May 5, 2010 3:59 PM

How You End Up on the U.S. No-Fly List

By
CBSNews
(AP)  It starts with a tip, a scrap of intelligence, a fingerprint lifted from a suspected terrorist's home.

It ends when a person is forbidden to board an airplane — a decision that's in the hands of about six experts from the Transportation Security Administration.

The no-fly list they oversee constantly changes as hundreds of analysts churn through a steady stream of intelligence. Managing the list is a high-stakes process. Go too far in one direction and innocent travelers are inconvenienced. Go in the other direction and a terrorist might slip onto an airplane.

It could take minutes to put a name on the list. Or it could take hours, days or months.

Expert: New Security Steps a Smokescreen
Special Report: No-Fly List Error Diverts Plane
Where America Stands: Air Travel

That's because the list is only as good as U.S. intelligence and the experts who analyze it. If an intelligence lead is not shared, or if an analyst is unable to connect one piece of information to another, a terrorist could slip onto an airplane. Officials allege that's just what took place ahead of the attempted Christmas Day attack on a Detroit-bound jet.

Special Report: The Christmas Day Terror Attack

In the months since the arrest of Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmuttalab, the no-fly list has nearly doubled — from about 3,400 people to about 6,000 people, according to a senior intelligence official. The list expanded, in part, to add people associated with al Qaeda's Yemen branch and others from Nigeria and Yemen with potential ties to Abdulmuttalab, a counterterrorism official said.

The no-fly list has been one of the government's most public counterterrorism tools since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Adding more people to the list could make Americans safer when they fly. But it could also mean more cases of mistaken identity.

Current and former intelligence, counterterrorism and U.S. government officials provided The Associated Press a behind-the-scenes look at how the no-fly list is created. They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive security issues.

Despite changes over time, the list remains an imperfect tool, dependent on the work of hundreds of government terrorism analysts who sift through massive flows of information. The list ballooned after Sept. 11 and has fluctuated in size over the past decade. In 2004, it included about 20,000 people. The standards for getting on the list have been refined over the years, and technology has improved to make the matching process more reliable.

There are four steps to banning a person from flying:

-It begins with law enforcement and intelligence officials collecting the smallest scraps of intelligence — a tip from a CIA informant or a wiretapped conversation.

The information is then sent to the National Counterterrorism Center, a Northern Virginia nerve center set up after the Sept. 11 attacks. There, analysts put names — even partial names — into a huge classified database of known and suspected terrorists. The database, called Terrorist Identities Datamart Enterprise, or TIDE, also includes some suspects' relatives and others in contact with the suspects. About 2 percent of the people in this database are Americans.

Analysts scour the database trying to make connections and update files as new intelligence flows in. Abdulmutallab's name was in TIDE before the Christmas Day attempt, thanks to a warning his father gave the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria about the alleged bomber's extremist ties in Yemen.

But much of the information coming into the center is incomplete. This is one reason analysts didn't connect Abdulmutallab's father's warning to other fragmented pieces of information. Because of this, analysts did not send his name to the next tier of analysis at the Terrorist Screening Center, another Northern Virginia intelligence center, staffed by analysts from federal law enforcement agencies across the government.

-About 350 names a day are sent to the Terrorist Screening Center for more analysis and consideration to be put on the government-wide terror watch list. This is a list of about 418,000 people, maintained by the FBI.

To place a name on that list, analysts must have a reasonable suspicion that the person is connected to terrorism. People on this watch list may be questioned at a U.S. border checkpoint or when applying for a visa. But just being on this list isn't enough to keep a person off an airplane. Authorities must have a suspect's full name and date of birth as well as adequate information showing the suspect is a threat to aviation or national security.

-Once armed with information for those three categories, about a half-dozen experts from the Transportation Security Administration who work at the screening center have two options. They can add a suspect to the "selectee list," a roster of about 18,000 people who can still fly but must go through extra screening at the airport. Or, if analysts determine a person is too dangerous to board a plane, they can put the suspect on the no-fly list.

The names on each list are constantly under review and updated as the threat changes.

In 2007, officials removed people who were no longer considered threats. Some were inactive members of the Irish Republican Army, a former law enforcement official said. And in 2008, the criteria was expanded to include information about young Somali-American men leaving the U.S. to join the international terrorist group al-Shabab, the senior intelligence official said. If a person on the no-fly list dies, his name could stay on the list so that the government can catch anyone trying to assume his identity.

At times, officials have allowed passengers to fly even if they are on the no-fly list, the former law enforcement official said. In some cases, this is to let agents shadow suspected terrorists while they're in the U.S. Before this happens, FBI agents and TSA experts consult with each other. If it is decided a suspected terrorist should be allowed on the flight, he and his belongings might then go through extra screening, he might be watched on camera at the airport, and more federal air marshals might be assigned to monitor him during his flight, the former official said.

As the government takes on more responsibility for checking names against the lists, officials hope the number of mistaken identity cases will dramatically decrease. And since Dec. 25, national security officials have been looking at ways to change and improve the standards for placing people on it.

One thing is for sure: Another incident like the Christmas Day near-miss will cause more re-examinations of a system still far from foolproof.

AP
Add a Comment See all 15 Comments
by bobnjersey March 10, 2010 9:37 PM EST
[There, analysts put names ? even partial names ? into a huge classified database of known and suspected terrorists. The database, called Terrorist Identities Datamart Enterprise, or TIDE, also includes some suspects' relatives and others in contact with the suspects. About 2 percent of the people in this database are Americans. ]

how many records (people) are in the database ... 15 billion (300 million x 50)?
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 March 10, 2010 3:31 PM EST
The time is fast approaching when there will be no more 'no fly list'. Instead there will be a "allowed to fly list". By that time all commercial Air transportation will cease to be available because of the possibility of Airplanes being turned into weapons of mass destruction. Ocean going Cargo ships will have to be unloaded on platforms built at the 12 mile limit so that no super lethal cargo can be used against us. (the cargo will be brought to land by a long rail pontoon bridge).
And Bin Ladin will sit in his cave and cackle "I told you I'd get you".
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 March 10, 2010 3:34 PM EST
BTW: I think I am on the no fly list because I dare to criticize the leaders of the world (and this nation).
by rockcutr March 10, 2010 3:03 PM EST
National security no better than the oxymoron of Military Intelegence. It doesn't exist. Drones working for ghosts. Granted there may be a few of these folks that need to not fly into our airspace. But, try to focus people. Let's try convict a vice president for shooting someone. Lets actually impeach the scum that brought all this fear to us through their greed for oil and their hate for muslems. It is the hammerheads in charge that are the weapons of mass ignorance. Jerks cannot keep unarmed Mexicans from flowing through our boarders like flys to a pile of dog dukey.
They in charge choose not to fix these things. There is no justafication for these acts of theirs which produce no thing. Fire them all, or hand them a broom and have them sweep the freeways.
Reply to this comment
by quapawsix March 10, 2010 12:14 PM EST
So much for being a free and open society.
Reply to this comment
by extremophil March 10, 2010 11:38 AM EST
If terrorists ever start hiding explosives in their rectums, we are all in big trouble.
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 March 10, 2010 3:35 PM EST
(I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, 'butt'!!!!!)
by barbaram99 March 10, 2010 10:53 AM EST
thank one man for all this ladies and gents..
Reply to this comment
by tsigili March 10, 2010 10:32 AM EST
Couldn't care less, as I have zero intention of flying anywhere. Can't imagine any more miserable experience, in this age of "security" hassles, and just plain bad, airline customer service and employee behavior.

If I can't get there by car, I don't go.
Reply to this comment
by ajvw March 10, 2010 10:09 AM EST
"Handful of Experts has Final Say on Who Flies, Who Doesn't"

what would we do without experts?
Reply to this comment
by ktdfox March 10, 2010 10:03 AM EST
TSA and the no-fly list is a broken system and a waste of money. We all know what terrorists look like, and they do not look like 80 year old women or 4 year old children.
Reply to this comment
by KeithDrippingSprings March 10, 2010 9:38 AM EST
I hope I get on the list so the TSA will send me through the line faster. Since I am not over the age of eighty or under fifteen I shouldn't have any problems.

The last time I flew anywhere they were harassing old people and young mothers that were already struggling to travel with children.
Reply to this comment
See all 15 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook