March 8, 2010 8:35 AM

3D: Soon Coming at Ya' at Home

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  From the old red-and-green spectacles of days gone by to the more snazzy frames of today, you need special glasses to watch a movie in 3D (at least for now). 3D technology is already transforming the movies, and you don't need any high-tech glasses to see its impact. Our Cover Story is reported by Bill Whitaker:


It seems some things never change in Hollywood. For 82 years of Academy Awards there's always the flash ... the fashions ... the royalty ... the scene stealers ... the showdown.

This year the buzz is about the nail-biting faceoff between Kathryn Bigelow, director of the indie war movie, "The Hurt Locker" ... and her ex-husband, James Cameron, director of the all-time box office smash, "Avatar."

But what really has Hollywood talking is thatm, win or lose, "Avatar" could change everything, with its breathtaking imagination and out-of-this-world imagery in eye-popping 3D.

It cost $300 million, some say $400 million to get to the screen, where it's raked in a staggering $2.5 billion worldwide.

"There are a number of films that have gone out and proved repeatedly that the market is there," said director Cameron. "I think, you know, the verdict is pretty well in that 3D is here to stay. and that it's a major boost to the, theatrical exhibition business."

Jeffrey Katzenberg, CEO of Dreamworks Animation, calls the success of Cameron's 3D gamble "thrilling."

"I can't think of a more inspiring event to happen for the movie business in a decade than 'Avatar,'" he said.

"How to Train Your Dragon," Dreamworks Animation's next big release, is in 3D. In fact, all of the studio's releases from now on will be in 3D.

"There was silent-to-sound. There was black and white-to-color. And now, here we are 70 years later, and this is the next great revolution," Katzenberg said. "It amplifies the feelings that a filmmaker wants. It can make it scarier, can make it funnier, can make it more exhilarating, more of a ride. It's a powerful, powerful storytelling tool."

At Universal City Imax in L.A., the verdict on today's 3D is, well, universal:

"Oh my God, it was amazing," said Julia Correa. "It was, like, an attention grabber."

"It's like you're actually watching it in real life. It's cool," said Josh.

"Why would you want to sit and watch a 2-dimensional screen when you can watch a 3-dimensional screen and have those kinds of emotional roller coaster rides?" asked Ross Burkhardt.

Chris Sanders and Dean DeBlois, the co-directors of "How to Train Your Dragon," were blown away by the 3D images in their own movie.

"You're trying to get the audience to experience what you have in your mind, and 3D actually draws you in that much more," said DeBlois.

Los Angeles Times film critic Kenneth Turan says 3D isn't for every movie.

"I'm not sure, you know, 'Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?' is going to be in 3D," he said. "I don't know if people want to see that in 3D."

But, he says, Hollywood is banking 3D is just the ticket to get people off the couch and out to the movies.

"They really have a problem getting people into the theater," Turan said. "And just by looking at the numbers, it's been proven that if something's in 3D, more people will come."

Of the more than 500 movies released last year, only 16 were in 3D - about 3% - yet they accounted for 10% of total box office earnings.

(Twentieth Century Fox)
And two of them, "Avatar" and "Up," are up for Best Picture tonight. "Coraline," another 3D film, is competing against "Up" in the Best Animated Feature category.

"The DVD business is down and, you know, piracy is up," said Katzenberg. "And these are why most people in Holllywood are not sleeping very well these days. The one bright note is 3D in the movie theater. It's the one big, blue sky for us and our business."

This isn't the first time 3D was going to change Hollywood. Everyone of a certain age remembers the goofy glasses, the horror - and not just on the screen. Those flickering images in the 1950s left many moviegoers with horrible headaches, and the novelty soon wore off.

But what's on the screen today isn't your grandfather's 3D.

"This actually has nothing to do with the 3D of old, except for the word '3D,' said Steve Schklair, a founder of 3ality Digital in Burbank, Calif., one of those leading the charge in the 3D revolution.

3ality Digital has designed a camera that mimics the eyes' perception of three dimensions. Two digital lenses capture two distinct images, then the glasses - yes, you still need the glasses - direct one image to the right eye and the other to the left, and your brain sees 3D. "So 3D is really, in essence, an optical trick," Schklair said.

"There are cures for the 3D headache and that's just good quality images," he said. "The speed at which this is now hitting the consumer market is just surprising everybody."

"So you're really seeing it snowballing?" Whitaker asked.

"Avalanching!" Schklair laughed.

There's a blizzard of movies in the pipeline. Out this weekend: "Alice in Wonderland." Three-dimensional video games are in the works. 3D TVs are headed to the market already. Direct-TV, Discovery, ESPN all are launching 3D channels. Sky-TV broadcast a soccer match in Britain experimentally. The results: sky-high enthusiasm.

"It's fantastic. It's fantastic. Superb," said one British football fan.

Sony, with its hands in movies, TV and video games, has made a corporate decision to launch 3D from all its platforms.

"It's conceivable it might stimulate profit, which is not so easy to find in the industry," said Sir Howard Stringer, Sony President & CEO. "It's a pretty sort of effortless daisy chain of excitement, if we get it right."

"You want to get people up off the couch and get them to come into the movie theater . . . but, wait a minute! No, stay at home and watch your new 3D TV!" said Whitaker.

"No, I get them coming and going," Stringer said. "I don't mind. They can leave or stay. It's part or our world. If it's 3D, it'll give us another chance to seduce everybody."

But what about those glasses? Are they going to go away?

"Yeah, they will, they will," said Stringer. "And also. by the way, a lot of us wear glasses. It's not such a strange experience. In some ways it's being talked about as if, 'Oh my God, people have to wear glasses.' You say, Wait a minute! What do you think we're wearing?"

But until there's a 3D flat screen TV or game console in every house, the movies will be where most of us witness this transformation, taking us to new worlds, through a whole new world of 3D.

"What we're seeing now is a cumulative sense of it taking off through the best energies of a number of good films that have been made over the last three years or so," said Cameron.

"And it offers the opportunity to make the movie theater experience really special again," added Katzenberg. "This is not like the hula hoop, you know, some cheap gimmick or trick that's going to come along and go away. It's here to stay."

Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 19 Comments
by all3dmodels April 9, 2010 3:55 AM EDT
Now Free Download Hight Quality 3d models 3d objects for 3DSMAX, Maya, Softimage, Lightwave. (3D Cars, 3D People, 3D Furnitures, etc). For use in all your 3D Animation and multimedia works. animation | art | vr | tutorials | 3d models | 2d | software | plug-ins | textures | materials | scripts | poser and find out new 3d jobs and hot 3d video. http://www.all3dmodels.com
Reply to this comment
by Zorro5573 March 8, 2010 1:16 PM EST
CBS News should do a story on what an absolute scam that
3D movie glasses are. For every movie you see you MUST
buy or pay for a new pair. You can NOT bring the ones you've
already bought before to avoid paying the surcharge again.
Then they have the guts to offer a recycle box to drop them in
after the movie. Recycle? Yeh, right. I'll bet they get recycled
right back to box office and sodl again. Have none of your
"investigatvie reporters" even considered that? I forgot -- CBS
is owned by Sony. Silly me.
Reply to this comment
by rf35 March 9, 2010 5:58 AM EST
It's all about American greed. In England, you must purchase the glasses seperately, so you save money by keeping them and taking them with you to the next 3D movie you see. I agree that if the glasses are in good condition they probably just wipe them off and pop them into a new bag. I bet if these movies get popular enough, you'll be able drop $20 buck or more on real long-term use glasses...bet it won't change the ticket price, though!
by tonhogg March 9, 2010 11:38 AM EST
Actually the extra cost for a 3d movie does not go for the glasses. The theater has to turn the extra $3.00 over to the movie studio. Then the theater has to buy the glasses themselves, so they must pay for them out of their own pockets. If they buy a projector that uses the reusable glasses which are more expensive but make the movie look a little better, you better believe the theater wants those glasses back. That is an added expense they didn't have before. Other theaters may use a projector that uses the disposable glasses, these you can take home if you want. They are of thinner plastic and they hand them out sealed in plastic.

Also the public never really did tire of 3d movies in the past, the last major releases of the 1950's phase did well in 3d, and 3d has done well at Imax the last 20 years. The reason it went away is because movie studios just put it on the back burner anyway. It does not surprise me that 3d is doing well, the reason is because they are actually release the bigger movies in 3d. If no movie in 3d no one can buy the tickets to them, it is that simple.

Here is a link explaining the whole 3d glasses thing.
http://www.mercurynews.com/action-line/ci_14230785
by tsigili March 8, 2010 12:58 PM EST
Ok, let's look at the reality.....this whole 3D thing is likely just a Deja Vu fad, at best. We have a new generation, that hasn't experienced 3D....fine. The question is.....will they quickly tire of it, just as the public tired of it, in the last round of 3D??? Probably so.

The prospect of it on TV....might just make the new round very short term.
Reply to this comment
by barbaram99 March 8, 2010 11:08 AM EST
I have some sight in one eye..I am tatally blind in the other..3D is useless to me and others who can't see it.. Tool, I member analog TV..Yep that workrd..My late Dad use to say^ If it ain't broke don't fix it*. Somebody need to tell them fools who dream up all that useless junk to don't bother with it..It is just bloody greed. I am sorry people but that is the way I see it..
Reply to this comment
by IndiasWorstTechSupport March 8, 2010 1:40 AM EST
On a serious note here... for those people whom are adults/kids that are cross-eyed, how will they get to watch movies that are in 3D?
Reply to this comment
by voxpopulus March 7, 2010 7:21 PM EST
One of the problems with 3D is that many of us have to wear glasses on our glasses.
Reply to this comment
by 1notrub11 March 7, 2010 8:03 PM EST
I have to wear glasses at the movies too. However, I found that the glasses for Avatar were perfectly fine over mine. It may depend on the owner's glasses of course, but mine were ok. I was very impressed.
by ToolMangler1 March 7, 2010 5:39 PM EST
Get ready to fork out megabucks for TVs that only the people with good vision in both eyes can see and appreciate. The industry is going to force the FCC to mandate 3D and standard vision will be declared obsolete. (remember analogue TV)
Reply to this comment
by RoboBlogger March 7, 2010 2:18 PM EST
pretty soon we'll all be looking like Elton John with those glasses.
Reply to this comment
by curse914 March 7, 2010 11:52 AM EST
3D movies have been foisted on citizens since 1890. Interest wanes quickly. It is great in small doses, but this smacks of "marketing genius'" at work again.
Reply to this comment
by sammy310 March 7, 2010 11:25 AM EST
Isn't anybody paying attention! The reason that movie attendance and dvd sales are down is that the quality of movies being offered is generally lacking. 3-d is cool and it will help get people to go and see an otherwise marginal movie but once they are used to it we'll be back where we are now. It would help boost dvd sales if Blu-Ray was a bit more affordable.
Reply to this comment
See all 19 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook