By

CBSNews /

CBS/ March 4, 2010, 2:09 PM

Shiloh Jolie-Pitt Looking Too Boyish?

Shiloh Jolie-Pitt is one of the youngest style icons in the world. Whether she's accompanying her famous parents Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie on one of their international adventures or playing with her toys, Shiloh is always magazine cover ready. But has she become too much of a "he" in her wardrobe choices, and with her recent hair cut?

Photos: Angelina Jolie
Photos: Brad Pitt In Focus

Jessica Callan, news director of Life & Style Weekly magazine, who chose photos of Shiloh for an upcoming magazine cover, called the girl's look a "complete shocking transformation."

Callan said Shiloh looks like a little boy.

"The reaction was absolute shock," she said. "We could not believe she's gone as far as this. She's been a tomboy, dressed very boyish, has a sword and a self-professed love for Peter Pan, but all of a sudden now she's looking like their fourth boy."

But is that a problem?

Robi Ludwig, Psy.D, contributor for Care.com, said, "I think kids go through phases. So I don't think anybody should be too concerned. But I really do think that (Jolie and Pitt are) probably just following her lead here. That she has a preference for boys' clothes and short hair and that's really what you want to do as a parent anyway."

But "Early Show" co-anchor Maggie Rodriguez posed the question of whether or not that could confuse a child about their gender identity.

  • Quick Poll
Would you dress your daughter the way Shiloh is dressed?
 Yes.
 No.
 Only if she inisted on it.


Ludwig said, "It's really not uncommon for people to go through phases where they want to look like a boy or even pretend they're a boy or play boys' games. And really, at one point, they decide, 'is it worth it to be out of sync with my peers.' And in some cases, it's not a choice and even in major cases, where children are not clear what their gender is, parents and psychologists are suggesting go with your kids' lead because you really want to support their happiness and security."

Rodriguez pressed, "What's the danger if you don't (do this)? You say, 'No, no, no. You have to look like a girl. You have to wear the dress.'"

Ludwig said, "The downside (to that) is that you're not supporting your child's choices, and that could lead to them being you don't love them as you are."

"But you're the adult," Rodriguez said. "Some people would have to say, 'You have to guide them.'"

"True," Ludwig said. "Here's where I would say: There's a caveat. If you're supporting your kids' choices, and they're in school and there's a chance this they could get made fun of, you do want to protect them from the harsh onlookers and you don't want to put them in that position. But really, if a child feels that they want to do this and they feel that it's not good for them not to do it, you want to support them, but help them negotiate life in a way that feels tolerable to them."

As for the magazine, Rodriguez said it's sure to fly off the newsstands because of Pitt and Jolie's star power.

Academy Awards: Cast Your Vote
Download a Printable Oscar Ballot
Oscar Nominees: Full List
Oscars: And Still, Comedy Was Shunned
Photos: Oscar Nominees 2010
Photos: "Inglourious Basterds"
Photos: "Inglourious Basterds" at Cannes
Photos: "Inglourious Basterds" Premiere

Callan said, "They're the biggest celebrities we have at the moment around. These two huge A-list stars, of course when they came together, (created) a huge amount of controversy over that. So the minute they started having children, that was it. It just increased headlines."

Ludwig added Jolie's fashion icon status is also of interest here. The fact that her daughter wants to look more like her father, she said, is interesting.

Rodriguez added the press doesn't know what Jolie looked like as a child, that she herself could have dressed like a boy.

Ludwig said, "There are a lot of tomboys who turn out to be supermodels, and she could end up being a fashion icon herself. So it really is too soon to tell."
Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
46 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
femisez says:
Who the hell cares? She's a baby for Christs sake, and it wouldn't matter if she was ten, or thirteen or forty. This is the 21st century, not Victorian England, who gives a damn if the kid wears jeans and a beanie? Can we get something actually newsworthy and important instead of some fashion obsessed backwards moron banging on about how little girls need to wear pink frilly dresses and high heels to be accepted into modern culture? Please?

TL;DR: OH NOES NOT THE PANTS. THEY'RE CORRUPTING THE BABIES SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Chromesthesia says:
This just makes me so mad.
Why is this even news?
Stop bothering a 3 year old child. She can dress how she wants. I love wearing t shirts and camo pants. Dressing comfortably. I don't want to wear high heels and I won't so there.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
2catnight says:
Shiloh J-P and Suri Cruise are on opposite ends of the spectrum. Shiloh in pants and Suri in dresses. There is nothing wrong with either. Personally, I would rather see my 4 year old daughter dress like Shiloh instead of being all about fashion, make-up, and high heels like Suri. Shiloh seems to have a great imagination...she also has children to play with and brothers she may be imitating. Leave the kiddies alone! Shiloh and Suri are both adorable!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CompletelyFrustrated says:
O.M.G.!!!! You media vultures are pathetic!!!!

She's THREE for crying out loud! Maggie you should be ashamed - would you like your own daughter criticized like this?

Perhaps the short haircut was the result of a little girl try to cut her own hair and Mom needed to fix it??? If not SO WHAT!!! Now you morons are claiming she may be gender confused - you people are sick. Maybe we should pick the way your kids dress apart.

Oh short hair = masculinity - tell that to Katie Couric - her hair is just as short, OMG she changing gender.

Gimme a break!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Critic111 says:
Sorry but this is just what Brangelina wants. And as usual the media has played right into it. It seems just about any publicity is a sunny day for them. Hey they can even hide behind the open-mindedness card on this one. You knew THAT was coming. GLAAD. Great!

This is no more about their daughter being a tomboy, than Suri's dress code truly reflecting her inner girly-girl. This is about exploiting children, which is nothing new to these tots. The Smoking gun? Why do we see so much of Tom Kat and Brangelina's kids and comparatively little of Depp's, the biggest star on earth?

I will say lately Brangelina is better at the game than Tom-Kat. although Suri gets LOADS more attention (charisma maybe?), and is probably more popular than either of her parents. Still Brangelina doesn't pull physically dangerous stunts like putting their tot in heels. Well that's something. Although some might argue overexposing celeb children is by itself dangerous.

I was a tomboy, there wasn't a sport I didn't like. But as people have mentioned, that doesn't mean a kid dresses fashionably butch. They dress for comfort. Not black bomber jackets, and button-up shirts with crew necks. In fact the cr*p tots pull together is generally not what an adult sees as cool. It lacks consistency and is not well coordinated.

Go back and read that New York Times article on Brangelina. This is just more media manipulation, like the glossy highly styled shots in war torn countries, focusing on THEM, not the atrocities.

Using their kids to create image and manipulate the media is nothing new. Not for Brangelina. It's also not new that too few people apply critical thinking when discussing them. I think they just grab on to the easy buzz issues, regardless of whether they apply or not.

I just wish a respected news outlet would again, call them on their bulls**t. (ironically although the Times journo got in trouble over the People Magazine claims, he was ultimately proven right!)
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
imstillhere says:
eh let them dress how they want, get it out of her system before shes older. she so innocent now why bother her, I remember being rather boyish until i got interested in boys then i remember dressing like a girl and forgetting the boy stuff at home.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
skeezix06 says:
So in order to be acceptable to the public, 3-year-old Shiloh must now wear frilly dresses and conform to the media's expectations of her public and private behavior? That's insane. The people who wrote this story need to start looking for jobs elsewhere.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
charisma9949 says:
Leave the kid alone.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
liselle3 says:
Why does anyone care? Furthermore, why do people get so hung up on norms for what is female and what is male? Let it go folks, shes a little girl and she is what she is, whatever that means and whatever she grows up to be. I applaud Brad and Angelina for allowing her to dress as she likes. If people weren't so freaked out about sexual sterotypes this would be a non-issue... as it should be.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nylram says:
I'm a tomboyish when I was a kid but it changed when I went to highschool am now happily married to a man.
reply
See all 46 Comments