March 2, 2010 8:45 PM

Rangel Denies Losing Ways and Means Post

(CBS/AP)  Rep. Charles Rangel is denying that he's stepping down as chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee.

A Democratic source, however, says Rangel is likely to "temporarily" relinquish his chair in wake of an ethic report that admonished him for taking two corporate paid trips.

Rangel told reporters "you bet your life" when asked if we was still chairman. He had just emerged from a meeting with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to discuss his fate.

Pelosi had no comment.

The House ethics committee accused Rangel on Thursday of accepting corporate money for trips to Caribbean conferences in violation of House rules. The committee said it couldn't determine whether Rangel knew about the financing, but found that his staff did - and concluded Rangel was responsible for learning the truth.

Ironically, as the ethics committee was finalizing its report, the New York Democrat was attending President Barack Obama's bipartisan summit in an attempt to rescue the party's health care bill.

Rangel's case is certain to raise questions of whether the 20-term lawmaker, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, can retain his post in an election year.

The Ways and Means chairmanship is especially important this year, when Democrats are trying to overhaul the nation's health care system and Congress has to decide what to do about billions of dollars in tax cuts Americans at every income level have enjoyed for a decade - but are due to expire in December.

If this was Rangel's only ethics problem, it might not be crippling to Democrats. But still looming is a much larger ethics investigation. That one is focusing in part on Rangel's use of official stationery to raise money for a college center in his name; and his belated financial disclosure of hundreds of thousands of dollars in previously unreported assets and income.

The unreported assets included a federal credit union account worth between $250,001 and $500,000; a Merrill Lynch account valued between $250,000 and $500,000; tens of thousands of dollars in municipal bonds and $30,000 to $100,000 in rent from a multifamily brownstone building in New York.

The ethics panel also ended another widespread investigation Thursday, saying it found no violations of House rules by seven lawmakers who steered government money and projects and contracts to favored companies that donated to their re-election campaigns.

In the Rangel case, the ethics committee exonerated five other members of the Congressional Black Caucus who also were on the 2007 and 2008 trips to conferences in Antigua and St. Maarten but told them they will have to pay the costs of the trips.

The panel's report did not include any formal charges that could have brought a more serious censure against Rangel.

Rangel, at a hastily called news conference Thursday night, blamed his staff for his problems.

"Common sense dictates that members of Congress should not be held responsible for what could be the wrongdoing or mistakes or errors of staff unless there's reason to believe that member knew or should have known, and there is nothing in the record to indicate the latter," Rangel said. He refused to answer questions.

House members on the trips who didn't know about the corporate financing, according to the committee, were Democratic Reps. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, Yvette Clarke of New York, Donald Payne of New Jersey, Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick of Michigan and Donna Christensen, the nonvoting delegate from the Virgin Islands.

The ethics committee said the five relied on false information from the listed official sponsors of the trips, the Carib News, a New York newspaper, and the Carib News Foundation.

Peter Flaherty of the National Legal and Policy Center, an ethics watchdog group, attended the 2008 conference in St. Maarten and filed an ethics complaint that listed companies that had signs and materials at the event. He said Citigroup, Pfizer, American Airlines, AT&T, Verizon, Macy's, and IBM were among them.

While lawmakers have attended the Caribbean conferences for many years, the House adopted stricter travel rules before the 2007 and 2008 trips.

Rangel, 79, was first elected to the House in 1970 from New York's Harlem district, defeating Adam Clayton Powell Jr., at the time the most prominent black politician in the country and one with his own ethics problems.

In the case of lawmakers who sponsored targeted appropriations and also received contributions, The Associated Press obtained a copy of letters exonerating the seven along with an accompanying report.

All seven - five Democrats and two Republicans - are or were senior members of the House Appropriations Committee.

The most prominent of the them was the late Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., the former chairman of the defense appropriations subcommittee who died earlier this month. The other six lawmakers exonerated in that probe are Reps. Norman Dicks, D-Wash.; Jim Moran, D-Va.; Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio; Peter Visclosky, D-Ind.; Todd Tiahrt, R-Kan.; and C.W. "Bill" Young, R-Fla.

The appropriations went to companies represented by a now-defunct lobbying firm known as PMA Group - formerly Paul Magliocchetti Associates.

The Justice Department was conducting an investigation of its own into PMA. It is unclear whether that inquiry is still alive. At one point, a federal grand jury subpoenaed documents from Visclosky's office, campaign committees and some of his employees. The chief of staff for the Indiana Democrat resigned after the subpoenas were delivered.

The House committee's report said its investigators "found no evidence" that members or their official staffs considered or sought contributions in return for appropriations.

The committee also found that PMA used "strong-arm" tactics, threatening to withdraw financial support or encourage businesses to leave a member's district if the lawmaker opposed appropriations to companies represented by the firm.

"In these instances, members and their staff refused to change their positions and, in one case, notified the (ethics) committee," the report said.

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 17 Comments
by endurorob_5 March 3, 2010 9:06 AM EST
So the first sentance of this story says Charlie is denying that he is stepping down. Now CBS breaking news says Charlie is temporarily stepping down. So am I to assume that from the time this story was written until now Charlie changed his mind or am I to assume when charlie was asked about this earlier he was lying?
Reply to this comment
by endurorob_5 March 3, 2010 9:07 AM EST
I think I will go with the Charlie was lying assumption.
by infantryman1968 March 3, 2010 8:04 AM EST
Rangel Denies Losing Ways and Means Post
Powerful Democrat Involved in Another Ethics Scandal, but Says He Isn't Stepping Down from Committee Chair - for Now


They locked up Randy (Duke) Cunningham for a lot less than this guy.
Reply to this comment
by willremember1 March 3, 2010 7:39 AM EST
Rangel is a crook just like the rest of them in DC. They all are, the difference is that he has done absolutely nothing to help Obama and everything he can to hurt him. He needs to step down now for the good of his party. HE WON"T
Reply to this comment
by jckbrn-2009 March 3, 2010 6:52 AM EST
Why would he step down? There are excuses and people to blame that he hasn't even thought of yet - -
And he still has support from his "just as crooked" cohorts in the "elected elite".
Only politicians need an ethics panel - and then ignore it ! ! !
Reply to this comment
by stychokiller March 3, 2010 6:41 AM EST
Even if he killed his momma in plain sight of Congress, Congress could not bring itself to get rid of him outright -- the legal profession (and Sharks!) take care of their own!
Reply to this comment
by SIKCHUTNAY March 3, 2010 5:51 AM EST
THIS IS WHY TERM LIMITS SHOULD BE APPLIED. THE FOOL HAS BEEN THERE SINCE THE 70'S.
Reply to this comment
by -One_American- March 3, 2010 1:40 AM EST
Charles Rangel plays his supporters for fools - which they certainly are, and will likely always be.
Reply to this comment
by 45ford March 3, 2010 12:15 AM EST
It's time for Rangel to go as chair of the committee AND to be given the boot as congressman too.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt March 2, 2010 11:10 PM EST
Rangel has no shame.
Reply to this comment
by gboyd41 March 2, 2010 11:07 PM EST
Let's see, if I didn't disclose hundreds of thousands of $ to the Feds my guess is I would be fined severly, or be in jail. But, if the WH needs your vote, no big deal-it was no security threat. ???. He may not be chairman any more-what a penalty. Amazing the corruption that is rampant in DC!
Reply to this comment
See all 17 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook