April 10, 2010 7:17 AM

Rare Shroud of Turin Showing Attracts Millions

(AP)  The long linen with the faded image of a bearded man is the object of centuries-old fascination and wonderment, and closely kept under wrap. Starting Saturday, and for six weeks, both the curious and those convinced the Turin Shroud is the burial cloth of Jesus Christ can have a brief look.

By late Friday, 1.5 million people had reserved their three-to-five-minute chance to gaze at the cloth, which is kept in a bulletproof, climate-controlled case. Organizers said earlier this year they hoped some 2 million pilgrims and tourists would see the linen during the special viewing from April 10 to May 23.

That number doesn't include Pope Benedict XVI, who will fly up to Turin, Piedmont's capital, in northwest Italy, on May 2 for a day trip to pray before the shroud.

Traditionally, the public gets a peek at the 14-foot-long, 3.5-foot-wide cloth only once every 25 years. But recent decades have seen much shorter intervals. The shroud went on display in 1998 after a 20-year-wait and then in 2000 during Millennium celebrations.

Church officials resisted putting the cloth on display when tourists poured into Turin in 2006 for the Winter Olympics. But, as city officials recently put it, in a nod to the "importance to the economy and employment" of this city that is automaker Fiat's hometown, they allowed that is being billed as the "first showing of the new millennium."

Since the linen's previous showing a decade earlier, restorers have removed patches sewn on by nuns in 1534, two years after a fire damaged the case then holding the it, Shroud Museum director Gian Maria Zaccone said in an interview with Associated Press Television News.

Taking off the patches allowed the linen to be fully extended and let restorers smooth out creases in what for centuries had been a rolled-up cloth, making for what restorers hope will be better preservation.

"A challenge to the intelligence" is how John Paul II defined the cloth in 1998 when he journeyed to Turin to view it. In a major papal pronouncement about the shroud, the late pope asked experts to study it without preconceptions using "scientific methodology" while keeping in mind the "sensibility of the faithful."

His balanced instruction reflected a Vatican tiptoe around the issue of just what the cloth is, calling it a powerful symbol of Christ's suffering while making no claim on its authenticity.

A Vatican researcher said late last year that faint writing on the linen, which she studied through computer-enhanced images, proves the cloth was used to wrap Jesus' body after his crucifixion.

But experts stand by carbon-dating of scraps of the cloth that determine the linen was made in the 13th or 14th century in a kind of medieval forgery. That testing didn't explain how the image of the shroud - of a man with wounds similar to those suffered by Christ - was formed.

However, some have suggested the dating results might have been skewed by contamination and called for a larger sample to be analyzed.

Among those in Turin on Friday for the start of the viewings this weekend was Antonio Lambatti, a professor of Christian history at the University of Parma, who describes himself as a skeptic.

"In my judgment, it's a fake," Lambatti told APTN. He cited historical research, specifically a declaration by a church official in 1355 that the cloth was a "representation" of the original cloth.

But the fascination about the shroud "goes beyond history and archaeology," Lambatti acknowledged. "It implies a choice of faith."

Besides the 16th-century blaze, the cloth has had other brushes with disasters, including a 1997 fire in the cathedral.

It also might have survived the covetous clutches of Hitler.

In the early weeks of World War II, the cloth was secretly whisked from its resting place in the cathedral to a monastery in Montevergine in the southern Apennine mountains, recalled Rev. Andrea Davide Cardin, director of Montevergine's state library.

"It wasn't so much that Hitler was looking for it, but that the Nazi hierarchy wanted it as a symbol of power, of omnipotence," Cardin said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press in Rome.

Because of a friendship between the monastery's chief abbot and the Savoys, the Piedmont royal family, long custodian of the shroud, Montevergine was chosen for safekeeping, and a hiding place carved in a wooden altar in a chapel of the abbey, Cardin said.

"During the war, no one knew it was there, except for the Victor Emmanuel III (then king of Italy), the head abbot and the Vatican secretary of state," he said.

The shroud was returned to Turin's cathedral in 1946, after the war's end, Cardin said. "What would have happened if, instead of entrusting it to the Benedictine monks of Montevergine, it was entrusted to the monks of Monte Cassino?" Cardin said, saying he was quoting a 1946 letter from then Turin Cardinal Maurilio Fossati in tribute to the shroud's survival.

The Benedictine monastery at Monte Cassino, about 90 miles to the northwest, was heavily bombed by the Allies in 1944, and many Savoy family documents about the shroud that were placed there for safekeeping during the war were destroyed, Cardin said.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 19 Comments
by fariborzzak April 11, 2010 3:09 AM EDT
maybe
Reply to this comment
by chevywins1 April 10, 2010 7:48 PM EDT
If the Catholic church was really honest they would declare the shroud a fake since they know that it is fake. There's many reasons why, but I will list 2.

1) Johns gospel says Jesus had a hankerchief wrapped around his head before burial. That hankerchief would have pulled Jesus's hair tight around his head on the sides. The artist who painted the shroud didn't know his Bible well because of the way he painted the hair on the cloth.

2) The Apostle Paul taught Christians that long hair dishonors a man. (1 Corinth.) Therefore it makes no sense that Jesus would have long hair. Again, the artist who painted Jesus's hair didn't know his Bible well since he is shown with long hair.

The real mystery is .. which artist did the Vatican hire to create the shroud?
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 April 10, 2010 10:13 PM EDT
2) The Apostle Paul taught Christians that long hair dishonors a man. (1 Corinth.)


The Beloved Apostle Paul was among other things 'Human' and allowed to teach that which he believed was necessary. Long hair in itself is nothing, Samson had long hair by GODs edict.
Now, Tell me, "Is long hair a sin"? Also tell me, By 'what' do you judge your answer..

One other thing.. Whom does it hurt if the Shroud is real or a forgery, and why????
by TVO1CITW April 10, 2010 10:36 AM EDT
There are no remnants from Christ. People would do just what is being done here they would focus on the item and not Him. Man begins to worship things instead of the One they should be focusing on. That is one of the major problems with any church that has pictures and shrines and idols of things that are supposed to be in heaven.

?You shall not make for yourself a carved image--any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth;? Exodus 20:4
Reply to this comment
by from_the_north April 11, 2010 9:36 AM EDT
The bible says, "Charity shall cover the multitude of sins" 1 Peter iv. 8, and "It is more blessed to give than to receive" Acts xx. 35, and "Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God" Luke 6:20,24. Now does these parts of the bible belong to the modern catholic church?
by pensacola8-2009 April 10, 2010 10:36 AM EDT
I read about this shroud 40 years ago. It was intriguing as a little boy. A few visits to Ripley's Believe It or Not museums started to give me some perspective about the oddities that are unexplained. I concluded that our attachment to possessions and the vanity behind discriminating which is more valuable than the other gives the greatest clue to what lies inside our hearts. Materialism is a powerful factor in relationships. A Holy Shroud in Turin is a splendid example of Pagan temple...complete with Pagan patriots and those who empower materialism to define themselves.
Reply to this comment
by JustYourAverageReader April 10, 2010 9:07 AM EDT
This is proof that human idiocy is infinite.
Reply to this comment
by p94932 April 10, 2010 7:23 AM EDT
they aint no way to no for sure this is the pic of christ, for all we know it could be the town drunk!!!!
unless we take a trip back in time to see christ wrapped in the shroud its hearsay! No way to know for sure!
But, if you like that I got some ocean front property in Arizona Id like to sell ya!
Reply to this comment
by taxchurches April 10, 2010 3:42 AM EDT
"a choice of faith."

Isn't that like saying, choosing to be deluded, choosing to ignore reality? Of course it is.

And all the claims about this old rug are nonsense. It has been painstakingly examined numerous times, and repeatedly shown to be a fraud. For that matter, it doesn't even remotely resemble anything described in the Bible. At the time of this thing's manufacture -- the 14th century -- "holy" relics were abundant, from enough pieces of the cross to build a Walmart, to an disproportionately (we hope) alarming number of Jesus's foreskins.
Reply to this comment
by Overruled1 April 10, 2010 2:57 PM EDT
That's funny, for the church and the Spaniards gave no choice of faith to their victims.
by bankersvox April 10, 2010 2:38 AM EDT
The carbon dating was faulty , because it too peripheral twigs, that had been sewed during that 1300s etc to tighten the cloth. What is amazing about the scientific inspection, is the BLOOD protein, not visible to the eye, that was found where wounds would have been, with folding of the cloth. This was unexpected and unexplainable, unless....
Reply to this comment
by Overruled1 April 10, 2010 4:01 PM EDT
unless what? What is so unexpected about finding blood in of all things a burial cloth?
If the blood was so special we'd have drinking beverages labeled ticket to heaven...
by rwsmith29456 April 10, 2010 2:19 AM EDT
What I would like to know is why a medieval forger would create a faint, negative image on the cloth.
Reply to this comment
by Overruled1 April 10, 2010 12:30 PM EDT
DaVinci
by RoboBlogger April 10, 2010 12:22 AM EDT
ehh...i really don't believe it's real either. kinda odd to have this come up during this big scandal. another scandal within a scandal? hmm...maybe. who knows. all i know is they could've handle this matter when it was small rather than have erupt into a big a@# ordeal.
Reply to this comment
See all 19 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook