The widely-reviled "
Cornhusker Kickback" is out. A little special treatment for Tennessee is in. A special deal for a North Dakota bank
almost made it in.
Democrats
unveiling revisions Thursday to their health care overhaul bill decided to kill the extra $100 million in Medicaid funds for Nebraska that has become a symbol of backdoor deal making.
But the 153 pages of changes to the massive health care package do include extra money for hospitals in Tennessee that serve large numbers of low-income patients. Democrats say the money simply brings Tennessee up to par with the rest of the country.
And though the bill would revamp the nation's student loan system to make the government the only lender, lawmakers briefly considered allowing just one bank -- the state-owned Bank of North Dakota -- to continue making student loans.
Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D. ended up scrubbing that provision. Fearing it would become a target by Republicans in what he said is "an overly heated partisan environment," he asked the House late Thursday to remove it from the legislation.
Still alive is special spending for Louisiana, Connecticut, Montana and other states that was included in the health care bill that the Senate approved in December. The House may give it final approval this weekend.
Senior White House officials have sent mixed signals about the special deals. They initially demanded that they be eliminated, but by Sunday senior White House adviser David Axelrod said they only objected to provisions affecting just one state.
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs last week singled out projects from Montana and Connecticut as items President Barack Obama wanted removed. There was resistance, however, from two influential committee chairmen, Democratic Sens. Max Baucus of Montana and Christopher Dodd of Connecticut, and their projects have survived.
To help win the vote of Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., the massive measure the Senate passed on Christmas Eve had included $100 million that only Nebraska would get in added federal Medicaid assistance.
The Hunt for Health Care Votes: Democrats to WatchObama Deploys Personal Presidential TouchGOP Plots Ways to Fight Health CareSteny Hoyer: Health Vote Won't Cost Us in Nov.Immediately mocked as the Cornhusker Kickback, critics called it the epitome of special Washington dealing, and even Nelson advocated ending his state's special treatment. Under the changes announced Thursday, the Nebraska provision would be deleted and all states would get additional Medicaid help from Washington.
Also eliminated from the Senate measure was a provision allowing about 800,000 elderly Floridians to keep enhanced Medicare benefits that are being cut for residents of other states.
The changes also include an additional $99 million in 2012 and 2013 for Tennessee hospitals that treat many poor people.
Retiring Rep. Bart Gordon, D-Tenn., has fought for the funds for years to bring the state's aid up to par with the rest of the country, spokeswoman Emily Phelps said. She said their inclusion had nothing to do with his announcement Thursday that he will vote for the final health legislation after opposing an earlier version in November.
The new package also promises new aid for colleges serving minority students, using money the government is supposed to save by no longer paying banks to make student loans. Included are annual payments of $100 million for schools with large numbers of Hispanic students, the same amount for colleges with many black students, and millions more for schools with large numbers of native Americans and other minorities.
Based on Thursday's changes, the health legislation also:
Retains $300 million in extra Medicaid aid for Louisiana, which had helped win support for the Senate health bill from Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La. The state is still struggling to recover from Hurricane Katrina.
Keeps $100 million included in the Senate bill that is expected to go for a public hospital in Connecticut sought by Dodd, who is retiring.
Preserves language won by Baucus permitting many of the 2,900 residents of Libby, Mont., to qualify for Medicare benefits. Some of them have asbestos-related diseases from a now-shuttered mine.
Provides an additional $8.5 billion over the next decade for 11 states and the District of Columbia to help them pay for the more generous Medicaid assistance they have been providing low-income residents. These states are Arizona, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin.
Maintains a Senate-approved provision giving extra money for hospitals and doctors in North and South Dakota, Montana and Wyoming.
More Coverage of the Health Care Reform Debate:Dem Health Care Bill Pegged at $940B Over 10 YearsWashington Unplugged: Nancy Cordes on the Final CountdownDueling News ConferencesObama Cancels Foreign Trip for Health Care PushPelosi: Health Care Bill "Best Initiative" for the EconomyGOP Plots Ways to Fight Health CareObama's Health Care Plan: What Do You Think?CBSNews.com Special Report: Health Care
"The Congressional Budget Office said Friday that rolling back a programmed cut in Medicare fees to doctors would cost $208 billion over 10 years. If added back to the health care overhaul bill, it would wipe out all the deficit reduction, leaving the legislation $59 billion in the red."
If the cuts are left in, Seniors are screwed over. Many doctors are already refusing to take Medicare patients because of the extremely low pay they receive for service from this government program. In the current health care bill, Medicare payments to doctors will be cut another 21%, which will result in even fewer doctors accepting Medicare patients. This is terrible. If Congress tries to roll back those cuts, then this health care bill will be yet another massive federal program that will add to deficit spending. This is terrible. Either way you look at it, this health care bill is a terrible bill. Not to mention the fact that it is filled with corrupt political favors, and was done in a strictly partisan manner. Or the fact that a great deal of the federal savings would the result of forcing states to pay for the system through increased Medicaid coverage. The states don?t have the money, so they will have to raise state taxes on everyone. We can do better than this lousy bill.