AP/ April 12, 2010, 1:23 PM

Oil Spill Threatens Great Barrier Reef

A coal-carrying ship that strayed outside a shipping lane and ran aground in protected waters was leaking oil on Australia's Great Barrier Reef and was in danger of breaking apart, officials said Sunday.

The Chinese Shen Neng 1 ran aground late Saturday on Douglas Shoals, a favorite pristine haunt for recreational fishing east of the Great Keppel Island tourist resort. The shoals - off the coast of Queensland state in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park - are in a protected part of the reef where shipping is restricted by environmental law.

Authorities fear an oil spill will damage the world's largest coral reef, which is off northeast Australia and listed as a World Heritage site.

The ship hit the reef at full speed, nine miles outside the shipping lane, State Premier Anna Bligh said.

A police boat was standing by to remove the 23 crew if the ship broke apart and an evacuation was necessary, she said.

Patches of oil were seen near the stricken ship early Sunday, but Maritime Safety Queensland reported no major loss from the 950 metric tons of oil on board.

"We are now very worried we might see further oil discharged from this ship," Bligh told reporters.

Maritime Safety Queensland general manager Patrick Quirk said the vessel was badly damaged on its port side.

"At one stage last night, we thought the ship was close to breaking up," he told reporters. "We are still very concerned about the ship."

"It is in danger of actually breaking a number of its main structures and breaking into a number of parts," he added.

A salvage contract had been signed, but the operation would be difficult and assessing the damage to the ship could take a week, Quirk said.

Bligh said she feared the salvage operation could spill more oil, which could reach the mainland coast within two days.

Local emergency crews were on standby to clean any oil that reached mainland beaches, she said.

Aircraft on Sunday began spraying chemicals on the oil patches to disperse it, she said.

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett said authorities had been working through the night to determine what risks the ship posed to the environment.

"The government is very conscious of the importance of the Great Barrier Reef environment and ensuring that impacts on its ecology are effectively managed," Garrett said in a statement.

The 755-foot bulk carrier was carrying about 65,000 metric tons of coal to China and ran aground within hours of leaving the Queensland port of Gladstone.

Conservationists have expressed outrage that bulk carriers can travel through the reef without a marine pilot with local expertise.

"The state government is being blinded by royalties and their shortsightedness will go down in history as killing the reef," said Larissa Waters, spokeswoman for the Queensland Greens, an environmentally focused political party.

Bligh said the question of when ships should require a marine pilot on the reef was under review because of the increase in freight traffic that will flow from new gas and coal export contracts to China.

She said a separate inquiry would determine how the ship came to stray from its shipping lane.

Quirk said state authorities were seeking information about the effect the coal could have on the reef environment if the ship broke up before its cargo can be salvaged.
© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
18 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
paragshah123 says:
The Great Barrier Reef looks to be a truly extraordinary creation. I've never been there unfortunately but I have seen documentaries, and the sheer size and complexity of it are amazing.

http://www.travelaustralia360.com/great-barrierreef-australia.html
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rf35 says:
Pump the oil out, unload the coal, then give the ship any help it needs to break apart. The sections that don't sink where they are can be hauled to the edges of the reef where they will form an anchor for coral to attach. Seems the least they can do try and make up for some of the damage the ship caused. I hope the shipping company is help responsible for clean-up and any other costs related to this little display of gross negligence and incompetence.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I_am_me1953 says:
Straying nine miles off course is not "jut a little bit" Ever heard of GPS?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rightbehind says:
For what has already been spent on the Iraq war we could have put solar power on 1 of every 3 single family homes in the US. The nut cases want to drill here and drill now. People need to be asking why?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rightbehind says:
I like fish. Huge parts of the Gulf are now devoid of fish. Vast dead zones. We need to be moving to Solar and Bio Fuels to remove the threat to food supplies.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
erasmus111 says:
Surely not ALL of China is incompetent?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Overruled1 says:
The Gulf has many dead zones.
Yes it's true.
Dead zones are created because of the lack of oxygen in the water.
Fish and sea creatures mostly need oxygen to live as well.
They breath oxygen in the water, so if there is no oxygen in the water, they suffocate just like you and I would without it too.
Some other dead zones have been found caused by acidification of our seas, mostly due to human dumping into our vast sea.
Just look at Midway Island, there the trash has been upwelling and resembles more a trash heap than the middle of the pacific.
We are responsible for this as humans. No God is going to save us from our actions. We shouldn't live as if there were salvation, because it will be very dissapointing and the future of our civilization depends on us.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rightbehind says:
When using sugar beets 714 gallons of Ethanol per single acre can be produced. When spilled it simply evaporates and causes no harm to the environment at all. When burned it simply produces water. It's carbon neutral. Puts our farmers to work and it's always nice to have extra food in storage. We only use a fraction of the land available for farming in the US. The drill here drill now nut cases say it competes with the food supply. Personally I like fish. I wonder how many will be destroyed by this spill. The gulf has vast dead areas devoid of fish.
reply
curse914 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Unless you are using a "carbon neutral" energy source in the process of creating this Ethanol, it is not "carbon neutral."
edgy44 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Distillation requires energy. Test Question: How many gallons of Ethanol does it take to produce one gallon of Ethanol? If you answer that we should use geothermal energy, then you are about 1-light year away from current thinking. I'm all for Alcohol based fuel, but we need a natural source of energy first.
See all 4 Replies
See all 18 Comments