CBS/AP/ March 30, 2010, 4:57 AM

U.S. Plans Huge Afghan Summer Offensive

The U.S. military this summer is looking toward a lengthy offensive in the Taliban heartland of Kandahar, an operation that could ultimately define the outcome of the war.

The two-month campaign, expected to begin in June, also will test President Obama's bet that tens of thousands more troops can make the difference in an 8-year war that has shown only modest progress.

"This is really a strategic moment in the history of our involvement," national security adviser Jim Jones told reporters aboard Air Force One during Obama's covert overnight flight to Afghanistan last weekend.

Obama in Afghanistan: "This Fight Matters"
CBSNews.com Special Report: Afghanistan

Kandahar has long been considered crucial to winning the war. U.S. officials believe it was where al Qaeda leaders planned the Sept. 11 attacks, and it served as a governing capital to the Taliban before the 2001 invasion.

That the Taliban still enjoys considerable influence in the city and other areas in the south was a primary reason that Obama decided last fall to send 30,000 more troops. Under his plan, there will be nearly 100,000 U.S. forces in Afghanistan this year - nearly triple the level when he took office.

Military officials have already reported progress in other areas, as fresh troops have begun to trickle in. But officials hope wrestling Kandahar away from the Taliban would deal a fatal blow to the insurgency and help persuade the Afghan people to swing behind the central government in Kabul.

A senior military official said Monday that the offensive on Kandahar was expected to begin in June. The goal is to rid the city of Taliban forces before the Muslim holy month of Ramadan begins in August.

The official, who was not authorized to speak publicly on the operation, discussed it on condition of anonymity.

U.S. officials have previously disclosed plans for a NATO-led offensive in the area this year, but have not said when it might happen.

Until the start of major military operations, U.S. troops are working on securing transit routes and persuading the leaders of districts surrounding Kandahar to cooperate with NATO forces.

Even after major operations begin, officials say it won't look like World War II's D-Day. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, said much of the focus will be on working with political leaders and teaming U.S. forces with Afghan police.

Still, U.S. officials are warning of increased casualties as a result of operations in Kandahar and elsewhere.

"We all expect the fight to get tougher as we carry out the new campaign plan," said Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

CBS News correspondent Mandy Clark reports that more than 1,000 U.S. troops have been killed in the eight year war, and those casualty figures have risen sharply in recent months. In the first three months of 2010, the number of troops killed has nearly doubled compared to the same period last year.

Obama made his first trip to Afghanistan on Sunday, meeting with troops and Afghan leaders.

During his six-hour visit, Obama told Karzai and other Afghan officials that they must step up and make progress on reducing corruption and ensuring the delivery of basic services to the Afghans. In a visit to troops at Bagram Air Field, Obama said the fate of the nation is ultimately up to the Afghans.

"Our intent is to make sure that the Afghans have the capacity to provide for their own security. That is core to our mission," Obama said.

At least 945 members of the U.S. military have died in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Uzbekistan since the war's start, according to an Associated Press count. With the fight engaged more intensely now, the number killed in the first three months of this year was roughly double the total from the same period last year.
© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
28 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
K. Daraa says:
From the article: "...945 members of the U.S. military have died in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Uzbekistan since the war's start."

I'd like to hear more about the US military that have died fighting in Pakistan? Is Pakistan now part of the war zone with American ground forces fighting and dying there?

I know we went to Afghanistan to kill Al Qa'ida after 911. Basically for revenge. Is that still the only reason we are there?

Don't tell me it is to iradicate opium, because we make all kinds of drugs from the stuff, and 90 percent of the world's supply comes from Afghanistan. Opium is big business.

Taliban's sin was to defy the US and shelter Al Qa'ida after 911. Why are they demonized as 911 perpetrators?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lilbear925 says:
Great! Now the terrorists know exactly how long they have to rig all the booby traps, plant IED's and dig in to defend their position -- or they can simply walk to their next position before the attack starts. What ever happened to the old "surprise attack" where we could catch them sleeping or sitting down to feast on a goat, or something?
reply
checkthepast replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
What ever happened to the old "surprise attack" ....

Simply put...
That was before the media was on their side and totally anti-American.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
love2ridend says:
How can Obama look at these soldier and say were going to give you a
1.4% pay raise for this. The smallest pay raise since 1973. What a guy
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bajajohn1 says:
Interesting article. But I do have one question; Why are we advertising an upcoming military operation? Let us warn the enemy we are coming shall we. Let us give them time to relocate.
reply
thinkdeeply8 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If you've been following the war in Afghanistan, the generals are intentionally broadcasting coming assualts on urban areas. The theory is it cuts down on civilian casualties, which in turn wins the heart of the people.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
NowBeWithThat says:
by erichsh March 30, 2010 11:02 AM EDT
Now that CBS has labeled this 'President Obama's War', I note that the press coverage is decidedly more favorable and optimistic.
____________________

Things that make you go, hmmmmm.
reply
thinkdeeply8 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You are seeing what you want to see based on a preexisting belief. It you think the press is bias, then you'lll find every evidence to support the fact, and ignore the evidence that disproves your belief.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wheresmycountry says:
I have to admit I wanted Obama to concede defeat in Iraq and Afghanistan and pull out. He's a good man. He was willing to see his poll numbers drop in his first year while he did the work that needed to be done. Now the war in Iraq is over, and we're starting to make a real difference in Afghanistan.
reply
finkfurst replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
by wheresmycountry March 30, 2010 11:03 AM EDT
...... and we're starting to make a real difference in Afghanistan.
-------------------------
Really? Can you tell us what real difference you're now making? I bet you can't!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
erichsh says:
Now that CBS has labeled this "President Obama's War", I note that the press coverage is decidedly more favorable and optimistic. No more stories about grieving widows, no angry anti-war (ie anti-Bush) protester stories, no ominous polls, no talk about "Obama's Vietnam".
reply
thinkdeeply8 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
See my comment above about preexisting belief.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
slownewsday_____ says:
"by KabulsHere-0005
Yeah, but our commanders are so stupid that they have to advertise their attack in advance.That's because they don't want any fight, they just want the Taliban to leave Kandahar and start its drug business in another Afghan city.Do we really want to end this war?"


Who is "we", Kabhul/Baghdad? You don't live here, and aren't an American taxpayer.


.
reply
thinkdeeply8 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Kandahar is a large city. Control it and you control more of the country.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wyodutch says:
Ah yes. Tunnel at the end of the light.
.
That's why the Obamster is asking the French to lend a hand... cause things are going so well.
reply
tuathadedannan replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I don't think the French will help that much.

Unless our plan is to surrender.
thinkdeeply8 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Thank you France for fighting against the British during the Revolutionary War. You helped free this nation, even though Mr. Washington took the credit. I am happy to be free. Allies are a great thing to have.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sean56v says:
American Forces need a peace agreement with Taliban and al Qada. Many of their people are impoverished and they never enjoyed political enfranchisement from Kabul. The United States promises plantations of medicinal cash crops and international trade. Afghanistan as a sovereign state will cease terror activity against the West.
reply
tuathadedannan replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Is that why they allowed Bin Laden to orchestrate his terror attacks on 9/11, because of our occupation forces in Afghanistan?
See all 28 Comments