February 10, 2010 11:38 AM

The GOP's Post-Murtha Challenge

By
CBSNews
(National Review Online)  Jim Geraghty writes the Campaign Spot on National Review Online.

With the death of longtime congressman John Murtha, there is an open House seat in Pennsylvania's twelfth congressional district. The state's regular primary is scheduled for May 18, and Gov. Ed Rendell is expected to set the twelfth district's special election for that date as well. Because of the abbreviated schedule, there will be no primary for the special election; each state party will simply nominate its choice.

If you're flashing back to the name "Dede Scozzafava," it's for good reason: This situation is similar to the one that created so much controversy in New York's 23rd congressional district last year. The GOP's county committees selected state assemblywoman Scozzafava as their nominee over eight other Republicans. One of the other candidates, Doug Hoffman, ran against Scozzafava as the Conservative-party candidate and gradually chipped away at her support as the election approached. Right-of-center support for Scozzafava dwindled as conservatives learned of her support for same-sex marriage, card check, federal funding for abortion, the stimulus, the public option, and police action against inconvenient Weekly Standard reporters. Several days before the election, she withdrew from the race, and the following day, she endorsed the Democrat, Bill Owens. Owens won, 49 percent to 46 percent.

Two Republicans were already preparing to run against Murtha this year: Tim Burns and Bill Russell. And because Murtha's death was so unexpected, it is possible that several Republicans who had not planned on running this cycle may choose to.

Burns is a newcomer to campaigning, but he's experienced as an entrepreneur: He started his own pharmacy-technology company in the basement of his house, and it grew to employ more than 400 workers before he sold it in 2003. Back in November, he attended one of the rallies against the Democrats' health-care reform. (He stopped by Murtha's office, hoping for a chance to chat with the man he hoped to unseat, but Murtha was out.)

In 2008, Russell ran against Murtha and got 42 percent of the vote (polling earlier in the race showed him closer), holding Murtha to 58 percent. That was the smallest percentage Murtha had received since 1974.

A lot of conservatives got enthused about Russell, a retired lieutenant colonel, as he tore into Murtha for his casual accusation that U.S. Marines at Haditha had "killed innocent civilians in cold blood." Russell said that Murtha's comments, and his refusal to retract them, were a big factor in his getting into the race. "As an Iraq War vet, I was enraged when I heard Mr. Murtha's endorsement of enemy propaganda." Russell also hit Murtha for his pork-barrel politics, noting that the district's primary export had become its young people.

To vote for one of these two Republicans, or any other, each precinct will get one representative, plus an additional representative for each 1,000 votes it cast for McCain in the 2008 presidential election, explained Michael Barley, the communications director of the Pennsylvania Republican party. Each county Republican party has its own process of selecting its representatives; some will be appointed by the county chair, others may be selected by panels.

The conferees will meet publicly, and the candidates will answer their questions. Judging by precedent, this meeting should occur in several weeks, probably in March.

The winner will proceed to face a Democrat in the special election; since the special election and the primary will take place on the same day, it is possible that two different Republicans could win - the special-election winner would serve out the remainder of Murtha's term, and the primary winner would run in the general election in November. Barley notes that this has happened in lower-ticket races in the past, and the Hoffman experience opens the door for any Republican who's passed over for the special-election ticket to denounce a "backroom deal."

Sources close to the Russell campaign are hearing that Burns will be the pick. "Our guy never stopped running after 2008, and their guy has never run before," says one Russell consultant. "It looks like they're going to nominate Tim Burns, and if they do, we'll just turn this into New York 23. Are they dumb enough to dismiss the guy who got more against Murtha last year than anyone else had before?" This consultant contends that Russell should be well-positioned for both campaigns; he ended the 2008 campaign with 60,000 donors. While some of those donors undoubtedly gave only out of an eagerness to see Murtha defeated, this consultant feels confident that Russell has developed a loyal base of supporters.

This cycle, Russell has raised an astonishing $2,892,109; Burns has raised a more modest $174,489. Nonetheless, Pennsylvania Republicans say that Burns can self-finance if needed, and that could be a factor in the abbreviated campaign season between the party's selection and the special election in May.

On paper, this is a seat Republicans should have a good shot at winning. Pennsylvania's twelfth is the only district in the country that voted for John Kerry in 2004 and John McCain in 2008. It has a Cook Partisan Voting Index score of R+1, meaning that it leans very slightly Republican. The district's lines are as crooked as your least favorite Murtha earmark, as the borders were drawn to include heavily Democratic regions and exclude the more Republican-leaning suburbs of Pittsburgh. Almost 15 percent of the residents live in poverty.

Michael Barone's Almanac of American Politics describes the region: "The mountains and valleys within a 100-mile radius of Pittsburgh comprise one of America's most beautiful - and economically troubled - regions. . . . But this area has not followed the national Democratic Party on all issues. Voters here tend to take conservative stands on cultural issues and foreign policy."

The GOP can win here - if it chooses its candidate wisely.



By Jim Geraghty:
Reprinted with permission from National Review Online

National Review Online
Add a Comment See all 16 Comments
by generationc February 11, 2010 8:31 PM EST
TO ALL OF THE REPUBLICANS:
What Health Plan have you completed? You are the biggest waste of time as anyone ever was. You criticize the current plan, but have done nothing to ensure the 10 million Americans have healthcare. You only agenda is to try and destroy The President's Proposal for America, and you have NO Plan for America. You got us in a position where the only way to save this country from a depression is to spend. Economists from the Democratic and Republican party said so. You on the other hand, instead of being productive and accomplishing what you were elected to do and that is to represent the People who voted for you, you are trying to fight every idea and every proposal and have not offered any proposal of your own. IF YOU ARE NOT APART OF THE SOLUTION, THEN YOU ARE STILL APART OF THE PROBLEM. If you cannot get with you own party to come up with a proposal of you own for America, Then YOU NEED TO RESIGN, so that someone who is productive and competent can replace you. Anyone can disagree with everything one is proposing, but anyone cannot be apart of solving the problem. That takes effort and NO TEA PARTY will change that. A Tea Party campaign? Seriously? Shock America and do you job by helping America !!!
Reply to this comment
by 91786 February 11, 2010 9:22 PM EST
The GOP says start with Tort Reform and allowing health insurance companies to complete across state lines. Democrats, in the pockets of trial attorneys, will not vote for that. I say the Democrats that invented Mewdicare need to fix it first before tackling socialized medicine for the enntire country
by noloyalisti February 11, 2010 5:47 PM EST
Climategate was fraudulent outrage ballooned out of control by the polluting corporations and their right wing slaves at Fake Faux News and "free" trade wackos like the Cato Institute.

What do you expect from these corporate apologists, facts? In fact, the rate of CO2 increase and measured rates of climate change are the key: changes that used to take 1,000 years are happening in 10 or 20.

Man, this science stuff sure is confusing.
Reply to this comment
by 91786 February 11, 2010 9:24 PM EST
Fraudulent outrage? Climategate is about Fraud by the left. It is real outrage. Remember the liberals like you have lost three elections in a row. Corporations and Fox news did not make the politized scientistrs lie and have software that ony raises temperaturtes, then destroy the data when busted by someone in Russia. Go take your pill before you are 5440.
by noloyalisti February 11, 2010 5:19 PM EST
So what plans does the GOP have? They had their chance to lead. They pushed the economy off the cliff, causing 10% unemployment and adding over $5 trillion to the deficit.

They are still holding on the to the failed "free" trade, globalization policies of Reagan, the ignorant, uneducated actor. Nothing new, just the same policies that keep failing. The GOP is obsolete and no longer wanted in this country, their wreckage is littering the country all around us, isn't it?
Reply to this comment
by 91786 February 11, 2010 4:28 PM EST
Murtha declared the Iraq War lost in 2004. His statement certainly caused more American injured and killed. Murtha's remains should be burned in a gargage dump
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti February 11, 2010 5:15 PM EST
He was dead on. Trillions of dollars spent, over 4,000 American dead, maybe a million Iraqis.

For what? What did we win? We did lose just like in Vietnam. Invasions and occupations for imperial purposes always fails. Just ask Hitler and Mussolini.
by 91786 February 11, 2010 4:27 PM EST
Veteren what-- college student for 20 years? Obviously you were never in the military as we WON the IRAQ WAR. Saddam was a terrorist paying familys of terrorists $10,000 to kill people in other countries. I guess that was OK with you. I guess the 6,000, by UN count, violations of the 1991 cease fire were OK with you too. You are a TOOL.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti February 11, 2010 1:33 PM EST
We don't want ANY ideas from the Republicans. They had their chance to lead and failed miserably. They are all about the best interests of the rich and big corporations in direct conflict with We the People.

They have proven they do not care about the economy, health care for humans or for the environment. Why should we give them the time of day? Their ideas are ignorant of science, old fashioned and frankly not applicable to our current society.
Reply to this comment
by 91786 February 11, 2010 4:24 PM EST
Really, why the 10%+ unemployment under Dumbocrats? Remember Carter-- 12% unemployment and 18% interest rates. Ignorant of science. Liberals actually believed the human made climate fraud, not the GOP. The most ignorant people I've ever met were knee-jerk liberals that will lie to prove their point-- see climategate.
by greenlantern1 February 10, 2010 10:00 PM EST
Dear Sirs,
Why not let Sarah Palin or Rush Limbaugh decide this?
After all, didn't Spiro Agnew decide that Senator Goodell was not a true Republican.
A Texas two-step or a wink has got to be cheaper than a real primary.
President Abraham Lincoln believed in government by the people.
No wonder he bolted from the republican party to form the Union Party!
Clifford Spencer
Reply to this comment
by wdh3007 February 10, 2010 6:39 PM EST
Was Murtha killed to cover up his ties to Defense Contracts?
Reply to this comment
by TVO1CITW February 10, 2010 1:08 PM EST
What if a Republican won? O my! Let's be bipartisian for sure.
Reply to this comment
by TVO1CITW February 10, 2010 1:00 PM EST
What will happen if a Republican wins? (finger biteing)
Reply to this comment
See all 16 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook