AP/ March 13, 2010, 10:50 AM

Fish Supply Crisis Could Trigger Bans

The Atlantic bluefin tuna and other marine life in the world's overfished oceans will be the focus of a two week United Nations conference that opened Saturday in the Gulf state of Qatar.

The 175-nation Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, or CITES, will be discussing new proposals to regulate the shark trade and a ban on the export of Atlantic bluefin, a tuna species prized by sushi lovers.

There are 42 proposals on the table at the conference, addressing a range of issues from combating elephant poaching for ivory in Africa to banning trade in polar bear skins. But those focusing on sharks and tuna are likely to be among the most contentious.

They pit the Europeans and Americans against fishing nations in North Africa and Asia, especially Japan, which has already vowed to ignore any bluefin ban. A bid to regulate the trade in red and pink corals - harvested to make expensive jewelry - could also divide the delegates.

CITES Secretary-General Willem Wijnstekers told The Associated Press this week that countries were turning to his organization because existing management tools were not working and that many of the ocean's commercially fished species were under threat. He also said there was much more support than two years ago for restricting or banning the trade of many marine species, including the Atlantic bluefin.

"I don't think anyone has an argument against the listing of Atlantic bluefin tuna," said Wijnstekers, whose organization has come out in support of the export ban. "There is no scientific argument against that."

According to the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization, more than half of all marine fish stocks are under threat.

Monaco - the sponsor of the proposed ban on the export of Atlantic bluefin tuna - says numbers have fallen by nearly 75 percent since 1957. But most of the decline has occurred over the last decade with demand driven by sushi lovers in Japan and elsewhere for the bluefin' succulent red and pink meat.

The United States backed the ban proposal last week. Many European countries also expressed support, although France and the European Commission have endorsed a compromise to delay the ban until 2011.

Japan, which consumes 80 percent of Atlantic bluefin eaten worldwide, has said it will ignore the ban. The more critical issue is whether other key fishing countries will join Japan's rebuff - which would allow them to sell tuna to Japan.

Tokyo also argues that concerns about the extinction of the Atlantic bluefin are overblown.

The threat of a ban has some Japanese warning their culture is under siege. Sushi is an iconic dish in Japan, where fatty bluefin - called "o-toro" in Japan - sells for as much as 2,000 yen ($20) a piece in high-end Tokyo restaurants.

The conference in Doha is also expected to discuss ways to tackle the illegal trade of tiger products, and the protection of less-known species such as the spiny-tailed iguanas of Mexico and Central America and the spectacular Dynastes satanas beetle of Latin America - both prized by collectors.

Achim Steiner, the executive director of the United Nations Environment Program, which administers the CITES, said limiting the trade on a range of threatened species could go a long way to ensuring biodiversity.

"By ensuring that the international trade in wildlife is properly regulated, CITES can assist in conserving the planet's wild fauna and flora from overexploitation and contribute to the sustainable development," Steiner said.
© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
5 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rf35 says:
I agree with most of the comments so far, especially Tool's. Seems to me that most of the world's issues can be traced back to too many people. This one is no exception. Fewer people = fewer fish harvested. If allowed to replenish, the oceans could sustain us indefinately. This requires a world population of around 1 bn. We can get there within a century if humans could combat their urge to breed themselves into extinction.

As far as Japanese "culture," this doesn't give them the right to drive a species to extinction. Dolphins, whales, tuna, doesn't matter. If your culture requires this, it's time to look at making a cultural change. Maybe we should revive human sacrifices to preserve various S. American, European, and Pacific Island cultures.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tsigili says:
The fish will all be gone, before humans wake and recognize that there is a limit to the number of humans this planet can support.

The human animal is basically in denial.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
barbaram99 says:
Tool, Well said, I do mean it..I was raised in bad foster homes. I heard every day their hatred of raising other's children..People haved dressed me down for the lessons I was taught..It has to do with human breeding..This is what foster Mum said* Barbara ye havr no business having a child ye can't care for,give him/her a home,the basics. None* I did not want children. It was harder to find a Dr to burn my tubes. They just would not. I am a sp needs person and for health wise it was the reason I demanded to be fixed,,They threw marriage in it.. I am single. Miss. The church is the reason they won't allow birth control. It is needed. I know the reason children are born to replace us. I chose to be childless. They need abled bodied to fight the wars. That is a waste. People want to breed. Should we go to a one or 2 child/ren per family. Theare is no need forbig families of years ago. The Drs won't fix them so they can't breed.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Wickedashtray says:
if your "culture" consists of having to harvest an endangered fish then maybe its time that bit of culture should be remanded to history. The Japanese cry the same river about whaling as well "its part of our culture". I'm so sick of tradition heavy cultures who seem to think that theirs must be preserved at any costs and if not, they are somehow being singled out and "under siege". It reminds me of the American farmers who insist on govt. subsidies to "preserve a dying way of life". Guess what, if you can't operate and keep yourself afloat, time to say goodbye to that aspect of your life.

Quite being ignorant, your not the only culture on the planet, sometimes you have to sacrifice what you hold dear to preserve the more important things in life.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
the74blaster says:
Its time to regulate the harvest of Bluefin Tuna to sustainable levels.

If the Japanese want to pay $ 2,500 per sitting for Sushi, thay can. Lets regulate and let the market decide how much Sushi costs rather than ban it.

Is someone is caught over harvesting, toss them in prison for life....no exceptions.
reply
Scroll Left Scroll Right