March 30, 2010 7:46 PM

Boy Scouts Hid Sex Abuse, Lawsuit Claims

(AP)  The Boy Scouts of America has long kept an extensive archive of secret documents that chronicle the sexual abuse of young boys by Scout leaders over the years.

The "perversion files," a nickname the Boy Scouts are said to have used for the documents, have rarely been seen by the public, but that could all change in the coming weeks in an Oregon courtroom.

The lawyer for a man who was molested in the 1980s by a Scout leader has obtained about 1,000 Boy Scouts sex files and is expected to release some of them at a trial that began Wednesday. The lawyer says the files show how the Boy Scouts have covered up abuse for decades.

The trial is significant because the files could offer a rare window into how the Boy Scouts have responded to sex abuse by Scout leaders. The only other time the documents are believed to have been presented at a trial was in the 1980s in Virginia.

At the start of the Oregon trial, attorney Kelly Clark recited the Boy Scout oath and the promise to obey Scout law to be "trustworthy." Then he presented six boxes of documents that he said will show "how the Boy Scouts of America broke that oath."

He held up file folder after file folder he said contained reports of abuse from around the country, telling the jury the efforts to keep them secret may have actually set back efforts to prevent child abuse nationally.

"The Boy Scouts of America ignored clear warning signs that Boy Scouts were being abused," Clark said.

Charles Smith, attorney for the national Boy Scouts, said in his own opening statement the files were kept under wraps because they "were replete with confidential information."

Smith told the jury the files helped national scouting leaders weed out sex offenders, especially repeat offenders who may have changed names or moved in order to join another local scouting organization.

"They were trying to do the right thing by trying to track these folks," Smith said.

Clark is seeking $14 million in damages on behalf of a 37-year-old man who was sexually molested in the early 1980s in Portland by an assistant Scoutmaster, Timur Dykes.

Clark said the victim suffered mental health problems, bad grades in school, drug use, anxiety, difficulty maintaining relationships and lost several jobs over the years because of the abuse.

Dykes was convicted three times between 1983 and 1994 of sexually abusing boys, most of them Scouts.

Although there have been dozens of lawsuits against the organization over sex abuse allegations, judges for the most part have either denied requests for the files or the lawsuits have been settled before they went to trial.

The Boy Scouts had fought to keep the files being used in the Portland trial confidential. But they lost a pretrial legal battle when the Oregon Supreme Court rejected their argument that opening the files could damage the lives and reputations of people not a party to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit also named the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints because the Mormons acted as a charter organization, or sponsor, for the local Boy Scouts troop that included the victim. But the church has settled its portion of the case.

The Portland trial comes as the Boy Scouts are marking their 100th anniversary.

"They spent a century building the Boy Scout brand," said Patrick Boyle, author of a book about sex abuse in the Boy Scouts. "It's one of the most respected organizations in the world."

The trial "can only erode what they have been doing for 100 years," he said.

The Portland case centers on whether the Boy Scouts of America did enough to protect boys from Dykes.

The Mormon bishop who also served as head of the Scout troop, Gordon McEwen, confronted Dykes after receiving a report of abuse by the mother of one boy in the troop in January 1983.

In a video deposition played for the jury, the bishop said Dykes admitted abusing 17 boys.

But McEwen said he contacted the parents of all 17 boys and the boys themselves, and none would confirm any abuse.

Dykes was arrested in 1983 and pleaded guilty to attempted sexual abuse, received probation and was ordered to stay away from children.

Clark told the jury Dykes continued with his scouting activities until he was arrested in July 1984 during a routine traffic stop while he was driving a van full of Scouts on a camping trip.

A spokesman for the Boy Scouts of America at its headquarters in Irving, Texas, said in a statement the organization cannot comment on details of the case. But it has worked hard on awareness and prevention efforts, including background checks.

"Unfortunately, child abuse is a societal problem and there is no fail-safe method for screening out abusers," Deron Smith said.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 20 Comments
by CBSisCommunist5 March 19, 2010 8:01 PM EDT
Gays in scouting and what happens...
Reply to this comment
by CBSisCommunist5 March 20, 2010 8:41 PM EDT
not talking about the teens
by kansas1946 March 19, 2010 6:21 PM EDT
The problem is that people accept at face value who a person says they are. Parents think if someone is a priest, a teacher, a boy schout leader, that they are trustworthy. That is the most dangerous attitude a parent can take. Trust no one until they are proven trustworthy by their actions.
Reply to this comment
by diamruby March 19, 2010 2:44 PM EDT
The Boy Scouts of American has been taken over by the Mormon church & most of the sex abuse we have seen in Idaho has been covered up & the parents have had to tough time even getting them convicted & put in prison. It is a shame that this church has taken over this organization because it leaves alot of non-Mormon children out. It is one more way to use to get children sucked into their cult. This church like the catholics has so much money that they but their way out of it all. We need to make our children aware of the evil in these churches & other organizations so they can be aware & able to go for help when they are targeted for abuse by these nuts.
Reply to this comment
by 2garden4fun March 19, 2010 1:35 PM EDT
Reading this I finally feel vindicated - 14 years later. My son and his best friend(ala 'guilt by association")were kicked out of their scout troop 14 years ago (by the #2 leader since the #1 leader was relieved of his troop) because my son reported the sexual abuse he had suffered at the hands of his "leader" for 4 years. I complained to the regional scout office but received absolutely no help. The courts failed my son (3 years passed before going to trial) and the Scouts kicked him in the teeth. I realize there are bad apples in every association, but we can't afford bad apples when it comes to the safety of our children. My son still suffers the long term affects of the abuse and the retaliation by the scouts.
Reply to this comment
by fedup12 March 19, 2010 1:12 PM EDT
I'm a scout leader now. There are LOTS of mechanisms in place to protect Kids now. Foremost among them are 2 deep leadership. Training of both leaders and scouts in detecting child abuse and dealing with it is required.

Scouting is huge and I am sorry for anything that may have happened but Scouting does teach ideals, character and morals. It did when I was a scout and I plan to do it as a leader.

A bad apple does not spoil the bunch.
Reply to this comment
by 2garden4fun March 19, 2010 1:43 PM EDT
I have always believed that the #2 leader in my son's troop knew exactly what was going on and most likely was a victim himself at one time. This troop had a history of raising their own leaders and isolation from other troops in the region.
by CBSisCommunist5 March 20, 2010 8:42 PM EDT
A bad apple does not spoil the bunch._
_________________________________________

But molests a few
by Richard_Saunders March 19, 2010 1:05 PM EDT
The Boy Scouts have a rigorous Youth Protection Program, that every leader must be re-trained on every year.

Including:

Creating External Barriers

After selecting the best possible leaders,
further protections for children are structured into
the program. The following policies have been
adopted to provide additional security for youths
in the program. In addition, they serve to protect
adult leadership from situations in which they are
vulnerable to allegations of abuse.

? Two-deep leadership. Two registered adult
leaders or one registered adult leader and a
parent of a participant, one of whom must be
21 years of age or older, are required on all
trips and outings. The chartered organization
is responsible for ensuring that sufficient
leadership is provided for all activities. This
requirement applies to all the activities of
the Order of the Arrow as well as
provisional unit activities.

? No one-on-one contact. One on one contact
between adults and youth members is not
permitted. In situations that require personal
conferences, such as a Scoutmasters
conference, the meeting is to be conducted
in view of other adults and youths.

? Respect of privacy. Adult leadership needs to
respect the privacy of youth members in situations
such as changing into swimming suits or taking
showers at camp and intrude only to the extent
that health and safety requires. They also need to
protect their own privacy in similar situations.
? Separate accommodations. When camping, no
youth is permitted to sleep in the tent of an adult
other than his own parent or guardian. Councils
are strongly encouraged to have separate shower
and latrine facilities for females and when separate
facilities are not available, times for male and
female use should be scheduled and posted for
showers.
? Proper preparation for High-adventure
activities. Activities with elements of risk should
never be undertaken without proper preparation,
equipment, clothing, supervision, and safety
measures.
? No secret organizations. There are no ?secret?
organizations recognized by the Boy Scouts of
America. All aspects of the scouting program are
open to observation by parents and leaders.
? Appropriate attire. Proper clothing for activities
is required- for example, skinny-dipping is not
appropriate as part of Scouting.
? Constructive discipline. Discipline used in
Scouting should be constructive and reflect
Scouting?s values. Corporal punishment is never
permitted.
? Hazing prohibited. Physical hazing and
initiations are prohibited and may not be included
as part of any Scouting activity.
? Junior leader training and supervision.
Adult leaders must monitor and guide the
leadership techniques used by junior leaders
and see that BSA policies are followed.
Adherence to these policies not only enhances
the protection of our membership, but ensures that
the basic values of Scouting are preserved. Local
Councils are prepared to assist units in
implementing these policies: for example, sharing
leadership between units if two-deep leadership for
campouts is a problem. All of these policies are
designed to create barriers to abuse within the
Scouting program.



The guidelines can be found here:

http://www.usscouts.org/safety/yp_guidelines.pdf
Reply to this comment
by jschmidt27 March 19, 2010 12:40 PM EDT
Trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent. Those are the 12 points of the Scout law. What other organization teaches those characteristics? Yes there have been problems with the some Scout leaders. But do not condemn the entire organization because of some individuals. I'm sure there were never any liberals or Democrats guilty of this.
Reply to this comment
by fedup12 March 19, 2010 1:13 PM EDT
Why do you make it political?
by kansas1946 March 19, 2010 6:19 PM EDT
I'm sure there were never any liberals or Democrats guilty of this
*************************

What an ignorant comment.
by jschmidt27 March 19, 2010 12:33 PM EDT
In the last several years Boys Scouts have fingerprinted leaders to do background checks. But the principle of 2 deep leadership has been taught for years and it is the responsibility of the sponsoring organization to verify that the principles are followed. All Scout organizations are sponsored by a Church, or other community group.
Reply to this comment
by jschmidt27 March 19, 2010 12:31 PM EDT
Sorry meboard- it seems I should have address my comments to all the outrageous posters who obviously have no experience with Scouting.
Reply to this comment
by jschmidt27 March 19, 2010 12:29 PM EDT
mebiard- I assume you have some first hand knowledge of your outraguous claim. I was a Scout leader in the 80's for about 14 years. We had to take classes on how to protect boys and we followed the 2 deep leadership principle always. You are never alone with a boy. You can have a personal meeting with a boy over a badge or his progress but in the corner of the large room where the meeting is going on. You don;t share tents with boys. We never had a problem. The media loves to hammer on the Scouts because of the homosexual issue but in reality the program teaches boys responsibility and how to lead. They lead the meetings. An Eagle Scout candidate needs to pull off managing a project and leading the other boys in helping him do it. It is a program that is very valuable to teach boys how to grow and live up to their word. You obviously have no experience in the organization.
Reply to this comment
See all 20 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook