February 15, 2010 11:05 AM

Hooters CEO Coby Brooks 'Undercover'

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  When Coby Brooks, president and CEO of Hooters, goes undercover in his own company, he finds himself struggling to keep up in a fast-paced kitchen, and is later forced to take action when a restaurant manager steps out of line.

In the second episode of "Undercover Boss," which aired Sunday on CBS, Brooks started out at an entry-level job at a Hooters location and was axed before the day was out.

The next day, he worked on marketing with two female employees and discovered -- it really seemed to be a surprise to him -- that many Americans did not view Hooters as a family establishment and had the impression that the franchise was degrading to women.

In an interview with "Early Show" co-anchor Harry Smith last week, before the segment aired, Brooks said Hooters "empowers women all the time."

"Thirty-seven percent of our corporate office and management staff are women, 75 percent of all of our employees are women," he explained. "We raised a lot of women. We just sent one of our vice presidents, who was a Hooter girl, to Rwanda recently to help better educate women and empower women. So, there's a lot of things that Hooters does behind-the-scenes that we never get credit for, but the bad things, you always hear about."

On the third day, he got to see first-hand why customers might not view Hooters as female friendly. At a restaurant in Texas, he encountered "Jimbo," a manager who treated his female employees as chattel, held leering "inspections" of the staff and had an unusual way of determining who would be lucky enough to go home early if business was slow. The lucky staffer was the winner of a contest in which all the women had to eat a plate of beans without using their hands.

Brooks called those actions "inappropriate" and said they would not be tolerated. According to the show, Jimbo was reprimanded and has since adopted a more politically-correct management style.

Day Four brought Brooks into contact with a single mom who managed one of his shops and to whom he managed to give a vacation. On Day Five, he went to the Naturally Fresh factory in Atlanta, where his dad, who founded the enterprise, used to have an office. There, he learned morale was poor and that employees who had never met him, and referred to him only as "the son," couldn't stand him.

In 1983, Brooks' father, Robert, joined six fellow entrepreneurs to start the company in Florida, and he ended up with the franchising rights and then the actual name. Robert Brooks passed away in 2006.

While out in the field, Brooks took notice of the different views his employees had of him and his father.

"Well, my father and I are different characters," he told Smith. "He was much more strong-armed. I'm more laid back. I manage by majority movement and my whole executive team gets together.

"My father was more of a single person; this is what we're going to do. There are some differences," he said.

Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 45 Comments
by Bellaedwards July 26, 2011 5:52 PM EDT
I watched this last night and had to write something... I was like seriously you want to make this a family place. Well not only do women that go with their husbands to eat feel awkward and their busts pour out as you order, but the fact you would seriously think I would bring my children there to eat.
The fact of the matter is that if you want it to be a family place then change the name and the girls outfits.
If you dont really care then make your money off of men coming and gauking at the women as the eat and drink...
But dont say I would like it to be a family place when no way in hell will most women walk in their and feel comfortable. Let your men go there but not your family.
I'm wondering how men would also feel if we women took them to a place that only men served you and they were in short shorts and no shirt seriously umm... you know as well as I do men would not go but yet they expect us to like the name and the atmosphere and think we should be ok with it. If men want to go then go but dont think women and children will ever feel comfortable there.
Reply to this comment
by andrea568 October 10, 2010 4:49 PM EDT
Disgraceful!Disgraceful!Disgraceful!Disgraceful!Disgraceful!

Oh please....do me a favour!!!!!!..how thick do you think we are? the only reason you went onto undercover boss is for a bit of publicity.

I felt sick at this load of old rubbish, really, this concept should have stayed in the UK because we're a cynical lot here and these CEOs couldn't give a monkey's chuff about the working people. To say that he would be fine with his daughters wearing hooters outfits and working there??? Bollocks!!! complete Bollocks!!! It's easy for him to say that as he knows that would never happen!!!

And....what's with all the crying????? I don't understand

HOOTERS...Let us educate you!!! I don't think so!!!
What an A****ole!!
Reply to this comment
by knish20900 September 21, 2010 12:05 AM EDT
Mr. Brooks,

I watched the Undercover Boss and was appalled at your lack of understanding. One of your "girls" summed it up beautifully after the negative responses on the street, and I quote "it's ok, their husbands will still come in." What part of family don't you understand? Husbands going to a joint to see scantily dressed babes as opposed to being home with their families. Shame on you!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by ekugler1 September 20, 2010 3:41 PM EDT
I like this show because it opens CEO's eyes to what is really happening. I'm usually impressed with the actions they take. In this case - whoa! Talk about closing your eyes! He listened to what the Woman on the Street was saying, and then heard his Hooter Girls talk about how small the outfits are. Then he says he needs to take action -- but it has to be something other than changing the Hooters outfits!! What's the point of listening to what the public is saying. Let's see how he really feels when his daughter's put on outfits that show their boobs and buts.
Reply to this comment
by JMeyer1011 September 19, 2010 11:21 PM EDT
After watching this program I was astonished that Coby still found it difficult to hear women on the street comment on how degrading "Hooter's" is to women. You take young attrative women, you place them in shirts that are 3 sizes too small so that their breasts hang out, then you place them in shorts that are too small in order for their behinds to fall out and you give them hula hoops and parade them all around town trying to drum up more business. My question for Coby is at what point does this NOT degrade women?????
After he sits and ponders this analogy (not too mention his daughters working there)I think he may just have a little more insight as to why people have the perceptions (women) as they do!! One more question for Coby, how does he think his father would have handled "Jimbo"?????
Please Coby feel free to E-mail me on this:
jennifermeyer1011@yahoo.com
Reply to this comment
by fmgm67 September 19, 2010 11:04 PM EDT
I can't believe a lawsuit didn't happen from this show - I'm angry the manager was not fired - I screamed at the TV. I thought it was harassment in every fashion possible. I will never go to Hooters again. This just emphasized their disrespect to women and I will tell this story over and over again to encourage others not to eat there too. Those girls have every right to sue Hooters for everything for how that manager treated them and then to just give him a stern talking too - wow!! Unreal!!
Reply to this comment
by raeruth August 22, 2010 11:06 PM EDT
I just finished watching Coby Brooks in 'Undercove Boss" and cried my way through it. For years, I have stood up for the rights of young women. I'm the founder and Executive Director of an organization that works with at-risk young women and it thrills me to death, that the president and CEO of "Hooters" takes his employees seriously. These are not just girls in skimpy outfits, they are mothers, girlfriends, students, etc. There should be more bosses like you, that support their employees. Thank you so much.
Reply to this comment
by robsnow September 19, 2010 11:02 PM EDT
The handling of manager Jimbo was absolutely a disgrace. He should have been fired. In any other corporation, he would have been brought up on harassment charges, sued and fired. The fact that Coby would need to keep an employee that would do something like this totally places this company at the top of "worst places to work." No matter how long Jimbo was employed by Hooters or what sales results he has delivered...
by badjama August 2, 2010 1:53 AM EDT
(I never participate in these things, but felt the need to comment after this show)

This was a good show, and i rarely go to Hooters.

Coby's handling of Jimbo was well done - He absolutely needed to be held accountable and be told to apologize to his staff. I see a lot of comments where they expected something more instant - but firing on the spot wouldn't have resulted in an apology, or accountability. A situation like that requires a professional hand to make sure it doesn't degenerate or provoke even worse behavior (and yes, it could have gotten worse). Being a manager elsewhere, I'm sure 10x more happened behind the scenes that wasn't in the interview, and I'd bet that he was told to leave after they recorded the show.

Having said all that... Hooters also has a tough problem - it definitely has the image of objectifying women, but a business that could work really well if they focused on what kind of customer they want. The show had evidence (although small evidence) that you can have a strong manager that works up through the company, and run a great restaurant. I'd like to believe they could change for the better, but the tide is definitely against them to prove it.
Reply to this comment
by jenb2525 May 1, 2010 7:10 PM EDT
hooters is another name for ****. Does anyone else not see that this is morally wrong? girls choose to go in there yes. but not every girl does and this is an image projected on women in general and it sucks. If the place was named "****" (which it might as well be) would people say something then? honestly, I dont have a problem with the way they are dressed, I dont have a problem with strip clubs or anything else of a sexual/adult matter. But when it they name a restaurant after a womans chest and act shocked that people dont find it to be family oriented, its just plain insulting and makes me wanna bang my head against a wall. How about they make a restaurant called "*****" and have an all male wait staff. cause of course! we would be talking about roosters! right? not anything sexual....gimme a break.
Reply to this comment
by RussinAustin March 6, 2010 9:02 PM EST
Ok let's get this straight....HOOTERS does not exploit women. Not nearly as much as Madison Avenue does. WOMEN exploit themselves! Unless you're one of the first 5 Hooters girls to put on the uniform, every girl walking in that place to fill out an application knows EXACTLY what's she's getting herself into. Anyone claiming those same girls are exploited are the same ones saying that men don't respect a woman and her mind. WEll duh!
It was her mind, that made the decision to sign the application on the dotted line, to then put on the same uniform that she obviously saw every other Hooters girl in existence wearing before she walked in the place, and her beautiful mind that used her body to get more tips. After all, Waffle House was hiring? IHOP jobs all taken? You never see a flat chested Hooter's girl, yet instead of using those same minds to realize they're better than that, they use their bodies to do the talking.
Women don't think with their minds. They think with their emotions. Why else do they paint themselves up to look unlike their true selves, put on high heels to make them look taller, and any other fake thing they can think of to impress others (usually to compete with other women)?
Reply to this comment
See all 45 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook