March 10, 2010 6:58 PM

Boyfriend: "Jihad Jane" Wasn't Religious

(CBS/AP)  The self-dubbed "Jihad Jane" who thought her blond, all-American profile would help mask her plan to kill a Swedish cartoonist is a rare case of a U.S. woman inciting foreign terrorism and shows the latest evolution of the global threat, authorities say.

The suburban Philadelphia woman, Colleen R. LaRose, was accused in Tuesday's indictment of trying to recruit jihadist fighters, and pledging to murder the artist, marry a terrorism suspect so he could move to Europe and martyr herself if necessary.

Her boyfriend of five years said LaRose had never hinted at Muslim leanings or attended religious services of any kind. Kurt Gorman, 47, of Pennsburg, said that he met LaRose in Texas and that nothing seemed amiss until she moved out of their apartment without warning in August.

"I came home and she was gone. It doesn't make any sense," he said Wednesday outside his small business in nearby Quakertown. "She was a good-hearted person."

The indictment paints a picture of a woman whose devotion to the cause grew as she prowled the Internet and conversed with a loose band of terrorist suspects in Europe and South Asia. She eventually agreed to try killing Swedish artist Lars Vilks, who had angered Muslims by depicting the Prophet Muhammad with the body of a dog, according to a U.S. official who wasn't authorized to discuss details of the investigation and spoke on condition of anonymity.

LaRose is "one of only a few such cases nationwide in which females have been charged with terrorism violations," said U.S. Department of Justice spokesman Dean Boyd.

LaRose, 46, of Pennsburg but with close ties to south Texas, has been held without bail since her Oct. 15 arrest in Philadelphia.

Separately Wednesday, a spokesman for the Pennsburg police chief said that LaRose attempted suicide in 2005 with an overdose of pills, but later said that she didn't want to die, CBS News has learned.

Authorities said the case shows how terrorist groups are looking to recruit Americans to carry out their goals.

"Today's indictment, which alleges that a woman from suburban America agreed to carry out murder overseas and to provide material support to terrorists, underscores the evolving nature of the threat we face," said David Kris, assistant attorney general for national security.

LaRose had targeted Vilks and had online discussions about her plans with at least one of several suspects apprehended over that plot Tuesday in Ireland, according to the U.S. official.

Vilks said Tuesday that he has no regrets about his images - some of which depicted the Prophet Muhammad with the body of a dog - and that he believes the suspects in the plot to kill him were amateurs.

Vilks, who has faced numerous death threats over the controversial cartoon, said he has built his own defense system, including a "homemade" safe room and a barbed-wire sculpture that could electrocute potential intruders. He said he also has an ax "to chop down" anyone trying to climb through the windows of his home in southern Sweden.

"If something happens, I know exactly what to do," Vilks told The Associated Press in an interview in Stockholm.

Irish police said Wednesday those arrested were two Algerians, two Libyans, a Palestinian, a Croatian and an American woman married to one of the Algerian suspects. They were not identified by name.

A U.S. Department of Justice spokesman wouldn't confirm the case is related to Vilks. At least three Swedish newspapers published the Muhammad cartoon Wednesday, arguing that it had news value or was a free-speech symbol.

The indictment charges that LaRose, who also used the name Fatima LaRose online, agreed to try killing the target on orders from the unnamed terrorists she met online, and traveled to Europe in August to do so.

LaRose indicated in her online conversations that she thought her blond hair and blue eyes would help her move freely in Sweden to carry out the attack, the indictment said.

LaRose as a convert to Islam who actively recruited others, including at least one unidentified American, and her online messages expressed her willingness to become a martyr and her impatience to take action, according to the indictment and the U.S. official.

Killing the target would be her goal "till I achieve it or die trying," she wrote a south Asian suspect in March 2009, according to the indictment. Her federal public defender, Mark T. Wilson, declined to comment Tuesday.

"I'm glad she didn't kill me," Vilks told The Associated Press on Wednesday, saying the suspects appeared to be "low-tech." He said he has built defense systems in his home to thwart would-be terrorists, including a safe room and electrified barbed wire.

U.S. Attorney Michael Levy said the indictment doesn't link LaRose to any organized terror groups.

In recent years, the only other women charged in the U.S. with terror violations were lawyer Lynne Stewart, convicted of helping imprisoned blind Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman communicate with his followers, and Aafia Siddiqui, a Pakistani scientist found guilty of shooting at U.S. personnel in Afghanistan while yelling, "Death to Americans!"

But neither case involved the kind of plotting attributed to LaRose - a woman charged with trying to foment a terror conspiracy to kill someone overseas.

Stewart has insisted she is "not a traitor," while Siddiqui has accused U.S. authorities of lying about her.

LaRose called herself JihadJane in a YouTube video in which she said she was "desperate to do something somehow to help" ease the suffering of Muslims, the indictment said. According to the 11-page document, she agreed to obtain residency in a European country and marry one of the terrorists to enable him to live there.

She moved to Europe in August with Gorman's stolen passport and intended to give it to one of her "brothers," the indictment said. She hoped to "live and train with jihadists and to find and kill" the targeted artist, it said.

LaRose also agreed to provide financial help to her coconspirators in Asia and Europe, the indictment charged.

LaRose had an initial court appearance on Oct. 16 but didn't enter a plea. No further court dates have been set.

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 17 Comments
by curse914 March 10, 2010 6:25 PM EST
by kamsack50 March 10, 2010 4:39 PM EST

Why on earth do you foolish people think she did that for religious reasons?
She likely was attracted to men of exotic cultures and exploits and it got out of control.
Can't you see???

===================

I am curious how you think an individual acquires a given faith.

You are not born Secular, Christian, or Muslim. These ideologies may be shoved into your cranium by your parents, peers and society, but as an adult you make a conscious choice to adopt a belief system. She is as much a Jihadist as Bush was a born again Christian.

Could it have been a vehicle to satisfy some "need", absolutely it was, isn't that why we adopt our given ideologies, because they hit that reptilian pleasure center in our brain? It is gives us a tingle in our tummies. Just like the reward I get for venting on this forum, aaah, I just hit that nucleus accumbens! This guaranties I will post up here any time that I may have available for such distractions.
Reply to this comment
by asamiller March 11, 2010 8:40 AM EST
You're right, she's no different than Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh or any of their followers who love to spew and hate.
by curse914 March 10, 2010 6:11 PM EST
by curse914 March 10, 2010 4:01 PM EST
Boyfriend: "Jihad Jane" Wasn't Religious

Well, her boyfriend is an absolute idiot or a liar. As per the article and her intentions to kill this artist, she is obviously a violent religious zealot.

Freedom of expression is condemned in religious circles. It may introduced competing ideologies to the sheep. If these "faithful" had any confidence in their convictions they would not feel the need to kill anyone who presents an opposing perspective. Such is the history of religion. Can we please close this chapter in history...

by Lifeson2112 March 10, 2010 4:37 PM EST
It seems like everything you ever post is some anti-religion diatribe. Leave it alone will you? No one is forcing you to go to church. If you want to be Godless, be that way. But leave the hate speech out of it. I know many people of many faiths. Not one of them is a murderer. God is one thing, perverting his message to mean killing someone is something in his name is something else. Its called insanity.

[][][][][[][][][][][][

I am just expressing my opinion, big fella. Have courage, Lifeon, if your convictions are strong, "true" and "good", they should not need defending.

And there was no twisting of religious texts necessary. There are plenty of passages in every one of the 3 major monotheist faiths where (god) sanctions murder, genocide (ethnic cleansing) and rape. I am trying to find the Secular "bible" that sanctions such actions, can you give me a link. And don't fall back on the usual, Stalin killed millions carp. Stalin did not want to destroy religion, he wanted to replace it with his own and replace the face of god with his. Murderous dogma is still dogma.

I will give you this, Martin Luther King had the best interpretation possible of the blood soaked texts of the monothiests. The man is deserving of respect.
Reply to this comment
by alanrobisch March 10, 2010 7:10 PM EST
Boy are you good you attack religious beliefs as sanctioning murder and then you tell people who disagree to chin up. Marx was an atheist and called religion the opiate of the masses. Stalin suppressed religion and made it difficult for anyone of religious beliefs to move ahead. He continenced the murder of 20 million and justified in the name of communism. Secular zealots justify the murder of the unborn or the assisted suicide for the elderly or those in pain.
by wyodutch March 10, 2010 5:33 PM EST
Oh my GOD!!!!!
.
A woman posting bizarre comments on the internet! Oh the terror! Oh the humanity!
.
Let's all panic and demonstrate once again, how utterly gutless the American people are. In fact... let's all form a circle, hold hands and listen to a federal spokesdork tell us once again about the incredible dangers that we face simply because "they hate us because we're free". Then we can fill our pants and savor the aroma of gutless fear.
.
America... GROW A PAIR!!!
Reply to this comment
by blitzder March 10, 2010 5:53 PM EST
What do we do now?? Profile ALL WHITE AMERICAN BORN AND BRED WOMEN???
by curse914 March 10, 2010 6:13 PM EST
Is she a part of the new double wide Jihad?
by Harden_Tar March 10, 2010 5:22 PM EST
Of course she's not religious. She's nucking futs.
Reply to this comment
by USMC-Mom March 10, 2010 5:27 PM EST
Couldn't agree more.
by blitzder March 10, 2010 5:51 PM EST
She was in it for the money.
by dwilson59 March 10, 2010 4:56 PM EST
I say put her on trial for Treason then we take her out back and shoot her.
Reply to this comment
by kamsack50 March 10, 2010 4:39 PM EST
Why on earth do you foolish people think she did that for religious reasons?
She likely was attracted to men of exotic cultures and exploits and it got out of control.
Can't you see???
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 March 10, 2010 4:37 PM EST
The true adherents of Islam or christianity could never be terrorists. Read all the scriptures and find out why I say that. Fundamentalist believers of both religions can and often do become terrorists of the worst kind. any terrorist that claims no religion is nothing but a cowardly criminal.
Those of you that don't reflect on and study what I just asked you too will die clueless.
Reply to this comment
by babooph March 10, 2010 4:22 PM EST
Many of the ones who act out violently in these matters have been described as not very religious-seems there are other delusions at work...
Reply to this comment
by kmrunner122 March 10, 2010 4:17 PM EST
This is why cults happen and people follow anyone they think is charismatic. People don't think for themselves and will believe the stupidest things from total strangers. Nigerian scams, Jim Jones, Hitler, Koresh, Rush Limbaugh, the list goes on.
Reply to this comment
by curse914 March 10, 2010 4:01 PM EST
Boyfriend: "Jihad Jane" Wasn't Religious

Well, her boyfriend is an absolute idiot or a liar. As per the article and her intentions to kill this artist, she is obviously a violent religious zealot.

Freedom of expression is condemned in religious circles. It may introduced competing ideologies to the sheep. If these "faithful" had any confidence in their convictions they would not feel the need to kill anyone who presents an opposing perspective. Such is the history of religion. Can we please close this chapter in history...
Reply to this comment
by Lifeson2112 March 10, 2010 4:37 PM EST
It seems like everything you ever post is some anti-religion diatribe. Leave it alone will you? No one is forcing you to go to church. If you want to be Godless, be that way. But leave the hate speech out of it. I know many people of many faiths. Not one of them is a murderer. God is one thing, perverting his message to mean killing someone is something in his name is something else. Its called insanity.
See all 17 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook