Dow
     -135.17
12755.29
-1.05%
|
     -12.00
1339.95
-0.89%
|
     -135.88
13973.53
-0.96%
|
     -23.41
2903.82
-0.80%
|
     -1.04
53.26
-1.92%
|
     +1.09
116.27
+0.95%
|
     -0.00
2.00
-0.21%
March 20, 2010 9:03 AM

Cabin Crew Strike at British Airways Looms

(AP)  A three-day strike by British Airways cabin crew is set to start at midnight Friday after last-ditch talks between the airline's management and union leaders collapsed.

BA Chief Executive Willie Walsh said it was "deeply regrettable" that the union declined to accept a proposal on pay and working conditions from the airline, adding that offer would be withdrawn once the strike begins.

Unite joint general secretary said that BA "does not want to negotiate and ultimately wants to go to war with this union."

BA said it expects to operate around 65 percent of its scheduled flights over the next three days.

"Tens of thousands of BA people stand ready to serve our customers," Walsh said. "BA will be flying tomorrow."

Walsh added that he had "no concern whatsoever" about the threat of solidarity actions in other countries, after unions representing ground crew and plane service workers in the United States, Spain and Germany indicated they may be prepared to join a walkout.

"I believe this industrial action is completely unjustified," he said, adding that he remained available 24 hours a day for talks.

The prospect of travel chaos in Britain in the run-up to the Easter break also intensified with news that railway signal workers voted in favor of a strike, joining rail maintenance workers. The Rail Maritime and Transport union has not called dates for a walkout of both groups of workers but has refused to rule out the Easter long weekend.

The prospective industrial rest is an unwelcome turn of events for the ruling Labor Party on the eve of a national election.

"As the country struggles out of the recession, the last thing we need is the unions holding the country to ransom," said Theresa Villiers, the opposition Conservative Party's transport spokeswoman.

BA argues that the disputed changes - including a pay freeze in 2010, a switch to part-time work for 3,000 staff and a reduction in cabin crew sizes from 15 to 14 on long-haul flights from Heathrow airport - are critical for its survival. Unite argues it was not properly consulted on the changes.

Analysts estimate that BA has already lost more than £25 million because of canceled tickets and the cost of contingency plans, which include leasing fully crewed planes from other airlines.

The airline placed an advertisement in British newspapers on Friday reassuring customers it would do its best to minimize disruption.

Unite has a second, four-day walkout planned to begin on March 27 and has said more strikes will be scheduled for after April 14 if the dispute is not resolved. It has made a pledge not to walk out over the busy Easter period.

BA's contingency plans for the first walkout allow for the operation of enough flights for around 65 percent of its booked passengers across its network.

A total of 1,100 flights out of the 1,950 scheduled to operate during the first three strike dates will be canceled.

More than 60 percent of its long-haul services into and out of London Heathrow and 30 percent of short-haul flights will operate. From Gatwick, it plans to operate all long-haul flights and more than half its short-haul network. Flights from London City airport should operate as usual.


For more info:
britishairways.com
BA Cabin Crew Strike Alert
unitetheunion.com
By AP Business Writer Jane Wardell

© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment
by rockcutr March 21, 2010 9:09 AM EDT
Sorry for the mistake,,,please reprint. Brittish airways, hates it's employees so much that a mere 1000 flight cancelations is no problem. Likely the bloody snobs of management lost more money on the hold out than if they had resigned to consessions. Typical. The corp is making money,,,but, will not compensate the people that made it happen. Let them eate cake.
Reply to this comment
by hateisafourletterword March 21, 2010 7:04 PM EDT
They lost 19 cents per share. How is that making money.

When your company is losing money, not a good time to strike. They may find out they are profitable with fewer flights.
by hateisafourletterword March 20, 2010 11:48 AM EDT
skank and sjc, fine you win.

Just when the union and management settle this little tussle, do not bother me if I never effing fly your GD airline again. And then if you lose your effing job, do not complain to me.

My point to you two dimwits is that now is not a great time to strike. The economy is terrible and they have a job. How many people in America would love that problem today?

I always loved how unions would strike at an airline and even whisper about safety issues and such. Then in two weeks when the strike was over they expected me to come running back to them. SORRY. If there were real safety issues before the strike then there still may be safety issues. Of course another 5% increase in pay always seemed to "get rid of the safety issues" didn't it? JERKS!
Reply to this comment
by hateisafourletterword March 19, 2010 2:24 PM EDT
Great. Lousy economy. Millions of people willing to work are out of jobs and living with minimal support from family, friends and government. And these morons go on strike.

Maybe we should fire them and hire replacements. There is a time and a place to strike. Now is not the time.
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 March 20, 2010 10:20 AM EDT
"Maybe we should fire them..."

What is this "we" stuff, are you on the board of BA? If not, shut the heck up!
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook