March 17, 2010 5:33 PM

Bernanke to Wage Battle for Fed Powers

(AP)  Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke plans to wage a fresh battle against Senate efforts to scale back the Fed's role in supervising the nation's banks.

In testimony prepared for a House hearing on Wednesday obtained by The Associated Press, Bernanke argued that the Fed factors in information it gets from its role as a regulator into its decisions on interest rates. And, Bernanke said its banking duties give the Fed insights into the health of the entire banking system.

"The insights provided by our role in supervising a range of banks, including community banks, significantly increases our effectiveness in making monetary policy and fostering financial stability," Bernanke said in his prepared remarks to the House Financial Services Committee.

Bernanke's testimony comes as the Fed faces a significant shift in its supervisory duties.

Fed Holds Rates at Record Lows, Again

In his effort to overhaul the nation's financial regulatory structure, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn. has offered legislation that would strip the Fed of its power to supervise state-chartered banks and bank holding companies with assets of less than $50 billion.

That would leave the Fed with 35 of the biggest bank holding companies under its supervision. Dodd's bill, however, would also give the Fed new powers to oversee nonbank financial firms that are so large and interconnected that their failure could pose a risk to the economy.

Such firms could include insurance giant American International Group Inc., or General Electric Co.'s GE Capital.

But with its narrower authority, the Fed's system of 12 regional banks could face profound changes. The Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank and the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank, for instance, would have no banks under their supervision.

The Obama administration has supported a broader supervisory role for the Fed.

Dodd's bill would also place an independent consumer watchdog inside the Fed. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, however, would have its own director appointed by the president and would not fall under the authority of Bernanke.

The administration has called for a freestanding consumer agency, an approach that would strip the Fed of its consumer-protection responsibilities. The House-passed version of a financial revamp hues to the administration's approach. Bernanke has argued that despite past weaknesses, the Fed should retain its consumer-protection duties. He didn't address the matter in his testimony prepared for Wednesday.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment
by antoniof123 March 17, 2010 10:49 AM EDT
I think it is time to strip the FED of their powers take it back America. These people control our money supply and they control your lives. They are private and look at the wonderful things they did to our country you know sub-prime lending, wall street mess and eveything thing else.

Get rid of the FED they have nothing to do the the Federal government.
Reply to this comment
by rockcutr March 17, 2010 9:56 AM EDT
This is one arrogant putz. The most guilty in allowing the banks to lay a big smelly one on the country, along with the senators that sit on bank board seats. Sure it isn't right but, you can bet senators are there by proxy. All these ticks on the south end of our country need to be dipped with the cheney dawg. That would make a great start to reclaiming some sort of dignity from the internal terrorist known as the fed. MBA's on steroids, not a pretty picture. Lots of fussy fits when these weenies don't get their way. What miffs me the most is this jerk is still arround. Why do we even have to hear about this pin head. Shouldn't he be in with the gitmo boys for terrorist crimes against the People?
Reply to this comment
by hologram5 March 17, 2010 8:08 AM EDT
THIS MAN NEEDS TO BE IN PRISON ALONG WITH ALL HIS BUTT BUDDIES IN PUBLIC OFFICE!! THEY are all traitors to the constitution and should hang for it.
Reply to this comment
by stychokiller March 17, 2010 1:53 AM EDT
So, if this so-called Finance Reform includes having the Federal Reserve account for just where over $700 Billion went in 2009, they might have my support -- if not, forget it!
Reply to this comment
by rykatspop March 16, 2010 10:48 PM EDT
What supervision? There's been supervision? TARP was a thing of the Fed supervising the banks? I'm stunned. God help us if the Fed is allowed to do more than before. Wait, more of doing nothing? Right, more IS less.
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook