April 18, 2010 8:04 AM
- Text
Goldman Tarnished by SEC Suit, Experts Say
Traders and investors alike are catching their breath this weekend after federal regulators filed suit Friday against banking giant Goldman Sachs.
"This is the watershed event of the financial crisis," bank analyst Sean Egan said.
That's how Egan describes the Securities and Exchange Commission's lawsuit alleging fraud against Goldman, the most powerful and politically wired Wall Street house, reports CBS News Correspondent Tony Guida.
The SEC says that in February of 2007 Goldman Sachs created what it called "abacus," a basket of bonds based on mortgage-backed securities to sell to investors. But the SEC says Goldman failed to tell them some of the securities were chosen by a hedge fund manager named John Paulson, who was betting they would fall in value.
"You'd have to say right now the Goldman Sachs gold standard is very tarnished," Forbes' Neil Weinberg said.
Goldman calls the charges "completely unfounded in law and fact" and adds it "lost money" in the deal for which "extensive disclosure was provided."
Just nine days ago in its annual report, Goldman patted itself on the back with the CEO writing to investors "Our first priority is and always has been to serve our clients' interests."
"Nothing could look worse, nothing could look more hypocritical for Goldman Sachs right now than these type of charges," Weinberg said.
Investors lost a billion dollars in "abacus" in just nine months. The reason, says Egan, is that the ratings of the securities by Moody's and Standard & Poor's were worthless.
"Investors had good reason to assume these were safe securities - they're rated triple A and thought they were on par with the U.S. government," said Egan. "Obviously, they weren't. In fact, these securities were among of the junkiest of the junk."
This, says Eagan, may be the most important facet of the SEC lawsuit.
"It puts the spotlight on the massive, unmitigated, ongoing conflicts in the market," he said.
That the conflict that Moody's and S&P are paid to rate investments by the same firms that create them. Unfortunately, says Eagan, there's nothing in the financial reform act that will correct that. What is needed, he says, is someone at the table looking out for investors, a sort of consumer advocate when deals like "abacus" are created.
Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved. "This is the watershed event of the financial crisis," bank analyst Sean Egan said.
That's how Egan describes the Securities and Exchange Commission's lawsuit alleging fraud against Goldman, the most powerful and politically wired Wall Street house, reports CBS News Correspondent Tony Guida.
The SEC says that in February of 2007 Goldman Sachs created what it called "abacus," a basket of bonds based on mortgage-backed securities to sell to investors. But the SEC says Goldman failed to tell them some of the securities were chosen by a hedge fund manager named John Paulson, who was betting they would fall in value.
"You'd have to say right now the Goldman Sachs gold standard is very tarnished," Forbes' Neil Weinberg said.
Goldman calls the charges "completely unfounded in law and fact" and adds it "lost money" in the deal for which "extensive disclosure was provided."
Just nine days ago in its annual report, Goldman patted itself on the back with the CEO writing to investors "Our first priority is and always has been to serve our clients' interests."
"Nothing could look worse, nothing could look more hypocritical for Goldman Sachs right now than these type of charges," Weinberg said.
Investors lost a billion dollars in "abacus" in just nine months. The reason, says Egan, is that the ratings of the securities by Moody's and Standard & Poor's were worthless.
"Investors had good reason to assume these were safe securities - they're rated triple A and thought they were on par with the U.S. government," said Egan. "Obviously, they weren't. In fact, these securities were among of the junkiest of the junk."
This, says Eagan, may be the most important facet of the SEC lawsuit.
"It puts the spotlight on the massive, unmitigated, ongoing conflicts in the market," he said.
That the conflict that Moody's and S&P are paid to rate investments by the same firms that create them. Unfortunately, says Eagan, there's nothing in the financial reform act that will correct that. What is needed, he says, is someone at the table looking out for investors, a sort of consumer advocate when deals like "abacus" are created.
1 Comments +
Popular Now in CBS Evening News
- Okla. tornado survivor finds dog buried alive under rubble
- 5/24: I-5 bridge collapses north of Seattle; "On the Road": Three siblings survive Okla. tornado
- The forecaster who sounded the alarm for Moore, Okla.
- Sibling rivalry takes a backseat after Okla. tornado
- Jersey Shore shop owners reopen for Memorial Day
- Survivor of KKK Baptist Church bombing: "I had to forgive"
- I-5 bridge collapses north of Seattle
- On the road: Three siblings survive Okla. tornado
- Survivor of Bangladesh factory collapse speaks out
- CBS News goes undercover in a Bangladesh clothing factory
- Security dwindled before deadly Libyan consulate attack
- Man killed in brutal London attack
- Tornado victim reunites with dog during interview
- Teacher injured in Okla. tornado takes first steps
- Second London terror suspect identified
- Injured third-grade teacher tells of trying to protect students


















