March 22, 2010 9:42 AM

Iran Vows Death Penalty for 6 Protesters

(CBS/AP)  Iran said Monday that it would put to death six people arrested during protests in December, the New York Times reported.

The announcement may have been meant as a signal to opposition groups ahead of the "Feat of Fire" celebration Iran March 21 - a non-Islamic tradition similar to Halloween that the government has denounced.

The opposition had called for its celebration this year as a sign of protest and has timed protests to other holidays in the past, the Times reported.

Separately Monday, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's hard-line government said it has banned the country's largest pro-reform political party - a new strike against the opposition movement that has largely been swept from the streets since last year's postelection turmoil.

It was not immediately clear if the protestors facing the death penalty were linked to the banned party.

Keeping the pressure on elsewhere, dozens of government-supporters descended on the home of Mahdi Karroubi, one of the main opposition leaders, on Sunday night, shouting slogans against him and vandalizing his property.

Ahmadinejad's disputed re-election in June ignited Iran's opposition, first in challenging the legitimacy of the official vote results and then in confronting the entire ruling system for supporting him and killing protesters. Besides the crackdown in the streets, authorities responded with a mass trial of pro-reform leaders and activists, restrictions on journalists and a campaign to choke off hundreds of opposition Web sites.

Under the assault, opposition parties are already up against harassment, raids on offices and the confiscation of documents and equipment. So it was not clear what additional effect Monday's announcement would have on the Islamic Iran Participation Front.

Deputy Interior Minister Solat Mortazavi said judiciary has stripped the party of its authorization to conduct political activity, the semi-official ISNA news agency reported.

The party disputed that, saying there was no such court ruling, though it was forced to cancel its annual meeting on March 11.

"There is no court ruling banning us," spokesman Hossein Kashefi said. "We won't be coerced. We will continue our activities as a legal party ... (and) we will take the government to court for seeking to deprive Iranians of their rights as citizens."

Karroubi, who was one of two pro-reform candidates to challenge Ahmadinejad in the June 12 election, has been singled out for sporadic attacks after he revealed allegations that protesters were tortured and raped by their jailers. The claims deeply embarrassed Iran's clerical leadership.

Karroubi's wife, Fatemeh, said vandals damaged their apartment block Sunday night as police stood by and watched.

"A group of about 50 thugs on the government payroll, under the protection of security forces and police, gathered in front of our building and shouted slogans" against opposition leaders, she said on her husband's Web site Monday.

She said "corrupt government officials" were taking revenge on her husband for exposing "dirty crimes" prison officials committed against detainees.

For several months, protesters have held demonstrations coinciding with religious holidays and other national events, and authorities warned activists against any such attempt during Tuesday evening's celebrations of an ancient feast known as Chahar-Shanbe Suri.

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and several other top religious leaders have denounced the event itself as incompatible with Islam.

The celebration is intended to purify the soul for the Iranian New Year, or Nowruz, which begins on March 21. It dates back to the time when Zoroastrianism was the dominant religion in ancient Persia before the advent of Islam and is frowned upon by hard-liners who say the feast contradicts Islamic traditions.

"Not only does it have no Islamic basis, it involves much harm and corruption ... that should be avoided," Khamenei was quoted as saying by the Web site dolat.ir.

State TV quoted police chief Gen. Ismail Ahmadi Moghaddam as saying that security forces and police will "arrest those who block streets or engage in dangerous acts."

The elite Revolutionary Guard and its paramilitary Basij force have also set up a base to "provide peace and order and confront any disturbance" - a clear signal that security forces will crush any possible opposition protests coinciding with the celebration.

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 16 Comments
by DawnBroderick40 March 16, 2010 6:58 AM EDT
I guess it makes Ahmadinejad temporarily feel like a real man when he kills people for speaking out. Oh, and for being gay or anything else he deems unsuitable. Islam, religion of peace my foot. I thought their holy book taught about peace and tolerance?
Reply to this comment
by erb0087 March 16, 2010 6:20 AM EDT
"Iran said Monday that it would put to death six people arrested during protests in December, the New York Times reported."

===========================================

The other day a poster assured me that Iran is a "democracy."

There's been a lot of confusion about the words "democracy" and "republic", also involving a failure to distingusih between "democracy" and "direct democracy," leading to silly statements like "America is a republic, not a democracy."

A nation can be:

A democracy but not a republic - e.g. Japan and Norway.

A republic but not a democracy - e.g. Iran and North Korea.

Neither a republic nor a democracy - e.g. Saudi Arabia.

Both a republic and a democracy - e.g. the United States.

Democracy just means the people (actually the citizens) rule, either directly (as in ancient Athens) or through their elected representatives (as in the Republic of America or the Empire of Japan).

Democracy is a Greek word meaning "people power" -- "demos" (the people) + "crates" (power). The people (the citizens) can rule directly or by electing representatives.

OK, class dismissed.

Enjoy your Spring Break.
Reply to this comment
by KPeters_from_UK March 16, 2010 5:12 AM EDT
by chipsmydog March 15, 2010 9:05 PM EDT
Take note--- True religion:Christianity-Power of God in effect transforming people into the image of Jesus Christ. All other man made, man centered religions are false religions:impotent to change fallen man.
America: founded and based upon fundamental freedom and individual worth inherently characterized by Judaeo/Christian ethic.
Falsehood: No Christianity=No moral basis for society mores and structure which results in a perfectly neutral environment for peace and equality and brotherly love.
_________________________________________

Good post. Think you've just made cambry1 and christoph41's point? Try to substitute the words Christian and Jesus with Islam and Mohammed. Do you see the impasse? No? Go figure........
Reply to this comment
by KPeters_from_UK March 16, 2010 5:05 AM EDT
by 50BMS13 March 16, 2010 2:24 AM EDT
Why isn't Obama doing anything for these poor protesters????
___________________________________

Ahhhh the naivety.

Do you not realize that if just for a moment Obama mentions anything in favor of the protesters Iran will use Obama's words against the opposition as "evidence" of CIA interference. Many exiled opposition supporters and Iranian affairs experts also have asked Obama not to say anything. No one wants to give the government of Ahmadinejad any reason to jail and execute protesters. The media and twitter are doing the best job of informing the world and supporting the protesters. That's what they need people on the inside secretly filming what's going on. The last thing they need is the American government saying anything.
Reply to this comment
by 50BMS13 March 16, 2010 2:24 AM EDT
Why isn't Obama doing anything for these poor protesters????
Reply to this comment
by gorgeousm March 15, 2010 9:40 PM EDT
The current Iranian regime is working AGAINST the interests of the world's non-Islamic people. It is deceptive and more dangerous than we realize at this time.

All that is possible should be done to prevent these Iranian, religious fascists from producing or possessing ANY nuclear weapons!
Reply to this comment
by curse914 March 15, 2010 11:29 PM EDT
by gorgeousm March 15, 2010 9:11 PM EDT
Hi curse914

What if normal deterrence doesn't apply to those religious nuts who actually WISH AND PRAY for that Apocalyptic end-of-world scenario?!

============

It is a tough question. Their theocratic society will never know the advances and success we have. So, I am willing to take the risk. Iran has been on the verge of a progressive revolution since the 1970's. The Iran Iraq war killed the first progressive movement as the Orthodoxy used the war as an excuse to imprison free thinkers and stifle social upheaval. Young men who may have participated in a coup given time were instead tossed into the Iran Iraq meat grinder and killed. But the Nation is right back to the same situation because its leadership have not lifted their people above the muck. Instead they have proven that theocracies are stagnant and regressive.

What I am trying to say in a long winded way is that I think their ability to do massive damage is actually limited by their zealotry. So I am willing to except that risk. And I certainly, if given a vote, would not have Nation Built in Iraq to create some democratic Utopia. We should have assisted revolution, not given the orthodoxy another straw man scapegoat of "The West" or "The Great Satan" invading their lands.
by ToolMangler1 March 15, 2010 8:38 PM EDT
You Iranians out there should remember that Nobody can force any God to do anything. I am Christian and I know that 'I' have no power over GOD. I also know that to even 'try' to 'make' GOD do my will (kill my enemies) will not be good for me when I am called for judgement. To kill somebody for speaking out against abuse of power (even for the Imams) is against GODs will.
Reply to this comment
by wdh3007 March 15, 2010 7:47 PM EDT
On another topic the Afghan government was holding secret talks with the Taliban's No. 2 when he was captured in Pakistan, and the arrest infuriated President Hamid Karzai, according to one of Karzai's advisers. This just shows that Karzai is a puppet president put in by the U.S. & that they are doing nothing about terror in their own country why should we defend it for them? They are all talibans!
Reply to this comment
by gorgeousm March 15, 2010 7:29 PM EDT
NEVER LOSE SIGHT OF THE THREAT THAT THE CURRENT IRANIAN REGIME POSES TO ALL MANKIND

We are advised not to allow ourselves to become too complacent or worn out, while the Iranian ayatollas and President Ahmadinejad continue with their plans for ushering in The Mahdi's or Moslem Messiah's arrival, by way of an Apocalyptic nuclear war.

We MUST persevere against the encroaching Iranian menace that will make this world into a strictly religious Islamic hell - imposing Sharia onto all peoples and all nations - as bad as our worst nightmares.
Reply to this comment
by curse914 March 15, 2010 8:25 PM EDT
Iran would have to have some technology to carry those warheads. Dirty bombs are hugely "inefficient" and could be traced right back to the creator via an atomic signature. It would not be mutually assured destruction; Iran would be the big loser in such a conflict since we would be splitting atoms above their heads not dusting a square mile with radioactive material.

So, we should understand and respect; but fear is only useful to the enemy when scales of annihilation are so dispirit.

You are right though, religious nutters from the Big 3 monotheist faiths cannot be reasoned with.
by gorgeousm March 15, 2010 9:11 PM EDT
Hi curse914

What if normal deterrence doesn't apply to those religious nuts who actually WISH AND PRAY for that Apocalyptic end-of-world scenario?!
by mensarino March 15, 2010 7:10 PM EDT
Take note----This is what happens when you let religion into the political arena.I seriously believe that many in the religious right would love to have the power Islam enjoys in the theocracies of the middle east.
Reply to this comment
by christoph415 March 15, 2010 7:29 PM EDT
Well, it certainly was heading in that direction with GWB allowing the conservative Christians to have a strong hand in many government programs.
by cambry1 March 15, 2010 8:58 PM EDT
Absolutely correct. There is not any differece between what the Taliban does and that what fundy Christians want in the USA. Superstition is dangerous and deadly to rational behavior everywhere.
See all 16 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook