April 30, 2010 3:40 PM

Crews Start Burning Gulf Oil Slick

(CBS/AP)  Updated 10:43 p.m. ET

It's a hellish scene: Giant sheets of flame racing across the Gulf of Mexico as thick, black smoke billows high into sky.

This, though, is no Hollywood action movie. It's the real-life plan to be deployed just 20 miles from the Gulf Coast in a last-ditch effort to burn up an oil spill before it could wash ashore and wreak environmental havoc.

The Coast Guard late Wednesday afternoon started a test burn of an area about 30 miles east of the delta of the Mississippi River to see how the technique was working. Crews planned to use hand-held flares to set fire to sections of the massive spill. Crews turned to the plan after failing to stop a 1,000-barrel-a-day leak at the spot where a deepwater oil platform exploded and sank.

A 500-foot boom was to be used to corral several thousand gallons of the thickest oil on the surface, which will then be towed to a more remote area, set on fire, and allowed to burn for about an hour.

If the hourlong test burn was successful, rig operator BP PLC was expected to continue the oil fires as long as the weather cooperated. The burns were not expected to be done at night.

The Coast Guard said Wednesday evening that there is a new leak from where the rig sank in the Gulf of Mexico. Rear Adm. Mary Landry said that 5,000 barrels a day are estimated to be leaking from the blown-out well drilled by the Deepwater Horizon oil rig. Eleven workers are missing and presumed dead. The cause of the explosion has not been determined.

Greg Pollock, head of the oil spill division of the Texas General Land Office, which is providing equipment for crews in the Gulf, said he is not aware of a similar burn ever being done off the U.S. coast. The last time crews with his agency used fire booms to burn oil was a 1995 spill on the San Jacinto River.

"When you can get oil ignited, it is an absolutely effective way of getting rid of a huge percentage of the oil," he said. "I can't overstate how important it is to get the oil off the surface of the water."

The oil has the consistency of thick roofing tar.

When the flames goes out, Pollock said, the material that is left resembles a hardened ball of tar that can be removed from the water with nets or skimmers.

"I would say there is little threat to the environment because it won't coat an animal, and because all the volatiles have been consumed if it gets on a shore it can be simply picked up," he said.

Authorities also said they expect minimal impact on sea turtles and marine mammals in the burn area.

A graphic posted by the Coast Guard and the industry task force fighting the slick showed it covering an area about 100 miles long and 45 miles across at its widest point.

"It's premature to say this is catastrophic. I will say this is very serious," said Landry.

From the air, the thickest parts of the spill resembled rust-colored tentacles of various thickness. The air was thick with the acrid smell of petroleum.

Amid several of the thicker streaks, four gray whales could be seen swimming, and one of them appeared to be rolling and curling as if struggling or disoriented. It was not clear if the whale was in danger.

More than two dozen vessels moved about in the heart of the slick pulling oil-sopping booms.

The Deepwater Horizon tragedy has re-ignited the debate over offshore drilling, CBS News Correspondent Don Teague reports.

In the Gulf alone, there are more than 3,500 oil and gas platforms with about 35,000 offshore workers. They produce more than 1.7 million barrels of oil per day, almost 30 percent of total domestic production.

But working in the oil industry is more dangerous than in coal mines with 59 deaths, 1,300 injuries and 853 fires on rigs in the Gulf alone since 2001, Teague reports.

Environmental groups say the disaster proves offshore drilling isn't worth the risk, Teague reports.

"We've always said oil and gas drilling is a dirty and dangerous business in terms of pollution but also in terms of what damage can be done to workers and the environment," the Sierra Club's Athan Manuel said.

Earlier Wednesday, Louisiana State Wildlife and Fisheries Secretary Robert Barham told lawmakers that federal government projections show a "high probability" oil could reach the Pass a Loutre wildlife area Friday night, Breton Sound on Saturday and the Chandeleur Islands on Sunday.

As the task force worked far offshore, local officials prepared for the worst in case the oil reaches land.

More on the Oil Rig Explosion

Oil Rig Cook Haunted by Nightmares Since Blast
Oil Spill Growing off Coast after Rig Explosion
Oil Spill Continues; Will Robot Fix Leak?
Man-Made Disaster in the Gulf
Crews Work to Stop Oil Leak in Gulf
Sunken Oil Rig Off Louisiana Coast is Leaking
New Oil-Rig Safety Rules Eyed Before Blast
Louisiana Oil Rig Explosion

In Plaquemines Parish, a sliver of Louisiana that juts into the Gulf and is home to Pass a Loutre, officials hoped to deploy a fleet of volunteers in fishing boats to spread booms that could block oil from entering inlets.

"We've got oystermen and shrimpers who know this water better than anyone," said Plaquemines Paris President Billy Nungesser. "Hopefully the Coast Guard will embrace the idea."

But there was anxiety that the Gulf Coast was not prepared for the onslaught of oil.

"Our ability to deal with this would be like us having a foot of snow falling in Biloxi tomorrow," said Vincent Creel, a spokesman for the city government in Biloxi, Miss. "We don't have snow plows, and we're not equipped to deal with this."

The parish's emergency manager planned to meet in Houma on Thursday with a Coast Guard official to discuss whether volunteers can help, Nungesser said.

"We don't want to just sit by and hope this (oil) doesn't come ashore," Nungesser said.

The decision to burn some of the oil came after crews operating submersible robots failed to activate a shut-off device that would halt the flow of oil on the sea bottom 5,000 feet below.

BP says work will begin as early as Thursday to drill a relief well to relieve pressure at the blowout site, but that could take months.

Another option is a dome-like device to cover oil rising to the surface and pump it to container vessels, but that will take two weeks to put in place, BP said.

Winds and currents in the Gulf have helped crews in recent days as they try to contain the leak. The immediate threat to sandy beaches in coastal Alabama and Mississippi has eased. But the spill has moved steadily toward the mouth of the Mississippi River, home to hundreds of species of wildlife and near some rich oyster grounds.

The cost of disaster continues to rise and could easily top $1 billion.

Industry officials say replacing the Deepwater Horizon, owned by Transocean Ltd. and operated by BP, would cost up to $700 million. BP has said its costs for containing the spill are running at $6 million a day. The company said it will spend $100 million to drill the relief well. The Coast Guard has not yet reported its expenses.

As the oil spill disaster continues to build, the White House is taking a much more cautious approach to the president's previous endorsement of offshore drilling, reports CBS News correspondent Peter Maer.

Officials previously said the accident was not causing second thoughts about the policy. But today, a spokesman said, "We take very seriously the concerns that people have and the issues that are underway today in the cleanup and the fire."

Over the past two days, the president has visited two alternative energy sites - a wind power plant and a bio-fuels facility - without mentioning offshore sources, Maer notes.

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 44 Comments
by ddog88 April 28, 2010 11:52 PM EDT
THE EARF, THE EARF, THE EARF IS ON FIRE-WE DON'T NEED NO WATER LET THE MFER BURN, BURN MFER BURN.
Reply to this comment
by ladd09 April 28, 2010 11:26 PM EDT
British Petroleum owns this Oil Rig. Mark my words, they will say they now have got to raise Gas Prices to recover their losses. You know the company with their pretty Flower as their logo and now their New ad campaign Say's this, BP, Beyond Petroleum. And these guy's are going to get away with it just like Exxon did with the Exxon Valdez Spill in Alaska. They Litigated it for so long, the Lions share of the Plaintiffs died before the final outcome and the Lawyers got all the money and all the fisherman got screwed!
Reply to this comment
by ladd09 April 28, 2010 11:13 PM EDT
DRILL, BABY DRILL!!! I wonder how Sarah Palin "The Alaska Fisherman" feels about all the Fisherman on the Gulf Coast?
Reply to this comment
by DSR_57 April 29, 2010 6:19 AM EDT
My god, are you that stupid ???
by sunday42 April 28, 2010 10:59 PM EDT
Brilliant! Take the pollution from the water and put in the air. Magnificent!!!!
Reply to this comment
by rock0223 April 28, 2010 8:24 PM EDT
The oilers weren't there first. Calling the Gulf a 'fishery' is what destroys the environment. Likewise referring to trees as 'timber'. Well, that's what started the whole 'environmental destruction' boogie in the first place.
Reply to this comment
by rock0223 April 28, 2010 8:22 PM EDT
Yahoo! A blazing environmental catastrophe on top of the one already there. Who's running this? Loonie Tewns, Inc.? They should make an Afro-American version of the Bev Hillbillies, with O'bomba playing Jed.
Reply to this comment
by barbaram99 April 28, 2010 4:38 PM EDT
I would love to see more cars taken off the roads. The day of joy riding is over.. I have been posting since 06. I think we need to address the issue of oil usage..Yep it will run out. Americans are the most wasteful of it. It is true greed is apart of it. Would ye walk to the store down the street or drive..I walk.
I watched a show about oil..It brought up issues we don't want to face..The military uses more oil than the public..
People don't want to see the wind farms..Cars are so costly .
If they are going to use the oil rigs why have they not learnt from other oil stills.
What they will do is raise the cost oil etc.. They have told us to get off the oil and use other systems..The govt wont. Sure the oil stillages does damage. The reason we won't move to cleaner systems are the cost of changing /retooling,redegning etc.. The cost get passed on to John/Jane QPublic.
Gone are the use it once and toss it mindset.
The truth hurt when it hits the pocket book.
Reply to this comment
by Cattzen April 28, 2010 3:52 PM EDT
I'm not claiming a conspiracy theory but, it would seem that the timing of this latest disaster at the behest of the President to begin to open more available offshore drilling would point to the oil company?s consistent efforts to slow the harvest of crude oil in efforts to maintain, and force the increased price per barrel of oil.

???
Reply to this comment
by barbaram99 April 28, 2010 1:25 PM EDT
I am a Mainer by birth and raised there. However the farmers would do a control burn of their fields years ago. The only problem if the wind blew then ye know it could fan the fire.
Years ago there was not that many cars running the roads there. There were pretty blue sky.
I am aware just about everything we use,wear,eat is based on oil..
People can do little things
Like use cloth bags at store
Use the bus if their city/town has it
Drive one car
Plan travel to and from
I do turn off the computer and ask my roommate to do the same
I have use lights but they are turnt off where not in use
TV is on a sleep timer so if I fall asleep it turn off at set time
Wash/dry full load
I can hibernate Notebook
As a legally blind sp needs person there things I try to do to conserve.
I have blankets so the heat is off
A towel at the door
I don't care for AC my roommate uses it as a heart patent
My room door is closed as to keep it warm.

I
Reply to this comment
by AlwaysSmiling April 28, 2010 12:03 PM EDT
Personally I thought the "dome" idea was the best. They were talking about dropping a dome over the well and having a pipe in the top of it to route the oil up to a drill. Essentially finishing what the original well started to do.

I think they should put these "domes" around every active well. Have the shutoff valve at ground level like they're doing now, and have a pipe running through a secondary shutoff valve at the top. One that they can detach the pipe right below and then shut off until they can hook a new pipe up.
Reply to this comment
See all 44 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook