Lone Gunmen Feats May Shift Qaeda Strategy

(CBS/AP)  On Christmas Day, a passenger on a Northwest Airlines flight bound for Detroit tried to blow up the plane with plastic explosives in his underwear. He failed, yet the very attempt shook the U.S. government, set federal agencies against each other and triggered months of political second-guessing.

In fact, short of mass casualties, the attack allegedly attempted by Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab had exactly the kind of reaction that al Qaeda is after. And, it appears, that lesson is resonating with the terror network's leadership.

Complete Coverage: Christmas Terror Attack

For the first time, the group that carried out the Sept. 11 attacks and has prided itself on its ideological purism seems to be eyeing a more pragmatic and arguably more dangerous shift in tactics. The emerging message appears to be: Big successes are great, but sometimes simply trying can be just as good.

U.S. officials and counterterrorism experts say the airline attack and last November's shooting at Fort Hood, Texas, prove that simple, well-played smaller attacks against the United States also can be harmful to the American psyche, although not as devastating as a 9/11-style attack.

In a recent Internet posting, U.S.-born al Qaeda spokesman Adam Gadahn made a public pitch for such smaller, single acts of jihad.

"Even apparently unsuccessful attacks on Western mass transportation systems can bring major cities to a halt, cost the enemy billions and send his corporations into bankruptcy," Gadahn said in a video released and translated by U.S.-based Site Intelligence Group, which monitors Islamic militant message traffic.

It's a message that officials believe has been evolving for the last year and has turned upside down the prevailing wisdom that the next al Qaeda attack against the U.S. must be bigger and bolder than the one on Sept. 11, 2001.

"It's pretty clear that while al Qaeda would still love to have home runs, they will take singles and doubles if they can get them," said Bruce Riedel, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution Saban Center and a former CIA officer. "And that makes the job of counterterrorism much, much harder."

Counterterror officials note that al Qaeda leaders monitor the U.S. closely and watched the reverberations of the Abdulmutallab attack. They saw the scramble to boost security, the members of Congress blasting federal agencies for intelligence and screening failures, the political drumbeat against the Obama administration's national security efforts and the agency leaders who rushed to blame each other.

The shift is ideological as well as tactical. Before Gadahn's latest video missive, al Qaeda central - Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri - had not seemed to embrace the call for smaller, more singular insurgent operations.

"Big al Qaeda still has too much of an ego; they still want big, synchronized, high-visibility attacks," said Jarret Brachman, an expert on jihadist groups. "They haven't yet said, 'Let a thousand flowers bloom."'

Core al Qaeda senior leaders have worried that unleashing scattered and untrained insurgents who could make mistakes could do more harm than good to the greater jihadi message.

Brachman pointed to the November 2005 hotel bombings in Amman, Jordan, when one of the bombers set off his suicide belt in a wedding reception at the Radisson SAS rather than the lobby - killing the groom's father and 16 other family members and in-laws.

Killing vast numbers of innocent civilians - including fellow Muslims - was one of the factors leading to the erosion of al Qaeda in Iraq, a mistake the terror group doesn't want to make again.

In larger, more elaborate plots there are often multiple people involved, and the chances are greater that one will make a mistake or that law enforcement authorities will get a tip or notice something is going on. In smaller operations, involving just one person or two, the chances are slimmer.

Take, for example, Najibullah Zazi. His plot to bomb the New York City subway system late last year unraveled after investigators got a tip and were able to gather information from a Queens imam who was communicating with the 24-year-old Afghan immigrant, as well as others at the same mosque.

Zazi, who has said he was recruited by al Qaeda and received training in a camp in Pakistan on how to build a bomb, was arrested in Denver, before he was able to make his planned drive back to New York to set the plot in motion.

In contrast, officials allege that Maj. Nidal Hasan acted alone after exchanging e-mails with radical Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki. The shooting spree he is accused of undertaking at Fort Hood killed 13 people and wounded more than two dozen others.

Officials have raised concerns that while U.S. authorities were aware that Hasan was communicating with al-Awlaki, that information wasn't passed along to the military. But, since his assault did not include other people, and simply involved him walking into a building on base where he was allowed to be, it still would have been difficult to predict or prevent.

The call for more individual jihad is not a new idea to al Qaeda followers on Internet forums. They have been touting the strategy for a year or two, and the foiled Northwest Airlines attack only re-energized the debate.

One writer on a jihadi Internet forum scolded those who condemned Abdulmutallab, the alleged perpetrator, as a failure.

"From my prospective living in the United States brother Abdulmutallab succeeded. Maybe he didn't achieve his full objective but you do not necessarily need to achieve a grade of 100 percent to pass the class," the writer said in an early January posting on the Ansar al-Mujahideen discussion forum, which is pro-al Qaeda and is now closed to new members.

"What Abdulmutallab did was instill a fear in Americans. This is a very significant accomplishment. An increased fear of flying, for example, can cripple the airlines and cause economic problems."

Another poster answered: "What did he accomplish? How many billions do you think they will spend to boost security that won't work anyway? He humiliated the Americans, afterward Newark Airport was on lock down for 6 hours because someone walked the wrong way. Success comes in many ways."

Gadahn, in his video, took a broader view, telling followers: "Jihad is neither the personal property nor the exclusive responsibility of any single group, organization or individual. ... Instead it is the personal duty of every able-bodied Muslim on the face of this earth."

[math_joseph]

Dear CBS copy editor: Terrorist attacks are not "insurgent operations". Those two concepts are not the same. What kind of occupation is al-Qaeda fighting by sending people to commit mass murder of civilians on our soil? This kind of linguistic subterfuge is fundamentally dishonest and corrosive to clear-minded public discourse. Please cut it out. (I'm not holding my breath.)

[jsf14]

34,000 people died last year on US roads. Yet it's the terrorists who are succeeding in making us freak out. We don't let car fatalities disrupt our way of life. Calm down. Let's curse terrorists but get on with our lives without hysteria. Muslim terrorists have already gotten us to spend billions, go through intrusive scanning, be patted down offensively by strangers, be yelled at by TSA agents, and a lot else. Let's calm down and rethink.

[wyodutch]

The American government long ago adopted a foreign policy that favors Israel over any other group, nation or people in the Mideast.
.
We sentence ourselves and all future generations to perpetual war until we return to a foreign policy descbribed by Thomas Jefferon, in his inaugural address on 4 March 1801... as "peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none."

[jsf14]

Israel long ago adopted a domestic policy of democracy and equal rights. Equal opportunity is an ongoing struggle, but compared to every other country in the area democracy and equal rights are first rate. In fact they are comparable to democracy and rights throughout the world. The UN established Israel without trying as far as I can see to enforce its 1947 resolution. All the surrounding states, and much of the local Arab Palestinian population, immediately said Israel had no right to exist and went to war. The US supported the UN resolution and Israel's right to exist. The Arabs then had an excuse for anything bad they wanted to do to their own populations or to anyone else. So there are lots of places to spread the blame. But even total elimination of Israel is not going to stop Muslim terrorism (they give many reasons other than Israel for violent jihad), nor would such an elimination improve the lives of Arabs. So come up with positive ideas, please.

[ToolMangler1]

Only the complete obliteration of all the 'Westernized nations' and the abject surender of all other nations will stop some of the bloodshed fueled by Islamic fumdamentalism. The bloodshed will continue because there will always be those that choose not to be Muslim.. and you must either be Muslim or be dead.
The librarys of the world will be destroyed,(just like the one at Alexandria) and all storage media will be destroyed to make the Muslims feel less threatened. Freedom of thought and Ideas cannot be tolerated by the Taliban and Al Qaeda also the Shia Islamic sect.

[mljohns00]

There was litle to worry about until the U.S. invaded and terrorized Afghanistan and Iraq. There haven't been terror attacks in the U.S. because, until we started invading the Muslim homeland, most U.S. citizens and residents weren't feeling desperate enough to risk their lives in support of the Muslim states.

Obviously, after ten years of war, we are generating those desperate people.

[hateisafourletterword]

Other than military targets, I would think most of the targets are deep blue major cities. So who really cares then.