February 15, 2010 11:32 AM

How Iran Obtains U.S. Technology

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  The Islamic Republic of Iran announced this week that it has already starting enriching uranium at its nuclear facility at Natanz, giving the Obama administration ammunition in its drive to pressure Russia and China into imposing tough new sanctions against Iran.

But, as we found out, it's no easy task enforcing the sanctions that already exist in this country. Iran is getting hi-tech materials and components for a variety of weapons from right here in the USA, and we have a total embargo: blanket sanctions against any trade with Iran.

Our law enforcement agencies have become more aggressive in hunting down and catching the smugglers engaged in this illicit trade. Yet it is an ongoing cat and mouse game.

One reason it's been so hard to shut this down is that Iran often turns to under-the-radar middlemen who run small trading companies around the world. Some are based in American cities.

Institute for Science and International Security
Export Law Blog
Web Extra: Using Google?
Web Extra: Convincing Dubai
Web Extra: Malaysia & Iran

"Are you a procurement agent for Iran?" 60 Minutes correspondent Lesley Stahl asked Mohammad Vaghari, an Iranian who has lived in the U.S. for 15 years and is facing up to 85 years in prison.

"No, that's ridiculous, no," he replied.

"But of course that's sort of the implication of the case against you," Stahl pointed out.

"I'm nothing to do with the Iranian government or things like that at all," Vaghari said.

Vaghari and his lawyers are preparing for his trial next month on charges that he conspired to send U.S. technology to Iran through a trading company he set up in his basement apartment in Philadelphia.

"You are charged with trying to buy a centrifuge that could be used to make biological weapons like anthrax," Stahl remarked.

"I don't know about that. I'm not a biological expert to tell you…," Vaghari said.

"That's in the affidavit, and it's part of the charges against you," Stahl said.

"Yes, that's what they say," Vaghari replied.

He says his client for the centrifuge was a science lab at a university in Dubai, but he says he never bought it, he only asked for its price.

"It was too expensive," Vaghari said. "You know, we couldn't afford such a thing."

"This is apparently why the FBI came to you…over this centrifuge because the salesperson who you spoke to got suspicious. Says he asked you all kinds of questions. He asked you for a shipping address that you wouldn't give him," Stahl remarked.

"I told them we are a middleman. I just want to know how much is this?" Vaghari replied.

But this middleman fit a pattern: a U.S.-based Iranian with a small export company trying to send technology to Dubai, which is a popular port for sending goods on to Iran.

The FBI then learned that Vaghari was asked to buy a hydrophone that could be used to listen to submarines, and laptops.

Vaghari did end up sending three items to Dubai, but says they were "very common college lab equipment."

Asked if the items ended up going to Iran, he told Stahl, "Never, no."

"You're sure of that?" Stahl asked.

"As far as I know, yes," Vaghari replied.

"Is it your argument that you were duped, that there were people in Iran and they fooled you into thinking the stuff was going to Dubai, when it was really going to Iran?" Stahl asked.

"No. The stuff was intended for Dubai, and ended up in Dubai and stayed in Dubai. That's what I think," Vaghari said.

But in a search of his apartment, the FBI found e-mails asking him to make inquiries for the Pasteur Institute and Tarbiat Modares University, both are based in Tehran and, according to intelligence out of Europe, both are trying to buy lab equipment in the west that could be used to produce biological weapons.

Vaghari will argue in court that the equipment was for Iranian professors who work in Dubai.

Asked if he thinks the whole premise of the U.S. case against him is faulty, Vaghari said, "Doesn't make sense."



Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 20 Comments
by monahb February 17, 2010 10:56 PM EST
Maybe the answer can be found at the CPAC Conference which is according to John Avalon of the Daily Beast being co-sponsored by the John Birch Society. All the Republican presidential hopefuls will be there. Glenn Beck will be the keynote speaker.

Check out the CPAC website.

As right-wingers ready for CPAC, the convention reveals a shocking sponsor: the conspiracy-spewing John Birch Society. John Avlon on how the original Wingnuts have entered the mainstream. Avlon is the author of Wingnuts: How the Lunatic Fringe Is Hijacking America.




It's CPAC time again?the Conservative Political Action Committee?s annual Washington cattle call begins Friday. This year, they?ve attracted an all-star lineup in a bid for renewed respectability: a half-dozen GOP presidential hopefuls (Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, etc.), conservative congressional darlings, a keynote address by Glenn Beck. And co-sponsorship by the John Birch Society.




Read Full Article ?
Reply to this comment
by taxpayingvoter February 16, 2010 6:17 PM EST
I believe that it is time to help Iran get a nuke, maybe several. We have far too many so we should share them. We do not even have to land the plane to give them to the Iranians. We will just fly a few B-52's there with our gifts and show them how they work. You just drop them from a plane and life as you know it changes dramatically.
Reply to this comment
by warsux February 17, 2010 7:43 AM EST
wow. Considering a huge portion of the population rose up against the existing regime, you knuckle draggers want to nuke them. Watch many hollywood movies? Ignorant.

Got a challenge? Bomb it. Typical. That way you can sit on your couch and watch it all live on fox.
by babooph February 15, 2010 6:00 PM EST
Biggest suckers to Iran as I recall were Reagan & North -paying Hawk missles for ransom-then getting stiffed....
Reply to this comment
by book_of_wally February 17, 2010 4:10 PM EST
No they got the presidency and f'd Carter remember?
by Carvin82604 February 15, 2010 1:33 AM EST
OMG....all previous comments were made by idiots....
Reply to this comment
by WiseAsOwl February 14, 2010 11:53 PM EST
Are we going to do what has to be done???? or aren't we?? It's not time for you Libs to wimp out on us... Are we willing to quake in fear of what some tin-horn from the Middle East threatens us with?? Do you, perhaps, think that we won't get threatened?? I hope we're awake, here.. There are no acceptable alternatives... Let's get it done.... There's no real argument that any of you can come up with any more that would suggest we NOT do anything... I sure wish someone.... anyone... was in charge, other than Obi.. He is not committed to America's survival, strength, or freedom. He doesn't have the sense of "absolutes" that most of us, especially the older generation, have... I would be afraid of him surrendering... or meeting demands, if things got dicey.. I hope I'm wrong as heck.. I'm willing to be the village idiot and be totally wrong about this stuff... But, I think the time is over for talking about Bush.. or Cheney... or any other diversions.. It's time to talk for and about ourselves...and what we need to do NOW...
Reply to this comment
by warsux February 16, 2010 2:14 PM EST
wow! Where were you 20 years ago when ollie and ron (your messiahs) were selling weapons to Iran? Funny, now you are "you libs this, and you libs that". Are you aware of history? hmmm, Rumsfeld sold weapons Saddam, Ron to Iran, and you blame liberals? GET A LIFE and take accountability rather than trying to blame others for your parties past issues.
by jayrh February 16, 2010 11:05 PM EST
So this is Reagan's fault warsux? Aren't you a bright one!

It's not that I think Reagan should have done this and I'm sure if he really would have known who they were, he wouldn't have either but I don't really see how obtaining a nuclear weapon has much to do with Reagan...
by honest_pols February 14, 2010 11:15 AM EST
WHATEVER WE DO, THE INEVITABLE AND FINAL CLASH
BETWEEN WESTERN AND EASTERN RELIGIOUS BELIEFS HAS COME

In summary, we must face it.

We are headed for the real McCoy - the final, ultimate showdown.

All we in the West can do is make preparations to win.

Conflicting religious belief has resulted in what is about the worst for all of us.

To repeat this FINAL WARNING:

WE IN THE WEST, MUST BE PREPARED TO TAKE CIVILIZATION-PRESERVING MEASURES BEFORE WE ARE PLACED AT A GREATER DISADVANTAGE THAN WE ARE ABLE TO BEAR.

AND THAT MEANS NOW!!!
Reply to this comment
by Overruled1 February 14, 2010 10:10 PM EST
Not my religions...both false and bloodstained with the souls of millions
by jayrh February 16, 2010 11:02 PM EST
You can't really seperate religion from this conflict... It's not our religion though... It's radical Islam. They want the destruction of Israel along with the United States if they can figure out how to pull it off. As for the rest of the world, Islam's intent is to dominate it with a world wide caliphate.
by SunDog8259 February 13, 2010 10:07 PM EST
Technology or trade aside. Terrorism, as we know it, could not exist if all people were "brights" It will eventually happen, but probably not in my lifetime. Like Carl Sagan said in his famous COSMOS series: "... men may not be the dreams of the gods, but rather that the gods are the dreams of men."
Reply to this comment
by February 13, 2010 8:16 PM EST
It's only about making money and nothing else. American companies have no ethics and will sell to anyone....albeit in a roundabout fashion.
Reply to this comment
by nor-one February 15, 2010 9:39 AM EST
This trading with the enemy is not "new" to US business, all through WW2 IBM supplied nazi germany with punch cards and spare parts to run their punch card machines. Without IBM they couldn't have managed their train system or death camps. Of course just like Old Henry Ford, and lindburg, Watson was a true "blue" american hero. Just a penchant for liking nazi's ideas and methods!
by jwesel1 February 16, 2010 5:54 PM EST
The missile technology USA has is based on German V2 rockets. It's common to get technology where it is available. This is free trade that republicans cherish.
by TVO1CITW February 12, 2010 9:18 AM EST
Maybe we are too believing of everyone who wants to be an American. We teach and reveal everything to people who hide in their hearts how they feel about us and freedom doesn't matter to them. Our pity is our own worst enemy.
Reply to this comment
by consh8theusa February 13, 2010 6:17 PM EST
Pity?, since when striving for the almighty dollar involve pity, besides, we openly trade with countries through the world for these items and then try and control what the "other" countries do with their purchases, well after we get our money of course.
by ToolMangler1 February 14, 2010 10:17 PM EST
by consh8theusa February 13, 2010 6:17 PM EST


Making a buck is ok when it doesn't give a country a reason to think it can defeat the strongest country on the Earth at this time by giving some religious nutcases Nuclear weapons. The only thing that comes from that is a 'war' that only the most insane people on earth would contemplate. (There is no group more insane than a bunch of religious extremists.)
See all 20 Comments
.
The Best of Andy Rooney on DVD. Order now! Order Now »
60 Minutes on Facebook