost the taxpayers dearly.
reply
jxknowles replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I agree with your comments. Unfortunately GM, Ford and Chrysler were train wreck after train wreck in a business model that was losing more money than BP is dumping oil into the gulf. Poorly designed, gas guzzling dinosaurs were as much to blame as the worker compensation packages. It had to come to an end. Stopping the bleeding once and for all was necessary if we were ever to have an auto industry in the U.S. Any success is better than the failed auto industry we lived with for the last few decades.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
army166 says:
"After the lie campaign last month about "paying" their debt, how can we believe they made a profit." It wasn't a lie. The truth is a third or more of the people in this country (like you) want it to fail just so they can say 'I told you so'. They're not Americans. The WWII vets who say the people of this country can't pull together like they did in the 40's are right. That's because the bunch of moaners and whiners that do nothing all day but knock progress are more anti-American than American.
reply
See all 15 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right