February 26, 2010 3:18 AM

VA to Reopen "Gulf War Illness" Cases

By
CBSNews
(AP)  The Veterans Affairs Department will re-examine the disability claims of what could be thousands of Gulf War veterans suffering from ailments they blame on their war service, the first step toward potentially compensating them nearly two decades after the war ended.

VA Secretary Eric Shinseki said the decision is part of a "fresh, bold look" his department is taking to help veterans who have what's commonly called "Gulf War illness" and have long felt the government did little to help them. The VA says it also plans to improve training for medical staff who work with Gulf War vets, to make sure they do not simply tell vets that their symptoms are imaginary - as has happened to many over the years.

"I'm hoping they'll be enthused by the fact that this ... challenges all the assumptions that have been there for 20 years," Shinseki told The Associated Press in an exclusive interview.

The changes reflect a significant shift in how the VA may ultimately care for some 700,000 veterans who served in the Gulf War. It also could change how the department handles war-related illness suffered by future veterans, as Shinseki said he wants standards put in place that don't leave veterans waiting decades for answers to what ails them.

The decision comes four months after Shinseki opened the door for as many as 200,000 Vietnam veterans to receive service-related compensation for three illnesses stemming from exposure to the Agent Orange herbicide.

About 175,000 to 210,000 Gulf War veterans have come down with a pattern of symptoms that include rashes, joint and muscle pain, sleep issues and gastrointestinal problems, according to a 2008 congressionally mandated committee that based the estimate on earlier studies.

But what exactly caused the symptoms has long been unanswered. Independent scientists have pointed to pesticide and pyridostigmine bromide pills, given to protect troops from nerve agents, as probable culprits. The 2008 report noted that since 1994, $340 million has been spent on government research into the illness, but little has focused on treatments.

Last week, Shinseki and Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., a member of the Senate Veterans' Affairs committee, met privately in Charleston, W.Va., with several Gulf War veterans. In an interview after the meeting, Rockefeller told the AP that Shinseki's background as a former Army chief of staff made the changes possible. He said either the military has been reluctant over the years to release paperwork related to the war or kept poor records about exposures in the war zone, which made it harder for the veterans to prove they needed help.

"The paperwork isn't very accurate, but the pain is very real," Rockefeller said.

Shinseki has publicly wondered why today there are still so many unanswered questions about Gulf War illness, as stricken veterans' conditions have only worsened with age.

Last fall, he appointed a task force led by his chief of staff, John Gingrich, a retired Army colonel who commanded a field artillery battalion in the 1991 war, to review benefits and care for Gulf War veterans. The changes stem from the task force's work.

Gingrich said in an interview that he feels a personal stake because some of his own men who were healthy during the war are dealing with these health problems. Gingrich said the VA isn't giving a new benefit to Gulf War veterans, just making sure the claims they submitted were done correctly.

"We're talking about a culture change, that we don't have a single clinician or benefits person saying 'you really don't have Gulf War illness, this is only imaginary' or 'you're really not sick,"' Gingrich said.

A law enacted in 1994 allows the VA to pay compensation to Gulf War veterans with certain chronic disabilities from illnesses the VA could not diagnosis. More than 3,400 Gulf War have qualified for benefits under this category, according to the VA.

The VA says it plans to review how regulations were written to ensure the veterans received the compensation they were entitled to under the law. The VA would then give veterans the opportunity to have a rejected claim reconsidered.

The VA doesn't have an estimate of the number of veterans who may be affected, but it could be in the thousands.

Of those who deployed in the Gulf War, 300,000 submitted claims, according to the VA. About 14 percent were rejected, while the rest received compensation for at least one condition.

AP
Add a Comment
by HM2USN September 7, 2010 1:44 AM EDT
Im a veteran, and Im really surprised at some of you and your postings. Do you hear yourselves? One clown even makes an argument for medicinal marijuana for PTSD. I doubt if he even knows what PTSD is, you don't get rid of what's in your head by frying your brain moron. Never forget what America stands for, if you doubt that or wonder then maybe it's time for you to reevaluate your values as an american !!!
Reply to this comment
by junkman1957 March 1, 2010 10:55 AM EST
this is just away for our goverment to keeep in the news (we are vietam vets) when i say we the whole family these vets can't get a agent orange diagnosis you have to be dying or dead i do hope there is help for other vets but as for the older ones they are viewed by the goverment as not productive so we no what that means just more meds no diagnoses no claim no addmitance
Reply to this comment
by RL_Cudd February 26, 2010 9:45 AM EST
The Vet Admin is the biggest waste of money out there. My experience with VA doctors was just like portrayed in the movies - the faciities were lacking - the word slum lord comes to mind. The doctors were not experienced, nor even caring. They work for the VA because no one esle would take them.

I submitted two letters of complaints to Shinseki over a year ago, and NO ONE has even responded - that shows it is just a farce to give those who haven't yet joined the miitary a false sense of security.

The gov't has to lie to get recruits.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb2011 February 26, 2010 8:19 AM EST
Now that we have a volunteer based military, Those who choose to become free mercenary suckers for multinational corporations will have only themselves to blame for whatever injury they receive.

Ever since WW2, whose origins can in part be blamed on US isolationism of Japan, there has been no legitimate reason for US soldiers to be in another country killing and otherwise harming the occupants.

Soldiers taking part in such operations may delude themselves, but in reality they were not defending the country.

Those seeking treatment should be hitting up the corporations that were the beneficiaries of our corrupt government's largesse, and the government should also be clawing back the blood profit.
Reply to this comment
by porcine_aviator February 26, 2010 9:26 AM EST
1) WWII was not caused by isolationism. It was caused by genocidal regimes in Germany, Japan, Russia, and Italy. That we isolated Japan was predictable. Did Roosevelt allow Pearl Harbor to happen so as to bring about the necessary push to war? Perhaps. But the fact remains that we couldn't have sat on the sidelines and allowed the world to become overrun by fascism.

2) While a lot of our recent military adventurism is ill conceived, it is not without merit. The Taliban did give safe harbor to Al Qaeda. We were justifed in removing the Taliban. That we're still spinning our wheels is related solely to the inept leadrship under Bush/Cheney; the stated objective, however, was justifiable.

3) While our military is largely serving the needs of a few well-connected special interests (Halliburton et al), I don't think the people who serve in the military are guilty of mass delusion. In fact, many of them are disgusted with where we are going as a nation. In only about 5 years I think we will see a total change in the way we approach foreign policy and nation building exercises.
by wyodutch February 26, 2010 7:52 AM EST
The government, as well as the people, love a war... Parades, speeches, video at 7 of hi-tech weapons blasting the newest enemy.
.
But... after the parades are over and the people have a new war to cheer... The wounded are quickly forgotton. They screwed the Vietnam War vets with Agent Orange and they screwed the Gulf War vets with vaccinations and chemicals.
.
"Support the troops".. A term we really do not understand the meaning of.
Reply to this comment
by USMC-Mom February 26, 2010 12:11 PM EST
You are so right, the people do not really support the Troops.
Medical care is needed for all Military, vets & those serving.
All those promises made at the recuiters office do not happen.
People should be out raged over how they are treated.
This health care bill ticks me off. The government does not medically reat out military ( serving & VA's) how are the rest of us going to be treated?
by Mokkie57 February 26, 2010 4:34 AM EST
As a starting point. Why dose the VA refuse to give PTSD PT. Medical marijuana

POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER/ PTSD

Israel to soothe soldiers with marijuana
NewsMine.org - Israel to soothe soldiers with marijuana

Study: Marijuana Eases Traumatic Memories
cannabisnews.com: Study: Marijuana Eases Traumatic Memories

Medical Marijuana: PTSD Medical Malpractice
Medical Marijuana: PTSD Medical Malpractice - Salem-News.Com

Cannabis for the Wounded - Another Walter Reed Scandal
LP: Cannabis for the Wounded - Another Walter Reed Scandal

PTSD and Cannabis: A Clinician Ponders Mechanism of Action
CCRMG

Cannabis Eases Post Traumatic Stress
CCRMG

Endocannabinoids extinguish bad memories in the brain
International Association for Cannabis as Medicine

Natural high helps banish bad memories
Natural high helps banish bad memories - 31 July 2002 - New Scientist

The use of a synthetic cannabinoid in the management of treatment-resistant nightmares in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
The use of a synthetic cannabinoid in the manageme... [CNS Neurosci Ther. 2009] - PubMed result

Marijuana could alleviate symptoms of PTSD
Marijuana could alleviate symptoms of PTSD | health
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook