March 15, 2010 7:43 PM

Dodd Unveils Financial Market Reform Plan

 

(CBS/AP)  Updated 6:26 p.m. EDT

A new Democratic Senate bill to tame the financial markets would give the government new powers to break up firms that threaten the economy, force the industry to pay for its failures and create a consumer watchdog within the Federal Reserve.

Legislation unveiled Monday by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd falls shy of the ambitious restructuring of federal financial regulations envisioned by President Barack Obama or contained in legislation already passed in the House.

But the bill, which includes provisions negotiated with Republicans, would still be the biggest overhaul of regulations since the New Deal. It comes 18 months after Wall Street's failures helped plunge the nation into a deep recession.

"We will have financial reform adopted this year in the Congress of the United States," Dodd said.

The bill would give the government power to seize and dismantle failing financial companies and require banks to contribute to a reserve fund to pay for it, reports CBS News correspondent Anthony Mason. It would also create a "Consumer Financial Protection Bureau." The agency would have an independent director, but would be made part of the Federal Reserve.

"There's no two ways about it that the Fed's reputation in protecting consumers is not very good," University of Maryland law professor Michael Greenberger told Mason.

In its sweep, the bill would touch all corners of the financial sector, from storefront payday lenders to the highest penthouse office suites on Wall Street.

"Americans are frustrated and angry, as we all know," Dodd said. "They've lost faith in our markets, and they wonder if anyone is looking out for them."

In announcing his bill at a news conference, Dodd stood alone, a sign of the difficult task ahead of him in forging a bill that can pass the Senate. None of the 10 Republicans on his committee endorsed his plan. Several Democrats have voiced dismay at Dodd's decision to reject a plan for a freestanding consumer agency, an Obama regulatory centerpiece.

The bill also does not fully embrace Obama's most recent demand to reduce the size of the largest financial institutions and to ban commercial banks from conducting risky trades on their own accounts.

Critics say the reforms do little to police derivatives and credit default swaps, the complex financial contracts which helped set off the financial crisis.

Even Jamie Cawley wants more reform. His company, IDX Capital trades $200 million in derivatives a day. The crisis occurred, he said, because the market is unregulated and interconnected.

And "That risk is still there." Cawley told Mason. "We don't think the current legislation in its form today goes far enough."

"The key question of whether we really will be able to fight future recessions, near depressions, is our ability to get a handle on these toxic instruments," Greenberger said. "And we have not even heard the opening shot on that today."

Obama called Dodd's bill "a strong foundation," but he signaled that it fell short of his requirements.

"I will take every opportunity to work with Chairman Dodd and his colleagues to strengthen the bill and will fight against efforts to weaken it," he said.

The bill envisions a leaner Federal Reserve that would gain new powers to regulate the size and the activities of the nation's largest financial firms. The Fed's independent consumer bureau would write regulations governing all lending transactions. Bank regulators, however, could appeal those regulations if they believe they would affect the health of the banking system.

The bill creates a powerful nine-member Financial Stability Oversight Council that could:

--Place large, interconnected financial institutions such as insurance conglomerate American International Group under the supervision of the Federal Reserve.

--Approve the breakup of large complex companies if they pose a "grave threat" to the to the nation's financial system.

--Veto regulations written by the new consumer protections bureau at the Fed.

All those actions would require a two-thirds vote of the council.

The bill also would give shareholders of publicly held financial institutions a voice on executive pay by letting them cast a nonbinding vote on compensation packages. Though advisory only, that step has drawn fire from Wall Street as an intrusion into corporate governance.

Recognizing New York as the capital of the financial sector, Dodd would upend the selection of the leadership of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York Fed, which counts five of the nation's seven largest banks under its supervision. The president of the New York Fed would be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate for a five-year term.

Moreover, Dodd would prohibit past officers, directors or employees of institutions supervised by the Fed from serving on the boards of the regional Fed banks. Under current, law, three of the nine directors in each of the 12 Fed regions are bankers.

The American Bankers' Association panned Dodd's regulatory effort.

"We oppose this bill because it will subject traditional banks, which did not cause this crisis, to heavy new regulation, while non-banks will have even further competitive advantage," said Edward Yingling, the ABA's president and chief executive officer.
John Taylor, head of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, a consumer advocacy group, said Dodd was "capitulating to the industry's interests."

"He's offering a faux consumer protection agency that holds little promise to be effective in the long run," Taylor said.

Author Michael Lewis explained on "60 Minutes" Sunday how some of Wall Street's finest minds managed to destroy $1.75 trillion of wealth in the subprime mortgage markets.

Wall Street: Inside the Collapse
Full Segment, Part 1: Inside The Collapse
Full Segment, Part 2: Inside The Collapse
Web Extra: Is Wall Street Overpaid?
Web Extra: Bailout Blues
Web Extra: The $8.4 Billion Bet
Web Extra: Wall Street Misfit
Web Extra: "The Blind Side"

"This was an episode where capitalism was almost destroyed, just by the capitalists. And, in the most sensational way, they were sort of destroyed by their own folly," Lewis told correspondent Steve Kroft.

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 42 Comments
by Steppenwolf12 October 23, 2010 7:55 PM EDT
Maybe a new approach to financial market reform is needed here. This may be a unique and rare opportunity. In a recent interview Alexander Mirtchev analysed this subject and he considers that the initiatives to reform the global financial markets and reshape regulations ultimately represent an attempt to ?put the genie back in the bottle?. To an extent, the regulatory drive is reminiscent of an effort to bring the global financial system back to its pre-crisis status, rather than reform it. Even though strengthened market regulation and a newly empowered IMF could address certain economic security threats and upcoming financial market upheavals, these regulations could also impede financial innovation, create opportunities for ?regulatory arbitrage? and stifle the eventual emergence of a new global financial system. This reform process would also have to contend with the residue of decades of misdirected policy, over-leveraging and major economic imbalances. It could prove more beneficial for the global economy to consider supporting the emergence of a ?global financial mega-market? of mass participation, based on the technologies and infrastructure that are already in place, that empowers the market players and individual consumers to conduct business activity, incentivizing rather than restricting, establishing clear, consistent and transparent rules of the game, and, respectively, educating about the new realities.
Reply to this comment
by Steppenwolf12 October 23, 2010 7:54 PM EDT
Maybe a new approach to financial market reform is needed here. This may be a unique and rare opportunity. In a recent interview Alexander Mirtchev analysed this subject and he considers that the initiatives to reform the global financial markets and reshape regulations ultimately represent an attempt to ?put the genie back in the bottle?. To an extent, the regulatory drive is reminiscent of an effort to bring the global financial system back to its pre-crisis status, rather than reform it. Even though strengthened market regulation and a newly empowered IMF could address certain economic security threats and upcoming financial market upheavals, these regulations could also impede financial innovation, create opportunities for ?regulatory arbitrage? and stifle the eventual emergence of a new global financial system. This reform process would also have to contend with the residue of decades of misdirected policy, over-leveraging and major economic imbalances. It could prove more beneficial for the global economy to consider supporting the emergence of a ?global financial mega-market? of mass participation, based on the technologies and infrastructure that are already in place, that empowers the market players and individual consumers to conduct business activity, incentivizing rather than restricting, establishing clear, consistent and transparent rules of the game, and, respectively, educating about the new realities.
Reply to this comment
by erich_1-2009 March 16, 2010 1:36 AM EDT
Translation of CBS News articles for today:

President Obama is telling his Democrat collegues to sacrifice their bodies and shove Obamacare down our throat.

President Obama is making the United States less friendlier with Israel and more friendly with Islamic extremists.

...just when I thought it couldn't get worse Senator Dodds and the Obama Administration is trying to control the stock market.

These guys are marxist nuts!
Reply to this comment
by IL-Independent March 16, 2010 8:32 AM EDT
by skyk-2009 March 16, 2010 7:09 AM EDT
erich_1-2009, Do YOU actually ever think? You post the same tired old RNC trash day after day, I guess thinking that everyone out here is as stupid as you are. We HAD the Worst Health Care System in the Industrialize World. We HAVE a financial system that is VERY broken. Now the Incompetent Republiklans have NO solution to anything but FEAR and BIGOTRY... we KNOW this because they TOLD us that. We have ONE Party right now and ONE President that are trying to do something about these and so many other problems. The Other party? They know NOTHING but the word "NO". They are INCOMPETENT and are bought and paid for by the Corporations... thus we will address this Problem as we have done all along, with ONE party trying to do something and the other party trying to stop them from doing something. You do know there are places you can get educated in reading don't you?


You are such a lying a$$ punk. First off, show me where the Republicans are Bigots? You Can't. Secondly the Summit proved Republicans had idea's, the DEMOCRATS did not like them. You have no honor or code. You are a disgrace to the uniform you wore. And if you are still teaching, lord help those students
by likeitbe March 16, 2010 1:36 AM EDT
Dodd will be voted out in November. He;s irrelevant.
Reply to this comment
by IL-Independent March 16, 2010 8:33 AM EDT
Listen here Skyk, you POS

You are a bigot too, so shut the F Up
by bajajohn1 March 15, 2010 11:00 PM EDT
Voters need to throw obstructionist Republicans out of the Congress. They are bad for the economy, bad for the interests of working people and bad for the nation. We must forge ahead without their obstructionism dragging on the nation's heels.
Reply to this comment
by bankersvox March 15, 2010 10:48 PM EDT
Why has it taken Dodd, who has been there for so long, and the Sen from The Bank State....
Reply to this comment
by rockcutr March 15, 2010 8:42 PM EDT
This is toothless legislation. If the banks have the ability to repeal the recomndations, no thing good can come of it. A huge waste of time. I wonder why sparing the rod is assumed to not spoil the banking child. They have their foot on the neck of america. Personally I think that foot should be in a bear trap.
Reply to this comment
by run2jazz2 March 15, 2010 8:00 PM EDT
Dodd is on his way out! Pass legislation and go retire!
Reply to this comment
by IL-Independent March 16, 2010 8:36 AM EDT
EARTH TO SKYK,
YOU ARE A MORON. THERE IS NO CAMPAIGN TO HATE THE PRESIDENT. AND THE MELT DOWN WAS JUST AS MUCH THE DEMOCRATS FAULT AS THE REPUBLICANS. MORON
by Lickedy March 15, 2010 7:57 PM EDT
Good deal, we'll have multiple foxes watching the hen house ! That way, when one fox get's too glutenous, the others can carve up and devour the kill much faster. You know this is exactly what's going to happen ? Money talks and more legislation will only cost more so in the end, the new officers will be bought-off. The only answer is to get rid of the Federal Reserve and put the money in the Treasury, where it belongs. If not, then enjoy the merry-go-round.
Reply to this comment
by curse914 March 15, 2010 7:47 PM EDT
For a little context. Dodd voted for the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act which opened the flood gates.

If anyone is interest in the individuals who voted for this act here is a link.

For anyone who wants to crow Partisan. Republicans in the Senate overwhelmingly supported and crafted this bill. Shelby (R-AL) stood alone in his NAY vote on the Republican side.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=1&vote=00354
Reply to this comment
See all 42 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook