March 11, 2010 8:42 PM

Kansas City Closing Nearly Half of Schools

By
CBSNews
(AP)  The Kansas City school board narrowly approved a plan Wednesday night to close nearly half of the district's schools in a desperate bid to avoid a potential bankruptcy.

The board voted 5-4 after parents and community leaders made final pleas to spare the schools even as the beleaguered district seeks to erase a projected $50 million budget shortfall. The approved plan calls for shuttering 29 of 61 schools - a striking amount even as public school closures rise nationwide while the recession eats away at academic budgets.

"The urban core has suffered white flight post-the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision Brown v. the Board of Education, blockbusting by the real estate industry, redlining by banks and other financial institutions, retail and grocery store abandonment," Kansas City Councilwoman Sharon Sanders Brooks said to applause from a standing-room-only crowd of more than 200 people.

"And now the public education system is aiding and abetting in the economic demise of our school district," she said. "It is shameful and sinful."

Many school board members said the vote was a difficult one. An emotional Duane Kelly told the crowd that "this is the most painful vote I have ever cast" in 10 years on the board.

Under the approved plan, buildings will be shuttered before the next school year. Teachers at six other low-performing schools will be required to reapply for their jobs, and the district will sell its downtown central office. It also is expected to cut about 700 of the district's 3,000 jobs - including 285 teachers.

"Now he has to figure out how to do it," said board member Joel Pelofsky, who voted for the closures. "My analogy is we took a meat ax to the district. Now we have to figure out how to sandpaper it into place."

Some parents called for Superintendent John Covington's departure after the vote, shouting, "He has to go."

Covington, one in a long line of superintendents, has spent the past month making the case to sometimes angry groups of parents and students that the closures are necessary. He declined to discuss the closures after the meeting but planned to talk at a news conference Thursday morning.

Laura Loyacono, 45, the parent of a 13-year-old girl and 16-year-old boy, served on a committee that helped draft the closure proposal.

"It's not an easy thing," Loyacono said. "We knew going into it that we would have to close a significant number of schools because of the budget issues and because the resources have been so diluted and so spread out that I think some of the program quality has really suffered."

Despite the need, she said nobody likes to see schools closed.

"It's a tough day," Loyacono said.

Covington has stressed that the district's buildings are only half-full as its population has plummeted amid political squabbling and chronically abysmal test scores. The district's enrollment of fewer than 18,000 students is about half of what the schools had a decade ago and just a quarter of its peak in the late 1960s.

Many students have left for publicly funded charter schools, private and parochial schools and the suburbs.

Fewer students means less money from the state. For the past few years, the district has been plowing through the large reserves it built up when money from a $2 billion court-ordered desegregation plan was flooding its coffers.

School administrators have said that without radical cuts, the district could be in the red by 2011.

Further stressing the budget, the district will lose $23.5 million in the upcoming academic year that it had received from the state for educating students who attended seven schools that have switched to a better-performing neighboring district.

"None of us liked voting for this," board member and former desegregation attorney Arthur Benson said, "but it was necessary."

Nationally, many big districts are closing just one or two schools. Detroit closed 29 schools before classes began this fall, but that still left the district with 172 schools.

AP
Add a Comment See all 45 Comments
by KeithCall1975 March 13, 2010 6:00 PM EST
Since the Brown decision was in 1954 and the district peaked at the end of the 1960s, I can hardly believe the decline was due to that decision. School population declined nationwide in the 70s and 80s due to the baby boomers aging -- I would think that would be the more logical reason.

My guess would be academic performance had a play in it as well, especially after enrollment increased in the late 80s and beyond.

It certainly can?t be the funding. The district budget is $300 million dollars, and with 17,400 students, that leaves only the paltry sum of $17,241 per student. For a class of 18, the district receives over $310,000. I think I could run one class on $310,000 ? couldn?t you?
Reply to this comment
by stop2think March 11, 2010 1:06 PM EST
proudmilvet: Europe does not have FREE healthcare. They pay through higher taxes and less liberty. But what would a welfare loving SOB like you know about that?
Reply to this comment
by stop2think March 11, 2010 1:02 PM EST
Blaming white flight that started 56 years ago is a stretch, isn't it? But this shows there is Karma. Wasn't KC School Division under that horrendous court order that increased everyone's taxes in the state and poured millions and millions of dollars in this pathetic excuse of an education system? And what do they have to show for it besides gaping budget holes, failing schools, kids who don't learn, but teachers who are paid well above the MO state average. Nice. Liberalism at its best. Fast forward 50 years from now when Obamacare has had 5 decades to fester. It will be deja vu all over again.
Reply to this comment
by afmcalax March 11, 2010 12:30 PM EST
The end of the article summed it up best. The school board should be fired. They were practically criminally negligent. An enrollment 75 percent of its peak and they wasted a $2 billion dollar settlement keeping half filled, under performing schools open. They should have used the $2 billion to re-organize, consolidate, and reach for excellence. Don't blame white flight, red-lining, or anybody else ... the memebers of the School Board are the only ones to blame!
Reply to this comment
by midlclass March 11, 2010 10:13 AM EST
i had some concerns this morning hearing about this on the radio. however after reading this article. it looks to be simple math and logistics. if you have half the students that you had a decade ago you cant' support the schools infrastructure. half the students half the school and teachers. it sounds like they need to redistrict the city, take the best schools and teachers and goo from there. some kids may have to ride a bus or parents may have to drive them farther. but these are small sacrifices to make to keep and maintain a good public school system. it may be smart on the boards part to look at what is working in the charter and other schools.
Reply to this comment
by evelynibarra March 11, 2010 10:11 AM EST
sad story all children need a education.
Reply to this comment
by afmcalax March 11, 2010 12:34 PM EST
And they would still be receiving it if the school board would have done its job and consolidated earlier. This is not new; the school board has been incompetent for decades. They blew $2 BILLION dollars by avoiding the tough, but needed decisions and now they are crying discrimination for it all falling apart. This can all be blamed on their stupidity.
by ken1dall March 11, 2010 10:03 AM EST
Students STILL get no education but teachers STILL get their pensions.
Reply to this comment
by hateisafourletterword March 11, 2010 9:58 AM EST
Note to conservatives, do not even try to leave a constructive comment here. The liberals will just reply with some nasty mean comment. They are no interested in solutions to the problems they themselves created, they are just interested in the amount of money they can take from taxpayers and give to others so they buy their votes.
Reply to this comment
by inketolstoy March 11, 2010 10:13 AM EST
Don't give up, hate. If you are looking for a thoughtful liberal you would have to travel back in time about 70 years ago. Just encourage them to spout their comedy central, cnn party line to educate the moderates of what a liberal is today.
by midlclass March 11, 2010 10:15 AM EST
just left one. sounds like you have the same issue.
by infantryman1968 March 11, 2010 9:37 AM EST
by wjksea March 11, 2010 8:45 AM EST
infantryman1968 March 11, 2010 8:15 AM EST
Acording to Biden Bin Obama Isreal is the best friend of the US.

Do you have a problem with that?
-------------------------------------------
3 billion a year to the Zionists ----at least.



LOL! Aparently Obama and Biden are cool with it!
Reply to this comment
by newsterl March 11, 2010 9:01 AM EST
"Covington, one in a long line of superintendents, has spent the past month making the case to sometimes angry groups of parents and students that the closures are necessary."

LOL maybe those "angry parents" should cough up some more money out of their OWN pockets to close the budget shortfall on those schools, after all, THEY are the ones using them and shouldn;t expect everyone else, least of all childless people to foot the bills for THEIR extravagant lifestyles having 3,4 and 5 kids they cant afford in the first place that they want everyone else to pay the bills for.
Reply to this comment
See all 45 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook