Iran Claims Further Uranium Enrichment
Updated at 3:13 p.m. Eastern.
Iran began enriching uranium to a higher level on Tuesday, an acceleration of its nuclear program that was followed by a U.S. threat of a "significant regime of sanctions."
Speaking in Washington, President Barack Obama said the process of developing an additional set of sanctions on Iran was moving along quickly, but he gave no specific timeline.
Iran, he said, was still pursuing a nuclear program that would lead to nuclear weapons.
Iran's announcement Tuesday that it has begun enriching uranium to a higher level raised fears that the process could eventually be used to give the Islamic republic nuclear weapons. Iran denies that its program is geared toward acquiring a nuclear weapon.
France and the U.S. have said that Iran's action left no choice but to push harder for a fourth set of U.N. Security Council sanctions to punish it. Russia, which has close ties to Iran and has opposed new sanctions, appeared to edge closer to Washington's position, saying the new enrichment plans show the suspicions about Iran's intentions are well-founded.
"Although Iran's declaration that it has begun higher-grade uranium enrichment does not mean a nuclear weapons breakthrough is imminent, Iran's defiance does mean that it is testing the resolve of the international community while it increases its nuclear capability," CBS News foreign affairs analyst Pamela Falk said.
Mr. Obama said Tuesday that the United States is developing a "significant regime of sanctions."
"They have made their choice so far, although the door is still open," Mr. Obama told reporters at the White House.
Iranian state television said the process began in the presence of inspectors from the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency. Uranium has to be enriched to fuel nuclear power plants and Iran needs the 20 per cent enriched fuel for a research reactor producing medical isotopes.
Enriching uranium to 90 per cent, however, creates the material for nuclear weapons, which many countries are afraid Iran is seeking. Iran denies the charge.
In an effort to defuse the crisis, the International Atomic Energy Agency brokered a deal last year in which Iran would ship out its low enriched uranium to be processed abroad and returned a year later.
Iran initially rejected the deal, then later said that if an acceptable alternative could be reached, it would not continue the high level enriching process.
Ali Akbar Salehi, a vice-president as well as the head of the country's nuclear program, said the further enrichment would be unnecessary if the West found a way to provide Iran with the needed fuel.
"Whenever they provide the fuel, we will halt production of 20 per cent," he told state TV late Monday.
Iran has so far enriched uranium to a level of 3.5 per cent, which is suitable for use in fueling nuclear power plants.
On Tuesday, the spokesman of Iran's Foreign Ministry, Ramin Mehmanparast, said any plan by the West to impose new Security Council resolutions would not be helpful.
"If they attempt another resolution, they are making a mistake. It is not helpful in resolving the nuclear dispute between Iran and the West," he said. "They are completely wrong if they think our people will back down even a single step."
Salehi said Iran has been trying to buy the higher enriched fuel for its research reactor for the past several months, but the West made providing the fuel conditional on Iran's acceptance of the U.N.-drafted agreement to ship its uranium stockpile abroad first.
That plan would come with some safeguards, because the enriched fuel provided to Iran would be in a form that would be difficult to further process to make weapons.
According to the report on state TV, the higher level enrichment began after Iranian scientists injected 25 kilograms of 3.5 per cent enriched UF6, or Uranium hexafluoride, gas into a cascade of 164 centrifuge machines at a laboratory in the central town of Natanz, some 150 miles south of Tehran.
The machines are expected to produce some 2.5 kilograms of 20 per cent enriched uranium out of 25 kilograms of gas every month, according to the report.
It said inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency were present during the injection.
When asked about the enrichment process, Gill Tudor of the IAEA only said that the agency had inspectors in the country already.
"The agency continues to have inspectors in Iran conducting normal safeguard operations," Tudor said.
Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said Defence Secretary Robert Gates believes a new U.N. resolution would lay the legal groundwork countries need to impose sanctions independently and pressure Iran to abandon its nuclear program.
CBS Radio News correspondent Robert Berger reports that Israel's government reacted swiftly and harshly Tuesday to Iran's increased enrichment.
"Iran is rushing forward to produce nuclear weapons," said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. "This means crippling sanctions and these sanctions must be applied right now."
German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, meanwhile, said Tuesday that Germany is "very concerned about the developments in Iran," and that "if Iran insists on refusing to join negotiations, talks at the United Nations will be unavoidable and we will then have to talk about new measures."
"There is also the possibility of widening the sanctions," he told reporters in Berlin.
No new U.N. Security Council sanctions can be passed, however, without unanimous agreement from all members, including China, which has been reluctant to impose new punitive measures on Iran.
China called for more talks on Tuesday, with Foreign Ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu, saying "I hope the relevant parties will step up efforts and push for progress in the dialogue and negotiations."
Russia, another Security Council member, has also been reluctant to back new sanctions.
The nation's security chief said on Tuesday, however, that Iran's decision to enrich uranium to higher levels has added to doubts about its nuclear program.
"Iran says it doesn't want to have nuclear weapons. But its actions, including its decision to enrich uranium to 20 per cent, have raised doubts among other nations, and these doubts are quite well-founded," Nikolai Patrushev was quoted as saying by Russian news agencies.
Iran says it needs the 20 per cent enriched fuel for a research reactor producing radio isotopes to treat cancer and manufacture radiography materials. Iran says more than 850,000 people need the products for their illnesses.
© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report. Iran began enriching uranium to a higher level on Tuesday, an acceleration of its nuclear program that was followed by a U.S. threat of a "significant regime of sanctions."
Speaking in Washington, President Barack Obama said the process of developing an additional set of sanctions on Iran was moving along quickly, but he gave no specific timeline.
Iran, he said, was still pursuing a nuclear program that would lead to nuclear weapons.
Iran's announcement Tuesday that it has begun enriching uranium to a higher level raised fears that the process could eventually be used to give the Islamic republic nuclear weapons. Iran denies that its program is geared toward acquiring a nuclear weapon.
France and the U.S. have said that Iran's action left no choice but to push harder for a fourth set of U.N. Security Council sanctions to punish it. Russia, which has close ties to Iran and has opposed new sanctions, appeared to edge closer to Washington's position, saying the new enrichment plans show the suspicions about Iran's intentions are well-founded.
"Although Iran's declaration that it has begun higher-grade uranium enrichment does not mean a nuclear weapons breakthrough is imminent, Iran's defiance does mean that it is testing the resolve of the international community while it increases its nuclear capability," CBS News foreign affairs analyst Pamela Falk said.
Mr. Obama said Tuesday that the United States is developing a "significant regime of sanctions."
"They have made their choice so far, although the door is still open," Mr. Obama told reporters at the White House.
Iranian state television said the process began in the presence of inspectors from the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency. Uranium has to be enriched to fuel nuclear power plants and Iran needs the 20 per cent enriched fuel for a research reactor producing medical isotopes.
Enriching uranium to 90 per cent, however, creates the material for nuclear weapons, which many countries are afraid Iran is seeking. Iran denies the charge.
In an effort to defuse the crisis, the International Atomic Energy Agency brokered a deal last year in which Iran would ship out its low enriched uranium to be processed abroad and returned a year later.
Iran initially rejected the deal, then later said that if an acceptable alternative could be reached, it would not continue the high level enriching process.
Ali Akbar Salehi, a vice-president as well as the head of the country's nuclear program, said the further enrichment would be unnecessary if the West found a way to provide Iran with the needed fuel.
"Whenever they provide the fuel, we will halt production of 20 per cent," he told state TV late Monday.
Iran has so far enriched uranium to a level of 3.5 per cent, which is suitable for use in fueling nuclear power plants.
On Tuesday, the spokesman of Iran's Foreign Ministry, Ramin Mehmanparast, said any plan by the West to impose new Security Council resolutions would not be helpful.
"If they attempt another resolution, they are making a mistake. It is not helpful in resolving the nuclear dispute between Iran and the West," he said. "They are completely wrong if they think our people will back down even a single step."
Salehi said Iran has been trying to buy the higher enriched fuel for its research reactor for the past several months, but the West made providing the fuel conditional on Iran's acceptance of the U.N.-drafted agreement to ship its uranium stockpile abroad first.
That plan would come with some safeguards, because the enriched fuel provided to Iran would be in a form that would be difficult to further process to make weapons.
According to the report on state TV, the higher level enrichment began after Iranian scientists injected 25 kilograms of 3.5 per cent enriched UF6, or Uranium hexafluoride, gas into a cascade of 164 centrifuge machines at a laboratory in the central town of Natanz, some 150 miles south of Tehran.
The machines are expected to produce some 2.5 kilograms of 20 per cent enriched uranium out of 25 kilograms of gas every month, according to the report.
It said inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency were present during the injection.
When asked about the enrichment process, Gill Tudor of the IAEA only said that the agency had inspectors in the country already.
"The agency continues to have inspectors in Iran conducting normal safeguard operations," Tudor said.
Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said Defence Secretary Robert Gates believes a new U.N. resolution would lay the legal groundwork countries need to impose sanctions independently and pressure Iran to abandon its nuclear program.
CBS Radio News correspondent Robert Berger reports that Israel's government reacted swiftly and harshly Tuesday to Iran's increased enrichment.
"Iran is rushing forward to produce nuclear weapons," said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. "This means crippling sanctions and these sanctions must be applied right now."
German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, meanwhile, said Tuesday that Germany is "very concerned about the developments in Iran," and that "if Iran insists on refusing to join negotiations, talks at the United Nations will be unavoidable and we will then have to talk about new measures."
"There is also the possibility of widening the sanctions," he told reporters in Berlin.
No new U.N. Security Council sanctions can be passed, however, without unanimous agreement from all members, including China, which has been reluctant to impose new punitive measures on Iran.
China called for more talks on Tuesday, with Foreign Ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu, saying "I hope the relevant parties will step up efforts and push for progress in the dialogue and negotiations."
Russia, another Security Council member, has also been reluctant to back new sanctions.
The nation's security chief said on Tuesday, however, that Iran's decision to enrich uranium to higher levels has added to doubts about its nuclear program.
"Iran says it doesn't want to have nuclear weapons. But its actions, including its decision to enrich uranium to 20 per cent, have raised doubts among other nations, and these doubts are quite well-founded," Nikolai Patrushev was quoted as saying by Russian news agencies.
Iran says it needs the 20 per cent enriched fuel for a research reactor producing radio isotopes to treat cancer and manufacture radiography materials. Iran says more than 850,000 people need the products for their illnesses.
Popular on CBSNews.com
- N. Korea sends top envoy to China as tensions mount
- Visitors evacuate after suicide at Paris' Notre Dame Cathedral
- 12 years post-Taliban, Afghan women's rights under fire
- Costa Concordia captain ordered to stand trial
- Boat hijack stokes tension between N. Korea, China
- Octogenarians in race to summit Mt. Everest
- Egypt troops in Sinai sweep mistakenly hit funeral
- Egypt TV: 7 security personnel kidnapped in Sinai freed
by SueZeeeQue February 9, 2010 9:02 AM EST
If we hadn't already wasted thousands of lives, trillions of dollars, and all our credibility in Iraq, we might be able to do something about Iran.
Iran will have nuclear weapons and we can't do anything about it.
Thanks neocons!
_____________________
Thanks for what, you act like we ran their nuclear weapons program....blame Iran.
Let's play your little game, WHAT IF we never destroyed Saddam Hussein, what are you suggesting we "might be able to do against Iran" ? Invade Iran ? Attack them ? what ?
You libs can't even handle destroying a two-bit dictator without crying
Actually SueZeeeQue, Saddam Hussein ALWAYS kept Iran in check, and it wasn't until Bush removed him, that Iran REALLY began to start exploring nukes.
But Joe will once again give Bush a free pass, and blame Obama's birth certificate or teleprompter.
If we hadn't already wasted thousands of lives, trillions of dollars, and all our credibility in Iraq, we might be able to do something about Iran.
Iran will have nuclear weapons and we can't do anything about it.
Thanks neocons!
_____________________
Thanks for what, you act like we ran their nuclear weapons program....blame Iran.
Let's play your little game, WHAT IF we never destroyed Saddam Hussein, what are you suggesting we "might be able to do against Iran" ? Invade Iran ? Attack them ? what ?
You libs can't even handle destroying a two-bit dictator without crying
Eventually enough colonists understood what was at hand and the British empire and the corporate leveraged capital of the British East India Company were defeated.
The reality is no matter what the ideology of the day or era is, there is no absolute guarantee of well being and security. It is the ability of a society or an individual to insure their own ongoing well being and security. Severe imbalance in the midst of social contracts is identified by the majority who are sacrificing the quality of their lives to enrich and defend the excess and extravagance of a shrinking minority. Such imbalance sparks social unrest and revolution. In the end, it all comes tumbling down. Dysfunctional socioeconomic ponzi schemes never last.
?
The american revolutionaries fought against enormous concentrations of wealth backed by the British empire. A few Palins and Becks of the day profited from the conflict defending through propagandist distortion the status of the plutocracy. ?
?
Eventually enough colonists understood what was at hand and the British empire and the corporate leveraged capital of the British East India Company were defeated. ?
?
The reality is no matter what the ideology of the day or era is, there is no absolute guarantee of well being and security. It is the ability of a society or an individual to insure their own ongoing well being and security. Severe imbalance in the midst of social contracts is identified by the majority who are sacrificing the quality of their lives to enrich and defend the excess and extravagance of a shrinking minority. Such imbalance sparks social unrest and revolution. In the end, it all comes tumbling down. Dysfunctional socioeconomic ponzi schemes never last.
Nothing makes much sense these days because the non-democratic corporate plutocrats don't have to when for the corporation, the end favoring the plutocracy justifies the means.
A drone. Run run run. Boom.