AP/ May 3, 2010, 1:54 PM

United, Continental Agree to Merge

Updated 11:28 a.m. ET

United Airlines has agreed to buy Continental in a $3 billion-plus deal that would create the world's largest carrier with a commanding position in several top U.S. cities.

The new United would surpass Delta Air Lines in size, which should help it attract more high-fare business travelers. It will fly to 370 destinations in 59 countries.

The companies insisted the deal is a merger of equals.

But United shareholders will hold a majority stake, the airline will be based in United's hometown of Chicago and it will be called United.

It would be run by current Continental CEO Jeffery Smisek, however. United CEO Glenn Tilton, a longtime advocate of consolidation in the airline industry, will be non-executive chairman for up to two years before Smisek adds the chairman title.

The new parent company will be called United Continental Holdings Inc., and have about $29 billion in annual revenue based on 2009 results and $7.4 billion in unrestricted cash. The airlines said combining would save them $1 billion to $1.2 billion a year by 2013, including between $800 million and $900 million in new yearly revenue.

The deal would create a giant with major hubs in key domestic markets including New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston and San Francisco and an international network stretching from Shanghai to South America.

It will leave three big U.S. airlines with major international routes — the new United, Delta and American Airlines, with US Airways a distant fourth.

United is the nation's third-largest carrier by traffic, while Continental Airlines Inc., in Houston, is No. 4.

Shares of both companies rose in morning trading Monday. United parent UAL Corp. shares rose 39 cents, or 1.8 percent, to $21.99, while Continental shares rose 25 cents, or 1.1 percent, to $22.60.

Wall Street has pushed consolidation as a way to let airlines raise fares by reducing the number of flights and seats. Antitrust regulators are likely to scrutinize the deal for its effect on fares, but Smisek and Tilton said even a larger United won't have power to boost prices because other carriers might undercut them.

"There is no carrier in the world that can set air fares," Smisek said. "We couldn't set air fares before this. We can't set air fares after this."

Two years ago, Continental walked away from a deal with United at the last moment. Smisek said in an interview that times have changed since 2008, when both airlines were low on cash and facing record fuel costs.

"Both carriers are performing better than they have been for the past couple of years," he said. "The economy is on an upswing. Fuel prices, although high, are manageable."

Continental shareholders will get 1.05 UAL shares in exchange for each Continental share.

The two carriers are similar in size. As of Friday's closing stock prices, UAL's had a stock market value of $3.6 billion, while Continental's was $3.1 billion.

The companies expect to close the deal in the fourth quarter, with approval needed from shareholders and regulators.

The deal came together in just three weeks after reports surfaced that United was in discussions with US Airways, the nation's No. 6 airline.

"I recognized that United is the best possible partner for Continental," Smisek said on a conference call. "I didn't want him (United's Tilton) to marry the ugly girl; I wanted him to marry the pretty one, and I'm much prettier."

Labor issues have often been messy in airline consolidation. Smisek and Tilton said they had briefed their unions on the deal. Both companies said their boards had approved the transaction unanimously, which would include a labor representative on the UAL board.

Pilots at both airlines are represented by the Air Line Pilots Association. People briefed on the negotiations said the two groups have not started negotiations on a joint contract.

The machinists' union, which represents 16,000 workers at United and more than 10,000 Continental employees, said it was concerned about the impact of the deal on pensions, benefits and job security.

Both United and Continental have been losing money first due to higher fuel costs, then a recession. Last year, UAL lost $651 million while Continental lost $282 million. Revenue plunged 19.1 percent at UAL and 17.4 percent at Continental.

They have eliminated flights to meet the new, lower demand - United cut capacity 7.4 percent last year, and Continental shrank 5.2 percent.
© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
14 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
citizenusa-2009 says:
Ronald Reagen championed "de-regulation" which put the American people in the dumper with regard to air travel. Of course Ronnie and his family never had to worry about sub-standard travel because they've always enjoyed the luxury of PRIVATE JETS. (He just couldn't "relate" to the peons).

Just another example of the "haves and the have nots". God Bless America!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
citizenusa-2009 says:
Continental: The airline of "flying sardine cans" is merging with United. Hmmmm. Does that mean that United will make their seats MORE cramped or does that mean Continental will now give their passengers room to move their legs beyond the lotus position?

Either way, they are both so lame, I'm glad we still have Southwest. I "LUV" them!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
novamba says:
American Airlines remains the only major airline not to file for bankruptcy in the last 2 decades, and continues to fund and honor a large part of their pensions. inevitably, they too will get into the madness and end up buying Lan or Avianca/taca sooner or later to be able to remain competitive. I hope they do, as delta and United only know how to get large, and file for bankruptcy...I give either 3-5 years before they do so again.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
francescopa says:
Two bed airlines merge,to make one worst airline.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gruven13777 says:
Just like the banks, soon there will only be 2 or 3 airlines to choose from.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bradkt1 says:
I worked as a lawyer for the now-defunct Civil Aeronautics Board when deregulation was first enacted. Our agency regulated rates, domestic and international routes, mergers (antitrust), consumer protections and determined the fitness of operators who wanted to run an airline. Congress enacted deregulation for the airline industry in 1978 and put the CAB out of business in 1984.

We warned you then that deregulation meant that carrier after carrier was going to fall by the wayside and that only a few mega-carriers would be all that's left. Deregulation was the latest great idea that people who didn't believe in government used to dismantle it.

Now you all can see the result...we were right.

There are no effective consumer protections anymore. Not too much competition either.

Ain't deregulation wonderful?
reply
murrowseye replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Actually filmguy 107, dereg of the airlines happened with the Carter administration's approval. Great comment bradkt1. You are so right. We are in the final mutations of what deregulation has wrought.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
retm-w says:
If the Government allows this, then it will be another to big to fail corporation. The taxpayers will be bailing them out in a year or two. And more people end up in the unemployment line.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kbbpll says:
We're all pigs in a can now. Can't wait until the new United decides to stop serving meals or drinks on 13 hour flights to Asia.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
spaceatoms says:
Why compete anymore? The large banks, Wall Street and D.C are ensuring the plutocratic way stays in gear using credit card companies, war and an unstable housing market balancing big oil, lawyers, and insurance companies with demand payment rules to ensure that foreign investments are met so we can watch laugh line television at night. I vote for two or three car companies, airlines, banks, and one Wall Street to make sure that the current Constitution is nothing more than a piece of paper in the globalization of Earth and the consumption of more goods, so much for engineering 101!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
blazercoach says:
I guess they figured it was good to become "too big to fail" since both airlines have had their pensions subsidized by the government after they FAILED.
reply
See all 14 Comments