Dow
     -89.23
12801.23
-0.69%
|
     -9.31
1342.64
-0.69%
|
     -108.90
14000.51
-0.77%
|
     -23.35
2903.88
-0.80%
|
     -1.03
53.27
-1.90%
|
     +1.09
116.27
+0.95%
|
     +0.01
2.01
+0.42%
April 7, 2010 12:32 PM

Greenspan: Subprime Mess Not Fed's Fault

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan testifies before the Federal Crisis Inquiry Commission, April 7, 2010.

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan testifies before the Federal Crisis Inquiry Commission, April 7, 2010. (CBS)

(AP)  Updated at 11:25 a.m. Eastern

Alan Greenspan defended his tenure Wednesday as head of the Federal Reserve before a panel investigating the roots of the financial crisis. As he has in the past, Greenspan disputed critics who say he kept interest rates too low for too long, encouraging risky lending.

Greenspan also hit back against criticism that his Fed failed to regulate high-risk loans to borrowers who couldn't afford the debt. Many of those loans became the toxic assets that sparked the crisis.

Testifying to the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, Greenspan insisted the Fed lacked authority to regulate the nonbank lenders that issued most subprime mortgages.

But Phil Angelides, the panel chairman, referred to internal Fed documents in which staffers had recommended "broad prohibitions on deceptive lending." Angelides said the Fed had issued guidance on predatory lending but had failed to regulate it.

"Why, in the face of all that, did you not act to contain abusive, deceptive subprime lending?" Angelides, a former California state treasurer, asked Greenspan.

Greenspan pointed to a series of actions he said the Fed took. Angelides countered that the Fed's actions covered only 1 percent of the subprime lending market.

"You could've, you should've and you didn't" regulate the lending activities, he said.

In his opening remarks, Greenspan blamed a litany of other parties and historical events for the meltdown but accepted no responsibility for himself or the Fed, which he led from 1987 until early 2006.

He said excess saving in developing nations left too much money in the system. And he said credit rating agencies undercounted the risk of mortgage investments.

Greenspan said demand from the government-backed mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac inflated the housing bubble. He said the government policy of encouraging homeownership pushed Fannie and Freddie to create demand for risky loans. Those firms play a vital role in the mortgage market by buying up mortgage loans and packaging them into bonds that are resold to global investors.

But Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, said the Greenspan Fed's decision not to set national mortgage lending standards was a key factor in the housing bubble - far more so than Fannie and Freddie.

Zandi noted that countries like Canada and Germany with tighter regulations largely avoided the bust, while countries that followed the U.S. model of light regulation fell into crisis.

"The Federal Reserve had that authority," Zandi said in an interview. "They just never acted on it. That was a clear policy decision."

Zandi also rebutted Greenspan's argument that his Fed's low-interest-rate policy played no role.

"The aggressive monetary policy in the wake of the tech bubble contributed to the inflating of the housing bubble," Zandi said. "There's strong evidence that the Federal Reserve kept interest rates too low for too long."

Regarding his own missteps over his two decades as Fed chair, Greenspan said, "I was wrong 30 percent of the time, and there were an awful lot of mistakes in 21 years."

He would not cite any specific failures, except banks' and regulators' collective failure to anticipate that so many challenges would hit the financial system at once.

Greenspan said future credit crises will be prevented only if banks:

Are required to hold more capital as a buffer against future loan losses.

Are forced to keep more cash-like assets instead of investments that can be hard to sell

Are required to hold more collateral to protect against default by other financial companies.

The 10 bipartisan commissioners later will grill former and current executives of Citigroup Inc. about that bank's role in financing and reselling mortgage investments.

Greenspan's appearance opened three days of hearings by the FCIC. The hearings are focused on high-risk mortgage lending and the way trillions of dollars in risky mortgage debt was spread through the financial system. They are designed to provide a firsthand accounting of decisions that inflated a mortgage bubble and triggered the financial crisis.

The panel is using Citigroup as a case study because the bank was heavily involved in every stage of that process. The megabank was a major subprime lender through its subsidiary CitiFinancial. Other divisions of Citigroup pooled those loans and loans purchased from other mortgage companies and sold the income streams to investors.

As borrowers defaulted, Citigroup took losses on mortgage-related investments it held on and off its books. Mortgage troubles at Citi, defunct investment bank Bear Stearns and elsewhere exposed cracks in the financial system. In late 2007 and throughout 2008, those fissures grew into a full-fledged credit crisis that crippled the global economy.

The FCIC aims to dissect the bank's structure and show how its functions interacted. Wednesday's witness list includes current and former executives from CitiMortgage, parent company Citigroup Inc., and the division of Citi Markets & Banking that created the most notorious mortgage-backed investments.

Congress created the FCIC last year to examine the causes of that crisis. It is structured like the 9/11 panel that examined intelligence failures preceding the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Like that panel, the commission has authority to issue subpoenas to compel witnesses to testify or force companies to turn over documents. The commission is charged with examining 22 topics - from executive compensation to tax policy - in a report it must issue Dec. 15.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment
by riddelup April 7, 2010 5:20 PM EDT
Greenspan has to take partial blame because he helped interest rates artificially low.
Reply to this comment
by kalojohn April 7, 2010 2:26 PM EDT
Mark Zandi is an over quoted politically biased economist lacking any intellectual weight. You may not like Alan Greenspan but for Zandi to be stood up as an "expert" against him is ridiculous.
Reply to this comment
by ffotoragg April 7, 2010 12:32 PM EDT
greenspan, summers, and rubin were the only ones responsible for blocking brooksley born from REGULATING cds--and she also told them what would happen if they didn't do it--and i believe she said it in a public senate hearing!!! if it hadn't been for all the DE-REGULATION, things might have been stopped, or at least recognized before they got soooo bad----the black pools and things not traded in public are what get everybody in trouble--and if greenspan doesn't admit to it--he's a lying b-----d--
Reply to this comment
by dcreno April 7, 2010 10:40 AM EDT
I know first hand how a lender will tell you one thing about what you can afford. and what you know you can afford.we were smart and stuck to our budget when we bought our house . our bank told us we could afford a $320k house which in reality was more like $250. i do not feel sorry for these homeowners who bit off more than they knew they could chew, or took risky interest only option loans ans ARM loans . or cashed out all their equity so they could buy cars ,RV's and toys.. do the math people . stop being greedy, and living beyond youe means!! "champagne appetite on a beer budget!!" what was so hard about an FHA 30 yr fixed loan? theres our rule of thumb, if you get paid every week your mortgage should be LESS than 1 and a half paychecks .. but, i do have to say thank you ,because we were able to buy a house that during the houseing bubble was about $100k more than we could afford. so thank you greedy people!!!
Reply to this comment
by tsigili April 7, 2010 10:20 AM EDT
The fault lies in the government, whose regulatory oversight was inadequate to keep banks from investing in shady deals.

Trouble is.....the Dems keep asking us to "invest in bigger and bigger government", that is totally ineffective at doing anything other than spending money with little to show for it.
Reply to this comment
by omega42 April 7, 2010 12:07 PM EDT
Uhn huh, the real fault with the Government is certain dummies keep electing a party to run it that openly professes to hate it. When the regulatory structure then fails because said government hating party staffed the regulatory agencies with former lobbyists that had previously opposed those agencies, then the dummies point to the failures of government as some sort of self fulfilling prophecy.
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook