Most Young Adults: Oral Sex Is Not Sex
What is sex? Think you have that answer down pat? Well, if you have a teen or college-aged child, you might want to ask them what they think.
Most young adults agree penile-vaginal intercourse is sex, but less than one in five think that oral-genital contact counts as "having sex," according to a 2007 survey of undergraduate college students.
This attitude toward oral sex represents a dramatic and sudden shift in thinking since 1991, when a similar survey found that nearly twice as many young adults (about 40%) would classify oral-genital contact as sex.
Researchers point to former President Clinton's infamous statement, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman," as the pivotal turning point in society's changing views about oral sex. The attitude shift has been dubbed the "Clinton-Lewinsky" effect.
"Like President Clinton, adolescents and young adults often interpret these words with a degree of latitude, depending on whether they want to maintain an image of being sexually experienced or inexperienced," Jason D. Hans and colleagues at the University of Kentucky, Lexington write in their report, "Sex Redefined: The Reclassification of Oral-Genital Contact."
A surge in abstinence-only education and sex education programs that focus primarily on vaginal-penile intercourse also may play a role in the disassociation of oral-genital stimulation from sex, the authors say.
Would You Say You Had Sex If ...?
The survey involved 477 undergraduate students, mostly white heterosexual females, enrolled in a human sexuality class. The majority (98%) of participants was age 24 or younger; the average age was 20.7 years.
The participants answered the following question:
"Would you say you 'had sex' with someone if the most intimate behavior you engaged in was ..."
• Penile-vaginal intercourse?
• Penile-anal intercourse?
• Oral contact with partner's genitals?
• Partner's oral contact with your genitals?
• Partner touches your genitals?
• You touch partner's genitals?
• Oral contact with partner's breasts/nipples?
• You touch partner's breasts/nipples?
• Deep kissing?
• Partner's oral contact with your breasts/nipples?
• Partner touches your breasts/nipples?
Among the survey's notable findings:
• Only 20% of those surveyed said oral contact with their partner's genitals would constitute sex.
• Less than 80% of participants considered penile-anal intercourse as sex.
Males were much more likely than females to say sex included the following behaviors:
• Their partner touched their genitals (13% vs. 7%).
• Orally stimulating a partner's breasts or nipples (9% vs. 4%).
• Touching a partner's breast or nipples (8% vs. 3%).
Why the Concern?
Oral sex has become increasingly acceptable among youths in recent years, perhaps because it's viewed by some as a less risky alternative. But experts say oral-genital contact can lead to sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Such diseases include HIV, herpes, syphilis, gonorrhea, and the human papillomavirus (HPV), which has been linked to cervical cancer.
The researchers encourage sex educators to increase awareness about oral sex and how it can lead to the spread of STDs.
Complete survey results are available online ahead of print. The article will be published in the June 2010 issue of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health.
By Kelli Stacy
Reviewed by Laura Martin
?2005-2008 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved
© 2010 WebMD, LLC.. All Rights Reserved. Most young adults agree penile-vaginal intercourse is sex, but less than one in five think that oral-genital contact counts as "having sex," according to a 2007 survey of undergraduate college students.
This attitude toward oral sex represents a dramatic and sudden shift in thinking since 1991, when a similar survey found that nearly twice as many young adults (about 40%) would classify oral-genital contact as sex.
Researchers point to former President Clinton's infamous statement, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman," as the pivotal turning point in society's changing views about oral sex. The attitude shift has been dubbed the "Clinton-Lewinsky" effect.
"Like President Clinton, adolescents and young adults often interpret these words with a degree of latitude, depending on whether they want to maintain an image of being sexually experienced or inexperienced," Jason D. Hans and colleagues at the University of Kentucky, Lexington write in their report, "Sex Redefined: The Reclassification of Oral-Genital Contact."
A surge in abstinence-only education and sex education programs that focus primarily on vaginal-penile intercourse also may play a role in the disassociation of oral-genital stimulation from sex, the authors say.
Would You Say You Had Sex If ...?
The survey involved 477 undergraduate students, mostly white heterosexual females, enrolled in a human sexuality class. The majority (98%) of participants was age 24 or younger; the average age was 20.7 years.
The participants answered the following question:
"Would you say you 'had sex' with someone if the most intimate behavior you engaged in was ..."
• Penile-vaginal intercourse?
• Penile-anal intercourse?
• Oral contact with partner's genitals?
• Partner's oral contact with your genitals?
• Partner touches your genitals?
• You touch partner's genitals?
• Oral contact with partner's breasts/nipples?
• You touch partner's breasts/nipples?
• Deep kissing?
• Partner's oral contact with your breasts/nipples?
• Partner touches your breasts/nipples?
Among the survey's notable findings:
• Only 20% of those surveyed said oral contact with their partner's genitals would constitute sex.
• Less than 80% of participants considered penile-anal intercourse as sex.
Males were much more likely than females to say sex included the following behaviors:
• Their partner touched their genitals (13% vs. 7%).
• Orally stimulating a partner's breasts or nipples (9% vs. 4%).
• Touching a partner's breast or nipples (8% vs. 3%).
Why the Concern?
Oral sex has become increasingly acceptable among youths in recent years, perhaps because it's viewed by some as a less risky alternative. But experts say oral-genital contact can lead to sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Such diseases include HIV, herpes, syphilis, gonorrhea, and the human papillomavirus (HPV), which has been linked to cervical cancer.
The researchers encourage sex educators to increase awareness about oral sex and how it can lead to the spread of STDs.
Complete survey results are available online ahead of print. The article will be published in the June 2010 issue of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health.
By Kelli Stacy
Reviewed by Laura Martin
?2005-2008 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved
Popular in Health
- Shocking study: Math skills improved by electric stimulus
- Flesh-eating disease victim gets bionic hands
- Controversial update to psychiatry manual, DSM-5, arrives
- Skin cancer self-exam: What to look for (PHOTOS)
- Handbags may contain more germs than average toilet flush
- Doctor: Gel manicures a potential skin cancer risk
- CDC: One in five U.S. kids has mental health disorder
- Depression may double stroke risk for middle-aged women














For all of you liberals who have in the past defended .........
==========================================================
I would personally like to take you and the rest of your
Morongelical christian brethren and place you all on the
bottom of the sea.
Don't worry about apologizing to us now, those of us who already knew he was wrong have already come to the realization that this type of behavior is somehow acceptable to many people in your party. We also predicted what effect this would have on our children and impressionable youth, and now you are hearing it from a group of researchers, who don't apparently have an agenda against Democrats. Apparently this change in behavior has a new name, The Clinton-Lewinsky effect, Mr. Clinton should be so proud to have something else named after him.
Every one of you has or knows someone with young adults in their household. I have 3 young children and as you might imagine, I am concerned with this news. I guess this is progress, right?
I know some will bring up names of unfaithful Republicans, please continue to do so. I want them outed. Just remember this, President Clinton dragged his lies out for years, perjuring himself to a grand jury investigation, so this was not just being unfaithful, he lied to each and every one of us in the highest court in the land, costing the American public us time and money on a charge he eventually admitted was true.
-----------------------------------------
Hence the decline of societal morality.
Speaking from experience, trust me they are enjoying the anal sex they are having or they wouldn't do it.
"...When I'd heard "I did not have sexual relations" - I heard exactly what the President meant - that he had not gone so far as sex..."
But he DID have sexual relations. If Clinton had said "I did not have sex with that woman" THEN his statement would have been consistent with your explanation. But, heavy petting IS sexual relations, even though it's not "sex"
I also disagree with the interpretation that oral sexual relations constitute "sex" although penile-anal sexual relations are definitely "sex" even though as someone pointed out a lot of girls do that so they can claim they are "virgins" That is a technicality since in reality they can only claim their vagina is "virgin" the rest of their body isn't - but on the other hand, it's pretty sick for a man to assume he has some sort of "right" to marry a virgin or to even place any emphasis on it. From a sexuality point of view, women who are virgins are a bad risk anyway, since they have no real idea of what turns them on and how can any man or woman insure sexual compatability before marriage if they don't at least engage in pretty heavy petting?
In an ideal world people who get involved in relationships where they want to have them end in marriage should start by insuring mental compatability first then check out sexual compatability, and they should definitely be engaging in regular sexual relations for at least 6-9 months before getting married - this insures real sexual compatability after the "honeymoon" glow wears off.
But, we do not live in an ideal world. Many people are involved in situations where they want to get involved in relationships that DON'T end in marriage and nowhere is this more common than on a college campus. Many students these days have at least 5 years of school before they can even get a bachelors degree, and quite a lot of that time must be spent studying. It is pretty unrealistic to expect them to just turn off their sex drives for 5 years, particularly when they have already had boyfriend/girlfriend relationships in high school. "Friends-with-benefits" relationships suit these situations just fine.