March 3, 2010 1:53 PM

Can Obama Health Care Plan Ease Dem Fears?

By
CBSNews
(CBS/ AP)  Democratic congressional leaders hope President Barack Obama's unveiling of his final health care package Wednesday will help resuscitate an effort to enact his top domestic priority that seemed all but dead until recently.

The president planned to describe his plan at the White House, a day after he said he was open to melding four Republican ideas into his proposal. In a measure of the partisanship that has dominated the battle, his embrace of those policies drew no plaudits from Republicans, and instead was designed more to coax votes from nervous Democratic moderates by demonstrating an attempt to cooperate with the other party.

"I like the idea that the president is working with Republicans and trying to find common ground," said Sen. Mark Pryor, a centrist Democrat from Arkansas. "I think that's a good place to be for him, I think that's what the American people want to see."

Mr. Obama's effort signaled the climax of a yearlong duel over his premier domestic priority, with the outcome still uncertain. Democratic leaders hope to muscle the overhaul package through Congress by month's end or sooner over what is expected to be unanimous Republican opposition, teeing up a pivotal issue for the November elections when control of Congress will be at stake.

"He'll reiterate why reform is so crucial and what it will mean for American families and businesses," said a White House official who described Mr. Obama's remarks on condition of anonymity to avoid upstaging the president.

Special Report: Health Care Reform

"What the president is trying to do here is to be able to say to the country, 'Listen, I've reached out. I did everything I could possibly do to get Republican support and they just wouldn't go along with it,'" CBS News chief Washington correspondent Bob Schieffer said. He added that the president's attempt to pass health care reform on a straight party line vote will be "very complicated."

"At this point he really doesn't have the votes to get that done. He's trying to set himself up in a position that if this fails, he can say it's the fault of the Republicans."

Mr. Obama has already made the basics of his plan clear. He would extend health coverage to about 30 million uninsured Americans, with a first-time mandate for nearly everyone to buy insurance; rein in the insurance industry by banning practices like denying coverage for the ill; expand pharmaceutical benefits for the elderly and give lower-income people subsidies to help them afford coverage. It would be paid for by raising taxes on upper-income Americans and culling savings from Medicare, the government program providing health care coverage to seniors.

It will be less expensive than the health care bill the House narrowly passed in November, and will contain no government-run insurance program to compete with private insurers.

In a letter to congressional leaders Tuesday, Mr. Obama went further. He said he was exploring Republican proposals for cracking down on fraudulent medical charges, revamping ways for resolving malpractice disputes, boosting doctors' reimbursements under the government-run Medicaid program for the poor, and offering tax incentives for curbing peoples' visits to doctors.

Even Republican sponsors of those plans said the inclusion of those proposals would not win their votes.

"That in and of itself doesn't change my support at all," said Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley, who has pushed for higher Medicaid payments to doctors but opposes much of what Mr. Obama wants to do.

Mr. Obama also used his letter to draw a line in the sand, rejecting Republican appeals to restart the health care debate. He said "piecemeal reform is not the best way" to achieve his health care goals - a clear message to Republicans and moderate Democrats who say the president should take a more modest, incremental approach to reshaping the health care system.

In mid-January, the health overhaul drive seemed to have sputtered out after Republicans captured the special Senate election in Democratic-leaning Massachusetts. That gave them 41 of the Senate's 100 votes - just enough to stop Democrats from shoving final legislation through that chamber.

Democrats are now aiming toward a two-step approach. The House would approve a sweeping Senate-passed overhaul bill, then both chambers would make changes in it - like making subsidies more generous - by passing a separate measure.

Democrats would use a fast-track process - called reconciliation - for that second bill that would let them approve it with only a majority of Senate votes. Budget reconciliation rules prohibit filibusters, which are delaying tactics meant to stall legislation. It takes 60 votes to halt a filibuster.

Republicans say that the reconciliation process should not be used for such major legislation and accuse Democrats of subverting the rules, but White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel defended it Tuesday after meeting with top Democrats, calling it "a normal procedure."

An initial health overhaul bill squeaked through the House in November. The new bill will probably have eased restrictions on using federal funds for abortion - meaning some Democratic supporters may now vote "no." To compensate, leaders need to find support from three dozen Democrats - mostly moderates - who opposed the bill last fall.

To round up votes, Democratic leaders have been citing polls showing that many voters dislike the overall idea of a health overhaul but favor specific proposals. One presentation by the Democratic firm Lake Research Partners suggests that lawmakers emphasize benefits that would take effect this year, like preventing insurers from denying coverage to those already sick and beginning to improve seniors' pharmaceutical coverage.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Tuesday that the abortion dispute cannot be resolved in the companion bill Democrats plan to use to settle the main differences between the health care reform bills passed by the House and Senate. That legislation would be limited to provisions that have budget impact. That means Democrats may have to pass a third bill, making an already complex situation even tougher.

The United States is the only major industrialized country that lacks universal health care. Nearly 50 million people are uninsured in the U.S.

CBS/ AP
Add a Comment See all 156 Comments
by slownewsday_____ March 3, 2010 2:47 PM EST
"by chevyhotrod
"refute video are idiots" did you even bother to notice the video you speak of was cut and edited? Maybe taken out of context?

Even so, if he did say such a thing he would be dead wrong and I do not agree with what anyone says. My experince has been great with our healthcare system.

I don't need to be brainwashed, I am a free man without having to rely on others for my care, wellbeing or happyness."




The videos were in plenty of surrounding context, unless you're too daft to follow.

I was merely addressing the fact that you said you like video evidence, and I gave you some that Beck mis-represented himself on Fox News, which you were defending as the gospel.

In other words, you got caught in your own trap.

And, no, you don't need to be brainwashed - you've had enough already.



.
Reply to this comment
by slownewsday_____ March 3, 2010 4:57 PM EST
Well, I don't think you're too daft - I take that back.

But I stand by what I said about the brainwashing.

If you want a more-objective glimpse, read some non-US news. Just a suggestion.
by Brokennews March 3, 2010 2:39 PM EST
I think most americans would want to proceed cautiously rather than ending up with a big turd. Listen to the people Mr. President.

by Stevenapoli7 March 3, 2010 2:09 PM EST



Don't worry! They'll polish that turd up bright & shiny!!
Some seem to be looking at this current bill though beer goggles.

Yeah! She looked doable last night at 1:00am, but when morning comes & your brain & vision clear enough to grasp the reality of the horror that's in your bed and you ask your self: "Ya know, even though this is my place, it might be worth it to leave right now & never come back!!"
Reply to this comment
by Stevenapoli7 March 3, 2010 2:09 PM EST
Mr. Obama said "piecemeal reform is not the best way" to achieve his health care goals - a clear message to Republicans and moderate Democrats who say the president should take a more modest, incremental approach to reshaping the health care system.
--------------------------------------------------------------
I think most americans would want to proceed cautiously rather than ending up with a big turd. Listen to the people Mr. President.
Reply to this comment
by bugwhips March 3, 2010 1:30 PM EST
by starving1968-3 March 3, 2010 12:36 PM EST
by bugwhips March 3, 2010 12:07 PM EST

"Two - who is claiming to be a "socialist"?" your leftist buddy Goebbels said both statements.

How's it feel to be in the company of fascists. (Fascist socialists that is)







Who is a "fascist socialist", and what does Goebbels have to do with America - or me for that matter?
---------------------------------------------------------
Simply put your comparison of Goebbels and Fox is just misdirection, MSNBC or CNN would be more appropriate because:

A: they are more socialist (leftist)

B: their monotonous constant railing against FOX is laughable. I like to compare Olberman's closeups to the screen (full face screen shot) when he's screeching his opinion to the Macintosh 1984 Commercial where Olberman is the man on the screen and the audience is the blind leftist faithful. The woman running in to smash the screen and break the hypnosis is FOX news.

As far as how you fit in your constant socialist jargon, perpetuation of the democrat "talking words" in typical Goebbels fashion "The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly - it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over" you and most Obama supporters continually use when faced with facts.
Reply to this comment
by inketolstoy March 3, 2010 1:08 PM EST
starving -"I don't even factor social security into my retirement equation, because it most likely WILL NOT be there when I retire."

So why do you think letting the government run health care will be better? They couldn't be trusted with that money, and they won't mamnage healthcare any better. Keep watching Comedy Central for your news. Laughter will help keep you healthy when you are working at age seventy-five with government health care (a placebo until your 60, a poison pill after that.)
Reply to this comment
by starving1968-3 March 3, 2010 12:37 PM EST
by bugwhips March 3, 2010 12:18 PM EST
BTW here is the full quote:

"What does Christianity mean today? National Socialism is a religion. All we lack is a religious genius capable of uprooting outmoded religious practices and putting new ones in their place. We lack traditions and ritual. One day soon National Socialism will be the religion of all Germans. My Party is my church, and I believe I serve the Lord best if I do his will, and liberate my oppressed people from the fetters of slavery. That is my gospel."- Goebbels 1928






I already know that the nazi's based their fundamental philosophy on the writings of Martin Luther.

This quote only reinforces that.
Reply to this comment
by starving1968-3 March 3, 2010 12:36 PM EST
by bugwhips March 3, 2010 12:07 PM EST

"Two - who is claiming to be a "socialist"?" your leftist buddy Goebbels said both statements.

How's it feel to be in the company of fascists. (Fascist socialists that is)







Who is a "fascist socialist", and what does Goebbels have to do with America - or me for that matter?
Reply to this comment
by starving1968-3 March 3, 2010 12:33 PM EST
by chevyhotrod March 3, 2010 12:02 PM EST

I was talking about INCOME TAXES, not capital gains taxes. You still have not answered the question, and I doubt ever will. What percentage should our Federal Government be allowed to collect on PERSONAL INCOME TAXES. The one that affects everyone.

Should there be limit on the percentage of the amount of money our federal government should be allowed to conficate every year from it's citizens of personal income?

If you believe this, what is the percentage?







If we need $10 TRILLION to fund the federal government, and an effective income tax rate of 15% would provide that $10 TRILLION, then that is what it should be.

If an effective income tax rate of 35% would provide that $10 TRILLION, then that is what it should be.

The question isn't "what should the percentage be"?

The ANSWER is "tax the people 'just enough' to fund the federal government, without a deficit".
Reply to this comment
by grams09 March 3, 2010 12:25 PM EST
CBS states at the end of the article that nearly 50 million people are uninsured in the U.S. Wow, yesterday it was on 30 million. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2010/03/what_obama_left_out_about_the.html

I guess that's democrat math at work.
Reply to this comment
by rplat March 3, 2010 12:23 PM EST
Obama has effectively melded the administrative branch and the legislative branch into a functioning Marxist politburo and set the stage for his unique blend of fascism. Say goodbye to the ?United States of America?, because it is no more.
Reply to this comment
See all 156 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook