March 22, 2010 3:33 PM

EPA Tightening Drinking Water Standards

(CBS/AP)  The Environmental Protection Agency is tightening drinking water standards to impose stricter limits on four contaminants that can cause cancer.

In a speech Monday, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said the agency is developing stricter regulations for four chemical compounds: tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, acrylamide and epichlorohydrin. All four compounds can cause cancer.

Trichloroethylene, also known as TCE, and tetrachloroethylene are used as industrial solvents and can seep into drinking water from contaminated groundwater or surface water. The other two compounds are impurities that can be introduced into drinking water during the water treatment process.

Jackson said the EPA will issue new rules on TCE and tetrachloroethylene within the next year. Rules for the other two compounds will follow.

Jackson made the comments Monday as she announced a new strategy to better protect public health from contaminants in drinking water. With budgets strained and new threats emerging, the EPA, states and utilities need to foster innovation that can increase cost-effective measures to protect drinking water, Jackson said.

"To make our drinking water systems work harder, we have to work smarter," she said in a speech to the Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies.

Jackson called for greater collaboration among states and the federal government, as well as development of new technologies to meet the needs of rural, urban and other water-stressed communities.

The new strategy would address contaminants as a group to improve efficiency; develop new technologies to address health risks from a broad array of contaminants; use a combination of federal and state laws to protect drinking water; and form partnerships with states.

EPA's current approach to drinking water protection is focused on detailed assessments of individual contaminants and can take many years, Jackson said, resulting only in "slow progress."

TCE is especially problematic. The compound was used to clean nuclear missiles and was frequently dumped at missile sites.

Exposure to high concentrations of the chemical can cause nervous system problems, liver and lung damage, abnormal heartbeat, coma and death, according to the Department of Health and Human Services' Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is identifying and cleaning up dozens of former nuclear missile sites in nine states. The missile sites include 14 in Kansas, 10 in Nebraska, seven in Wyoming, seven in Colorado and two in Oklahoma. California, New Mexico, New York and Texas have one contaminated site each.

More people die from polluted water every year than from all forms of violence, including war, the U.N. said in a report Monday that highlights the need for clean drinking water.

In December, an analysis of federal data showed that since 2004 violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act, which requires communities to provide safe tap water, have been found at 20 percent of U.S. water treatment systems, but only six percent of those systems were ever fined or punished by state or federal officials.

The New York Times' Charles Duhigg reported that the violations - which include dangerous bacteria or illegal concentrations of toxic or radioactive substances - affected water delivered to more than 49 million people.


© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment
by dragon8me March 23, 2010 8:31 AM EDT
There is no reason we should have to buy drinking water because tap water is so nasty you can't drink it. It's about time for changes but they need to do more. The problem is cost for treatment. This is the sort of thing stimulus money should be used.
Reply to this comment
by carsoncooling March 23, 2010 5:50 AM EDT
i generally lean toward the liberal side on these issues but i will have to say that most republicans do want clean air they just see a different way of dealing with it.
http://blog.itechtalk.com/2010/joliese-tan-review/
Reply to this comment
by thesevenveils March 22, 2010 4:07 PM EDT
Good idea, poor execution. The EPA should instead focus on the industries that are responsible for the majority of ground water pollutants. This includes strip mining companies (specially coal mining Cos), the coal burning power plants hundreds of lakes of toxic ash soup, and companies like Intel, who use several million gallons of water each day in just one of their chip fabrication plants.
Reply to this comment
by nyscof March 22, 2010 2:25 PM EDT
EPA will also be reviewing fluoride. Fluoride jeopardizes health - even at low levels deliberately added to public water supplies, according to data presented in a 2006 National Research Council (NRC) report. Fluoride poses risks to the thyroid gland, diabetics, kidney patients, high water drinkers and others and can severely damage children's teeth.

The NRC panel, which convened at the request of the EPA, found the EPA's 4 mg/L maximum contaminant level goal (MCLG) for fluoride in drinking water is too high to be protective of health. At least three panel members believe that the new MCLG should be as close to zero as possible.

for more info http://www.FluorideAction.Net
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
Better Information. Better Health.
CBS News on Facebook