Bernanke Pushes to Retain Bank Oversight
Federal Reserve Chair Battles Lawmakers Who Want to Rein in Central Bank's Regulatory Powers
-
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, March 17, 2010, before the House Financial Services Committee. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
-
Interactive Inside The Fed A history of the Federal Reserve, glossary of terms and a look at changing interest rates.
Testifying at a House hearing, Bernanke waged a fresh battle against Senate efforts to scale back the Fed's role in overseeing the nation's banks.
The Fed boss argued that policymakers factor information they get from the Fed's role as bank regulator into their decisions on interest rates. And, Bernanke said its banking duties give the Fed insights into the health of the entire banking system.
"The insights provided by our role in supervising a range of banks, including community banks, significantly increases our effectiveness in making monetary policy and fostering financial stability," Bernanke told the House Financial Services Committee.
Bernanke's testimony comes as the Fed faces a significant shift in its supervisory duties.
Fed Holds Rates at Record Lows, Again
In an effort to overhaul the nation's financial regulatory structure, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd has offered legislation that would strip the Fed of its power to supervise state-chartered banks and bank holding companies with assets of less than $50 billion.
That would leave the Fed with 35 of the biggest bank holding companies under its supervision.
Critics blame lax regulation at the Fed and at other agencies for contributing to the financial and economic crises. Bernanke once again acknowledged deficiencies, and said the Fed is taking steps to beef up oversight.
"Frankly, the Fed's performance ... has been inadequate," said Rep. Spencer Bachus of Alabama, the senior Republican on the House panel. "In spite of its oversight, many of the large, complex banking organizations excessively leveraged and engaged in off-balance sheet transactions that helped precipitate the financial crisis," he said.
The Fed currently oversees about 5,000 bank holding companies, about 850 smaller banks that are both state-chartered and are members of the Federal Reserve system and some foreign banks operating in the United States.
Dodd's bill, however, would also give the Fed new powers to oversee nonbank financial firms that are so large and interconnected that their failure could pose a risk to the economy.
Such firms could include insurance giant American International Group Inc., or General Electric Co.'s GE Capital business.
Bernanke said the Fed is "quite concerned" about losing oversight of small banks and essentially becoming the "too big to fail regulator" under the Dodd bill. "We want connections to Main Street as well as Wall Street," said Bernanke.
With its narrower authority, the Fed's system of 12 regional banks could face profound changes. The Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank and the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank, for instance, would have no banks under their supervision.
The Obama administration has supported a broader supervisory role for the Fed. Legislation passed by the House overhauling the regulatory landscape doesn't trim the Fed's banking duties.
Former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker, who currently serves as economic adviser to Obama, also argued for the Fed to retain supervision over all the banks it now oversees and cited similar reasons as Bernanke.
"It would be a really grievous mistake," Volcker said of curtailing some of the Fed's banking oversight.
"Something important, if less obvious would also be lost if the present limited responsibilities for smaller member banks were to be ended. The Fed's regional roots would be weaker and a useful source of information lost," Volcker said.
Small banks also made the case to continue to be regulated by the Fed.
Jeffrey Gerhart, president of Bank of Newman Grove, said the Fed would "lose valuable information about local economies," which informs interest rate decisions, if the Fed no longer supervised small banks.
Dodd's bill would also place an independent consumer watchdog inside the Fed. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, however, would have its own director appointed by the president and would not fall under the authority of Bernanke.
The administration has called for a freestanding consumer agency, an approach that would strip the Fed of its consumer-protection responsibilities. The House version of a financial revamp resembles the administration's approach. Bernanke has argued that despite past weaknesses, the Fed should retain its consumer-protection duties. He didn't address the matter in his testimony prepared for Wednesday.
Anil Kashyap, professor of economics and finance at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, said that consumer-protection oversight should be handled by some other agency, not the Fed.
But he backed Bernanke's pitch for the Fed to keep its banking oversight. "Stripping the Fed of its role in bank supervision would be a step in the wrong direction," Kashyap said.
Allan Meltzer, a professor at Carnegie-Mellon University, doubted any regulator can prevent all risks to the financial system. "Setting up an agency to prevent systemic risk without a precise, operational definition is just another way to pick the public's purse," he said.
He also worried that the Fed's extraordinary money pumped out during the financial crisis will eventually spur inflation. "I believe we are headed for higher inflation, not immediately, but later," he warned.
© MMX The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
- Talk is cheap and the American greed is not going to shot it;s self in the foot
Just more hot air to make you people think that the goverment is for you.
wake up american make a stand - Reply to this comment
- Fed's one terrible recent mistake is one too many. Don't let Fed to have that kind of power again ever. Actually Fed is just a hired gun of our financial institutions. Fed couldn't care less about tax payers it just wants to have more tax dollars to themselves.
- Reply to this comment
- "Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke urged Congress Wednesday to let the Fed keep all of its banking oversight..."
In a democratic nation, anyone who argues against checks and balances has something to hide.
And you can take that to the bank. - Reply to this comment
- Understand this Mr. President,Congress and Senate we are going to be looking at all the bills from now on and will not stop looking.
And from this point forward I will be asking the hard questions of my representatives. Understand it is not up to Fox, CBS, NBC, CNN or any other news agency to tell you what is going on, it is our responsibility and if you don?t make the time this is what happens. And if you are in one of the States that is receiving kick backs, you need to call your representative, and let him or her know, that you don?t won?t corrupt representatives. Because if we stay silent, we than also become culpable, it is the corruption that is killing us. Here are some of the web pages I found useful.
www.recovery.gov Track the Money and the spending, this is a government web page.
www.epw.senate.gov U.S. Senate Committee on Environment, Public Works.
www.opensecrets.org OpenSecrets.org is your nonpartisan guide to money?s influence on U.S. elections and public policy. Whether you?re a voter, journalist, activist, student or interested citizen, use our free site to shine light on your government. Count cash and make change.
www.financialcrisisupdate.com The CCH Financial Crisis News Center is intended to provide the legal community and others with news and links to vital information on the current financial crisis
www.senate.gov Congressional Record, Bills & Resolutions
www.cop.senate.gov Congressional Oversight Panel
www.whorunsgov.com A Washington Post Company but gives quick list of who are in a government office.
www.judicialwatch.org Judicial Watch, a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation - Reply to this comment
- Oversight is only half of it, Bernanke. The Financial Sector needs to be re-regulated to the extent that all Depression era regulations are put back in place. You now, since those regulations were very effective and did nothing to hamper the growth and prosperity of Main Street.
- Reply to this comment
- Here's to you, you fiscal genius! Two versions of the same song to make sure you get the message (applies to Congress and the White House, too):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exM8vf2eC5I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1BaBj7G26tU&NR=1 - Reply to this comment




Like this Story? Share it: