March 16, 2010 10:19 AM

Uncle Sam Wants to "Friend" You

(AP)  The Feds are on Facebook. And MySpace, LinkedIn and Twitter, too.

U.S. law enforcement agents are following the rest of the Internet world into popular social-networking services, going undercover with false online profiles to communicate with suspects and gather private information, according to an internal Justice Department document that offers a tantalizing glimpse of issues related to privacy and crime-fighting.

Think you know who's behind that "friend" request? Think again. Your new "friend" just might be the FBI.

The document, obtained in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, makes clear that U.S. agents are already logging on surreptitiously to exchange messages with suspects, identify a target's friends or relatives and browse private information such as postings, personal photographs and video clips.

Among other purposes: Investigators can check suspects' alibis by comparing stories told to police with tweets sent at the same time about their whereabouts. Online photos from a suspicious spending spree - people posing with jewelry, guns or fancy cars - can link suspects or their friends to robberies or burglaries.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco-based civil liberties group, obtained the Justice Department document when it sued the agency and five others in federal court. The 33-page document underscores the importance of social networking sites to U.S. authorities. The foundation said it would publish the document on its Web site on Tuesday.

With agents going undercover, state and local police coordinate their online activities with the Secret Service, FBI and other federal agencies in a strategy known as "deconfliction" to keep out of each other's way.

"You could really mess up someone's investigation because you're investigating the same person and maybe doing things that are counterproductive to what another agency is doing," said Detective Frank Dannahey of the Rocky Hill, Conn., Police Department, a veteran of dozens of undercover cases.

A decade ago, agents kept watch over AOL and MSN chat rooms to nab sexual predators. But those text-only chat services are old-school compared with today's social media, which contain mountains of personal data, photographs, videos and audio clips - a potential treasure trove of evidence for cases of violent crime, financial fraud and much more.

The Justice Department document, part of a presentation given in August by top cybercrime officials, describes the value of Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, LinkedIn and other services to government investigators. It does not describe in detail the boundaries for using them.

"It doesn't really discuss any mechanisms for accountability or ensuring that government agents use those tools responsibly," said Marcia Hoffman, a senior attorney with the civil liberties foundation.

The group sued in Washington to force the government to disclose its policies for using social networking sites in investigations, data collection and surveillance.

Covert investigations on social-networking services are legal and governed by internal rules, according to Justice Department officials. But they would not say what those rules are.

The Justice Department document raises a legal question about a social-media bullying case in which U.S. prosecutors charged a Missouri woman with computer fraud for creating a fake MySpace account - effectively the same activity that undercover agents are doing, although for different purposes.

The woman, Lori Drew, helped create an account for a fictitious teen boy on MySpace and sent flirtatious messages to a 13-year-old neighborhood girl in his name. The girl hanged herself in October 2006, in a St. Louis suburb, after she received a message saying the world would be better without her.

A jury in California, where MySpace has its servers, convicted Drew of three misdemeanor counts of accessing computers without authorization because she was accused of violating MySpace's rules against creating fake accounts. But last year a judge overturned the verdicts, citing the vagueness of the law.

"If agents violate terms of service, is that 'otherwise illegal activity'?" the document asks. It doesn't provide an answer.

Facebook's rules, for example, specify that users "will not provide any false personal information on Facebook, or create an account for anyone other than yourself without permission." Twitter's rules prohibit its users from sending deceptive or false information. MySpace requires that information for accounts be "truthful and accurate."

A former U.S. cybersecurity prosecutor, Marc Zwillinger, said investigators should be able to go undercover in the online world the same way they do in the real world, even if such conduct is barred by a company's rules. But there have to be limits, he said.

In the face-to-face world, agents can't impersonate a suspect's spouse, child, parent or best friend. But online, behind the guise of a social-networking account, they can.

"This new situation presents a need for careful oversight so that law enforcement does not use social networking to intrude on some of our most personal relationships," said Zwillinger, whose firm does legal work for Yahoo and MySpace.

Undercover operations aren't necessary if the suspect is reckless. Federal authorities nabbed a man wanted on bank fraud charges after he started posting Facebook updates about the fun he was having in Mexico.

Maxi Sopo, a native of Cameroon living in the Seattle area, apparently slipped across the border into Mexico in a rented car last year after learning that federal agents were investigating the alleged scheme. The agents initially could find no trace of him on social media sites, and they were unable to pin down his exact location in Mexico. But they kept checking and eventually found Sopo on Facebook.

While Sopo's online profile was private, his list of friends was not. Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Scoville began going through the list and was able to learn where Sopo was living. Mexican authorities arrested Sopo in September. He is awaiting extradition to the U.S.

The Justice document describes how Facebook, MySpace and Twitter have interacted with federal investigators: Facebook is "often cooperative with emergency requests," the government said. MySpace preserves information about its users indefinitely and even stores data from deleted accounts for one year. But Twitter's lawyers tell prosecutors they need a warrant or subpoena before the company turns over customer information, the document says.

"Will not preserve data without legal process," the document says under the heading, "Getting Info From Twitter ... the bad news."

Twitter did not respond to a request for comment for this story.

The chief security officer for MySpace, Hemanshu Nigam, said MySpace doesn't want to be the company that stands in the way of an investigation.

"That said, we also want to make sure that our users' privacy is protected and any data that's disclosed is done under proper legal process," Nigam said.

MySpace requires a search warrant for private messages less than six months old, according to the company.

Facebook spokesman Andrew Noyes said the company has put together a handbook to help law enforcement officials understand "the proper ways to request information from Facebook to aid investigations."

The Justice document includes sections about its own lawyers. For government attorneys taking cases to trial, social networks are a "valuable source of info on defense witnesses," they said. "Knowledge is power. ... Research all witnesses on social networking sites."

But the government warned prosecutors to advise their own witnesses not to discuss cases on social media sites and to "think carefully about what they post."

It also cautioned federal law enforcement officials to think prudently before adding judges or defense counsel as "friends" on these services.

"Social networking and the courtroom can be a dangerous combination," the government said.


For more info:
Justice Department: Computer Crime & Intellectual Property
By Associated Press Writer Richard Lardner

© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 13 Comments
by zocr March 18, 2010 8:56 AM EDT
Nonsense. This is what I think...Some employees have been caught by their boss surfing Facebook for self entertainment during office hours and when they were ask what are they doing, embarrassed they've been caught checking out ex girlfriend's profile, they immediately said they're "investigating" lol. Then the media found out and now is scaring the bazooka out of people lol. If the Feds are actually using Facebook or MySpace to investigate people, they're really bored in there lol.
Reply to this comment
by zocr March 18, 2010 8:54 AM EDT
Nonsense. This is what I think...Some employees have been caught by their boss surfing Facebook for self entertainment during office hours and when they were ask what are they doing, embarrassed they've been caught checking out ex girlfriend's profile, they immediately said they're "investigating" lol. Then the media found out and now is scaring the bazooka out of people lol. If the Feds are actually using Facebook or MySpace to investigate people, they're really bored in there lol.
Reply to this comment
by xsilencefoolsx March 17, 2010 7:08 AM EDT
Don't worry about it-- if you don't like it, your Congressman can help by passing a bill without even having to vote on it... ; )
Reply to this comment
by RoboBlogger March 16, 2010 3:54 PM EDT
Well, one way for Uncle Sam to circumvent those laws in place is to create their own Social Networking Site. Oh no! Did I just let the cat out of the bag? It's already being efforted as we speak and for quite some time now. This is just a ruse to throw people off and give them somewhat of a comforting feeling that there are hoops that Uncle Sam too have to jump through.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb2011 March 16, 2010 3:10 PM EDT
My FB account has a window that asks if I speak Bahasa Indonesia, because I have many Indonesian friends. They also ask if I would like to help with translating.

Actually I wouldn't mind, as I am fluent in several of the more than 800 languages spoken across the archipelago.

And, btw you spook suckers, I have nothing to hide.

But if I click yes, the next page asks for permission to take information from all of my friends on the friends list. This is totally unacceptable, and not required to help translate a page.

I figured early on what this was, and no, FBA/DHS/CIA, I don't do Government phishing. If you want info, don't first try to call me a fool, then ask for my cooperation, this is a matter of principle.

One would think that the Central intelligence Agency would at least know how to ask intelligently.

I was thinking about changing my password to "FBIcansuckmybigBlack..." well you know the gist.
Reply to this comment
by IndiasWorstTechSupport March 16, 2010 6:32 PM EDT
i find that amusing. lol. Ever hear of a 5th wavier? whoever is on your friends list that's on parole/probation all gets thrown underneath the bus. I don't know why they make it so difficult on themselves.
by Hosheen March 16, 2010 2:54 PM EDT
Just another example of the totalitarian state encouraged by George Bush and the neo-con fanatics. This is one more reason why thinking people will be leaving the USA for free countries.

The country was lost when the "Patriot Act" was passed. Now, there's no going back.
Reply to this comment
by IndiasWorstTechSupport March 16, 2010 6:45 PM EDT
why worry about the "Patriot Act" you're probably the last to be screened because you have less knowledge of government importance. employees that work for the government should be on top of the list since they're more likely to have access anything useful for the undesirable ones meaning the terrorists unless they interested in KFC's secret recipe. If anything the only thing you should be concerned about is unpaid traffic tickets/bills in which it shouldn't concern top-level security.
by newsterl March 16, 2010 1:22 PM EDT
"A former U.S. cybersecurity prosecutor, Marc Zwillinger, said investigators should be able to go undercover in the online world the same way they do in the real world, even if such conduct is barred by a company's rules. But there have to be limits, he said. "

NOPE, sorry, but that's plain wrong, if "Joe" cant create a myspace acct with fake info, neither should anyone else be permitted to.
Reply to this comment
by A_Moderate March 16, 2010 12:34 PM EDT
No news here. It's a fact! And it is here to stay. The article forgot BLOGS. Pretty much anything that can be used to build a profile. If you do nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear.
Reply to this comment
by blindersoff March 16, 2010 1:15 PM EDT
Not necessarily true. Eventually it could be used against people that just happen to disagree with each other. It's a slippery slope.
by IndiasWorstTechSupport March 16, 2010 6:49 PM EDT
Reminds you of anything from the movie "Eagle Eyes" media room scene about profiles?
by tsigili March 16, 2010 10:48 AM EDT
"Big Brother" is here. Get used to it. The bonafide police state, will be arriving in the future.
Reply to this comment
See all 13 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook