February 21, 2010 1:37 PM

Powell: We Are Not Less Safe Under Obama

By
Michelle Levi
Former Secretary of State Colin Powell on

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell on "Face the Nation," Sunday, Feb. 21, 2010. FTN (CBS)

(CBS)  Claims that the United States is less safe under President Obama are not credible, former Secretary of State Colin Powell said on "Face the Nation" Sunday.

He also challenged criticism by some (including former Vice President Dick Cheney, who say that by not using extreme interrogation techniques such as waterboarding on terror suspects the United States is more vulnerable.

"The point is made, 'We don't waterboard anymore or use extreme interrogation techniques.' Most of those extreme interrogation techniques and waterboarding were done away with in the Bush administration," Powell said. "They've been made officially done away with in this current administration."

"The Transportation Security Administration created by George Bush is still in action working in our airports; they take care of me every day that I go to an airport," Powell told moderator Bob Schieffer.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence was also created under President Bush, "and it is still under President Obama working hard," he said. "Our counterterrorism authorities and forces are hard at work. Our law enforcement officials are hard at work. We have gone after the enemy in Afghanistan with 50,000 more troops, more predators are striking al Qaeda and Taliban leaders in Pakistan. We have continued the policies that President Bush put in place with respect to Iraq.

"The bottom line answer is the nation is still at risk. Terrorists are out there. They're trying to get through. But to suggest that somehow we have become much less safer because of the actions of the administration, I don't think that's borne out by the facts," Powell said.

He admitted he was "surprised" by the lack of coordination among different agencies in dealing with Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the suspect in the Christmas Day bombing attempt of an airliner.

"Should he have been given his Miranda rights either after 90 minutes or 15 hours? The story kept changing," Powell said. "I would have thought after all these years we would have had a process in place - either in the previous administration or in this administration - that when you get somebody like that, we all know how to respond and how to interrogate him, or not interrogate him. But he's in jail. He's facing trial. I don't think it will be a difficult trial to handle. And also he's still talking. They found other ways to interrogate him."

Powell stuck by his conviction that Guantanamo Bay prison facility should be closed. "I think Guantanamo has cost us a lot over the years in terms of our standing in the world and the way in which despots have hidden behind what we have at Guantanamo to justify their own positions," he said.

"I think we ought to remove this incentive that exists in the presence of Guantanamo to encourage people and to give radicals an opportunity to say, 'You see? This is what America is all about. They're all about torture and detention centers.'"

"Let's get this population of 192 sorted out," Powel said, adding that "I have no problem with them being tried here in the United States."

However, while he favors a federal court trial for Kaleid Sheik Mohammed, he said he would not have picked downtown New York City to try the alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, opting rather for a secure military base, "where it would not become a circus."

Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 153 Comments
by likeitbe February 23, 2010 9:27 AM EST
Powell lost all credibility with his WMD presentations. He was long ago revealed as a phony who will kowtow to the wishes of whomever is in power, whether it be Bush or Obama. Once a liar, always a liar.
Reply to this comment
by RedWings_ninety_one February 23, 2010 11:40 AM EST
Oh you mean the "WMD's" that were the perfect excuse for W to go in and finish what his former head of CIA daddy started? I'm pretty sure they never found any WMD's.

By the way, I'm not disagreeing with you if it sounds like I am.
by dodinyc February 22, 2010 5:22 PM EST
Cheney is making these "less safe" comments because if a terrorist act should happen (an it could at anytime no matter who is in office) he can take advantage of the tragedy by saying 'I told you so". He is not above using tragedy to his own advantage.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti February 22, 2010 5:48 PM EST
It worked like a charm for the Bushoccio Crime Family the last time they invited in the terrorists on 911.
by the74blaster February 22, 2010 5:57 PM EST
Absolutely!

I remember the "mushroom cloud" price we were going to pay if we did not invade Iraq.

Maybe Cheney should just come clean and just say thank you to the tax payers and the spineless democrats who voted for invading Iraq. After all the no bid contracts awarded to Haliburton and to other defense contractors must have added a ton of wealth to his 401K.

Its amazing how the so called "party of god" bends the rules like "Thou Shall Not Lie" when there is a profit to be made.
by noloyalisti February 22, 2010 4:23 PM EST
BTW, it is well known that Gore won Florida by almost any recount method. Why can't you just admit GOP thievery and thuggery? Bushoccio's brother was governor for God's sake. And a fundraiser for Bushoccio, Katherine Harris was the secretary of state. Wait, you are STILL a bush lover. OMG, so you are the one.
Reply to this comment
by the74blaster February 22, 2010 6:00 PM EST
Thats what happens if you have good lawyers, tons support from big money and a loyal family member gaurding the ballot box during a recount.
by noloyalisti February 22, 2010 4:19 PM EST
So how are the poor third world countries going to attack us? By rowboat? Or will they be let in again by a Republickan president? Or maybe we should make ourselves safe by committing more invasions and genocide all over the world. Or invading more Middle Eastern countries to steal their oil. Seems like that worked real well for the Bushoccio Crime Family.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti February 22, 2010 3:44 PM EST
I usually can smell a right winger who listens to Faux News and Beck and Limbaugh. If not, how did you get so frightened? Maybe it was because of the Bushoccio Crime Family who at the very least let the terrorists in to realize they dreams. They wrote it down in the PNAC document the neocons wrote prior to the first Bushoccio stolen election.
Reply to this comment
by Empire-George- February 22, 2010 4:07 PM EST
by noloyalisti February 22, 2010 3:44 PM EST

I never claimed to be "frightened" did I ?

We are talking about being "more or less safe" not more or less fearful....fear is best left to the liberal emotional girlyman, such as yourself.

Still bitter about the "stolen election" even though everyone in the country knows that Bush won every recount, but you keep on with that decade old "Gore really won"......yeah, he won alright....he won the scammer of the decade award, for fleecing the whole world about Global scamming, oopps, I mean warming.
by noloyalisti February 22, 2010 3:09 PM EST
Of course George feels less safe. He is listened to fake Faux News and reading the extremist right wing "news" like the Wall Street Journal. He is being frightened by the big corporations who have been profiting off of fear and occupation.
Reply to this comment
by Empire-George- February 22, 2010 3:38 PM EST
by noloyalisti February 22, 2010 3:09 PM EST

Of course George feels less safe. He is listened to fake Faux News and reading the extremist right wing "news" like the Wall Street Journal. He is being frightened by the big corporations who have been profiting off of fear and occupation.
______________

Wrong Commie.....wrong again, like always....I don't listen to those news outlets and don't read the Wall Street Journal.

But, since you probably live in nowhere, Kansas....of course Corn and Wheat aren't going to attack you....you don't travel, never left your "shire" and the only thing you have to worry about is if your sister will accept your engagement proposal.....so of course, you feel just fine....ignorance is bliss !!!
by BassGreat February 22, 2010 1:00 PM EST
Thank God he wasn't asked about what he thought of Sarah Palin. He probably would have become speechless.
Reply to this comment
by Empire-George- February 22, 2010 12:30 PM EST
by RedWings_ninety_one February 22, 2010 11:53 AM EST

We're not any less safe, and we're not any more safe, what's your point?
________________

Good day sir....are you directing your comment at General Powell ?

I feel less safe, do you ? specifically traveling, with the panty-bomber, the Ft. Hood shooter, Al Qaeda cells being uncovered throughout the country.....yes, we are stopping some attacks, but how soon before one succeeds ? ....maybe in rural America is different, but here in NY, we are still on alert, all the time.
Reply to this comment
by RedWings_ninety_one February 23, 2010 11:18 AM EST
Actually Joe, I was saying that I don't feel any safer or any less safe than when W was in office. I didn't get to catch this comment yesterday, sorry about that.
by noloyalisti February 22, 2010 12:16 PM EST
Obama has kept us safe quite a bit longer than he failed Bushoccio Crime Family. Cheney and Bushoccio got us hit after only 8 months in office.
Reply to this comment
by RedWings_ninety_one February 22, 2010 12:19 PM EST
Probably because Obama is a beacon of hope to most of the world... Fill in the blanks about Bush.
by Leaderless February 22, 2010 11:57 AM EST
Powell backed obama, what else can he say......
Reply to this comment
See all 153 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook