March 11, 2010 1:10 PM
- Text
Pink Floyd Wins Battle Over Online Sales
(AP)
In a victory for the concept album, Britain's High Court on Thursday ordered record company EMI Group Ltd. to stop selling downloads of Pink Floyd tracks individually rather than as part of the band's original records.
The prog-rock group sued the music label, saying its contract prohibited selling the tracks "unbundled" from their original album setting. Pink Floyd lawyer Robert Howe said the band was known for producing "seamless" pieces of music on albums like "Dark Side of the Moon," ''The Division Bell" and "The Wall," and wanted to retain artistic control.
EMI claimed the clause in the band's contract - negotiated a decade ago, before the advent of iTunes and other online retailers - applied only to physical albums, not Internet sales.
Judge Andrew Morritt backed the band, saying the contract protected "the artistic integrity of the albums."
He ruled that EMI is "not entitled to exploit recordings by online distribution or by any other means other than the complete original album without Pink Floyd's consent."
The judge ordered EMI to pay the band's legal costs and said he would rule later on how much the company must pay in damages. The judge also ruled on a second issue, the level of royalties paid to the band. That section of the judgment was made in private after EMI argued the information was covered by commercial confidentiality.
A spokesman for EMI said the company was considering its response to the ruling.
The band's spokesman said Pink Floyd had no comment. Pink Floyd signed with EMI in 1967 and became one of its most lucrative acts, with its back catalog outsold only by The Beatles. Online sales make up an increasing portion of music companies' profits, and are a growing area of dispute. The surviving members of The Beatles have yet to agree a deal to allow their music to be sold online.
Hard-rock band AC/DC also has withheld its music from iTunes, saying the group is not interested in selling individual tracks.
The prog-rock group sued the music label, saying its contract prohibited selling the tracks "unbundled" from their original album setting. Pink Floyd lawyer Robert Howe said the band was known for producing "seamless" pieces of music on albums like "Dark Side of the Moon," ''The Division Bell" and "The Wall," and wanted to retain artistic control.
EMI claimed the clause in the band's contract - negotiated a decade ago, before the advent of iTunes and other online retailers - applied only to physical albums, not Internet sales.
Judge Andrew Morritt backed the band, saying the contract protected "the artistic integrity of the albums."
He ruled that EMI is "not entitled to exploit recordings by online distribution or by any other means other than the complete original album without Pink Floyd's consent."
The judge ordered EMI to pay the band's legal costs and said he would rule later on how much the company must pay in damages. The judge also ruled on a second issue, the level of royalties paid to the band. That section of the judgment was made in private after EMI argued the information was covered by commercial confidentiality.
A spokesman for EMI said the company was considering its response to the ruling.
The band's spokesman said Pink Floyd had no comment. Pink Floyd signed with EMI in 1967 and became one of its most lucrative acts, with its back catalog outsold only by The Beatles. Online sales make up an increasing portion of music companies' profits, and are a growing area of dispute. The surviving members of The Beatles have yet to agree a deal to allow their music to be sold online.
Hard-rock band AC/DC also has withheld its music from iTunes, saying the group is not interested in selling individual tracks.
Popular Now in SciTech
- Apple iPad 3 rumors: thicker, sharper, coming soon
- Tesla's Model X: Finally, an electric car we all want
- Retro Duo will play your old Nintendo games
- Obama's 2012 campaign playlist now on Spotify
- iPad 3 mini on the way, says analyst
- FBI releases Steve Jobs background report
- Apple iPad 3 rumors resurface, sources say March release
- Apple iPhone 5 rumors, reports say June release
- Apple faces $1.6 billion iPad trademark lawsuit
- Facebook graffiti artist David Choe, from homeless to millions
- Google developing home entertainment system
- Apple supplier Foxconn hit by hackers
- Apple iPad 3 rumors, let's get real
- Hackers release Symantec pcAnywhere source code
- Facebook required for Spotify account, here's a trick
- Ethical iPhone 5 petitions head to Apple stores
- Shocking Stats on Texting While Driving
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Cops: Accused pimp solicits bail via Facebook
- US sex abuse lawsuit against Vatican dismissed
- US sex abuse lawsuit against Vatican dismissed
- Italy: Wrecked cruise ship moves in rough seas
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
on CBS News






